Ex-Biden aide says former president was 'fatigued, befuddled, and disengaged' prior to June debate: Book
Former White House chief of staff Ron Klain revealed that President Joe Biden was "fatigued, befuddled and disengaged" before his debate with President Donald Trump in June, according to a new book.
"At his first meeting with Biden in Aspen Lodge, the president's cabin," author Chris Whipple wrote, Klain "was startled. He'd never seen him so exhausted and out of it. Biden was unaware of what was happening in his own campaign. Halfway through the session, the president excused himself and went off to sit by the pool," according to an excerpt published by The Guardian.
Whipple's new book titled, "Uncharted: How Trump Beat Biden, Harris, and the Odds in the Wildest Campaign in History," is set to be released this month. Klain, a close ally and major supporter of the former president, served as his chief of staff from 2021 until 2023 and helped Biden prepare for his June debate against Trump.
"The president was fatigued, befuddled, and disengaged," Whipple wrote, according to the excerpt. "Klain feared the debate with Trump would be a nationally televised disaster."
The debate preparation team then organized two mock debates for Biden.
"The first was scheduled to last 90 minutes but Klain called it off after 45. The president's voice was shot and so was his grasp of the subject. All he really could talk about was his infrastructure plan and how he was rebuilding America and 16 million jobs. He had nothing to say about his agenda for a second term," Whipple wrote.
Klain, according to Whipple, said the president was irritable as he pushed back on the former chief of staff's suggestions.
"25 minutes into the second mock debate, the president was done for the day. 'I'm just too tired to continue and I'm afraid of losing my voice here and I feel bad,'" Klain said, according to the excerpt. "'I just need some sleep. I'll be fine tomorrow.' He went off to bed."
Whipple said in an interview with Politico about his book that many of Biden's closest aides were in a "fog of delusion" about the former president, and calling it a "cover up" did not go far enough.
"I have fresh reporting on an hour-by-hour, day-by-day basis of Biden's final days, and obviously his decline is a major part of the story," Whipple told Politico on Sunday. "I happen to think that to call it a 'cover-up' is simplistic. I think it was stranger and way more troubling than that. Biden's inner circle, his closest advisers, many of them were in a fog of delusion and denial. They believed what they wanted to believe."
Biden's team did not immediately return a request for comment.
Whipple's book is one of several coming out this year about the 2024 campaign, one of the most chaotic and unpredictable election seasons in recent history.
The Hill's Amie Parnes and NBC News' Jonathan Allen also have a book about the campaign and what led up to the former president dropping out of the race.
According to Allen, former President Barack Obama did not want Kamala Harris to replace Biden on the ticket and worked against her efforts behind the scenes.
CNN's Jake Tapper and Axios' Alex Thompson are also releasing a book titled, "Original Sin: President Biden's Decline, Its Cover-Up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again," in May.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NY auctions off unused decorative lights in $100 million Cuomo boondoggle
The lights have finally gone out on this project. In an extraordinary fire sale, the state Power Authority is auctioning off a huge storehouse of unused decorative bridge lights — which were supposed to be part of a $106 million project to brighten up the city's spans by former Gov. Andrew Cuomo, but which never got installed. With a minimum bid of just $25, the lights are only expected to fetch pennies on the dollar — and leave the state out a massive amount of cash for the failed lighting project, officials told The Post of the sale, which was was first reported by Politico. Cuomo announced the 'New York Harbor Crossings Project' in 2017, which was supposed to slap multi-colored light fixtures on all nine MTA bridges and tunnels, along with the Port Authority's Hudson River crossings and the Thruway Authority's Mario M. Cuomo Bridge. Critics lampooned the decorative lighting show as an unnecessary vanity project, at a time when breakdowns in transit service caused what was dubbed 'the summer of hell.' Facing outrage over a declining subway service, Cuomo suspended the bridge lights program after buying $106 million worth of the lights and equipment, putting them in storage. Then the COVID-19 pandemic hit New York. The bulbs have been gathering dust in storage for eight years after Cuomo promised the harbor light show would 'blow people away.' NYPA has paid about $300,000 a year in storage costs, bringing to the total tab of the bridge light project to $108 million. The unused lights became an orphan, after Cuomo resigned as governor amid sexual misconduct accusations he denies. MTA senior management, which had more pressing problems, wanted nothing to do with the light show. 'We have tried to repurpose these lights. Despite these efforts to identify new uses across the state, demand was not what was expected, so the next logical step is to auction the lights,' said NYPA spokeswoman Linday Kryzak. Transit advocates and government watchdogs said the light show boondoggle calls into question the claims by Cuomo and his backers that he's a good manager. 'Andrew Cuomo can talk about building big stuff but he's noted for boondoggles that allowed transit service for millions of people to slide toward a cliff,' said Danny Pearlstein, spokesman for the NYC Riders Alliance. It's not the only arguably wasteful project pushed by Cuomo. As The Post reported, he also ordered the MTA to burn as much as $30 million to retile two city tunnels — the Brooklyn Battery and Queens Midtown — in the state's blue-and-gold color scheme, instead of using the dough for desperately needed subway repairs. The agency originally ordered white tiles. 'This is a guy whose supporters tell us is a management genius. This bridge light project was a boondoggle, debacle and fiasco rolled into one,' said John Kaehny, executive director of the watchdog group Reinvent Albany. 'Cuomo stuck taxpayers with this gigantic bill. It was government by ego, by whimSometimes you make mistakes when managing during a crisis. This was premeditated mismanagement,' he said. Cuomo's campaign declined to comment. Gov. Kathy Hochul — who was lieutenant governor at the time — also declined to comment.
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Washington Post media critic admits failure in scrutinizing Biden coverage after ‘Where's Jackie' gaffe
Advertisement Washington Post media critic Erik Wemple reflected on his own 'failure' Monday in scrutinizing press coverage of Joe Biden and his cognitive decline, particularly after the infamous 'Where's Jackie?' gaffe. As the legacy media continues to face a reckoning over how it handled covering the former president's mental acuity before his disastrous 2024 debate performance, Wemple wrote a scathing piece calling out news organizations for not admitting any errors with the headline, 'Did legacy media fail in its Biden coverage? Not if you ask them!' In his lengthy critique, Wemple revisited an episode from a September 2022 event where Biden called for Rep. Jackie Walorski, R-Ind., who had died just weeks earlier in a car accident. Biden previously released a statement acknowledging her death after it happened and the event he attended similarly honored her memory. Advertisement 4 Erik Wemple wrote a scathing piece calling out the media's lack of self-reflection. Fox News 'Jackie, are you here? Where's Jackie?' Biden said in the viral moment. White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre defended the president at the time, insisting Walorski was simply 'top of mind.' 'It's time to turn this exercise on my own byline,' Wemple wrote Monday. 'The 'Where's Jackie' episode was my cue to start hammering mainstream outlets for not pushing on this story. Never happened — that was a failure.' Wemple noted, as Fox News Digital did at the time, that neither CNN nor MSNBC offered any coverage of the 'Where's Jackie' comment. Advertisement 4 Former President Joe Biden speaks during the White House Conference on Hunger, Nutrition, and Health, at the Ronald Reagan Building, Wednesday, Sept. 28, 2022, in Washington. AP 4 Rep. Jackie Walorski, R-Ind., is seen before a House Ways and Means Committee markup in Longworth Building on July 12, 2018. CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Imag While acknowledging some in the press, like Axios' Alex Thompson and The Wall Street Journal's Annie Linskey and Siobhan Hughes for their pre-debate reporting that shed light on Biden's cognitive decline, Wemple knocked the media for broadly lacking the vigor to get to the bottom of it sooner. 'White House coverage must involve more than observing the president in action and writing up analysis pieces about his comings and goings,' Wemple wrote. Advertisement 'It needs to include a muckraking component detailing behind-the-scenes strategies, conflicts and debates over all manner of issues, particularly those relating to the president's mental acuity. An adjacent question relates to whether Biden himself was fully abreast of and in charge of day-to-day decisions.' 4 The Washington Post office in Washington, DC, US, on Thursday, June 27, 2024. Bloomberg via Getty Images 'And it's on these fronts that major media organizations fell short: Though Biden's declining faculties were clear to all, they never ignited one of those glorious mainstream-media investigative frenzies that colonizes television and radio broadcasts,' he added. Thompson's 'Original Sin' co-author, CNN anchor Jake Tapper, said there should be 'soul-searching' in the legacy media for how Biden's clearly apparent issues were covered. 'Few souls are undergoing a pat-down,' Wemple wrote.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Opinion: Why Dems Have It So Wrong: Trump Is Spoiling for This L.A. Battle
Consider what the average American is seeing on their phones/TV screens/computers out of Los Angeles over the past 48 hours: Cars being lit on fire (see below) Masked protesters waving Mexican flags standing in front of the burning cars Fireworks and rocks (and scooters!) being thrown at police vehicles Buildings being spray-painted with anti-law enforcement slogans To be clear: I am not saying that that is the whole story. As virtually every news story I have read is careful to note, these protests are very limited in scope—with much of Los Angeles not even noticing that they are happening. Trump's decision to call up the National Guard could well have been an accelerant to the violence as opposed to the solution for it. But, as I say over and over again: The average person is not seeking out every single nuance of a story like this. They are focused on their daily lives. They catch this sort of news only in passing. And, when you see a quick gloss of this story, it's one that clearly favors Donald Trump. Remember that Trump ran—expressly—in 2024 on getting MUCH tougher on illegal immigrants. The consensus—especially among loose partisans and swing voters—was that the Biden administration had been ineffectual at the Southern border, largely because of its unwillingness to put in place real and biting policies that would curtail the flow of illegals into the U.S. Even as Trump's numbers have faded on virtually every issue during his first five months in office, his polling on the border and immigration more broadly has stayed strong. Ask yourself this. If you are Trump would you rather have the big national story be: Your fight with Elon Musk? The ongoing struggles to pass the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' through Congress (and all the stuff that's actually IN the 'OBBB')? An immigration fight where the dominant images are protesters lighting cars on fire and clashing with the police? It's a TOTAL no-brainer. Don't believe me? Check out the full-court press Trump has put on to draw as much attention to the issue as possible over the last 24 hours, via his Truth Social feed. Here's just one(of many) examples: Trust me, this is 100% a fight he wants. And he will egg it on in all possible ways over the coming days—as a way to keep it in the news. (I'd argue the decision to call up the California National Guard without even consulting California Gov. Gavin Newsom is an example of how Trump is working to turn up the heat.) And it appears as though Democratic elected officials are willing to play along. Newsom's weird come-arrest-me threat on MSNBC on Sunday night felt tone-deaf. And speaking of tone-deaf, California Rep. Maxine Waters' comments—'I don't know why we have guns. What are those guns for? Are they to shoot protesters?'—feel decidedly out of step with the images we are seeing of the protests on TV. Politics, as I have said many times before, is about picking your battles. It's about fighting on ground that is favorable for you—and unfavorable for your opponent. Like him or hate him, Trump gets that. He knows a fight about deportations defined by burning cars and anti-police graffiti is a winner for him. Democrats need to think this way if they want to beat Trump and the broader Republican party. Fighting Trump on ground where the public is clearly on his side makes ZERO sense. Want more ball and strike calling—no matter what uniform the batter at the plate is wearing? Check out Chris Cillizza's Substack and YouTube channel.
