Murshidabad violence: Two arrested from Odisha for murder of father, son
The police in Odisha's Jharsuguda district on Monday arrested two men in connection with the murder of a father and son in West Bengal's Murshidabad during violence that erupted amid protests against the Waqf Amendment Act, The Indian Express reported.
Harogobind Das, 72, and his 40-year-old son Chandan Das were killed by a mob on April 11 in the district's Samserganj area.
The two men arrested on Monday were identified as Bani Israel and Sefaul Haque. They hail from the Sulitala village in the Murshidabad district.
At the request of the West Bengal Police's Special Task Force, the Banharpali Police in Jharsuguda carried out raids, and took the two accused men in custody, The Hindu quoted Jharsuguda Superintendent of Police Parmar Smit Parshottamdas as saying.
'During the apprehension, one pistol was found in the possession of the accused persons, and they attempted to flee from police custody,' Parshottamdas said.
The officer said that the police filed four rounds as warning shots in the air to deter them from escaping. 'Due to the quick response of the police team, both accused were successfully apprehended,' he said.
The widow of Harogobindo Das alleged in the first information report that a mob had dragged her husband and son out of their home and murdered them. 'Though there were many people, the murder was committed by few people,' she alleged in the FIR, naming five suspects.
Earlier, on April 15, the West Bengal Police had arrested two other individuals – Asmaul Nadab, alias Kalu Nadab, and Dildar Nadab – for the murder.
While Kalu Nadab was among the initial suspects named in the police complaint, his brother Dildar was not.
Violence broke out in Murshidabad on April 11 and 12 during protests against the Waqf Amendment Act passed by Parliament on April 4. Three persons, including Chandan and Hargobind Das, were killed in the violence.
The third fatality was that of a man named Ijaz Momin, who was allegedly shot dead by the police in the Suti town in Murshidabad.
The rioting led hundreds of Hindus, who are a minority in Murshidabad district, to flee to neighbouring Malda.
The Waqf Amendment Act curbs the authority of waqf boards and allows greater government control over them. Critics allege that the amended law violates the right to equality and the freedom to manage religious affairs.
A waqf is an endowment under Islamic law dedicated to a religious, educational or charitable cause. Each state has a waqf board led by a legal entity vested with the power to acquire, hold and transfer property.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
Who's afraid of Mysore Pak? The bitter taste of India's language wars
Languages can either foster peace and understanding or serve as tools for conflict and division. In India, they are increasingly being weaponised. For instance, amid tensions with Pakistan, some shopkeepers in Jaipur renamed sweets like Mysore Pak and Moti Pak to Mysore Shree and Moti Shree, erroneously assuming the word 'pak' (meaning 'sacred' in Persian) to be of foreign origin. Ironically, in the case of these sweets, 'pak' is rooted in the Sanskrit term 'pakva' (meaning 'cooked'), with cognates in several Indian languages, including Kannada. On the other end of the country, Hyderabad's Karachi Bakery faced vandalism for using the name of a Pakistani city, despite being founded by a Sindhi Hindu refugee who migrated from Karachi in 1947. Such acts of linguistic intolerance are not isolated but part of a larger pattern where language is being used to fuel differences. Kamal Haasan's remark that Kannada is born out of Tamil sparked a row Words of Arabic origin, such as jihad (spiritual struggle), halala (permissible), talaq (divorce), sharia (Islamic law), and hijab (veil), have been used by political groups to marginalise and discriminate against communities. Conversely, innocuous Sanskrit-derived terms like bhakta (devotee), gobar (cow dung), gaumutra (cow urine), and mandir (temple) are stigmatised by opposing groups to demean and trivialise cultural practices and identities. Jai Shree Ram (Victory to Lord Rama) and Allahu Akbar (God is Great), once expressions of devotion, have been twisted into polarizing war cries. Forget humans, even AI chatbots like X's Grok have been manipulated to abuse and dehumanize people, communities and organisations using the 'unhinged mode' feature. More worrying than the language conflicts on social media is what is playing out on the streets. Skirmishes have been reported in several cities with migrant workers becoming soft targets for these 'language vigilantes'. In a nation where languages are deeply intertwined with cultural identity and pride, these conflicts over language use, words and signage strike at the heart of personal and communal belonging. But why is India's linguistic diversity — it has over 424 distinct languages — under strain? Among the reasons are the continued distrust of multilingualism by central and state govts, inconsistent implementation of the three-language policy, and the push for a 'one-country, one-language' ideology based on a European model of a nation state. Moreover, state govts are implicitly supporting this ideology of linguistic homogenization. A 2024 Kerala govt order mandated exclusive use of Malayalam in public advertisements and notices, prohibiting multilingual signs. Govts in UP, MP, Uttarakhand, and Rajasthan have been actively replacing names of villages and cities perceived as Islamic with those reflecting Hindu heritage. In MP, for instance, Mohammadpur Machanai village was changed to Mohanpur, and Hajipur was renamed Hirapur. Critics argue that such renaming erases centuries of coexistence and shared history, while proponents claim it restores a pre-colonial identity. So widespread is linguistic prejudice in India that regional variations of a widely spoken language like Hindi are stigmatised. Hindi speakers from eastern states like Bihar and Jharkhand often face mockery for their distinct accents, word choices, and oral expressions. Their mother tongues, such as Bhojpuri, Magahi, and Angika, are labeled as crude or vulgar. By linking the perceived vulgarity of Bhojpuri films and songs to the language itself, the entire Bhojpuri-speaking community is viewed through a prejudiced lens. Similarly, though Telangana Telugu and coastal Telugu share a common script and a unified cultural history, Telangana Telugu has been treated historically as inferior. In films, Telangana Telugu speakers were frequently portrayed as comical or foolish. These linguistic, cultural, and social differences contributed to the 2014 separation of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh. In fact, there is a competitive race among linguistic groups to claim the antiquity of their languages. A recent flashpoint was actor Kamal Haasan's remark that Kannada was born out of Tamil which sparked a sharp backlash. The Indian govt's 'classical' tag for certain 'dominant languages' — the 2024-25 list included Sanskrit, Tamil, Telugu, Kannada, Malayalam, Odia, Marathi, Pali, Prakrit, Assamese, and Bengali — has also become a coveted badge of prestige. These languages already receive significant budgetary support from both Union and state govts. Such official labels often end up intensifying conflicts and further marginalising resource-scarce minority languages like Tulu, Bhili, Gondi, Santali, Dogri, Angami, Lotha, Mizo, Garo, Khasi, Badaga, Irula etc. Far from being a unifying force, languages have become tools of polarisation in electoral politics. If India is to uphold its democratic ideals, the embrace of multilingualism must be more than symbolic. It must be actively nurtured, through policy, education, and public discourse. Languages are not just a medium of communication; they are the essence of identity, culture, and coexistence. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.
Indian Express
3 hours ago
- Indian Express
Rahul Gandhi's attack on EC doesn't match poll data, officials say bid to ‘defame'
LEADER of Opposition Rahul Gandhi's attack on the Election Commission, in a piece in The Indian Express Saturday, reiterates allegations he has made in the past and contradicts Maharashtra Assembly election data the poll panel has released. A scrutiny by The Indian Express of his allegations and data around each shows that Gandhi's criticism selectively cites records, ignores crucial context and, in one case, even draws a connection where none exists. Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar was unavailable for comment. However, a senior EC official said: 'After losing the match, blaming the referee has become standard practice. These allegations are absurd and a bid to defame the poll body. ECI has responded to INC on 24 December 2024 on the same issues. It seems like the party has not shared the reply with him (Gandhi).' Consider: 🔴 Appointment of Election Commissioners: Gandhi questioned the government's decision to replace the Chief Justice of India (CJI) with a Cabinet Minister on the panel responsible for appointing Election Commissioners—over-riding a 2023 Supreme Court ruling and raising concerns about the neutrality of the selection process. The fact is that successive governments across party lines—including the UPA—had opportunities to institutionalise a more transparent appointment mechanism but failed to do so. For instance, in 2007, the Administrative Reforms Commission, chaired by Congress leader M. Veerappa Moily, recommended a collegium system for appointing Election Commissioners, citing the 'far-reaching importance' of the EC. The ARC proposed a selection panel comprising the Prime Minister, Lok Sabha Speaker, Leader of the Opposition, Law Minister, and Rajya Sabha Deputy Chairman. However, this recommendation was never implemented. Nor was a similar proposal made by the 20th Law Commission, headed by Justice A.P. Shah, which submitted its report to the NDA government in 2015. 'Now for the first time, a law made by Parliament under Article 325 is in place since 2023 for the appointment of CEC and ECs. Which is better—the earlier system or the new one? Now, there is consultation, there is transparency and there is a concept of majority,' a senior EC official said. 🔴 Increase in new voters: Gandhi flagged what he called an 'incredible leap' of 41 lakh new voters added in Maharashtra within five months between the 2024 Lok Sabha and Assembly elections—almost equal to the number added over the previous five years—suggesting possible manipulation of the voter rolls. However, under election laws, political parties are involved at every stage of preparing the final electoral roll. Election authorities regularly hold meetings with political parties, provide them free copies of draft and final rolls, and publish these on official websites. During the summary revision period, weekly lists of additions and deletions are shared to allow objections. Ahead of the 2024 Maharashtra Assembly election, 1,03,727 booth-level agents (BLAs) were appointed by political parties, including 27,099 from the Congress. These agents are responsible for interacting with election officials to flag any discrepancies at the polling station level. Yet, during this revision, fewer than 100 appeals pertaining to additions or deletions were filed by party agents across all parties. 🔴 Voter turnout: Gandhi questioned the reported voter turnout jump from 58.22% at 5 pm on November 20, 2024, to 66.05% the following morning—an increase of 7.83 percentage points, or about 76 lakh voters. He called the rise unprecedented, noting that in the 2019 Maharashtra polls, the difference between provisional and final turnout was only 0.64 percentage points. The fact is that the poll watchdog has always treated turnout figures released on polling day as provisional—and for good reason. Polling officers prioritise the integrity of the voting process over real-time reporting, and delays in updates are common. Before the Voter Turnout app, the EC would brief media around 6 pm on polling day, with officials consistently stating that the 5 pm figures were tentative, as voting often extended beyond the official deadline. In this context, the gap between the provisional turnout reported at 5 pm and the final figure released the next morning is not unusual—especially when compared to previous elections. On Saturday, the Maharashtra Chief Electoral Officer's office clarified that the difference between provisional and final voter turnout figures in 2024 was not unusual when compared to 2019. In 2019, turnout rose from approximately 54.43% at 5 pm to 61.10% final; in 2024, it rose from 58.22% to 66.05%. The CEO's office said final figures are based on official records (Form 17C), provided to polling agents for verification. It also pointed out that Gandhi's data comparison was flawed: for 2019, he used provisional turnout figures recorded at the actual end of polling—which may have extended beyond 6 pm—alongside the final figures. But for 2024, he compared the 5 pm provisional turnout (before polling had ended) with the final numbers. Further, EC officials said that in 2024, an average of 58 lakh voters cast their votes every hour in Maharashtra. Based on this, 116 lakh voters could have voted in the last two hours alone—making the increase of 76 lakh voters completely plausible. 🔴 'Bogus' Voting: Gandhi further alleged that the surge in voter turnout was concentrated in 12,000 booths across 85 constituencies where the BJP had fared poorly in the 2024 Lok Sabha polls and connected this to gains made by the BJP in the Assembly polls. He cited Kamthi Assembly seat as an example, claiming BJP's votes rose from 1.19 lakh in the Lok Sabha election to 1.75 lakh in the Assembly poll, while Congress figures remained mostly stable. However, the EC allows candidates and their polling agents full access to all polling booths to raise objections in real time. Even after results are declared, candidates may challenge the outcome by filing election petitions in High Court. Congress candidate Suresh Yadavrao Bhoyar, who contested from Kamthi Assembly seat, has not filed such a petition. Of the 112 election petitions filed across Maharashtra, only 28 are from Congress—and Kamthi is not among them. When asked about Gandhi's claim, a Maharashtra CEO official said it was factually incorrect. Kamthi falls under the Ramtek Lok Sabha seat, which was contested by Shiv Sena in the general election—not the BJP. 'Therefore, the question of the BJP receiving 1.19 lakh votes in Kamthi during the Lok Sabha polls does not arise,' the official said. The officer also pointed out that Bhoyar received 1,07,064 votes in 2019 and 1,34,033 in 2024, an increase in support. 🔴 'Concealing' evidence: Accusing the Election Commission of responding with 'silence and even aggression,' Rahul Gandhi said requests to access voter rolls from the Lok Sabha and Assembly elections were denied, and that the poll watchdog has also refused to provide videography and CCTV footage of the polling process in Maharashtra. Electoral rolls—lists of registered voters—are already available to political parties. What cannot be shared is the list of those who actually voted, as this would violate the 'secrecy of voting,' a foundational principle in ensuring free and fair elections, a top official said. It's for this reason the EC provides private voting compartments for each voter. Disclosing post-poll attendance could expose voters to intimidation or pressure. On CCTV footage, it is a fact that in December 2024, the EC—after consultations with the Centre—amended the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961, to restrict access to electronic records. This followed a Punjab and Haryana High Court directive ordering the EC to share footage with advocate Mehmood Pracha. The Commission has argued that providing CCTV footage would amount to violation of secrecy of vote and open it up to potential misuse using artificial intelligence. Asked about this, an official in the State CEO office said, 'In case of any grievance or objection related to the election process, the Representation of the People Act, 1951, under Section 80, provides a legal option in the form of an Election Petition, which may be filed before the Hon'ble High Court. If the Court deems it necessary during the proceedings of such a petition, the relevant electronic or documentary evidence related to the election process is produced before the Court as per its directives.'
Hindustan Times
4 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump travel ban shows ‘deep hostility' towards Iranians, Muslims, says Iran
Iran on Saturday lambasted US President Donald Trump's travel ban on countries, including Iran, and said that it showed "deep hostility" towards Iranians and Muslims. Iran's foreign ministry posted a statement on X quoting a senior official and said, "The decision to ban the entry of Iranian nationals - merely due to their religion and nationality - not only indicates the deep hostility of American decision-makers towards the Iranian people and Muslims but also violates... international law." Separately, Iran on Saturday slammed the new sanctions imposed by the United States targeting over 30 individuals and entities that Washington said are part of a "shadow banking" network linked to Tehran. It said that the network has laundered billions of dollars through the global financial system. "The new U.S. sanctions ..., are illegal and violate international law, and are further evidence of the deep and continuing hostility of the U.S. ruling regime towards the Iranian people," foreign ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei said in a statement, Reuters reported. Earlier on Wednesday, Trump issued a full-entry travel ban on nationals from 12 countries, including Afghanistan, Burma (Myanmar), Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. Meanwhile, partial restrictions will also be enforced on Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela, limiting immigrant and non-immigrant visas due to high overstay rates or insufficient collaboration between law enforcement. The travel ban was justified by the White House, which cited Taliban control in Afghanistan, Iran and Cuba's state-sponsored terrorism, and Haiti's influx of illegal migrants during the Biden regime. Additionally, countries like Chad (49.54% B1/B2 visa overstay rate) and Eritrea (55.43% F/M/J overstay rate) were flagged for disregarding US immigration laws. 'We will restore the travel ban, some people call it the Trump travel ban, and keep the radical Islamic terrorists out of our country that was upheld by the Supreme Court," Trump had said. The travel ban was also upheld by the Supreme Court which ruled that 'it is squarely within the scope of Presidential authority' and noted that it is 'expressly premised on legitimate purposes'.
