
From questions to action: Why Parliament must lead on youth employment
Written by Ruchi Gupta, Vandita Gupta and Abhishek Sharma
India is a young nation with an old promise — the promise that democracy, when made truly representative, can deliver on the aspirations of its people. Today, that promise rests on how seriously we confront the question of youth employment.
Two-thirds of our population is under the age of 35. Every month, nearly one million young Indians enter the workforce. Yet, too many find themselves navigating a maze of informal, low-paid, insecure work — or worse, excluded altogether from meaningful economic opportunity. This is not only an economic challenge. It is a democratic one. Youth employment is not a standalone issue —it is systemic. It shapes social mobility, institutional trust, and the long-term legitimacy of democratic governance itself.
Youth employment intersects with every sector, state, and social group, and while this enormously increases complexity, it also presents a unique opportunity. Youth employment is one of the few issues that can bring the entire country together in one unifying purpose. And the institution best positioned to harness this potential is Parliament. The Parliament is not just our country's highest institutional expression for bipartisan deliberation and decision-making in the national interest, but also India's only space where regional, ideological, and generational diversity come together with a mandate to deliberate.
A recently released report by the Future of India Foundation, The Public Record: Parliament on Youth and Employment, assesses Parliament's engagement with this critical issue. The report offers evidence of Parliament's growing, if uneven, engagement with this agenda. It is a foundation to build on — and a challenge to deepen.
Parliament is listening – but gaps remain
Of the over 60,000 questions asked by MPs in the 17th Lok Sabha, over 8,000 questions (more than 14 per cent) were related to youth employment. Over 88 per cent of MPs — across parties, states, and demographics — engaged with the issue at least once. Despite the partisan divides that often characterise public debate, through these individual questions, Parliament has quietly emerged as a place where the urgent needs of India's youth are finding common ground and being voiced.
What MPs are asking is instructive. Questions about vocational training outcomes, the performance of skilling schemes like PMKVY, support for MSMEs, and access to credit through the Mudra scheme reflect a keen interest in the mechanics of employability. Others probe into issues around labour conditions, public sector recruitment, contractualisation, and job security.
The report also surfaces important variations that Parliament can learn from: States like Maharashtra and Kerala show deeper engagement; women and ST MPs raise more community-specific concerns; thematic breadth spans from labour rights to entrepreneurship. These differences indicate not fragmentation but strength. They show that Parliament has within it the capacity to broaden and diversify its focus. The challenge is not to invent new agendas. It is to consolidate what is already on everyone's mind.
Crucially, attention is slowly turning to future-oriented themes: The gig economy, artificial intelligence, and digital skilling. However, these questions are still few, and the engagement with associated issues is still preliminary. Few MPs raised concerns about algorithmic management, digital exclusion, platform regulation or job displacement — key issues that will shape the future of work.
From ad-hoc questions to institutional leadership
Raising questions is necessary, but not sufficient. Institutional leadership means building the frameworks — across committees, ministries, and party lines — through which ideas can mature into outcomes. Parliament has the legitimacy and reach to convene a broader coalition: One that includes not just ministries, but state governments, industry leaders, educators, and, most importantly, young people themselves.
This is not a call for grand new institutions, but for deeper use of the ones we already have. Take, for example, the MP's dual role: As a representative of their constituency, and as a voice within their party. In both roles, the youth employment agenda must become central.
At the constituency level, MPs must ask — what does economic opportunity look like for young people in my district? Where are the gaps— in skilling, infrastructure, credit and employment? Tools like the YouthPOWER Index, developed by the Future of India Foundation, offer MPs granular data to help answer these questions and build targeted action plans.
At the party level, internal deliberations must rise above sycophancy, partisanship and performative politics. The lived realities of young Indians— low-quality education, underemployment, and digital exclusion — require serious attention from party forums. MPs must ensure that their party's platforms and legislative strategies reflect these structural challenges, not just in rhetoric but in design.
Youth employment requires a national compact
This agenda cannot sit in any one stakeholder's corner. It requires coordinated effort across domains — from the Centre and states, government and opposition, public and private sector.
Parliament can — and should — model this coordination. A dedicated 'Youth Priorities Day' during each session could create a structured space for multi-party dialogue on youth employment, skilling, and civic participation. Cross-party MP groups, formed voluntarily, could work together on specific themes — from gig worker protections to reforming recruitment processes.
Committees could anchor these efforts by embedding youth-impact assessments into their reviews of legislation and budgets.
Most importantly, Parliament must open structured pathways for engagement with India's youth themselves. A standing Youth–Public Policy Forum, under the Lok Sabha Secretariat, could bring together MPs, students, entrepreneurs, gig workers, and civil society on a regular basis. The goal would not be token consultation, but substantive dialogue — an acknowledgement that young Indians are not just beneficiaries of policy, but architects of its direction.
From representation to real leadership
This is a moment of opportunity. Parliament's engagement with youth employment can be made transformative. What is required now is regularity, structure, and political seriousness. The use of parliamentary questions should evolve from a method of information-gathering to a tool for agenda-setting. Budgetary scrutiny, legislative review, constituency planning — each must embed youth employment as a core lens.
If Parliament steps up to lead, it can renew the public's faith in the capacity of democratic institutions to respond meaningfully to national challenges.
The time is narrow, but it is ours
In every era, democracies are tested by the needs of their youngest citizens. The story of Young India is replete with stories of perseverance and restless aspiration of a generation determined to build a better future. Their ambitions are not exceptional — but they represent a political and moral challenge to our polity.
Parliament has the authority, the structure, and the precedent to act. The demographic dividend is not a promise. It is a window. And windows, by nature, close.
This is Parliament's moment. Party leaders, committee chairs, and individual MPs must recognise the urgency and opportunity before them and meet the future with the seriousness it deserves.
Ruchi Gupta, Vandita Gupta and Abhishek Sharma are with the Future of India Foundation. The complete report is available at http://www.futureofindia.in
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
How Canada, Russia, EU figure in UPBJP's campaign on 11 years of Modi govt
Lucknow: If medical treatment of over nine crore people under Ayushman scheme was more than twice the population of Canada, the construction of 12 crore toilets under Swachh Bharat Abhiyan surpassed the total population of Canada and Italy taken together. Likewise, the laying of more than 42 lakh km of optical fibre in the country was almost 11 times the distance between earth and moon. That's how the UP BJP has portrayed the scale of welfare measures and developmental initiatives rolled out during the 11 years of Narendra Modi government. The depictions came through social media posts even as the saffron outfit geared up to celebrate 11 years of PM Narendra Modi in office. The comparisons were seen as BJP's bid to simplify the figure and create relatability for people by comparing with a known, developed nation. This is especially true in case of construction of toilets under Swachh Bharat Abhiyan which underlined the massive scale of sanitation efforts, crucial for rural health and dignity—especially for women. Similarly, the metaphor vis-à-vis optical fibre, a senior BJP leader said, was meant to emphasize the depth of digital connectivity achieved even in remote areas, tying into the broader 'Digital India' vision. This is not all. The number of loans disbursed under Mudra scheme – 52.5 crore – is shown as more than the total population of US, Russia and Australia taken together. "Naya Bharat! Abhutpurva Scale! (New India! Unprecedented scale)" the party mentioned in one of the posts. Analysts said that by comparing Mudra loan beneficiaries to entire nations' populations, the BJP sought to underscore how deeply and widely its economic policies managed to penetrate. It tends to give a sense that almost every third Indian has been touched by the scheme—a powerful narrative to the informal sector, small traders, and aspiring entrepreneurs.


The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Tighten the process: on the Election Commission of India, election processes
The Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, has raised troubling questions about the conduct of elections based on what transpired in the 2024 Assembly elections in Maharashtra. There are specific issues: the abnormal increase in voters listed in electoral rolls between the general election and Assembly elections, higher turnout numbers after 5 p.m. on voting day, and the Centre amending the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 to restrict access to CCTV footage of the polling process. Mr. Gandhi has also questioned the process of appointing Election Commissioners, with the Union government refusing to implement a Supreme Court judgment in 2023 that recommended having the Chief Justice of India as a part of the selection panel. While political parties, including the BJP and the Congress, have raised complaints about Electronic Voting Machines in the past, many did not stand scrutiny considering the administrative and technological safeguards. The Congress has now focused on the electoral process, raising more fundamental issues that need to be unpacked separately. A preliminary analysis by The Hindu of registered voters in States where the general election and Assembly elections were proximate showed that there were precedents of sharp increases in the electorate before Assembly elections. While the number of new voters added before the Assembly elections was high — more than 39 lakh voters in just six months following the general election — similar increases were observed in 2014 as well. The increase of nearly four million voters is a large number and the ECI should proactively release machine-readable data on the rolls for verification. Regarding the allegation that turnout increases were abnormal after 5 p.m, the argument does not hold water. This is based on provisional turnout figures, and Election Commission of India (ECI) data show that there was no significant increase in voting after 5 p.m. in Maharashtra. Provisional turnout figures shared via an app by the ECI are not entirely accurate as these are dependent on the manual entry of numbers during elections and may have discrepancies when compared to the accurate machine count. As final figures via Form 17C data from each booth are released only after a lag, it would be incorrect to rely on provisional turnout figures. However, there is another contention that merits the ECI's response: retaining CCTV footage and providing parties and their nominees access to it to scrutinise complaints. The process of updating electoral rolls must be more transparent and involve political parties for scrutiny and verification. It is also incumbent upon parties to show alacrity during this process than cry foul after the results are out. Ultimately, the onus lies on the ECI to enhance transparency in the electoral process and, specifically, in providing electoral rolls and retaining CCTV footage for scrutiny.


NDTV
2 hours ago
- NDTV
Solution To In-Party Squabbles On Cards, Says S Ramadoss
Chennai: Amid the leadership tussle with his son Dr Anbumani Ramadoss, PMK founder Dr S Ramadoss on Monday said things were going well and that the matter was expected to be resolved. In a cryptic remark, the 85-year-old veteran also said he was "bidding farewell" to the media, while answering scribes' queries here. While the media was keen to know what was happening in Pattali Makkal Katchi (PMK), he said he could not share with them what the journalists needed. "Everything is going well. So a solution will come. And when it happens, you won't be unaware of that. That solution will be a good one for this party and country," he said. "Requesting you to be patient till then, I bid farewell to you," he said. "I bid farewell to you," he repeated. Asked about his earlier comments on having reservation over aligning with the BJP and whether he stuck to the stand, he said he cannot say anything now. He said the party workers were like his relatives and guide, and many looked up to him like a God. "I will do anything for them, their welfare and progress," he said. Party workers were always by his side. PMK was a part of the BJP-led NDA during the 2024 Lok Sabha polls.