WATCH: Top Dem says he has 'never heard' his fellow party members call LA riots 'peaceful'
"What do Democrats mean when they say the riots in L.A. are peaceful?" Durbin was asked by a reporter outside the Capitol.
"I never heard them say that," Durbin responded, leading the reporter to ask Durbin whether he condemned the ongoing anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles, which some have said amount to riots.
"I condemn violence, whether it's in the Capitol or in L.A.," Durbin shot back before being ushered away out of earshot.
California Officials Are Trying To Deny La Riot 'Chaos' For 'Political Gain,' Sheriff Says
The No. 2 Democrat in the Senate may not have heard any of his fellow party members use the word "peaceful" in their descriptions of the ongoing chaos in Los Angeles, but that doesn't mean they have not.
Read On The Fox News App
"A lot of these peaceful protests are being generated because the President of the United States is sowing chaos," Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., said on Sunday's "Meet the Press" on NBC.
Just the day before, President Donald Trump called on thousands of National Guard troops to go to Los Angeles to help quell the ongoing chaos, which has included attacks on law enforcement, property damage and looting.
"The vast majority of protesters and demonstrators are peaceful," Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Calif., said on MSNBC. "They're passionate."
Sen. Cory Booker Calls Los Angeles Riots 'Peaceful,' Slams Trump For Deploying National Guard
Rep. Nanette Barragán, a Democrat who represents California's 44th Congressional District, said on CNN's "State of the Union" program on Sunday that "We are having an administration that's targeting peaceful protests."
Conservative critics also fired back after former Vice President Kamala Harris referred to the ongoing chaos as "overwhelmingly peaceful."
"The country really dodged a bullet in November," Fox News contributor Guy Benson posted on X in response to Harris' social media post. In another post, Benson added, "Their official position is that they're appalled by what's happening in Los Angeles…because of Trump and ICE, not the violent rioters. In its current form, this party cannot be salvaged."
Dozens Of Anti-ice Rioters Arrested In La As Trump Sends In National Guard To Quell Violence
Meanwhile, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton got heat for describing the situation in Los Angeles as "peaceful."
"California Governor Newsom didn't request the National Guard be deployed to his state following peaceful demonstrations. Trump sent them anyway. It's the first time in 60 years a president has made that choice," Clinton posted on X. "Trump's goal isn't to keep Californians safe. His goal is to cause chaos, because chaos is good for Trump."
While there were initially examples of some peaceful protests at the start of this nearly weeklong chaos, by the start of the weekend, property destruction and violence broke out and devolved into a situation that became increasingly violent over the next few days. Several officers were injured during the riot, which included rocks and other projectiles thrown at them, and dozens of people were arrested related to the protests and rioting.
Looting has also been an issue, as has property damage, and on Tuesday evening Democrat Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass instituted a citywide curfew.
In a rare intraparty dissent, Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., criticized his own party this week for failing to adequately condemn the violence in Los Angeles.
"This is anarchy and true chaos," the Pennsylvania Democrat said in a Monday post on X alongside a picture of cars that had been destroyed by fire. "My party loses the moral high ground when we refuse to condemn setting cars on fire, destroying buildings and assaulting law enforcement."
"I unapologetically stand for free speech, peaceful demonstrations and immigration," Fetterman added. "But this is not that."Original article source: WATCH: Top Dem says he has 'never heard' his fellow party members call LA riots 'peaceful'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Asked for a yes or no on nonprofit transparency, top Maryland Democrats don't answer
BALTIMORE — It should be an easy yes-or-no answer, according to taxpayer advocate David Williams. But when Spotlight on Maryland asked the state's top three Democrats whether they would ensure transparency and accountability as tax dollars flow through nonprofits, none offered a yes or no response. The Baltimore Sun reported last month that neither state budget officials nor individual agencies can say exactly how much state money is flowing to nonprofits each year. That disclosure has led some state officials to call for more oversight. In response, Spotlight on Maryland — a partnership of The Sun, WBFF FOX45 in Baltimore and WJLA in Washington, D.C. — has launched an investigation into how much taxpayer money is allocated to Maryland nonprofits and how those dollars are spent. As part of that reporting, Spotlight on Maryland asked Gov. Wes Moore, House Speaker Adrienne A. Jones and Senate President Bill Ferguson, if they would ensure full transparency and accountability around nonprofit funding. After receiving no response from Ferguson and Jones, Spotlight on Maryland sent a follow-up question to all three, asking if they would assist the investigation in the public interest as journalists follow the money through Maryland nonprofits. Moore, Jones and Ferguson did not respond to the follow-up question. 'This is crazy. It's an easy answer,' said Williams, president of the Taxpayers Protection Alliance, an advocacy group based in Washington, D.C. 'They should all say yes.' Moore, for his part, gave an answer on camera to a Spotlight on Maryland reporter at an unrelated news event in Salisbury last week. 'I think people know and realize that our administration believes in full transparency, that we understand that the things that we are going to support are things that are both sustainable and effective. And when you're looking at the entire budget for the state of Maryland, we are, we are very wise and smart stewards of taxpayer dollars to make sure that the right capital is going to the right usages,' the governor said. When The Sun asked last month whether Ferguson believes taxpayers should have access to a full accounting of how their money is spent and how much of it flows to nonprofits in Maryland, he said: 'All public dollars should be spent wisely and with the utmost care, whether a public agency or a nonprofit uses them. To that end, nonprofits are an important bridge between the state government and the communities they serve. That's why we have a robust audit division of the Department of Legislative Services that has been doing this important oversight work for decades.' As part of its July reporting, The Sun sent inquiries to individual state departments and agencies, asking them to provide the amount of money they allocate to nonprofits. A few offered specific dollar amounts. 'Many nonprofits receive funds directly from agency grant programs, and we don't track that centrally,' said Raquel Coombs, chief of staff for the Department of Budget and Management, in a July email. This lack of oversight raises concern, especially for a state that needed to make cuts and raise taxes to resolve a $3.3 billion budget deficit earlier this year. Nonprofit spending 'increases the size of government,' Williams said. The more that government spends — on nonprofits and other line items — the more taxpayer money that is needed to fund the government, he said. One political analyst said the state's top Democrats appear 'overly cautious' in not answering Spotlight on Maryland's follow-up questions on nonprofit spending. 'It seems like a no-brainer,' said Flavio Hickel, a political science professor at Washington College. 'You'd think they would say, 'I will do everything in my power to ensure good governance with taxpayer money.'' Why aren't they saying that? 'There are good nonprofits, but they're probably being cautious in case one bad actor fell through the cracks on their watch,' Hickel said. 'They're probably being overly cautious to prevent campaign ads down the line.' Even as the state's top leaders declined to answer Spotlight on Maryland's follow-up, the governor was quoted in a news release about his chief of staff, Fagan Harris, leaving for the top spot at the Abell Foundation, one of the state's biggest and most influential nonprofits with more than $300 million in assets. 'While he will be deeply missed personally and professionally, I look forward to working closely with him as he leads the Abell Foundation for years to come,' Moore said. Top officials in government administrations moving to nonprofits is similar to Pentagon officials going to work for defense contractors, Williams said. 'We need more checks and balances to stop the revolving door,' he said. 'The government and nonprofits are way too cozy. There needs to be a firewall.' Hickel said he couldn't comment on the specifics of Harris moving to a nonprofit and noted that it could be 'perfectly coincidental and benign.' But, he added, 'it does raise questions' about the relationship between the governor's office and influential nonprofits that shape life in Maryland. 'It's not uncommon at all, though, to see someone in a high government role going to work at a nonprofit,' Hickel said. 'We advise students to do that. We tell them to do legislative work for a few years, meet people, then go to a nonprofit.' --------------- Solve the daily Crossword
USA Today
17 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump's push for peace
Hello!Rebecca Morin here. It feels like a fall day in DC, but I'm not ready for summer to be over! A mad dash toward peace It was a much different meeting than the one in February. There were laughs, a handshake and a lot of 'thank yous' from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who met with President Donald Trump at the White House on Monday. Trump expressed optimism of peace between Russia and Ukraine after meeting with Zelenskyy and European leaders. By the end of the meetings, Trump told Zelenskyy the United States would help guarantee Ukraine's security in any deal to end Russia's war. Trump in a social media post later said he called Russian President Vladimir Putin to start arranging face-to-face talks between Russia's leader and Zelenskyy, in a location to be determined. Takeaways from Trump's meeting with Zelenskyy. Will a Putin-Zelenskyy meeting happen? Trump said after a proposed meeting between Putin and Zelenskyy, Trump would join the two leaders for a discussion aimed at pushing the warring sides closer together. However, Phillips O'Brien, a historian and professor of strategic war studies at the University of St. Andrews, Scotland, said the meeting between Putin and Zelenskyy "may or may not happen." What to know about the proposed summit. No troops on the ground: Trump on Tuesday said U.S. troops won't be involved in any peacekeeping effort in Ukraine after the war. Trump on Monday had said European nations are the "first line of defense" but added "we're going to help them out also. We'll be involved." What assurances is Ukraine looking for. Overnight attacks: Russia attacked the central Ukrainian city of Kremenchuk with drones overnight, just a day after Trump's meeting Zelenskyy and European leaders. The city's mayor, Vitalii Maletskyi, said the attack was a sign Putin does not want peace. A politics pit stop Epstein files being turned over to lawmakers The Justice Department in four days will begin sending some of the so-called 'Epstein files' from its sex trafficking investigation into the disgraced late financier to the House Oversight Committee, committee Chairman James Comer said Monday. Comer earlier this month issued a subpoena to the DOJ for records related to Epstein, the longtime Trump friend who died by suicide in 2019 as he was awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges. What to know about the committee's investigation into Epstein. 'Like a horror movie' Exhausting, terrifying and like something out of a horror movie. That's how Jeremy Atherton Lin described the recent appeal that seeks to overturn Obergefell v. Hodges, the 10-year-old Supreme Court ruling that legalized same-sex marriage in the United States. Experts like Kenneth Gordon, a marital and family lawyer in Florida, say the potential to overturn Obergefell is a "long shot." Obergefell is sound, from a legal perspective, Gordon said, and same-sex marriage is widely accepted by the general public. If Obergefell was overturned, same-sex marriages would likely remain protected due to the Respect for Marriage Act into law by former President Joe Biden. How the LGBTQ+ community feels about the appeal. Got a burning question, or comment, for On Politics?You can submit them here or send me an email atrdmorin@
New York Post
17 minutes ago
- New York Post
Mayor Eric Adams, NYC call on ICE to end migrant courthouse arrests immediately
Mayor Eric Adams on Tuesday joined calls for ICE to immediately end the 'illegal' arrests of migrants reporting for their hearings at a Lower Manhattan federal immigration building. The city Law Department filed court papers in support of a lawsuit that seeks to halt the arrests by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement at 26 Federal Plaza, arguing the blitzes are driving fear among the Big Apple's roughly 3 million immigrants. 'From my first days as a rookie cop to my current role as mayor of New York City, my job is, and has always been, to keep law-abiding New Yorkers safe,' Adams said in a statement. 'We should allow New Yorkers to feel secure to attend legal proceedings in their pursuit to obtain legal status.' Advertisement The arrests have driven many to avoid courts, police and other basic city services for fear of detention and removal, sending otherwise law-abiding immigrants underground, claims the suit, filed by the American Civil Liberties Union and other legal groups. 5 Mayor Adams is taking his strongest stance against the Trump Administration yet by joining in on a lawsuit seeking to end ICE arrests at Manhattan immigration court. Stephen Yang 5 Adams and the city law department argue that the arrests 'undermines the public interest' by 'deterring City residents from participating in immigration proceedings.' Corbis via Getty Images Advertisement The Adams administration's public support of the suit, filed in Manhattan federal court earlier this month, marks the mayor's strongest stance yet against President Trump's immigration crackdown. Adams has previously appeared to cozy up to the White House, including pushing to rid the city of its sanctuary city status and to bring back ICE to Rikers Island — moves that he has repeatedly defended in court. Hizzoner and the city, in the amicus brief filed Tuesday, argued the ICE arrests at 26 Federal Plaza are not only illegal, but 'undermines the public interest,' by 'deterring City residents from participating in immigration proceedings.' 'Free access to courts is a pillar of the rule of law, but our judicial system cannot work as it should, as it must, if courthouses are used as traps for those who are simply following what the law requires,' the filing states. Advertisement 5 The city's top lawyer, Muriel Goode-Trufant, said that the city has become the 'epicenter of the Trump administration's courthouse arrest campaign.' William Farrington The city's top lawyer, Muriel Goode-Trufant, said that the Big Apple has become the 'epicenter of the Trump administration's courthouse arrest campaign,' constraining the ability for immigrants — and New Yorkers at-large — to seek justice through the legal system. 'With every illegal courthouse arrest, Immigration and Customs Enforcement is chipping away at the bedrock principles of fairness and due process that support our entire system of justice,' Goode-Trufant said in a statement. 5 One of the several lawsuits filed over the ICE arrests scored a victory last week when a judge ordered the agency to immediately improve conditions at a makeshift holding cell inside the federal immigration courthouse at 26 Federal Plaza. NYIC Advertisement A study of federal records by THE CITY revealed that half of all immigration court arrests in the country this spring occurred in Manhattan, but more recently, those busts have ground to a halt as immigrants have largely ceased showing up to courthouses altogether. While this is the first time the Adams administration has supported a wholesale end to the arrests, the city filed briefs earlier this summer in support of individuals caught up in the ICE dragnet — including several public school students. 'No one in our city should feel forced to hide in the shadows or be afraid to use resources, and that includes sending children to school, going to a hospital when sick, calling 911 when in danger, or going to a court hearing when called upon to do so,' Adams said Tuesday. 5 'Free access to courts is a pillar of the rule of law, but our judicial system cannot work as it should, as it must, if courthouses are used as traps for those who are simply following what the law requires,' the filing states. Getty Images One of the several lawsuits filed over the ICE arrests scored a victory last week when a judge ordered the agency to immediately improve conditions at a makeshift holding cell inside the federal immigration courthouse at 26 Federal Plaza. The order was walked back slightly when government lawyers successfully argued that detained immigrants should not have access to toothbrushes.
