logo
'Oldest' city business to shut due to costs

'Oldest' city business to shut due to costs

Yahoo13-05-2025
A business that has been trading for 295 years has decided to close while it is still able to pay its staffs, suppliers and creditors, it said.
Astleys in Coventry, which specialises in workwear, personal protective equipment, tools and cleaning products, announced in a statement it was "conducting a controlled shut-down" and "entering solvent liquidation".
The business, which operates from a distribution centre on Coventry Business Park has described itself as the city's "oldest".
Bosses said in a statement a number of factors had led to the decision, but operational costs were the "most difficult" problem.
They added higher rates of employment taxes and minimum wage were "increasingly difficult to swallow" and changes to buying habits, which had been "exacerbated by Covid", had also impacted the business.
The statement, which the business released on its website, also said customers had expressed shock and disappointment over the news.
"We have heard that Astleys is part of Coventry and indeed, after 295 years of employing Coventrians, serving Coventry businesses and paying our taxes and dues, we also feel that sentiment," the statement said.
"If only history paid the bills."
The business thanked its previous customers and wished them luck for the future.
Follow BBC Coventry & Warwickshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Shoppers urged to support independent stores
City's 109-year-old tobacconist shop to close
Staff 'devastated' after city centre bar closes
Astleys
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

California's burger wars heat up as Habit Burger & Grill trolls In-N-Out with new billboard
California's burger wars heat up as Habit Burger & Grill trolls In-N-Out with new billboard

Los Angeles Times

time18 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

California's burger wars heat up as Habit Burger & Grill trolls In-N-Out with new billboard

Habit Burger & Grill has doubled down on its provocative marketing strategy, updating its billboard trolling of burger giant In-N-Out for a second consecutive year after once again beating the chain in a national ranking. Habit has updated its existing billboard near Los Angeles International Airport, directly across from an In-N-Out location on Sepulveda Boulevard, to reflect its rival's drop to fourth place in USA Today's 10 Best fast-food burger rankings. The same sign from last year has been recycled, with the '#2' crossed out in red and replaced with '#4.' The company — which took first place for the best fast-food burger (the Double Char) — also earned top rankings from USA Today for best fast casual restaurant and best fast-food side dish for its tempura green beans. 'We congratulated In-N-Out on being #2 last year with a billboard,' Jack Hinchliffe, chief marketing officer at Habit, said in a press release. 'This year, we were going to send a gift but couldn't afford the postage to Tennessee, so we saved a few bucks and reused the same billboard. We just had to swap out the 2 for a 4.' The Tennessee reference is a pointed jab at In-N-Out's eastward expansion. In January 2023, the company announced plans to establish an Eastern territory office in Franklin, Tenn., by 2026. Last month, billionaire owner and Chief Executive Lynsi Snyder announced on a conservative podcast that she is personally leaving California for Tennessee. 'There's a lot of great things about California, but raising a family is not easy here. Doing business is not easy here,' Snyder said during her appearance on a conservative podcast. She specifically cited COVID-19 pandemic-era restrictions as particularly challenging for business operations. Snyder's departure represents a seismic shift for the leader of a brand that has been a pillar of California fast-food culture for more than 75 years. The move places In-N-Out among a growing list of major companies relocating from California, including electric car maker Tesla, financial services firm Charles Schwab, and oil giant Chevron, all citing regulatory challenges, operational costs and policy disagreements. The timing of Habit's latest marketing gambit coincides with In-N-Out's continued decline in the annual USA Today rankings. In-N-Out ranked sixth in 2023, second in 2024, and fourth this year. USA Today's 10 Best contests rely on expert panels to select nominees, followed by public voting to determine winners. While not scientific, the rankings have gained attention among consumers. The billboard campaign represents an asymmetric marketing battle between two companies of vastly different sizes. In-N-Out operates more than 400 locations across eight states, while Habit has more than 385 restaurants across 14 states and international markets since opening its first location in Santa Barbara in 1969. 'We were born in Santa Barbara in 1969, remain proudly Californian and we're not going anywhere,' Hinchliffe said. Both chains maintain their headquarters in Irvine, located about seven miles apart, though In-N-Out plans to consolidate its California operations in Baldwin Park, where Harry Snyder, Lynsi Snyder's grandfather, co-founded the company in 1948. The In-N-Out billboard is part of a broader campaign by Habit targeting multiple competitors. The company has deployed mobile billboards to locations near other chains that made the USA Today rankings, including Chipotle, Five Guys, Shake Shack and Panera Bread, offering congratulatory messages on their lower rankings. In-N-Out did not respond to a request for comment.

Are stimulus checks coming? What to know after Trump proposed tariff rebate
Are stimulus checks coming? What to know after Trump proposed tariff rebate

USA Today

time18 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Are stimulus checks coming? What to know after Trump proposed tariff rebate

Last month, President Donald Trump teased that a potential rebate could be attached to the worldwide tariffs he announced earlier this year. 'We have so much money coming in, we're thinking about a little rebate,' Trump said on July 25 ahead of his trip to Scotland, where he planned to iron out the details of a United Kingdom trade agreement. The White House has announced that some of the tariffs, which were disclosed on April 2, have raised $100 billion in revenue. Trump didn't provide further details on the potential rebates, which are unlikely to pass in Congress, except to say they would only be available to people from certain income levels. The president would need congressional approval to authorize the rebates. While details are scarce, here's what you need to know about a potential tariff rebate. Previous story: Trump considers 'rebates' to US taxpayers from tariff income Sen. Josh Hawley introduces rebate bill Shortly after Trump's July comments, Sen. Josh Hawley, a Republican from Missouri, introduced the American Worker Rebate Act of 2025. The proposed legislation would send rebate checks of at least $600 per individual to U.S. residents. A family of four could receive up to $2,400. The legislation allows the credit to increase if tariff revenues exceed 2025 projections. 'My legislation would allow hard-working Americans to benefit from the wealth that Trump's tariffs are returning to this country,' said Hawley in a news release announcing the bill. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has said tariff revenue is expected to reach $300 billion annually. Yet, economists have said the policies could increase inflation and cost taxpayers thousands of dollars per year, especially if Trump doesn't reach trade deals with key partners like Canada and Mexico. For joint filers with an adjusted gross income of over $150,000 and people filing single who earn more than $75,000, the benefit would be reduced by 5%. The legislation has been referred to the Senate Finance Committee. It would need to pass both the Senate and the House of Representatives to become law. What are some of the hurdles facing the rebate? Republican lawmakers are unlikely to be excited about increasing federal spending. The stimulus checks issued during the COVID-19 pandemic cost the government about $164 billion. If checks were issued, it would mean a significant percentage of tariff revenue would be going back to taxpayers at a time when Trump himself has said his priority is paying down $37 trillion in debt. "The big thing we want to do is pay down debt,' Trump said in July. 'But we're thinking about rebates.' In an interview with Semafor, one conservative lawmaker shot down the idea. "People love spending money and granting new tax cuts when we can't afford it," Sen. Ron Johnson, a Republican from Wisconsin, told the outlet. 'We're $37 trillion in debt and running $2 trillion a year deficits – some time, this madness just has to end.' How is a tax rebate different from a stimulus check? A tax rebate is a reimbursement made to a taxpayer for an excess amount paid in taxes during the year, while a stimulus check is a direct payment from the federal government to households. Tax rebates can be issued at any point during the year. Hawley's news release states that the parameters for the tax rebate would be similar to the stimulus checks issued in 2020 during the economic slowdown caused by the pandemic. When could a tax rebate be implemented? Hawley's bill has until the end of the current congressional calendar to pass through both chambers of Congress, or it will be considered dead and would need to be introduced again if lawmakers want to move forward with it. Michelle Del Rey is a trending news reporter at USA TODAY. Reach her at mdelrey@

Is UPS Stock Stuck Back at Pre-Pandemic Levels, or Is There Room for Recovery in 2025?
Is UPS Stock Stuck Back at Pre-Pandemic Levels, or Is There Room for Recovery in 2025?

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Is UPS Stock Stuck Back at Pre-Pandemic Levels, or Is There Room for Recovery in 2025?

Key Points United Parcel Service's stock rose sharply during the pandemic as shopping from home rose. As the post-pandemic world opened back up again, UPS' business stalled and the company began to revamp its operations. UPS is preparing for the future by slimming down and refocusing on its highest-margin operations. 10 stocks we like better than United Parcel Service › United Parcel Service (NYSE: UPS) is a vital cog in the e-commerce space. That was a boon to the business during the coronavirus pandemic, but it has been a bit of a trouble spot now that the world has learned to live with COVID-19. In fact, the stock now trades at around the same levels it did prior to the stock's pandemic rally. Is this package delivery giant stuck in neutral, or is there hope for the future? Why did investors get so excited about UPS? Wall Street has a really bad habit of getting a story in its teeth and then running with it. Investors usually run too far, leading to a deep snapback in the share price of whatever investments got caught up in the story. That is the backdrop for UPS' huge price advance in 2020 and 2021. And its subsequent crash in 2022, which is still ongoing today. Essentially, the stock has made a full round trip from bull to bear, currently trading hands at around the same levels it did prior to the pandemic rally. What changed? During the pandemic, people were stuck at home and did a lot more online shopping. That led to increased demand for delivery services like the one UPS operates. Investors appear to have reasoned that demand would grow forever. It didn't. When the world moved past COVID, UPS realized it had to change things up. It started by slimming down and using more technology. At the same time, however, it had to deal with a new, more costly, union contract. As it started to get a handle on its business overhaul, it proactively chose to halve the low-margin business relationship it has with Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN), its largest customer. The near term is likely to remain bumpy Here's the problem: UPS' current efforts are all near-term headwinds, even though they are likely to be long-term positives. For example, slimming down has included exiting certain businesses, which shrinks UPS and leads to volatility and uncertainty on the income statement. Closing facilities and increasing the use of technology both increase costs in the near term, even though they will likely reduce costs over the long term. The union contract's pay raises increased costs. But it creates more stability over the long term, since the dispute is resolved. And while focusing on more profitable business will likely lead to improved margins, it might also result in top-line weakness. That's particularly true with UPS' decision to materially reduce its work with Amazon. However, less revenue that is more profitable is better than growing the business by leaning into mediocre delivery niches. But, taken together, it seems like 2025 is going to be another transition year for UPS. That's likely to linger into at least 2026, as well, since the moves management is making are large and strategic in nature. Or, to put that another way, there are likely to be more bumps in the road for UPS before it sees a material recovery in its financial results or a big advance in stock price. UPS is a high-yield turnaround story At the end of the day, UPS is not going to be a great fit for most investors. There are a lot of moving parts, and the stock is likely to only interest turnaround investors. Yes, there's a huge yield on offer, noting the stock's 7.5% dividend yield. But sometimes turnarounds lead to dividend cuts, and the payout ratio has already risen to a fairly high 90%+, which materially increased the risk here for dividend investors. UPS is best suited to more aggressive investors who think in decades and not days, weeks, or even months. Should you buy stock in United Parcel Service right now? Before you buy stock in United Parcel Service, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and United Parcel Service wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $653,427!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,119,863!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,060% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 11, 2025 Reuben Gregg Brewer has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon and United Parcel Service. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Is UPS Stock Stuck Back at Pre-Pandemic Levels, or Is There Room for Recovery in 2025? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store