logo
The ins and outs of egg freezing, from how the process works to how much it costs

The ins and outs of egg freezing, from how the process works to how much it costs

CBS News04-05-2025
While birth rates in the United States are near historic lows, more and more American women are freezing their eggs to preserve their fertility.
The number of procedures has increased more than six times over, from 6,000 in 2014, to more than 39,000 in 2023. The process, which only became an accepted practice 12 years ago, has allowed women to freeze both their eggs and, some say, their biological clocks. Women who want children, but aren't ready yet, see it as a way to preserve their options for later.
There used to be a stigma around the process, as though freezing eggs meant something hadn't worked out in a patient's life, but that's not the case anymore, says Dr. Tomer Singer, system chief of reproductive endocrinology and infertility at Northwell Health.
"It became a common thing. It's almost empowering. You come in. 'I'm in my 30s. I'm not ready for a baby,'" Singer said. "'I want to freeze my eggs. I'm not gonna compromise on the wrong guy.'"
How does egg freezing work
Women spend nearly two weeks giving themselves daily hormone injections — sometimes several in a single day — before their eggs are retrieved. The shots induce the ovaries to ripen multiple follicles, the sacs that contain eggs.
A surgeon will then go in with a tiny needle and drain the fluid in those follicles. That fluid is taken to an embryology lab where embryologists do the delicate work of searching for the eggs.They maneuver tiny pipettes under a microscope to find and isolate egg cells.
Dr. Tomer Singer and Lesley Stahl
60 Minutes
Once found, the eggs are put onto tiny special straws, then plunged into liquid nitrogen and stored in tanks kept at -320 degrees Fahrenheit. The eggs stay there, possibly for years, until their owner is ready to thaw them, add sperm and turn them into embryos, which is effectively the second half of in vitro fertilization.
According to the data thus far, as with IVF, there are no differences in the health of babies born from frozen eggs.
How much does freezing your eggs cost?
Freezing eggs is expensive. A single cycle, including medication, costs an average of $12,000 to $15,000, plus another $500 to $1,000 each year for storage. Thawing and fertilizing the eggs later on costs an additional $10,000.
Back in 2014, Apple and Facebook made headlines when they started offering egg freezing as a covered benefit for their employees. Today more than a third of the largest corporations in the U.S. — those with 20,000 or more employees — cover egg freezing, 60 Minutes' parent company Paramount among them.
Why more women are turning to egg freezing
While more companies are covering egg freezing, many women, like Tina Rampino, pay out of pocket. Rampino's doctor suggested the procedure during a routine visit at age 35, telling her she was running out of time.
"'You can get married whenever you want to get married, but you can't have kids forever,'" Rampino recalled her gynecologist saying.
It was worth it for Rampino, despite the cost.
Tina Rampino
60 Minutes
Yasmine Higbee, 29, works in consulting and has a serious boyfriend. She's certain she'd love to have children, but she's not ready yet. Higbee said she wants to enjoy herself with her partner instead of rushing to have kids, so she turned to egg freezing.
Nameetha Jacob, a 38-year-old health care administrator, said she isn't ready for kids yet because she hasn't found the right partner. She knows she's going to be an older mother, so Jacob views having frozen eggs as akin to insurance. Jacob froze her eggs twice, once when she was 34 and again when she was 36.
"You're not pressured to find someone and settle down and get married," Jacob said. "You don't hear the ticking in your mind constantly."
The biological clock and egg freezing
The biological clock is a reality every woman faces. Women are born with all the eggs they'll ever have, Dr. Lucky Sekhon, a fertility specialist at RMA of New York, said. New ones are never made, and eggs can't be fixed or repaired. The number is always decreasing.
"It pretty much starts decreasing even before you're born," Sekhon said. "You're a fetus in your mother's womb at 20 weeks, and that's when you have the peak number of eggs, 6 to 7 million."
The numbers go down from there.
When an egg is frozen, it stops aging, which is important because egg quality also decreases as women age, Sekhon said. Even at peak fertility, in women's 20s, some 25% of eggs, when combined with sperm, will create embryos that are chromosomally abnormal and will likely lead to miscarriages. The percentages rise from there.
Dr. Lucky Sekhon
60 Minutes
Sekhon says the late 30s are a turning point, a time in a woman's life when about half of her eggs, when fertilized, will become abnormal embryos. Some women incorrectly think if they lead a healthy lifestyle, doing yoga and refraining from smoking, for example, then their eggs will be in good health, too.
"And I have to explain to them that we have no data to suggest that you can influence your egg quality in that way, unfortunately," Sekhon said.
She said the optimal time to freeze eggs is when a woman is in her 20s.
"Because that's when you're at your lowest possible rate of genetic errors in the embryos that result from those eggs," Sekhon said. "And you also have a lot more eggs at that age."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Apple's Blood-Oxygen Reading Feature Is in Legal Jeopardy… Again
Apple's Blood-Oxygen Reading Feature Is in Legal Jeopardy… Again

Gizmodo

timean hour ago

  • Gizmodo

Apple's Blood-Oxygen Reading Feature Is in Legal Jeopardy… Again

Apple just reintroduced a blood-oxygen reading feature to some Apple Watches last week, but a new lawsuit could force the company to turn it off again. The health tech company Masimo sued U.S. Customs and Border Protection on Wednesday over an agency decision that allowed Apple to restore the feature. Masimo had previously sued Apple, claiming that the company had infringed on its patents. The timing of the lawsuit comes as Apple has been pushing deeper into medical devices, while also cozying up to the Trump Administration in what some have speculated is an effort to secure favorable tariff policies. Masimo says CBP unlawfully allowed Apple to reactivate blood-oxygen tracking on its Watches, even though the feature allegedly rips off Masimo's tech. In a lawsuit filed Wednesday in federal court, the medical-device maker argued CBP overstepped its authority with an August 1 ruling that reversed its own January decision. 'It has now come to light that CBP thereafter reversed itself without any meaningful justification, without any material change in circumstances, and without any notice to Masimo, let alone an opportunity for Masimo to be heard,' the complaint reads. Masimo says it only learned about the reversal when Apple announced on August 14 that it was bringing the feature back, 'enabled by a recent U.S. Customs ruling.' This time, though, the Blood Oxygen app will offload the sensor data to the paired iPhone for processing instead of crunching the numbers on the Watch itself. Masimo is now seeking a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction to block CBP's decision and reinstate the original ruling, which had required Apple to fully disable the feature before selling its Watches in the U.S. The ban on the watch feature has been in place since October 2023, when the U.S. International Trade Commission found Apple was infringing two Masimo patents. Apple kept selling Watches with the hardware intact, but turned off the feature with a software update. Its appeal of the ITC ban is still pending. The lawsuit also points to the timing of Apple's big domestic investment pledges. After announcing more than $500 billion in U.S. investments earlier this year, Apple unveiled another $100 billion outlay during the August 6 Oval Office meeting with President Donald Trump. The new lawsuit also comes as Apple has increasingly been rolling out health features on its devices. Last year, Apple added a scientifically validated hearing test and a clinical-grade hearing aid mode to its AirPods Pro 2, letting them make 'personalized dynamic adjustments' to amplify sounds in real time. The company has also rolled out a new sleep apnea feature for its Watches—an algorithm that can detect signs of moderate to severe sleep apnea by analyzing breathing disturbances.

Doing Your Hair May Expose You to as Much Pollution as Standing in Traffic
Doing Your Hair May Expose You to as Much Pollution as Standing in Traffic

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

Doing Your Hair May Expose You to as Much Pollution as Standing in Traffic

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Blow-drying, straightening, or curling your hair in the morning might seem harmless—but it could be filling your lungs with as much pollution as standing on a busy highway, scientists warn. A research team led by professor Nusrat Jung and Ph.D. student Jianghui Liu of Purdue University, Indiana, found that a 10–20-minute heat-based hair routine can release more than 10 billion tiny particles into the air—which may then be inhaled into the lungs. These can cause health problems like breathing difficulties, lung inflammation and even cognitive decline. "This is really quite concerning," Jung said in a statement. "The number of nanoparticles inhaled from using typical, store-bought hair-care products was far greater than we ever anticipated." A stock image of a woman applying hair product to her curls. A stock image of a woman applying hair product to her curls. PeopleImages/iStock / Getty Images Plus What Counts as a "Typical" Hair Routine? "A typical 10-to-15-minute hair care routine, like the ones in our study, involved using one or more hair care products combined with heated styling tools such as flat irons, and curling wands," Jung told Newsweek. "In controlled experiments, volunteers performed realistic styling routines using five different hair products (hair cream, hair serum, hair lotion, and hair spray) and three types of appliances conditions that mirror what many people do in everyday life." During these hair-care routines, Jung explained, volatile and semi-volatile ingredients like so-called cyclic siloxanes are released into the air. When they encounter the hot surfaces of styling tools—which can exceed 300 degrees Fahrenheit—these compounds evaporate and form ultrafine nanoparticles. "We measured airborne concentrations reaching upward of 10 billion nanoparticles per cubic centimeter in the breathing zone, which is comparable to what one might encounter while standing in dense highway traffic," Jung continued. "It is important to note that the figure represents airborne concentration, not the total number inhaled. Inhalation depends on factors such as breathing rate, proximity, ventilation, styling temperature, type of product and routine duration. "However, because styling typically happens close to the face and in less ventilated spaces like bathrooms, the potential for meaningful inhalation exposure is substantial." A stock image of a woman styling her long at home with a modern hair curler. A stock image of a woman styling her long at home with a modern hair curler. Sergii Kolesnikov Hidden Chemicals In earlier research, Jung's team found that heat makes hair products release even more harmful chemicals. A notable example is D5 siloxane—a common ingredient in sprays, creams, and serums. "When we first studied the emissions from hair care products during heat surges, we focused on the volatile chemicals that were released, and what we found was already quite concerning," Jung said. "But when we took an even closer discovered that these chemicals were generating bursts of anywhere from 10,000 to 100,000 nanoparticles per cubic centimeter." D5 siloxane is widely used because it makes products smooth and stable. But the European Chemicals Agency has called it "very persistent, very bio-accumulative." Europe has already restricted its use in some cosmetics. "D5 siloxane has been found to lead to adverse effects on the respiratory tract, liver and nervous system of laboratory animals," Jung said. When heated, these ingredients can form huge numbers of nanoparticles that travel deep into the lungs—posing health risks that are still poorly understood. "And now it appears that the airborne hazards of these products—particularly 'leave-on' formulations designed to be heat-resistant, such as hair sprays, creams and gels—are even greater than we expected," Liu said. According to them, the deepest parts of the lungs get the highest dose of these nanoparticles when inhaled. The team concluded that heat-based hair styling is a major indoor source of these particles, which have been underestimated until now. How to Reduce the Risk The best advice, according to Jung and Liu, is to avoid using hair products with heating tools altogether. If that's not realistic, make sure to improve ventilation. "If you must use hair care products, limit their use and ensure the space is well ventilated," Liu said. "Even without heating appliances, better ventilation can reduce exposure to volatile chemicals, such as D5 siloxane, in these products." Jung added that future studies should look even more closely at how these particles form and what they're made of. "By addressing these research gaps, future studies can provide a more holistic understanding of the emissions and exposures associated with heat-based hair styling, contributing to improved indoor air pollution assessments and mitigation strategies," she said. Do you have a tip on a health story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about air pollution? Let us know via health@ Reference Liu, J., Jiang, J., Patra, S. S., Ding, X., Huang, C., Cross, J. N., Magnuson, B. H., & Jung, N. (2025). Indoor Nanoparticle Emissions and Exposures during Heat-Based Hair Styling Activities. Environmental Science & Technology, 59(32), 17103–17115.

Apple Fitness Chief Accused of Toxic Workplace Culture and Harassment
Apple Fitness Chief Accused of Toxic Workplace Culture and Harassment

New York Times

time2 hours ago

  • New York Times

Apple Fitness Chief Accused of Toxic Workplace Culture and Harassment

Jay Blahnik was a fitness superstar with a book and nearly two decades of work with Nike before he was hired in 2013 to work on the Apple Watch. He became known inside Apple as the creator of the watch's signature fitness feature: three circular bands that people could complete through the day by exercising, standing and burning calories. Marketed with the tagline 'Close Your Rings,' the concept helped galvanize sales of Apple's first breakout product after Steve Jobs's death. But along the way, Mr. Blahnik created a toxic work environment, said nine current and former employees who worked with or for Mr. Blahnik and spoke about personnel issues on the condition of anonymity. They said Mr. Blahnik, 57, who leads a roughly 100-person division as vice president for fitness technologies, could be verbally abusive, manipulative and inappropriate. His behavior contributed to decisions by more than 10 workers to seek extended mental health or medical leaves of absence since 2022, about 10 percent of the team, these people said. When confronted with Mr. Blahnik's behavior, Apple moved to protect him after an internal investigation. The company settled one complaint alleging sexual harassment by Mr. Blahnik and is fighting a lawsuit by an employee, Mandana Mofidi, who said he had bullied her. Mr. Blahnik stayed in his job after company officials said their investigation had found no evidence of wrongdoing, according to interviews and Ms. Mofidi's lawsuit, which she filed against Mr. Blahnik and Apple last year in Los Angeles County Superior Court. The tension inside Mr. Blahnik's division speaks to workplace dysfunction at the heart of one of Apple's signature health initiatives. These employees said the company was more willing to protect a star executive than address the concerns of rank-and-file workers. 'At the end of the day, we don't matter,' said Kayla Desautels, who was the team's social media coordinator before departing last year after a mental health leave. She said she had 'never worked anywhere more toxic.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store