Iran agrees to hold nuclear talks with Europe's big three
The move comes after warnings by the Europeans that failure to resume negotiations would lead to UN sanctions being reimposed on Tehran.
"The principle of talks has been agreed upon, but consultations are continuing on the time and place of the talks," the semi-official Tasnim agency quoted a source as saying. "The country in which the talks could be held next week has not been finalised."
Iran and the US held several rounds of negotiations aimed at reviving a nuclear deal but those were derailed when Israel launched strikes on Iran in June, leading to 12 days of war.
French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot has said France, Britain and Germany would launch the UN snapback mechanism on Iran to restore sanctions by the end of August if no concrete progress has been made on a deal by then.
Under the terms of a UN resolution ratifying a 2015 nuclear pact, the deadline for the three European powers to reimpose UN sanctions on Tehran is October 18.
But August had long been discussed as an informal date because of procedural reasons related to the snapback mechanism, which involves a 30-day review period.
The mechanism can be requested by participants of the 2015 deal and cannot be vetoed by any of the five permanent members of the UN Security Council – China, the US, Russia, France and Britain.
Tehran has said its nuclear programme is peaceful but Israel and the US say it was months away from producing a nuclear bomb before their recent air strikes on Iran, an assessment that has not been made publicly by the Europeans.
The strikes pushed the Iranian parliament to pass a law stipulating that inspection of Iran's nuclear sites by the UN's nuclear watchdog needs approval from Tehran's Supreme National Security Council.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Today
5 hours ago
- Gulf Today
Play wisely
This refers to the Congress leaders claim that our Prime Minister is unable to deny that the US President Donald Trump claimed 30 times that it is only due to his intervention the India-Pakistan war was called off. This is nothing put a ploy of Trump trumpeting for getting the Noble Prize for Peace. Even his attempt to stall the Israel-Iran-Russia war had failed miserably. As regards our ceasefire with Pakistan, though our prime minister, home, defence, and the external affairs ministers have time and again explained that there was no third party intervention to stop the war and was stopped purely at the request of Pakistan, our opposition leaders are not ready to believe our prime minister and his ministers, which is really unfortunate. With their counting the number of trumpeting of Trump, they are only degrading themselves in our country. It would be better if they act like a constructive opposition, instead of destructive and try to do something good for our nation and the Common man. Capt. N. Viswanathan, Coimbatore, India
Khaleej Times
7 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
Brazilians burn Trump effigies as tariffs spark anger
Brazilians set fire to effigies of Donald Trump in protests across several cities Friday, denouncing the US president's politically motivated trade tariffs. Anti-Trump protests were held in Brasilia, Sao Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, a sign of souring ties between two of the Americas' largest economies. The demonstrations were modestly attended, but reflected broad anger at Trump's decision to put a 50 per cent tariff on Brazilian exports and to sanction a top judge. The mercurial US President has openly admitted he is punishing Brazil for prosecuting his political ally, ex-president Jair Bolsonaro. The far-right Brazilian firebrand is currently on trial for plotting a coup after failing to win reelection in 2022. Bolsonaro supporters stormed Brazil's congress in January 2023, ransacking the chambers and attacking police, in scenes reminiscent of Trump supporters' attack on the US Capitol two years before. A Brazilian general has given evidence that the alleged plotters also wanted to assassinate leftist President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva and several other public officials. Trump has called the trial a "witch hunt" and his Treasury Department has sanctioned Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes in response. Trump also signed an executive order slapping 50 percent tariffs on Brazilian imports, citing Bolsonaro's "politically motivated persecution." The tariff is due to enter into force on August 6. Moraes, in a rare public address, said Friday he pledged to "continue working" despite a US travel ban and assets freeze. "This Court, the Office of the Attorney General, and the Federal Police will not bow to these threats," he said during a court session. And he vowed the court would remain "absolutely uncompromising in defending national sovereignty and its commitment to democracy." Moraes has repeatedly taken aim at the Brazilian far-right and its figurehead Bolsonaro, as well as tech titan Elon Musk, over online disinformation. He is also the presiding judge in the coup trial of Bolsonaro, who risks a 40-year prison sentence. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has accused Moraes of "serious human rights abuses, including arbitrary detention involving flagrant denials of fair trial guarantees and infringing on the freedom of expression." Moraes recently ordered Bolsonaro to wear an electronic ankle bracelet pending the conclusion of his trial, and barred him from leaving his home at night or using social media pending an investigation into potential obstruction of justice.
The National
13 hours ago
- The National
More states say they will ‘recognise' Palestine, but what does this mean?
A growing number of countries in the West have said they could soon recognise Palestinian statehood as Israel becomes increasingly isolated over its war in Gaza. Fifteen countries issued a joint declaration during a UN conference this week led by France and Saudi Arabia, to push for a two-state solution. Nations including Canada and the UK are expected to make their endorsement official at the UN General Assembly in September. The US - Israel's strongest ally - remains the exception, and even moved to impose sanctions against Palestinian Authority officials, partly for their role in pursuing legal cases against Israel. But what does it actually mean to recognise Palestine? The gesture is viewed as largely symbolic but, in practice, could it be the catalyst to end decades of Israeli occupation and illegal settlement expansion? In this episode of Beyond the Headlines, host Nada AlTaher speaks to former ICJ lawyer Ardi Imseis, a professor of law at Queen's University in Canada. They discuss why recognition even matters amid the ongoing war in Gaza, and how it can lead to Palestinian self-determination.
