
Macron admits French ‘repressive violence' in Cameroon decolonisation ‘war'
The admission follows an official report, published in January, which said France implemented mass forced displacement, pushed hundreds of thousands of Cameroonians into internment camps and supported brutal militias to quash the central African country's push for sovereignty.
The historical commission examined France's role in the years both leading up to and after Cameroon gained independence from France on January 1st, 1960.
'The historians of the commission made it very clear that there was a war in Cameroon, during which the colonial authorities and the French army carried out repressive violence of several kinds that continued after 1960,' Macron said in the letter to Cameroonian President Paul Biya, published by the French presidency.
'It is incumbent on me today to accept France's role and responsibility in these events,' he said.
Macron announced the creation of the commission during a 2022 trip to the Cameroonian capital Yaounde.
Composed of both French and Cameroonian historians, the 14-person committee looked into France's role in the country between 1945 and 1971 based on declassified archives, eyewitness accounts and field surveys.
Most of Cameroon came under French rule in 1918 after the defeat of its previous colonial ruler, Germany, during World War I.
But a brutal conflict unfolded when the country began pushing for its independence following World War II, a move France repressed violently, according to the report's findings.
Advertisement
Between 1956 and 1961, France's fight against Cameroonian independence claimed 'tens of thousands of lives' and left hundreds of thousands displaced, the historians said.
Mathieu Njassep, president of the Association of Cameroon Veterans (Asvecam), welcomed Macron's letter but told AFP that France must go further.
'France has committed many crimes in Cameroon. It can pay reparations,' he said, though Macron's letter did not mention the possibility of compensation.
For many in France, the war in Cameroon went unnoticed because it mainly involved troops from colonies in Africa and was overshadowed by Algeria's 1954-1962 war of independence.
Even after Cameroon gained independence in 1960, Paris remained deeply involved, working closely with the 'authoritarian and autocratic' government of Ahmadou Ahidjo, who stayed in power until 1982.
Biya, in office since that year, is only the second president in Cameroon's history.
Aged 92 and already the world's oldest head of state, he will seek an eighth term in office in a presidential election in October.
Cameroon's opposition is struggling to challenge Biya, who has been accused by groups such as Human Rights Watch of suppressing opponents.
Advertisement
Cameroon's constitutional court last week rejected the candidacy of opposition leader Maurice Kamto, Biya's main opponent.
Macron said that France would facilitate access to its archives so that researchers could build on the commission's findings.
He also suggested the creation of a bilateral 'working group' to help monitor progress in ongoing research and education.
Macron has taken tentative steps to come to terms with once-taboo aspects of France's historical record, though many argue he has not gone far enough.
A 2021 report concluded France bore 'overwhelming responsibilities' in the 1994 Rwandan genocide, and a 2020 review examining France's actions during Algeria's war of independence called for a 'truth commission' and other conciliatory actions.
Macron has, however, ruled out any official apology for torture and other abuses carried out by French troops in Algeria.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


France 24
3 minutes ago
- France 24
Moroccan feminist activist accused of 'offending Islam' has trial postponed
The trial of a Moroccan feminist activist accused of "offending Islam" opened on Wednesday but was immediately postponed until August 27 at the defence's request, her lawyer told AFP. Ibtissame Lachgar, a 50-year-old clinical psychologist, was arrested Sunday after posting online late last month a picture of herself wearing a T-shirt with the word "Allah" in Arabic followed by "is lesbian". The picture was accompanied by text saying Islam was "like any religious ideology... fascist, phallocratic and misogynistic". Lachgar's lawyer, Naima Elguellaf, said she had requested the postponement to give her time to prepare a defence. She also asked that her client be provisionally released, though the court has not yet ruled on that request. Elguellaf cited Lachgar's health, with a friend of the defendant describing her as a "cancer survivor who requires treatment". Lachgar's post drew a strong reaction from the public, with many calling for her arrest under a provision of the penal code that carries a sentence of up to two years in prison for "anyone who offends the Islamic religion". That sentence can be raised to five years if the offence is committed in public, "including by electronic means". In 2009, Lachgar founded the Alternative Movement for Individual Liberties (MALI), known for holding a picnic during Ramadan that year to challenge a law criminalising breaking the fast in public without a valid religious reason. MALI has led several other campaigns against violence towards women and against child sexual abuse. Lachgar has had previous run-ins with the authorities, getting arrested in 2016 for disturbing public order and in 2018 amid a campaign in support of abortion rights, though she was not prosecuted in those cases.


France 24
8 hours ago
- France 24
Bukele critics face long exile from El Salvador homeland
At 44 years old, the self-styled world's "coolest dictator" has been in power for six years, and has just scrapped constitutional term limits, raising the prospect he could rule for many more. For good measure, he and his allies also passed a "foreign agents" law, similar to those used to crush dissent in Russia, Venezuela and Nicaragua. Against this backdrop, about 80 human rights activists, journalists, lawyers and environmentalists have left El Salvador in the last four months, according to an AFP tally, fleeing what they call "escalating repression" and the risk of imprisonment. AFP spoke to several of those in exile. Here are the stories of four. Bukele's government did not respond to requests for comment. But the president -- popular with Salvadorans for his "war" on gangs that once ravaged the country -- accuses his critics of "distorting" and "manipulating" the truth. The human rights activist Ingrid Escobar's left arm is bandaged. Shortly after fleeing her homeland with her nine- and 11-year-old children, she underwent surgery for a tumor, leaving a wound that has yet to heal. "I prioritized my health, my freedom, and my children," says the director of Socorro Juridico (Legal Aid), which assists prisoners' families. Now in Mexico, the 43-year-old recalls how police patrolled near her home "twice a week." She lived in that shadow until a friend from the prosecutor's office warned her that she was on a list of 11 people about to be arrested. "I had no choice" but to leave she said. "Because of the intimidation and fear of dying in prison without medical treatment." "I grabbed some clothes and left when I could," she said. The prospect of being jailed in El Salvador is not far-fetched. Escobar has been a staunch critic of Bukele's state of emergency, which was imposed in 2022 and has led to about 88,000 people being detained. The government accuses them all of being gang members. But with scant evidence or due process, no one knows for sure. Escobar insists that among the prisoners are "thousands of innocents." An estimated 433 have died in prison, although the true figure may never be known. Her organization continues to operate in El Salvador, but they are at "high risk," Escobar laments. "Consolidating the dictatorship involves imprisoning human rights defenders to silence them," she claimed. "There is no such thing as a 'cool dictatorship.'" The Lawyer Ruth Lopez was already in pyjamas when police arrived to arrest her on the night of May 18. The lawyer, who led the anti-corruption unit of the humanitarian NGO Cristosal, was herself was accused of illicit enrichment by a Bukele-aligned prosecutor. Her high-profile arrest marked a turning point. A month later, her colleague Rene Valiente, head of investigations, went into exile along with 20 other Cristosal activists. "There were attacks on social networks, stigmatization of our work, surveillance by security forces," recounts the 39-year-old lawyer from Cristosal's office in Guatemala. A constitutional lawyer and an environmental lawyer were also arrested in May and June, and the "foreign agents law" stipulated strict new laws for NGOs, including a 30 percent tax on their income. Amid all this, the US administration of President Donald Trump has been notably muted in its condemnation. Valiente and Lopez continue to advise the families of the 252 Venezuelans deported from the United States and who spent four months in the mega-prison Bukele built for gang members. "He exercises repression because he has the validation of the United States and has undermined democratic checks and balances" said Valiente. "We will continue working from here for a country that doesn't have to choose between security, or rights," he said. The Environmentalist When the Bukele-controlled Congress lifted the ban on metal mining last December, many Salvadorans took to the streets to protest. An environmental leader with a decade's standing, Amalia Lopez could not be absent. But after helping file a legal challenge against the new rules the 45-year-old was forced to retreat from the fight and leave her country in April. "I felt watched. I thought about protecting myself, letting the pressure subside, and returning, but I am no longer safe there," she told AFP from Costa Rica. In May, an environmental defender and a community leader protesting with farmers near Bukele's residence were detained. "With such overwhelming military and political power, we can't do much," said Lopez, who also defends communities' rights to water and land threatened by "powerful economic groups." All her work and affections "were left there" she said. "With indefinite re-election, an early return is impossible. Now it's an increasingly distant reality." The Journalist Jorge Beltran still has his suitcases packed because he's seeking asylum in another country. The 55-year-old left El Salvador for Guatemala on June 14 "totally devastated," without his wife and children. "I am emotionally unwell. But in El Salvador, practicing free and critical journalism is no longer safe," he said from his small rented room. A journalist for 23 years, Beltran is one of 47 reporters who have gone into exile in recent months, according to the professional association APES. Working for El Diario de Hoy, he denounced what he called "corrupt Bukele officials and human rights violations." It was no easy task, Beltran said, as the government "closed access to public documents." He decided to leave when people close to power warned him he was being targeted by the police. "It's a very bitter pill," he said. Now the prospect of Bukele's indefinite re-election "erases the hope of returning in just a few years." Although he is currently unemployed, Beltran plans to create a website to report from abroad on what is happening in El Salvador.

LeMonde
8 hours ago
- LeMonde
Britain, France and Germany threaten to reimpose sanctions on Iran as nuclear program deadline nears
The top diplomats of Britain, France and Germany threatened to reimpose sanctions on Iran as an end-of-the-month deadline nears for the country to resume negotiations with the West over its nuclear program and cooperation with the United Nations nuclear watchdog . The three countries − known as the E3 − wrote in a letter to the United Nations dated Friday, August 8, that they were willing to trigger a process known as the "snapback" mechanism − which allows one of the Western parties to reimpose UN sanctions − if Tehran doesn't comply with its requirements. French Foreign Minister Jean-Nöel Barrot posted the letter on Wednesday to X. He co-signed it along with top diplomats from Germany and the United Kingdom. "E3 have always committed to use all diplomatic tools at our disposal to ensure Iran does not develop a nuclear weapon," the letter said. "We have made clear that if Iran is not willing to reach a diplomatic solution before the end of August 2025, or does not seize the opportunity of an extension, E3 are prepared to trigger the snapback mechanism." The Iranian government didn't immediately respond to the development, but parliament member Manouchehr Mottaki − who was Iran's top diplomat for five years in the 2000s − warned of a swift reaction to any move to trigger the snapback mechanism. He said the Iranian parliament has a "finger on the trigger" for quitting the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty, or NPT, the international treaty aimed at halting the spread of nuclear weapons. "We only need 24 hours to approve quitting the nuclear deal," if the E3 raises the issue at the UN Security Council, Mottaki said. The letter from the E3 comes following a period of apparent diplomatic deadlock after a 12-day war between Iran and Israel in June, where Israeli and American jets struck some key nuclear-related facilities in the Islamic Republic. The countries met with Iranian officials last month in Turkey at Iran's consulate building in Istanbul on the possibility of reimposing international sanctions, lifted in 2015 in exchange for Tehran accepting restrictions and monitoring of its nuclear program. Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesman, Esmail Baghaei, said at the time that he hoped that the meeting would see the E3 nations reassess their "previous unconstructive attitude." Since the war, talks with Washington for a new nuclear deal haven't resumed, and Iran has since suspended ties with the International Atomic Energy Agency, the UN nuclear watchdog , following the attacks. The IAEA's first visit to Iran since the war didn't entail any visits to nuclear facilities Monday, and cooperation wasn't officially restored. One of the three countries opting to trigger the snapback mechanism would renew sanctions on Iran, but Tehran renewing cooperation with the Vienna-based IAEA and addressing concerns about its highly-enriched uranium stockpile would delay it. Iran has had limited IAEA inspections in the past as a pressure tactic in negotiating with the West and it is unclear how soon talks between Tehran and Washington for a deal over its nuclear program will resume. German Foreign Ministry spokesperson Josef Hinterseher on Wednesday said that the letter "once again underlines that the legal preconditions for snapback have long existed." "Our position and our appeal is, very clearly, that Iran still has the choice of deciding to return to diplomacy (…) and full cooperation with the IAEA," he told reporters at a regular news conference in Berlin. US intelligence agencies and the IAEA had assessed Iran last had an organized nuclear weapons program in 2003, though Tehran had been enriching uranium up to 60% − a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90%.