How to Clean Your Smart TV the RIGHT Way
A resurfaced tweet about Katie Johnson's 2016 lawsuit against Donald Trump has reignited outrage online, amassing over 7 million views. Johnson had alleged Trump raped her in 1994 when she was just 13 at a party hosted by Jeffrey Epstein. Although the case was dropped before the election, allegedly due to death threats, it included supporting affidavits and briefly resurfaced before being withdrawn again. Now, with Trump under scrutiny for past ties to Epstein and backlash from his own supporters demanding transparency, the debate over the 'Epstein Files' is back in full force.
7.3K views | 1 day ago
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
17 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Trump administration releases files on Martin Luther King Jr: Everything you need to know
The Trump administration on Monday (July 21) released a trove of records on the assassination of the civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr, including FBI surveillance files on him. These documents, totalling around 240,000, were sealed since 1977 due to a court order. The records were released despite the opposition from King's family, and the civil rights group that he once led. King was killed on April 4, 1968, in Memphis, Tennessee. James Earl Ray was convicted of the assassination after he pleaded guilty. However, Ray later renounced that plea and maintained his innocence until he died in 1998. King's family and others to date believe that Ray did not act alone. Here is a look at what the documents say, and why there was opposition against their release. Soon after US President Donald Trump returned to the White House in January this year, he signed an executive order to declassify files related to the assassinations of President John F Kennedy (1963), lawyer Robert F Kennedy (1968), and Martin Luther King Jr. While the JFK records were unsealed in March, some of the RFK files were made public in April. On Monday, after releasing the records regarding King, Attorney General Pam Bondi said, 'The American people deserve answers decades after the horrific assassination of one of our nation's great leaders.' However, critics of Trump have alleged that the move was just a distraction, and not about transparency. That is because King's files have been released amid growing calls for the President to unseal documents concerning the sex trafficking investigation of Jeffrey Epstein, who killed himself behind bars while awaiting trial in 2019. Trump last Friday ordered the Justice Department to request the release of grand jury testimony but stopped short of releasing the entire case file. Al Sharpton, a civil rights activist, told the Associated Press, 'It's a desperate attempt to distract people from the firestorm engulfing Trump over the Epstein files and the public unravelling of his credibility among the MAGA base.' In fact, Bernice King, daughter of Martin Luther King Jr, tweeted on Monday, 'Now, do the Epstein files.' The documents contain leads the FBI received after King's assassination, and details of the CIA's fixation on King's pivot to international anti-war and anti-poverty movements in the years before he was killed, according to a report by AP. But several experts said that there were no major new revelations about the death of the civil rights leader in the documents. They also noted that the trove did not include FBI wiretap recordings of King and other materials that remain under court seal until 2027, according to a report by The New York Times. David Garrow, the author of a Pulitzer Prize-winning King biography, told The NYT, 'I saw nothing that struck me as new.' King's two living children, Martin III and Bernice, who were given access to the documents before their release, in a statement said that they 'support transparency and historical accountability' but 'object to any attacks on our father's legacy or attempts to weaponise it to spread falsehoods'. It is well known that FBI wiretaps and other surveillance on King were an attempt to find damaging material (like his extramarital affairs) on the Nobel laureate, which the agency hoped to use to derail the civil rights movement in the US. 'The intent … was not only to monitor, but to discredit, dismantle and destroy Dr King's reputation and the broader American Civil Rights Movement… These actions were not only invasions of privacy, but intentional assaults on the truth — undermining the dignity and freedoms of private citizens who fought for justice, designed to neutralise those who dared to challenge the status quo,' King's children said in their statement.
Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
Too 'woke' for America? Donald Trump pulls US out of Unesco; DEI policies, pro-Palestinian, pro-China tilt prime reasons
US President Donald Trump pulled out America from Unesco over its support for "woke, divisive cultural and social causes" including DEI policies, pro-Palestinian and pro-China tilt. "Continued involvement in Unesco is not in the national interest of the United States," AFP reported quoting state department spokeswoman. Back in February, Trump had directed a 90-day review of the US role in Unesco, focusing particularly on examining any 'anti-Semitism or anti-Israel sentiment within the organization.' "Upon conducting the review, administration officials took issue with Unesco's diversity, equity and inclusion policies as well as its pro-Palestinian and pro-China bias," the New York Post reported citing White House official. 'China has leveraged its influence over Unesco to advance global standards that are favorable to Beijing's interests,' the official said. 'President Trump has decided to withdraw the United States from Unesco – which supports woke, divisive cultural and social causes that are totally out-of-step with the commonsense policies that Americans voted for in November,' White House deputy spokesperson Anna Kelly said. 'This President will always put America First and ensure our country's membership in all international organizations aligns with our national interests,' Kelly added. Critics have pointed to Unesco's 2023 release of an 'anti-racism toolkit' and its 2024 'Transforming MEN'talities' campaign as examples behind Trump's concern. The toolkit urged member states to embrace 'anti-racist' policies and engage in a 'race to the top' to position themselves as leading voices for social justice, by confronting their histories of racism and committing to equity-driven reforms. The States initially pulled out of the UN agency in 1983 during the then President Ronald Reagan's administration, arguing that Unesco had overly politicized nearly every issue it addressed, shown clear antagonism toward free societies, particularly free markets and a free press, and engaged in unchecked budgetary growth.
Time of India
44 minutes ago
- Time of India
Shubman Gill explosive press conference: Hits back at England and big revelation on India Playing XI
Putin Dollar Shock For Trump After BRICS Declaration? Russia's Big De-Dollarisation Announcement Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov clarified that BRICS nations don't aim to replace the US dollar, but rather seek alternatives for mutual settlements to circumvent US sanctions. He stated BRICS intends to trade in national currencies, with Russia already conducting 90% of payments with partners in local denominations. This counters US President Trump's concerns and threats of tariffs on BRICS countries, who are also developing "BRICS Pay," a decentralized blockchain payment system for cross-border transactions. 42.2K views | 2 days ago
