Quest to solve Victorian murder leads to televison series
When a filmmaker had a dream he could not make sense of, he never imagined it would trigger a 15-year journey to solve the murder of a Victorian teenager.The body of 16-year-old Lucy Sands was found under a pile of cobbles, three months after her disappearance from Workington, Cumbria in 1881.But Stephen Baldwin had never heard of Lucy Sands - or her unexplained death - when he dreamt he was walking along a street and heard the blood-curdling scream of a young girl.Now, 15 years after that dream, the filmmaker is putting the finishing touches to a seven-part TV series exploring the life and death of the teenager, in which, he claims, he solves her unexplained murder.
'Not forgotten'
"I didn't know what that dream was, but it stuck with me," said Mr Baldwin.Instinctively, the director began trawling through historic records, focusing on Maryport - and eventually, he came across the murder of Lucy Sands. He became intrigued.Lucy was born in Northern Ireland, but when her parents died, she and her brother James were sent to live with their grandmother on Christian Street in Workington.One December evening in 1881 Lucy went to meet friends in town - among them, it is believed, a gentleman friend called Maynard - and she never returned. Her disappearance attracted worldwide attention and dominated the local news at the time.
"I had to dispel what was going on in my head so I went to Workington in my van for a couple of days, and headed to Christian Street," recalls the 63-year-old filmmaker."I met a man there who gave me a lot of information - and I found out where Lucy was murdered."From there, he headed to Northside - the area where Lucy's body was found - and it was then he realised that it was the same place he had seen in his dream.He became obsessed with the story, and in 2018 Mr Baldwin began filming The Ballad of Lucy Sands.
Initially Mr Baldwin wanted to make a film, but as he researched the story, there was just too much information so it became a seven-part series for television.The filmmaker even tracked down relatives of the alleged killer, in Wales and America - with two of them appearing in the series."One is a serving police officer and one is a retired one, so we got them to play the officers arresting him."The first four episodes have already been screened at the Helena Thompson Museum in Workington, with the final three episodes due to be shown in June.Understandably, the director doesn't want to spoil the ending ahead of its screening, but he believes he has solved the cold case of Lucy's untimely death."The killer escaped justice. We know they had him in cells for six weeks, but he got away with it," he said.
More than 300 local people worked as actors and extras in the series, which was filmed at locations including Workington, Whitehaven and Allonby.Rose Marian Finn, from Egremont, plays Sarah Harrison, the mother of Maynard, who was involved with Lucy and was present the night she disappeared."I hadn't heard about Lucy Sands at all, and I think the way the story came about and how it was conceived by the director is fascinating," she said."Lucy was a young girl who had her life cut short in such a horrible way, and now everybody knows about her - she's not forgotten."The 70-year-old had been involved in local theatre groups, but did not have much screen experience. She said the filming gave her the opportunity to meet other local actors, and the confidence to apply for other on-screen roles."It's given me that experience, and everyone who's had that could take it further," said the actress, who has since starred in the ITV series Innocent, filmed in Keswick.
Lasting legacy
After the first episodes of the series were shown in Workington, the town council decided to create a permanent tribute to Lucy Sands.Last month a memorial was created on the grounds of St John's Church, on the site of Lucy Sands' grave.Mr Baldwin said he was proud to see the memorial created, describing her memory as "something that's been lost for too long".He is currently editing the last episodes of the series ahead of their premiere in June, meaning his journey with Lucy Sands is drawing to a close."It's been a 15-year journey for me - I'm quite sad we're coming to the end of it."
Follow BBC Cumbria on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
4 hours ago
- Metro
Lucy Beaumont makes 'amazing' gesture after costing charity £79,000 on The Wheel
Lucy Beaumont has made a huge gesture towards a cancer charity after losing £79,000 on The Wheel. The comedian was competing in Michael McIntyre's BBC game show to win money for various contestants. The game sees a series of participants, guided by celebrity experts, attempting to answer their way to a fortune. However, after leading one of the participants astray, Lucy is now pleading with the public to help raise some money. Taking to Instagram, Lucy wrote to Newcastle City Hall saying: 'Hello, I'm a comedian (Lucy Beaumont) I recorded an episode of Michael McIntyre's The Wheel the other night and I lost a cancer survivor £79,000. 'I've done the show before and lost someone £98,000. 'The contestant in question is a Newcastle lad and top bloke and was trying to raise money for the charity Maggies. 'Could I put on a comedy charity night at your venue with a great line up to try and raise some money?' The comedian went on to add: 'I'll put my hand in my pocket too.' Towards the end of last year, Lucy finally broke her silence regarding her split from fellow comedian Jon Richardson. The pair announced they had 'jointly and amicably made the difficult decision to divorce and go our separate ways', just after the fifth season of their show hit screens. It was also reported that Jon agreed to a seven-figure payout from Lucy. The comedians were married in 2015 after being set up by a fellow comedian and mutual friend, After Life's Roisin Conaty. The pair welcomed their daughter in 2016. But Lucy told OK! Magazine: 'People might think I should talk about it because we were so public and everyone knew us as a couple, but I won't, and not because there's any animosity. More Trending 'We both agreed that while it might be weird for other people not hearing anything about it, we wouldn't talk about anything to do with the marriage or each other.' The couple's relationship was well-known to the public, largely due to their comedic collaborations, including the popular TV show Meet The Richardsons, which showed the world their married life. View More » Their chemistry both on and off-screen made them a favourite among fans, but despite their working partnership, their marriage ended with Jon paying Lucy a settlement of £1.625million. Got a story? If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@ calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you. MORE: Race Across the World's Sioned shouldn't be sneered at for her tears MORE: We travelled 14,000km on Race Across the World — this is the one place everyone should visit MORE: 'He's not coming back': Casualty confirms death tragedies as BBC drops new trailer
New Statesman
6 hours ago
- New Statesman
Geoff Dyer's English journey
Geoff Dyer is an Englishman, though it can look as though he's spent his life pretending not to be. His literary subject matter – travel, Andrei Tarkovsky, American photography, American jazz – is full of what Philip Larkin warily called 'being abroad'. His literary output is similarly unrooted, slaloming between cultural history, literary criticism, comic fiction and general reminisces. In the 2003 work Yoga for People Who Can't Be Bothered to Do It (which combines all of the above) he writes that ''Home'… is the place where least has happened… peripheral and, as a consequence, more than a little blurred.' Now, though, he has produced that most conventional thing, a boyhood memoir, a book about his home, Cheltenham in the Sixties and Seventies, and about ours – a book about England. Dyer gives us all the first fights and first fucks, and before that all the mewling and pissed-off-with-his-schooling. He does refreshingly leave out the self-abuse that dominates the 20th-century iterations of the genre, telling me when we meet in London that, while 'there was no cover-up', other male writers had exhausted the subject. But though guided by what he has called 'perpetual revelation' – often shaming self-revelation – this book represents something of a swerve for Dyer, a project equal parts social and personal. Homework is a study of Dyer's childhood, but also of the worlds that it scampered through. There is the provincial geography of Dyer's boyhood Cheltenham, a terraced England of high streets, lanes, closes and drives. There is the motion of class in the post-war period, frozen like a great glacier for so many generations before the meltwater of the grammar school system opened new streams of social mobility, sending Dyer to Oxford University and the literary life that followed. And then there is a peculiarly English psyche, simultaneously mean and kind, of which Dyer's parents are two beautifully drawn representatives. He may or may not be one of the greats – his books are so segregated by topic that it is hard to imagine anyone beyond an unusually polymathic biographer enjoying them whole. But, handed a great novelist's confluence of theme, narrator and occasion, I think he has now written a great book. We're far from Cheltenham when Dyer and I meet. We're in the top two floors of a Victorian house in Ladbroke Grove, to which he moved back permanently from Los Angeles last month. It's newly renovated, with high ceilings and a stylish, minimalist decor. And Dyer is certainly not a mean host: the interview only begins after smooth, home-ground coffee and almond croissants the size of small calzones, sourced from a local bakery. In the typical back and forth of his comic style (in Homework he calls it 'ironic switchback'), Dyer first says he is delighted to be back after a decade in America. But it soon becomes clear he means London rather than Britain: 'Typically, as soon as we have to go anywhere else in England, then all my rage returns because of the fucked-up train system. And I'm instantly reminded of the thing that used to drive me more insane about England than anything… this Soviet-style resignation to inefficiency and things not working.' It's an ambivalence he summarises with a quotation from DH Lawrence: 'English in the teeth of all the world – even in the teeth of England.' DH Lawrence is the most consistent preoccupation of a career that has been defined by curiosity and obsession. And, much like his literary output, Dyer's maisonette is a display cabinet of his periodic interests. Greeting me on his landing (at 67, he has an impressively slim frame which continues to resemble a life-size Giacometti statue), Dyer immediately gestures at a poster for the avant-garde jazz band the Necks, newly framed and mounted by the front door. Dyer tells me he had partly arranged his return to England for early May so he could make their residency at Cafe Oto, in east London, attending six of their eight sets. In the kitchen, meanwhile, there is a panoramic photograph of Nevada's Burning Man, the anarchic, alternative festival of 'self-reliance' which has served as a Dyer setting and muse on more than one occasion. This life – the insecure, bohemian, ungrounded existence Dyer calls 'the writer's life' – is a world away from the ancestral milieu found in Homework. Dyer's father was a sheet-metal worker; his mother was a school dinner lady and then a hospital cleaner. As a trio, they led the kind of respectable lower-middle-class life that was utterly normal but which has now taken on theair of a foreign country. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe In the book, Dyer's parents never fly on a plane (on a family holiday to London they visit Heathrow, just to look at it). The front room of their two-up, two-down is never used, except at Christmas, its deliberate vacancy and dusty drinks cabinet proof of a family that had 'a toe-hold in the age of plenty… more than we needed'. When on holiday, the Dyers make their own beds to spare the maid at the B&B, 'incapable by nature, circumstances and habit, of being served in any way'. They collect the series of cards that would come free with boxes of Brooke Bond Tea. And the children play games about the Second World War, even as its living veterans, including Dyer's father, rarely mention it, leaving their little boys' campaigns of Airfix and Action Man, their imagined El Alamein, undisturbed by the truth of memory. At times, too, it resembles a postwar sitcom. The greatest refrain of the book surrounds Dyer's father's attitude to money, cautious and miserly, what Dyer calls a 'subsistence existentialism'. It supplies the funniest set-pieces, as when his father offers to buy a company boss a drink at their Christmas do, and receives the order of a 'double scotch', such an unthinking injustice ('a double!') that Dyer's father repeats the story like 'the Ancient Mariner' for days after. The parents are also habitual hoarders – expired Bird's custard power in the cupboard, banknotes under the mattress – while Dyer's dad steals as much stationery from work as he can manage, a squirrel-like trait that made me wheeze with recognition. (In 2018, my own family finally exhausted a stockpile of candles first established by my grandmother during the three-day week – a stockpile she too had stolen from her workplace.) Part of Dyer's project in this book is to historicise these hang-ups. Having grown up in the Thirties, his parents were 'an inevitable product of centuries of rural life in which obligations and hardships greatly outweighed all possibilities of treats or abundance'. He has partially inherited this attitude of thrift: should he ever give up writing, he tells me, he would find it 'quite fulfilling, clipping out discount coupons in the local papers', though he admits that he has 'paid a lot of money for Japanese denim' in his time. But he is decidedly ambivalent about this more general attitude of self-privation. 'Noble is certainly the wrong word,' he says; 'admirable is not quite the right word… My parents were so weirdly resistant to having anything made nicer in their lives… Rebecca [his wife] was always saying, 'Shouldn't we do this with your mum and dad?' And I'd say, 'Well, they won't want to'. There's no point because – I just knew there wasn't.' The postwar instinct ofself-privation is a cousin of self-sacrifice and, in turn, Dyer writes in the moving final section of Homework, his mother was afflicted by a series of hairy moles across her body, one 'the size of a large casserole lid on her right hip', and the largest on her left arm. She underwent an operation after the war to remove the most visible section, but couldn't face any follow-ups. As a result she was, Dyer writes, marked 'as a kind of outcaste', fated to imperfection. 'This feeling,' Dyer writes, 'the opposite of the word we hear so often now, of entitlement… was not second nature to her: it was her first nature, part of the larger culture of deference and knowing one's place.' Dyer writes of a world only three generations removed, but this aspect can seem almost pre-modern. 'It's that historical change,' Dyer tells me. 'If you think of people of my parents' age, then of course they're going to think like that, whereas for all sorts of reasons now we feel things can be made better. I'm really conscious of this in LA: it's got to the ludicrous extent of the perfectibility of the individual at the expense of the society. It's just incredible where we lived, the number of gyms we were surrounded by: you can get the perfect body, you can get the perfect everything, really, partly by being at the gym, partly by surgery. And as a result you can sink into total despair about something else!' Whereas postwar England prioritised the perfectibility of the society at the expense of the individual? 'Yes, indeed. To exaggerate somewhat – I talk about my dad's lack of interest in everything – he sort of almost didn't have much of a 'self', really… They had so little agency. By the end of my dad's life, his agency was reduced to just saving money, recycling teabags endlessly.' This lack of interests, lack of culture, became a cleavage between father and son as Dyer enjoyed the social mobility that his parents willed him on to. 'My increasing sense… of part of my life being incommunicable,' he writes of his bookish teenage self, 'consolidated the habit of communicating less and less of what was important to my parents.' And this more bitter aspect of self-advancement is recalled tenderly but unsparingly by Dyer. 'We just gradually accepted this sort of silence settling between us about certain things. Such big parts of my life were incommunicable… If I'd had a brother or sister, then maybe the gap would have shrunk in a way; things would have been normalised. As it was, it just felt that we were in this kind of weird experiment.' Dyer was taking part in an experiment: the experiment of the meritocracy. Oxford overwhelmed his parents: 'We went for lunch when they visited and it was all a bit uncomfortable because they were so… deferential, and obviously feeling well out of their routine life. We so rarely went to restaurants, even that was a bit unusual.' The life Dyer chose after university – 'living on the dole in a slum in Brixton' and thereby entering a sort of welfare-leisure class – only broadened this distance from his parents. But it was during this Brixton period that Dyer discovered writers like Raymond Williams and EP Thompson, the cultural critic and historian whose famous lines on class epigraph and epilogue Homework. 'They're so important to me because they explain the process I had been through, and therefore they explained who I was. The crucial thing with this book, I think, is that there's nothing particularly interesting about my life, except to me. But it's interesting to tell my story precisely because it illustrates or embodies a larger social history.' These days, in his Ladbroke Grove pomp, Dyer makes no pretension to being working class any longer (that would be 'a delusion', he says). But, like so many English people, class pride and class resentmentcloud his peripheral vision. He tells me the story of how, when his 'upper-middle-class' wife's parents once came to visit and met his downstairs neighbours, he 'invented this whole pointless errand, just so I could really affirm to them that these were Rebecca's parents. I couldn't bear them to think that was the world I came from.' 'It's daft,' he says, and he's quite right. But it's the kind of pathology – and the kind of comedy – that might only make sense in England. 'It's not even a thing to which we can ascribe any motives, because it's just my DNA, really… Class is part of your DNA here; it's almost a biological part of one's being.' As our conversation goes on, it becomes clear that Dyer's life isn't just different from his parents'. It's the opposite. His father left England to fight in war; Dyer left it to write books. His parents had an extraordinary 'capacity for patience' and 'acceptance'; he is a 'raging inferno of impatience' with 'no capacity for acceptance'. Where they were private, self-secluded, he is warm and sociable. (At a reading I attended two days before our meeting, Dyer was greeted with a mixture of affection and professional envy.) He's had a good time. No room of his house exists to remain unused: thoughtfully curated, symmetrically styled, it is yet another form of self-expression. This is more than a lifestyle; it's a generational creed. And as young life becomes more static and straitened, it's one that begins to look as historical as that two-up, two-down in Cheltenham. If his life seems historical, Dyer is semi-conscious of his age: 'It sounds old, doesn't it?' he says. 'But I was conscious of this important book to be written… I really feel a great sense of relief that I've done this because I really was the only person capable, the perfect person to choose, to write this story.' This story? The story of the historical process, the peculiarities of the English, the lost promise of a postwar Jerusalem? 'No,' he says. 'Me!' 'Homework: A Memoir' is out now. Buy on [See also: Britain's new-build nightmare] Related
Scottish Sun
8 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Famous pub loved by Oasis brothers announces sudden closure after 25 years as ‘disappointed' brewers issue statement
The pub has had the same landlady since it opened in 1999 GLASS HALF EMPTY Famous pub loved by Oasis brothers announces sudden closure after 25 years as 'disappointed' brewers issue statement Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A FAMOUS pub loved by Noel and Liam Gallagher is set to close this week. The Shaston Arms, in London's Soho, will be shutting its doors on June 15 for the final time. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 3 The Shaston Arms pub facade in Soho with its gold-on-red lettering Credit: Alamy 3 The Gallagher brothers Noel and Liam both drank there - but not together Credit: Alamy The iconic boozer is literally a stone's throw from one of London's premier shopping shopping destinations, Carnaby Street. Liam and Noel both drank there - though apparently not at the same time. Other famous patrons included film stars Ewan McGregor and Jude Law, the later of whom was apparently fond of the pub's bangers and mash. The 90s boyband Blue even signed their first ever contract in the establishment. With its gold-on-red lettering outside and its dark wooden panelling and plush red leather banquette seating, you could be forgiven for thinking the Shaston Arms was a Victorian relic. However, the pub actually only opened in 1999, since which it has been managed by landlady Sally Graham. Prior to that the location hosted a pair of shops. The name 'Shaston' was taken from the novelist Thomas Hardy, who invented the name for his imaginary version of Shaftesbury in Dorset. To celebrate the pub's 25th anniversary last year, the public house changed its name to The Lady Shaston in homage to landlady Sally. One wag earlier this year posted on Facebook after visiting: "The Shaston Arms is now The Lady Shaston. My pronouns are still tipsy/drunk." Noel Gallagher looks stony-faced as he makes lonely Tube journey to Oasis rehearsals – but Liam's entrance is chaotic The pub was run by Dorset-based brewers Hall & Woodhouse. In a statement posted to Instagram announcing the closure, they said: "We are disappointed that after 25 wonderful years, we are sadly saying goodbye to The Shaston Arms in Carnaby. "Our wish was to renew the lease on the building, but we understand that the landlord wishes to pursue a restaurant offer on Ganton Street. "Therefore, the Shaston Arms will sadly close on Sunday 15th June 2025. "We know that the Shaton will be missed by the local community and thank our guests and team for their loyalty, support, and laughter over the past two and a half decades." 2025 has been a difficult year for London's historic pubs, with some of the capital's most famous taphouses closing. Ye Olde Swiss Cottage, on Finchley Rd in north west London, was shut down at the start of February, much to the displeasure of loyal customers. As staff poured their last pints behind the bar, one fan told the BBC: "You choose a pub with a different atmosphere - a lot of them are becoming like clones now." 3 Oasis sold more than 900,000 tickets for their reunion tour this summer Credit: PA "It's one of those institutions you've always seen when you come into London," added another. Another east London hotspot, The Gun, in Homerton, also closed its doors in March after 160 years of pouring pints. However, the brewer behind The Shaston Arms does stillhave a number of other pubs in London, including the Ship and Shovell by Embankment, which is split across two buildings facing each other that are joined by an underground cellar.
