logo
Legal academic Alan Boulton granted bail over child abuse material charges

Legal academic Alan Boulton granted bail over child abuse material charges

A former judge charged after allegedly showing child abuse images to university students has been granted bail and plans to travel to Europe on an expensive trip.
Alan Boulton, 74, was charged with three counts of possessing child abuse material after an alleged incident at Monash University's law chambers in the Melbourne CBD in February this year.
Mr Boulton's case was brought before the Melbourne Magistrates' Court for the first time on Thursday for a filing hearing.
His barrister, Holly Baxter, said her client had been "up front" with investigators, and was seeking permission to travel to Europe while on bail.
"He booked the trip. A serious amount of money has been spent on that trip," Ms Baxter said.
Ms Baxter said Mr Boulton had travelled overseas during the police investigation and had returned with no issues.
The condition was granted by Magistrate Brett Sonnet, who adjourned the case until November, and ordered police to file a brief of evidence by September 18.
Details of the allegations against Mr Boulton were not aired in court on Thursday.
Victoria Police has previously said that "inappropriate images were inadvertently displayed during a university lecture in the CBD on Wednesday 5 February".
Mr Boulton did not attend court in-person, instead appearing via video link wearing a suit and tie.
He is yet to enter a plea to the charges.
Mr Boulton, a former senior deputy director of the Fair Work Commission and Order of Australia recipient, was charged in July after a five-month investigation by Victoria Police.
Properties in the Melbourne suburb of Middle Park and in Sydney were raided by police during the investigation.
Monash University said it referred the matter to police and suspended Mr Boulton immediately.
He is no longer employed by the university.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Non-binary battle as worker fired for calling colleague ‘he'
Non-binary battle as worker fired for calling colleague ‘he'

Perth Now

timean hour ago

  • Perth Now

Non-binary battle as worker fired for calling colleague ‘he'

A 63-year-old Perth man has been sacked from his high-paying job after he called a non-binary colleague 'he' instead of 'they'. The case went to the Fair Work Commission after the fired worker claimed wrongful dismissal, but the matter was kept under wraps because the conciliation conference was confidential. The identities of the two people at the centre of the pronoun controversy and the name of their employer is not publicly available information, but details leaked out after lawyers started talking about the implications of the case. The West Australian understands the legal fight erupted after an exchange at a leadership training course in February, when the man said 'he' while introducing the younger co-worker to the room. Another staff member corrected him and the man apologised to the worker — a biological male who identified neither a man nor a woman. The non gender-specific employee had earlier told the man that they wanted to be referred to as 'they' and the pronoun was written on their name badge. Relations between the pair remained overtly cordial for the duration of the training day. They sat next to each other and were partners in various role-playing scenarios. The older worker was later informed by his manager that a formal complaint had been lodged, and a written apology was required. He refused, claiming nobody could be compelled to call a colleague 'they'. He later told a Fair Work hearing that if one person had the arbitrary right to use a particular pronoun then another person had the right not to. The decision to not apologise exacerbated an already harsh backlash from co-workers, many of whom were in their 20s and had sided with their non-binary colleague. The company launched an investigation in March and the older worker was shown the door. He claimed his dismissal was unlawful and sought legal advice, intending to take the matter to the Federal Court. The matter was shuffled to Fair Work, where he was told he risked a violent social backlash if he pursued the matter in open court. It was with that in mind he reached a confidential settlement with his former employer. The case is unusual because it is not tinged with religious overtones. The sacked worker's refusal to say sorry in writing was not motivated by faith, rather from a belief he was being bullied into accepting a position on gender politics. Lavan Legal partner Bruno Di Girolami, who specialises in workplace law, said the case was 'new legal territory'. 'This situation would broadly fall within equal opportunity legislation,' Mr Di Girolami said. 'Those laws say that you cannot be discriminated against based on gender or intersex status. So, if a company had a policy that employees would not be called 'they' or 'them' then that would likely be actionable by a transgender or non-binary employee on the grounds it is discriminatory, but each case would turn on the facts.' Lawyers who spoke to The West Australian about the case said there did not appear to be a legal right for someone to be called 'they' or 'them' and it was up to individual companies to articulate pronoun convention. It is understood that the company who employed the 63-year-old did not have a pronoun policy. Gender politics have dominated headlines over the past few days courtesy of transgender woman Roxanne Tickle going to court to prove that female-only spaces were illegal if they excluded trans women. Gay and trans rights advocates Equality Australia has thrown its weight behind Ms Tickle's fight with Giggle app founder Sall Grover. Ms Grover had rejected Ms Tickle from the female-only networking app on the grounds the applicant was born a man. The Lesbian Action Group has thrown in behind Ms Grover. Equality Australia's application to get involved in the case will be decided on August 4, when Ms Grover's appeal is heard.

Court hears covert recording of TV star Matt Wright allegedly asking friend to destroy evidence
Court hears covert recording of TV star Matt Wright allegedly asking friend to destroy evidence

SBS Australia

timean hour ago

  • SBS Australia

Court hears covert recording of TV star Matt Wright allegedly asking friend to destroy evidence

Court hears covert recording of TV star Matt Wright allegedly asking friend to destroy evidence Published 7 August 2025, 9:04 am The criminal trial of celebrity crocodile wrangler Matthew Wright has heard the TV star allegedly instructed a friend to destroy maintenance records of a helicopter, which was involved in a fatal crash three years ago. Wright's defence counsel today saying secret audio recordings of Mr Wight are 'extremely poor' while doubting the credibility of key witnesses. Matt Wright has pleaded not guilty to three counts of attempting to pervert the course of justice.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store