
LaMalfa: ‘Texas shouldn't be doing that
At the end of a raucous 90 minute town hall meeting at the Chico Elks Lodge Monday morning, LaMalfa responded to a direct question about his opinion on the Texas redistricting plan.
'Texas shouldn't be doing that,' LaMalfa said. 'California shouldn't be doing this. This is going to start a grass fire all across the country, every single state will try to change it based on a political outcome."
LaMalfa's district is one of five identified for a potential redistricting by vote in a special California election that would occur if Texas proceeds with its plans to redistrict. LaMalfa said he supports the decision of the California voters to place redistricting in the hands of a non-partisan commission and warned that an attempt to redraw California's boundaries mid-decade would be "trampling the people's voice on this.
"Texas shouldn't be doing it, either," LaMalfa said.
LaMalfa heard comments and took questions from a decidedly anti-president crowd of more than 1,000. The session began with a loud boo for an opening prayer, impatience for the presentation of the American flag by Chico veterans of Foreign Wars Post 1555, and a yell to "Let's Go."
"Good morning, everybody," the Congressman said to a smattering of applause and boos. "It might be the only applause of the day," he joked.
After brief remarks, LaMalfa turned the meeting over to comments and questions, which lasted about 85 minutes. Those attending the event were provided red and green cards to hold in the air to signify whether they (green) agreed with what was being said at the time or (red) disagreed. If the cards were intended to keep the audience from getting loud, it didn't work.
"You're not here to talk about the weather," one attendee shouted when LaMalfa opened with a mention of the forecast for a 103 degree day.
"If we want to have a productive discussion it needs to be civil right," the congressman said. "So whoever has the microphone whether it is me or someone making the comments or making the questions why don't we conduct ourselves where one person at a time gets to speak and that will work a heck of a lot better.
Repeatedly interrupted with shouts of "liar," LaMalfa said, "Ninety minutes is all we get so if you want to waste it go ahead. If you cant contain yourself, I don't know man."
The biggest boos were reserved for discussions around Medicaid and the "Big Beautiful Bill."
Most of the comments criticized the congress member for supporting the agenda of the current president. Anytime the congressman spoke, he was met with jeers.
Chuck Reynolds, who described himself as a member of the Oroville City Council, however, felt compelled to apologize to the congressman for the opinions and behavior of the audience members."We actually really appreciate you congressman and having experienced serving in office I tell you this is the typical crowd basing 90 percent of its opinion one the one percent of the information.
Reynolds called the crowd out for its "rude behavior, and I apologize on behalf of Butte County."
Reynolds called the crowd out for its 'rude behavior, and I apologize on behalf of Butte County.'
'If you met with us more often, we might not have to yell out our disgruntlement,' responded the next person to comment.
LaMalfa, a Republican from Richvale in Butte County, represents all of Sutter and Colusa counties and a large portion of Yuba County. The First District is a reliable safe Republican district after the redistricting which occurred following the 2020 census.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom is calling for a special election in November 2025 asking California voters to approve a redistricting plan to offset attempts by Texas to redraw districts to add five Republican friendly districts to aid GOP chances in the 2026 election. The governor said the California redistricting, if approved by voters, would only go into effect if Texas proceeds with its plans.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
4 minutes ago
- New York Times
New Orleans Mayor Joins Long Line of Louisiana Politicians Accused of Corruption
Hundred-dollar bills stashed in a freezer. Riverboat casino licenses sold to the highest bidder. Truckloads of granite traded in a quid pro quo. Louisiana has a long and colorful history of political corruption allegations, which for decades have ensnared lawmakers at many levels of government. The most recent was Mayor LaToya Cantrell of New Orleans, who was indicted on Friday after a lengthy federal investigation. According to the charges laid out in the indictment, Ms. Cantrell abused public funds to facilitate a romantic relationship with her bodyguard, a city police officer, and then sought to cover up the personal time they spent together in New Orleans and on out-of-state trips while he claimed to be on duty. Ms. Cantrell's lawyer said on Friday that he needed to review the indictment before commenting; he declined to comment again on Saturday. Here's a look back at some of the most significant corruption scandals in Louisiana history: Richard Leche After the assassination of Huey Long, a popular Louisiana governor turned United States senator, in 1935, Richard Leche emerged as his successor. But Mr. Leche's single term as governor came to an early end when he resigned in 1939 amid corruption allegations. His resignation failed to stave off charges, and in 1940, he was convicted of mail fraud in a plot that prosecutors said involved a dealer selling trucks to the state's Highway Department at excessively high prices, and then giving Mr. Leche a kickback. He served five years in prison before President Harry S. Truman pardoned him in 1953. Huey and Earl Long Earl Long, the lieutenant governor under Leche in 1939, was swept into the state's highest office when his predecessor resigned. Mr. Leche's scandals loomed over Mr. Long's first term, and in 1940, Long was himself charged with embezzlement. The charges didn't stick, however, and Mr. Long would go on to win the governorship in two elections, holding office from 1948 to 1952 and from 1956 to 1960, in a career defined by personal excess and eccentric behavior. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.


Forbes
4 minutes ago
- Forbes
Urban Deployments Raise Questions: What Is Our Military For?
As noted in a recent report by the Center for American Progress, in 2022 Donald Trump stated that 'the next President should use every power at his disposal to restore order — and, if necessary, that includes sending in the National Guard or the troops' to conduct law enforcement activities on U.S. soil. In 2023, said that if restored to office, that he he would send troops to U.S. cities to combat crime: 'The next time, I'm not waiting. … We don't have to wait any longer.' Ominously, the president has talked of using troops to combat 'the enemy within." That time has come. Earlier this year the Trump administration deployed 700 Marines to Los Angeles to deal with immigration protests. At the time, California Attorney General Rob Bonta said 'We don't take lightly to the president abusing his authority and unlawfully mobilizing California National Guard troops.' The new target of troops deploying to a U.S. city is in Washington, DC. On Saturday August 16th West Virginia Governor Patrick Morrissey annnounced a plan to deploy hundreds of National Guard member of his state's National Guard to Washington, DC, stating that 'West Virginia is proud to stand with President [Donald]The question is why? Violent crime in Washington, DC is projected to be down 26% this year from 2024. The demonstrations in Los Angeles were overwhelmingly peacaful until the show of force – police, National Guard and Marines – prompted clashes between protesters and military and law enforcement officials. Local law enforcement officers have gone so far as to fire munitions that have left both protesters and journalists injured. Many veterans have taken exception to the deployments, and some have filed an amicus brief in support of California Governor Gavin Newsom's opposition to the troop presence. One of them, Maj. Gen. Paul Eaton, said 'This is the politicisation of the armed forces. It casts the military in a terrible light." President Trump's rationale for sending troops into U.S. cities is the Insurrection Act of 1807, which does indeed allow the president to deploy troops for domestic law enforcement in the event of an insurrection. But neither the immigration protests in Los Angeles nor the crime rate in DC qualify as an insurrection, by any stretch of the imagination. The deployments are deeply disturbing, and should be questioned by our elected leaders across the spectrum, along with veterans and average citizens concerned about federal overreach. Questions about the troop deployments need to be louder and more persistent. This is not a partisan issue. It is a basic issue about the role of the. military in a democracy. We can't afford to ignore it and go about business as usual.

Associated Press
4 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Photos of ‘Free D.C.' protest against Trump's federal takeover of Washington police
WASHINGTON (AP) — A protest against Trump administration's effort to overhaul policing in the District of Columbia drew scores to Dupont Circle before a march to the White House. ___ This is a photo gallery curated by AP photo editors.