logo
Department of Social Protection fined €550,000 over facial scans

Department of Social Protection fined €550,000 over facial scans

Irish Timesa day ago

The
Department of Social Protection
has been fined €550,000 after data protection watchdogs found 'a number of deficiencies' in its compliance with European data privacy rules concerning the use of facial scans in issuing Public Services Cards.
The Department was also ordered to come up with a valid lawful basis for the use of facial scans and facial matching software for the registration of Public Services Cards within nine months, or it must stop using it.
The decision is the result of an inquiry that the
Data Protection Commission
commenced in July 2021, examining the department's processing of biometric facial templates and the use of facial matching technologies as part of the registration process for the Public Services Card.
The department uses Safe 2 registration to verify identity when accessing public services. The process involves a photo of the applicant, which is then run through software to check against images used in other Safe 2 registrations. This is designed to prevent duplicate registrations.
READ MORE
The registration is mandatory for applying for a Public Services Card, of which 3.2 million are in existence, and is necessary for certain services, including welfare payments.
[
'No legal basis' for photo database created using Public Services Card
Opens in new window
]
However, that means there is ongoing collection, storage and processing of sensitive personal data on a large scale by the DSP, which requires precise legal justification, the DPC said.
The inquiry looked at whether the DSP had a lawful basis for collecting biometric data for conducting facial matching as part of Safe 2 registration, if it could retain that data, if it complied with transparency obligations, and if it had carried out an adequate Data Protection Impact Assessment.
The DPC found the department had infringed data protection regulations on a number of fronts. In its decision, the regulator said it failed to identify a valid lawful basis for the collection of biometric data for Safe 2 registration at the time of the inquiry. As a result, it also infringed GDPR by retaining biometric data collected as part of Safe 2 registration.
The DPC also penalised the department for infringing its obligations on transparency, and for failing include certain details in the Data Protection Impact Assessment that it carried out.
The DPC said it had reprimanded the Department of Social Protection and issued the administrative fines. The department must also stop biometric data in connection with Safe 2 registration within nine months of this decision, if it cannot identify a valid lawful basis for the data collection.
'It is important to note that none of the findings of infringement identified, nor the corrective powers exercised by the DPC, pertain to the roll-out of Safe 2 registration by the DSP as a matter of principle. The DPC did not find any evidence of inadequate technical and organisational security measures deployed by the DSP in connection with Safe 2 registration in the context of this inquiry,' said deputy commissioner Graham Doyle.
'This inquiry was concerned with assessing whether the legislative framework presently in place for Safe 2 registration complies with the requirements of data protection law and whether the DSP operates Safe 2 registration in a data protection-compliant manner, and the findings announced today identify a number of deficiencies in this regard.'
A previous inquiry into the processing of personal data in connection with the issuing of Public Services Cards was concluded in 2019, with the department initially appealing the DPC's decision before withdrawing the action and coming to an agreement with the watchdog.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

When a mother is murdered, how can the killer remain her children's guardian?
When a mother is murdered, how can the killer remain her children's guardian?

Irish Times

time2 hours ago

  • Irish Times

When a mother is murdered, how can the killer remain her children's guardian?

Valerie French Kilroy was the mother of three very young boys, an occupational therapist and a much-loved sister and friend. In June 2019 she was murdered by her husband James Kilroy. She was 41. That he killed her was never in doubt – he admitted it – but the defence put forward at his trial in 2024 was that he was insane when he beat, stabbed and strangled his wife to death. That defence was rejected by the jury and he was convicted of her murder. For her siblings, including her brother David, he had committed child harm in that he had robbed three children of their mother. Such a crime they felt would surely mean he would no longer be the children's legal guardian. They soon learned that legally that is not the case. READ MORE From his prison cell Kilroy is still in the children's lives as their legal guardian, making decisions to do with their welfare, from medical treatments to travel outside the country. David French is now fighting for changes to the legislation around guardianship that would ensure that in cases where a partner has deprived children of their parent, guardianship would be denied. Called 'Valerie's law' it is, says French, a simple change in the legislation that would be of enormous benefit to the children in such horrendous cases; he says an average of seven children a year are impacted. It would also give more certainty to bereaved families as they navigate the path ahead. French has written a book , For Valerie, and he explains to In the News why that was important to him and why he is fighting to make Valerie's law a reality. Presented by Bernice Harrison. Produced by Suzanne Brennan.

Annie McCarrick: Gardaí arrest chief suspect, search property after new information emerges
Annie McCarrick: Gardaí arrest chief suspect, search property after new information emerges

Irish Times

time5 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Annie McCarrick: Gardaí arrest chief suspect, search property after new information emerges

Gardaí arrested the chief suspect for the murder of Annie McCarrick , and searched a property previously linked to him, after receiving new information three decades after the New Yorker vanished in Sandymount, south Dublin, The Irish Times has learned. The man arrested on Thursday, who is in his 60s, was well known to Ms McCarrick. He was being interviewed by detectives on suspicion of the murder of Ms McCarrick (26) and can be questioned for up to 24 hours without charge. He is the first person arrested in the 32-year investigation into what has become one of the State's highest-profile unsolved crimes. The arrested man has been the chief suspect in the case for a number of years, especially since it was upgraded from a missing person inquiry to a murder investigation two years ago. READ MORE Detectives have made significant efforts to locate scores of people Ms McCarrick knew in Ireland, including close friends, others she socialised with, work colleagues and people she knew while studying in college here. They have been interviewed, as has a man who was close to the main suspect at the time and who gardaí travelled abroad to speak to earlier this year. The chief suspect moved in Ms McCarrick's social circles. Gardaí spoke to him and many other people when Ms McCarrick went missing, and he has also been interviewed by detectives since that initial inquiry. Annie McCarrick. The man arrested was well known to Ms McCarrick. Photograph: PA Claimed sightings of Ms McCarrick on the day she vanished – Friday, March 26th, 1993 – have now been all but discounted by the investigation team. They include her getting a bus to Enniskerry, Co Wicklow, and being spotted in the village, with no evidence emerging to prove she was there on the day. A sighting of her in Johnnie Fox's Pub, Glencullen, Co Dublin, about 6km from Enniskerry, has been completely discounted. Gardaí are now focused on Ms McCarrick's movements in Sandymount, south Dublin, where she shared a rented property at St Cathryn's Court with two flatmates. Detectives strongly suspect she met her killer in that area. They believe she was murdered on March 26th and her remains disposed of, to conceal the crime, by the time she was reported missing on Sunday, March 28th. She had failed to keep a dinner date with friends on the Saturday and did not go to work, as a waitress, on either the Saturday or Sunday. When her flatmates returned to their shared property on the Sunday, after being away for the weekend, they found groceries purchased by Ms McCarrick on Friday morning still unpacked. The alarm was then raised with gardaí. [ Timeline of Annie McCarrick case: False leads and setbacks over three decades in search for American woman Opens in new window ] As the suspect was being arrested on Thursday morning by members of the Garda's south Dublin serious crime unit based in Irishtown station, the search of a Clondalkin house and garden began. The suspect was linked to the house, and Ms McCarrick is believed to have visited that property. However, the current occupants of the house, gardaí stressed, have no connection whatsoever to Ms McCarrick or the murder inquiry, having bought the property in the last 15 years. A metal fence was erected around the house on Thursday to ensure privacy for the Garda search team, with a mechanical digger and a saw for cutting concrete brought in to aid the search operation. Some neighbours who spoke to The Irish Times said there was 'shock' and 'curiosity' in the estate after the house was sealed off and gardaí, and the media, began arriving into the area. [ Annie McCarrick's best friend from childhood: 'I believe she knew the person responsible for her death' Opens in new window ]

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store