Chaos unfolds in Illinois after local lawmaker arrested during council meeting for raising residents' concerns
Tensions flared at a Harvey, Illinois, city council meeting on May 12, as Mayor Christopher Clark ordered the room cleared just 20 minutes into the session. He cited disruptions from residents and supporters of Alderperson Colby Chapman.
The confrontation underscored growing resident unrest over several issues they face with the southern Chicago suburb's administration.
Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how
I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 5 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast)
Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10)
Chapman, representing Harvey's 2nd Ward, has become a central figure in the city's political turmoil.
She was arrested during an April 28 council meeting — the second such incident — after attempting to raise concerns about a resident's property being sold. Video footage shows her being physically removed by police.
Chapman contends she was merely advocating for a constituent.
When asked why she didn't stay silent and just leave, she told FOX 32, "In that moment, I gathered my things, and that's exactly what I was looking to do. But when three male officers approached me as a female, as I'm trying to gather my things, I think that would startle any person, whether it be man or woman, because there's this abrasive approach to asking me to leave, and I simply was leaving.
But the further point is, is all of that insinuated simply because I was being a voice for Ms. Allen?"
Chapman's April arrest was for resisting arrest and disorderly conduct. Her mother was charged with the same. However, Chapman denies any physical altercation and explained, "I did not hit an officer (or) push an officer on my way out of the council. Nobody should have to ingest physical behavior simply for inquiry, and unfortunately, I digested that.'
Residents at the May 12 meeting voiced frustrations over rising water bills, lack of city spending transparency and perceived public input suppression.
Read more: You're probably already overpaying for this 1 'must-have' expense — and thanks to Trump's tariffs, your monthly bill could soar even higher. Here's how 2 minutes can protect your wallet right now
One attendee said, "They don't want you to speak up with the injustice that's happening in the Black community. They're displacing us out of our communities. They're taking our homes."
Chapman's next court appearance is scheduled for June 4. She and her supporters continue to call for a federal investigation into the city's practices, alleging systemic issues affecting the community's well-being.
Aside from the issues the residents cited recently, they are also grappling with some of the highest property tax rates in Illinois and even the U.S.
According to the Civic Federation, Harvey's estimated effective residential property tax rate was 4.74% in 2022, the highest among 11 selected suburban municipalities in Cook County.
Another source shows Harvey's rate reaching nearly 7%, mainly due to declining property values along with stagnant or increasing levies.
These burdens are compounded by a shrinking tax base. A report by the Illinois Policy Institute noted that from 2007 to 2016, Harvey's property tax rates nearly doubled as residents left the area, exacerbating the financial strain on those who remained.
This financial pressure has led some households to make difficult choices in their budgets, such as delaying medical care or utility payments, to meet their tax obligations.
Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it
Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead
Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now
Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you?
This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
New Florida A&M president Marva Johnson is a member of Alpha Kappa Alpha
The post New Florida A&M president Marva Johnson is a member of Alpha Kappa Alpha appeared first on ClutchPoints. Florida A&M University's controversial new president, Marva Johnson, is a member of Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc. Many people find that news surprising due to her conservative views. In May, Johnson was selected as the 13th president of Florida A&M last month despite major pushback from alumni, students, and supporters. On May 16, the Board of Trustees met, and Johnson was chosen by a vote of 8 to 4. She is just the second woman to be appointed as president of Florida A&M in the university's history. After Elmira Mangum, who was president from 2014 to 2016. Following weeks of intense discussion, campus visits, and growing resistance from community residents, students, and alumni who questioned Johnson's credentials and connections to Republican political figures, the choice was made. Johnson had previously worked for Florida Governors Rick Scott and Ron DeSantis as a political appointee. She currently works at Charter Communications as Vice President of State Government, according to the Tallahassee Democrat. Due to Johnson's lack of experience and political ties, especially to Ron DeSantis, supporters of the university and other members of the HBCU community are against her appointment. Due to the Florida Board of Governors, DeSantis and his appointees had significant influence over Johnson becoming president. The State University System of Florida is governed by the Board of Governors, which is the highest authority. For campus-level decisions, each institution has its own Board of Trustees, but for system-wide policy, the Board of Governors has the last word. During the search for a new president, four trustees supported Donald Palm, one of the four contenders for the 13th presidency. At the university, he currently serves as the chief operating officer and executive vice president. Palm was also endorsed by the Florida A&M National Alumni Association. 'We are proud to formally endorse Dr. Donald Palm as our preferred candidate for the 13th President of Florida A&M University,' FAMU NAA President Curtis Johnson said in a May 10 letter to the association's members obtained by the Tallahassee Democrat. He added in the letter, 'Dr. Palm's deep connection to FAMU as the current chief operating officer, former faculty member, and long-standing champion of our mission positions him uniquely to continue our trajectory of excellence.' Johnson's appointment comes after former president Dr. Larry Robinson resigned following the $237 million donation scandal with Gregory Gerami. Dr. Timothy Beard was appointed interim president and served a one-year term until a permanent president was found. Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority Incorporated was founded on January 15, 1908, on the campus of Howard University by nine collegiate women. Alpha Kappa Alpha is the oldest established Greek-letter organization for Black women. The sorority has over 355,000 members, including Vanessa Bell Calloway, Phylicia Rashad, Maya Angelou, Alice Walker, Patti LaBelle, and Coretta Scott King.
Black America Web
an hour ago
- Black America Web
SCOTUS Refuses To Review Discrimination Case By Black Dancer Allegedly Told By Club Owners There Were ‘Too Many Black Girls'
Source: CHIP SOMODEVILLA / Getty On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected an appeal filed by a Black dancer in Houston, Texas, who claims she has been discriminated against by several Houston clubs that place limits on how many Black women they will hire to perform. According to The Hill, professional dancer Chanel Nicholson filed her lawsuit in August 2021, claiming the clubs listed as defendants violated a federal law against racial discrimination in making and enforcing contracts by limiting the number of Black dancers who could work the same shift as a matter of policy. For example, Nicholson said a manager at the club Cover Girls told her she could not perform at the venue in November 2017 because there were already 'too many Black girls' in the club. She also claimed that, in August 2021, she was told by the manager at a club called Splendor that the club was 'not taking any more Black girls.' Now, off the top, anyone who has been paying attention to the way the conservative-leaning Supreme Court has treated discrimination cases recently might assume Nicholson's suit was dismissed for one (or both) of two reasons: she's a Black woman who is a dancer — so the courts are simply not taking her seriously for reasons rooted in systemic misogynoir — or she's not a white person filing a suit over a DEI policy, as that's pretty much what one has to be to get a federal anti-discrimination claim to shake their way under the current administration. Both of these might have been the real reason the plaintiff's case was dismissed, but the reason a district court gave was that the statute of limitations was up — despite the appearance that it wasn't. From the Hill: Nicholson said she was denied work repeatedly due to the quota, including in 2014, 2017 and 2021. However, her case was dismissed by a district court that concluded the applicable statute of limitations clock began ticking in 2014; the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit affirmed the decision. She asked the justices to decide when the statute of limitations starts to run in a claim of 'pattern or practice' of racial discrimination. They declined to hear her case. So, how exactly do the courts simply decide the statute of limitations clock started in 2014, and ignore the alleged offenses that happened years later? Well, apparently, all but two justices, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson and Justice Sonia Sotomayor, determined that the more recent discriminatory acts alleged by Nicholson were not acts that stood on their own, but 'continued effects' of past discrimination that is no longer actionable due to the statute. Brown Jackson wrote in her dissenting opinion that the court's decision to side with the district court 'flouts this Court's clear precedents.' 'We have long held that '[e]ach discrete discriminatory act starts a new clock for filing charges alleging that act,' regardless of whether similar instances of discrimination have occurred in the past,' she wrote. 'Because the Fifth Circuit's contrary ruling was patently erroneous, this Court should have granted Nicholson's petition and summarily reversed the judgment.' Jackson's opinion focused on the allegations from 2017 and 2021, arguing that both alleged 'discrete' instances of discrimination occurred within the four years before Nicholson filed her lawsuit, making the 5th Circuit's claim that the statute of limitations was up 'patently erroneous.' 'To conclude that Nicholson's claims are time-barred because there were earlier instances of discriminatory treatment, as the Fifth Circuit did, impermissibly inoculates the clubs' more recent discriminatory conduct,' Jackson wrote. 'If sustained discriminatory motivation is all that is required to transform recent, racially discriminatory acts into the 'continued effects' of earlier discriminatory conduct, then past discrimination could inexplicably prevent recovery for later, similarly unlawful conduct.' It really makes no sense for a court to conclude that different acts of racism committed by different people at different times are all part of the same 'continued effects' of the first act of racial discrimination. It's almost as if racial discrimination is treated like a trivial thing until white people are filing suits over diversity efforts. We're just basically repackaging white supremacy — that's how we're making America great again. SEE ALSO: Tulsa's 1st Black Mayor Proposes Reparations Plan For Descendants Of Race Massacre, But Will It Work In Trump's America? Op-Ed: Misogynoir Is Why Many Black Women Don't Care That Telvin Osborne's Killer Won't Be Charged SEE ALSO SCOTUS Refuses To Review Discrimination Case By Black Dancer Allegedly Told By Club Owners There Were 'Too Many Black Girls' was originally published on Black America Web Featured Video CLOSE
Black America Web
an hour ago
- Black America Web
Tulsa's 1st Black Mayor Proposes Reparations Plan For Descendants Of Race Massacre, But Will It Work In Trump's America?
Source: UCG / Getty Tulsa, Oklahoma's first Black mayor has proposed a reparations plan (of sorts) for the descendants of one of the most notorious and horrific race massacres in America's history, but can such a proposal come to fruition in a state that has, multiple times, denied reparations to the actual survivors of the 1921 Tulsa Race Massacre? According to the Associated Press, the reparations proposal, which Mayor Monroe Nichols won't even officially call a reparations plan due to how politically polarizing the term is, wouldn't provide direct payments to citizens. Instead, Nichols characterized his proposal as one that would put the Tulsa community on the 'road to repair' by creating a private charitable trust with a goal to secure $105 million in assets, including $60 million 'to go toward improving buildings and revitalizing the city's north side,' AP reported. The mayor said his plan wouldn't require city council approval, but the city council would have to approve the transfer of any city-owned assets to the trust. 'For 104 years, the Tulsa Race Massacre has been a stain on our city's history,' Nichols said Sunday, announcing the proposal to an audience of several hundred people at the Greenwood Cultural Center, which is located in a district of North Tulsa that was decimated by the white mob in 1921. 'The massacre was hidden from history books, only to be followed by the intentional acts of redlining, a highway built to choke off economic vitality and the perpetual underinvestment of local, state and federal governments.' 'Now it's time to take the next big steps to restore,' he declared. 'The Greenwood District at its height was a center of commerce,' Nichols told AP. 'So what was lost was not just something from North Tulsa or the Black community. It actually robbed Tulsa of an economic future that would have rivaled anywhere else in the world.' Nichols, who signed an executive order earlier this year recognizing June 1 as Tulsa Race Massacre Observance Day, acknowledged that a major hurdle that could get in the way of his plan is the war on all things diversity, equity and inclusion waged by the administration of President Donald Trump. 'The fact that this lines up with a broader national conversation is a tough environment, but it doesn't change the work we have to do,' he said. Source: UCG / Getty Of course, Nichols would be right to be wary about Trump's overreaching administration medling in his city's affairs over nonsensical (and racist as hell) DEI concerns. This is, after all, the same administration that recently ended a wastewater settlement for a mostly Black Alabama town, falsely calling it 'environmental justice as viewed through a distorting, DEI lens,' simply because environmental racism was addressed in the reaching of the settlement. Even more recently, Trump expressed his intention to end a Biden-era program to expand high-speed internet to underserved communities, including rural areas, falsely claiming it provides 'woke handouts based on race,' despite the fact that poor people from rural communites could absolutely be of any race (and would also include a significant portion of his MAGA cultists). But if Nichols is worried about Trump putting the kibosh on his proposal, he should be doubly worried about what his own state government might do. Last year, the Oklahoma Supreme Court sided with lower courts in dismissing a lawsuit or reparations filed by 110-year-olds Viola Ford Fletcher and Lessie Benningfield Randle, the two remaining survivors of the massacre. Here's what I wrote about that previously: None of it is terribly surprising, of course. The same year the lawsuit seeking reparations was filed, Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt signed into law another Republican white fragility bill prohibiting teachings in K-12 schools that include Critical Race Theory, a college-level academic framework that is not taught in K-12 schools, as well as any other race-based curriculum that causes 'discomfort, guilt, anguish or psychological distress' to (white) students. (Oklahoma wants to be Florida so bad.) Then, in 2022, Stitt called for an investigation into Tulsa Public Schools after claims that the school district violated the state's anti-CRT law, which was denounced by both the Oklahoma City Public Schools Board of Education and the Tulsa Race Massacre Centennial Commission, of which Stitt had the caucasity to be a member of until he was booted from the commission for signing the law that would certainly whitewash the manner in which the Tulsa massacre could be taught—in Tulsa. So yeah — good luck to Mayor Nichols, and we hope his bare-minimum proposal becomes a reality in Tulsa, but he might be fighting an uphill battle in a state that, much like the current federal government, will always prioritize white nationalism, white supremacy and white people's eternally fragile feelings over racial justice. SEE ALSO: Op-Ed: Misogynoir Is Why Many Black Women Don't Care That Telvin Osborne's Killer Won't Be Charged Trump Admin To Settle Suit Claiming Program For 'Disadvantaged' Businesses Only Serves 'Women And Certain Minorities' SEE ALSO Tulsa's 1st Black Mayor Proposes Reparations Plan For Descendants Of Race Massacre, But Will It Work In Trump's America? was originally published on Black America Web Featured Video CLOSE
