New Report Maps Otago's Exposure To Natural Hazards
The Otago Region Natural Hazards Exposure Analysis is the region's first comprehensive assessment of where people, buildings, and critical facilities may be situated in areas potentially affected by one or more natural hazard types.
'This analysis provides a regional-scale, data-driven snapshot that will help guide how we prioritise future resilience projects and hazard investigations,' ORC's Manager Natural Hazards, Dr Jean-Luc Payan says.
The report covers the entire Otago region and assesses exposure to nine key natural hazard types using regional-scale mapping and modelling datasets. It estimates the number of people, buildings, and critical community facilities (such as hospitals and emergency services) located in areas which may be exposed to natural hazards.
'This work is not about predicting when an event might happen,' Dr Payan explains. 'It's about identifying where exposure exists so we can make smarter decisions about resilience, planning and investment.'
Following presentation to council, work can begin prioritising areas and hazard types of most concern, working with communities, city and district councils to develop strategies to reduce risk.
Key Findings
River and lake flooding and liquefaction hazard types have the greatest exposure, with over 30,000 people and buildings potentially exposed to each hazard process.
Of the urban areas in the region, Dunedin City has the highest overall exposure, particularly to flooding, liquefaction and seismic hazards.
The Queenstown, Wanaka and Dunedin City urban areas have a relatively high exposure to slope stability hazards, such as landslides and alluvial fans.
Coastal hazards, such as tsunamis and storm surges, have a lesser exposure overall (about 500 people and 1,100 buildings), and mainly in the Dunedin City and Clutha district.
There were 90 critical community facilities identified in the region, with the highest exposure of these facilities being for flooding and liquefaction hazard types.
The full technical report and some supporting material are available to view online at orc.govt.nz/naturalhazardexposure
How the Data Will Be Used
The findings provide a critical foundation for ORC's natural hazards prioritisation programme, scheduled to begin in the 2025/26 financial year. The information will also support:
Long-term planning and land-use decisions.
Emergency management and regional policy development.
Infrastructure management and resilience-building projects.
The analysis will assist ORC and partner organisations, including Emergency Management Otago and territorial authorities, to focus natural hazard management efforts where they are most needed.
The natural hazards data used comes from ORC's region-wide natural hazards mapping, developed using interpretation from aerial imagery and topography, and modelling. While it offers broad-scale insights, it does not replace local-scale studies or individual property hazard or risk assessments.
No new natural hazards investigation was completed for the exposure analysis project, the analysis was based on ORC's existing natural hazards mapping data, which has been compiled over many years and is publicly displayed on the ORC Natural Hazards Portal.
'This is a living dataset,' says ORC Senior Natural Hazards Analyst, Tim van Woerden.
'As we gain access to more detailed information, we'll continue refining the analysis.'
Glossary: making the terms clear
To avoid confusion or alarm, here are simple definitions of some key terms used in the report:
Exposure: means a person or building is located in an area where a hazard process might occur — not that they are guaranteed to be affected.
Natural hazard: a natural process or event (like a flood or earthquake) that could cause harm to people or property.
Liquefaction: a process where ground made of loose, wet soil can behave like a liquid during strong earthquake shaking.
Alluvial fan: a fan-shaped landscape feature where debris and/or floodwaters from a hillside can wash out and spread during heavy rain events.
Critical community facility (CCF): buildings that are key to post-disaster response, such as fire stations, police stations, hospitals or emergency operation centres.
High exposure: a community area has a higher number or proportion of people or buildings located within a mapped hazard area — not that an event is imminent.
'These terms may sound technical or worrying,' Mr van Woerden adds, 'but it's important to remember this analysis is about where we focus effort to reduce exposure — not about predicting events or sounding alarms.'
What's next
ORC will now use the findings of the natural hazard exposure analysis as one tool to help identify and prioritise the areas most exposed for further study and investment. The natural hazards prioritisation workstream is scheduled to conclude by mid-2026. Updates to the exposure report will be made as more refined data becomes available.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
3 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
ORC reducing Shotover wastewater testing despite contamination spike
The regional council is dialling back its regular testing of the Shotover wastewater treatment plant despite E. coli levels spiking recently. The results, which come from the Otago Regional Council's own monitoring page, showed E. coli levels spiking above minimum acceptable standards about July 28, while there have also been breaches of compliance for suspended solids on at least three occasions in the past month. From August 18, instead of testing weekly and having weekly site visits, the ORC will shift to monthly testing and visits, although there will still be weekly water testing of the Kawarau River downstream of the treatment plant site. An ORC spokesman said in a media release this decision balanced the need to ensure a robust monitoring programme which provided assurance to the people of Queenstown and downstream from the discharge, "with the need to ensure prudent financial management, where appropriate monitoring and oversight is already in place". The spokesman said it had confidence in Queenstown's own monitoring of the site, as ORC would audit it for any discrepancies or breaches. "With the enforcement order in place, as well as the monitoring required under the resource consent, Queenstown are now required to undertake a wide range of monitoring and supply these results to ORC." The Shotover wastewater plant has been beset with compliance problems for several years. In January, the regional council sought an enforcement order from the Environment Court to address current compliance issues at the treatment plant, which followed the issuing of two abatement notices and 10 infringement notices. On June 9, the Environment Court approved the application for an enforcement order, which requires the Queenstown Lakes District Council to undertake several actions aimed at achieving compliance on site — most of them to do with frequent monitoring of the water quality. All test results will continue to be made public. The ORC declined to respond to a series of questions before yesterday's deadline.
Otago Daily Times
23-07-2025
- Otago Daily Times
Online form makes pest reporting easier
A new online "report pests" form has been created by the Otago Regional Council as a quick way to alert its biosecurity team. People can still use the regional council's 0800 number (0800 474 082) to report pests, but the new form has an emphasis on promoting citizen science. The benefits of using the form directly include information being passed on in a timelier manner, more accurate pest descriptions and location data and less double handling of information by regional council staff. People can upload photos and provide the exact location of the sighting. The form is available at — APL
Otago Daily Times
03-07-2025
- Otago Daily Times
Survey set to shed light on wedge
Coastal residents may spot a regular visitor to Clutha waters this month. The Otago Regional Council is set to conduct a bathymetric coastal survey in Molyneux Bay using the University of Otago's RV Tūhura. The vessel will observe seafloor elevations of a 6500-year-old sand wedge, made up of sediment from the Clutha Mata-Au River. Council natural hazards analyst Julion Wright said the survey would determine the latest dimensions of the coastal Clutha sand wedge deposit, which spilled river sediment into the Southern Ocean. Mr Wright said the sand wedge deposits were an important part of the South Otago sediment system, containing a large volume of sediment that might possibly contribute to the stability of the coast. "The modern sediment of the wedge is formed by deposits of material from the Clutha River over the last 6500 years. "This survey will be compared to a similar ORC survey, from 2013, to map any changes in the sand wedge deposit. "The results of this will have future implications for coastal and river management in South Otago." One such implication could be a better understanding of sediment accumulation and movement, as well as river mouth and coastal erosion effects, he said. Molyneux Bay lies to the south of Balclutha and encompasses the mouth of the Clutha Mata-Au River, down to the Nugget Point lighthouse, south of Kākā Point township. The offshore survey would be conducted by Geomatics NZ and use a single-beam echo sounder mounted on the research vessel. The Tuhura, a 6.5 m aluminium powerboat for up to six people, can support restricted oceanographic work, limited bottom sampling, trawling and diving, as well as operate around coastal Otago and inland South Island waterways. The vessel would not be streaming any devices astern, Mr Wright said. Over a week, it was expected to travel about 180km within the bay. The survey was scheduled to run this month, but the timing was otherwise weather-dependent. He said the shallower part of the sand wedge was influenced by discharges from the Clutha as well as coastal processes. The offshore surveying would also be extended onshore, using land-surveying techniques to cover the coastal shape and structure. The gap between the onshore and offshore surveys had already been covered by an earlier, 2025 airborne bathymetric LiDAR survey (Light Detection and Ranging), he said. Once the survey was complete, it would take up to three weeks to process data to form 2D imagery, which would then be analysed to interpret what changes may, or may not, have occurred since the previous survey in 2013. The results will then be made publicly available.
