Why Pakistan pressed panic button after India targeted its air bases
India's precision air strikes on critical Pakistani air bases on May 10 not only delivered a crushing blow to Pakistan's aerial capabilities but also signalled a decisive turn in the four-day escalation between the two nuclear-armed neighbours.As Indian missiles obliterated vital runways and struck uncomfortably close to its nuclear arsenal, Islamabad was sweating bullets. Within hours of the coordinated strikes, an alarmed US was forced to intervene and a cornered Pakistan made urgent overtures for a halt to all military actions. It was advantage India.advertisementIndia's response came hours after a Pakistani missile and drone attack targeted 15 Indian airfields and garrisons across Jammu and Kashmir to Gujarat. The assault, which killed 16 civilians and damaged religious structures, followed New Delhi's offer to Islamabad to open communication channels aimed at de-escalation.
After that, retaliation was inevitable—one designed to hit Pakistan where it hurts.India targets Pakistan's military infrastructureIn a pre-dawn operation on May 10, the Indian Air Force (IAF) struck 11 military sites deep inside Pakistan using air-launched precision weapons. The targets included critical air bases in Rafiqui, Murid, Nur Khan, Rahim Yar Khan, Sukkur, Chunian, Pasrur, and Sialkot, the Ministry of Defence said.Satellite imagery later confirmed the extensive damage, showing destroyed hangars and blown-up air strips. A strike on Rahim Yar Khan airbase left a massive crater on the runway.
advertisement
In Pasrur, Chunian and Arifwala, air defence radars were damaged, satellite images shared by the Indian armed forces showed.Strategic significance of strikesThe strike on Nur Khan air base in Chaklala, near Rawalpindi, carried significant strategic weight. The base is home to Pakistan's main transport squadrons and vital for logistical and strategic airlift operations, housing aircraft like C-130 Hercules and IL-78 mid-air refuelers.More critically, Nur Khan lies in close proximity to the headquarters of the Strategic Plans Division, the body overseeing Pakistan's nuclear arsenal.
The New York Times quoted a former US official familiar with Pakistan's nuclear programme, noting, "Pakistan's deepest fear is of its nuclear command authority being decapitated. The missile strike on Nur Khan could have been interpreted... as a warning that India could do just that."Satellite imagery also indicated a strike on the runway of Mushaf airbase in Sargodha. This base is reportedly linked to underground nuclear storage sites beneath the Kirana Hills and was struck with multiple loitering penetrating munitions.
(Source: X/@KawaSpace)
These strikes on Nur Khan and Sargodha were not merely retaliatory; they served as a calculated signal to Pakistan about India's capability to neutralise its nuclear arsenal if the conflict escalated further.Panic in Islamabad and US interventionAccording to government sources, the Indian strikes triggered panic in Islamabad.That same day, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif convened an emergency meeting of the National Command Authority, the apex body responsible for operational decisions regarding the country's nukes. While Pakistan later denied the meeting, the reports highlighted the impact of India's assertive action.In Washington DC, Trump administration officials worried about the conflict spiralling out of control. The New York Times reported that US Vice President JD Vance, who had previously stated the conflict was "none of our business," called Prime Minister Narendra Modi, urging de-escalation and direct engagement with Pakistan.Meanwhile, Secretary of State Marco Rubio spoke to Pakistan's Army Chief Asim Munir and then External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar, government sources said.Rubio conveyed that the Pakistanis were willing to stop firing, and would India agree. Jaishankar responded: "If they don't fire, we won't fire."advertisementSubsequently, the Pakistani Director General of Military Operations (DGMO) reached out to his Indian counterpart through established channels, seeking a ceasefire.The damaging air strikes on key air bases effectively cornered Pakistan, leaving it with little option but to stand down and parley for a pause in the fighting. This gave India the strategic upper-hand and paved the way for a fragile truce on its own terms, albeit with a nudge from the US.Operation Sindoor represents a marked shift in India's strategic approach towards Pakistan. By striking deep into Pakistan's heartland, targeting strategically important areas like Punjab province, it altered the terms of engagement.In a further caution to Pakistan, India adopted a new doctrine regarding cross-border terrorism: any future act of terror will be considered an act of war, warranting a direct and forceful response.Tune InTrending Reel
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
23 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
US hyphenating India, Pakistan; PM must drop 'stubbornness' and call special session of Parliament: Congress
Recently, the head of the US Central Command also stated that Pakistan is a "great partner" of America in the fight against terrorism, Ramesh said. "The Modi government is saying that Operation Sindoor is still going on. In such a situation, the Pakistani army chief's participation as a guest in the US Army Day is definitely a matter of serious concern," he said. Ramesh said the Trump administration is constantly making statements which can only be interpreted to mean that it is "hyphenating" India and Pakistan. "The prime minister is welcoming the delegation that returned after informing the entire world, including the US, about Pakistan's role in supporting terrorism, and at the same time, such news is coming from Washington DC makes India's diplomatic position even more uncomfortable," Ramesh said. "The prime minister should now leave aside his stubbornness and concern for prestige and call an all-party meeting and a special session of Parliament, so that the nation can clearly express its collective will and a concrete roadmap can be presented to the country," he said. Decades of diplomatic progress cannot be allowed to be weakened so easily, he added. With US Army General Michael Kurilla, Commander of US Central Command (CENTCOM), calling Pakistan a "phenomenal partner" in the counterterrorism world, the Congress on Wednesday asked what PM Modi had to say about this and whether it was not a "diplomatic setback".
The Hindu
29 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Addressing non-tariff barriers key for India, EU trade pact, says Piyush Goyal
Finding solutions to address non-tariff barriers would be important for the proposed free trade agreement (FTA) between India and the European Union (EU) and both sides are actively working on resolving these issues, Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal said on Thursday (June 12, 2025). He said the two sides are "pretty" close to finalising the talks for the proposed free trade pact. "Significant progress has been made. More than half the chapters are ready. In terms of content, I would say we are almost 90 per cent ready for market access. The important issues to be addressed are non-tariff barriers and how we will make it smoother, easier, and better to do business between the EU and India," Mr. Goyal told reporters in Stockholm. He added that both India and the EU are in active discussions to find solutions to make business smooth for companies of both sides. "Unless countries recognise that over regulation and barriers to trade will be met with reciprocal action, everybody suffers. We are committed to deregulation, to finding solutions to the high cost of regulation, the non-tariff barriers that these regulations cause and the impediments to free trade. I am quite hopeful that we will find very robust solutions to this problem," the Minister said. He is here on an official visit to meet his Swedish counterpart and companies for promoting trade and investments between the two countries. Sweden is a member of the 27-nation EU bloc. Key Indian exports that routinely face high barriers in the EU include — chillies, tea, Basmati rice, milk, poultry, bovine meat, fish, chemicals products. Most non-tariff measures (NTMs) are domestic rules created by countries with an aim to protect human, animal or plant health and environment. NTM may be technical measures such as regulations, standards, testing, certification, pre-shipment inspection or non-technical measures like quotas, import licensing, subsidies, government procurement restrictions. When NTMs become arbitrary, beyond scientific justification, they create hurdles for trade and are called NTBs (non-tariff barriers). India's exports are far below potential as they face NTBs in regions, including the EU, the US, China, Japan, and Korea. According to think tank GTRI, the EU has set MRL (minimum residual limit) for tricyclazole, a fungicide in rice, to 0.01 mg per kg as against the ten times higher limit earlier. Similarly, the EU has set MRL for aflatoxins B1 level in chilies and other spices at 5 to 10 ppb (parts per billion). The minister said negotiations on services and rules or origin have started. To give an impetus to the ongoing talks for the FTA, EU Commissioner for Trade and Economic Security Maros Sefcovic is expected to visit New Delhi on June 28-29. On the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), Goyal said this measure is "not good" as it is also a kind of a non-tariff barrier. This carbon tax, if imposed, will do injustice to Indian industry, he said, adding that if the EU will take any such step, India will have to respond to that. FTA talks are happening in a good environment and it will not be good to impose carbon tax on Indian goods, he added. "Our talks are going on the issue to find ways to deal with this," the minister said, adding that some good solutions will come out on this. On February 28, Prime Minister Narendra Modi and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen agreed to seal a much-awaited free trade deal by this year amid rising concerns over US President Donald Trump's policy on tariffs. In June 2022, India and the 27-nation EU bloc resumed the negotiations after a gap of over eight years. It stalled in 2013 due to differences over the level of opening up of the markets. India's bilateral trade in goods with the EU was $136.4 billion in 2024-25 (exports $75.75 billion, imports $60.65 billion), making it the largest trading partner of India for goods. The EU market accounts for about 17 per cent of India's total exports, while the EU's exports to India make up 9% of its total exports. EU's investments in India are valued at over $117 billion with around 6,000 European companies present in India. India's investments in the EU are valued at around $40 billion.
New Indian Express
29 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Child labour scene worsens in urban Bengaluru: NGO report
BENGALURU: Despite years of progress and policy reforms, child labour continues to cast a shadow over the children of South India. Marking the World Day against Child Labour, a recent report by the Child Rights and You (CRY) Foundation reveals that 16% of children aged 6 to 18 in the region are engaged in either full-time or part-time work, a direct violation of their right to education and protection. From agricultural fields and livestock management and more, children are being stripped of their childhood and basic rights. The report is based on surveys conducted across selected districts in four south Indian states —Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, and Telangana— primarily focusing on rural areas. In Karnataka, 8,413 children aged 6 to 14 were surveyed in four districts, and 443 were found to be involved in child labour. Among those aged 15 to 18, the number rose to 509 of 2,750 children. Harry Jeyakaran, AGM, CRY Program, and State Lead for Karnataka and Tamil Nadu, highlighted the lack of school accessibility in rural areas as a major factor contributing to this crisis. 'According to the RTE Act, every village should have a primary school within 1 km, a middle school within 3 km, and a high school within 5 km. But in our operational areas, only 60-70% of villages have a nearby primary school. The numbers drop sharply- only 40% have middle schools, and just 10-12% have access to high schools or PUC,' he explained.
