Fire lab scientist says we're not doing enough to prevent more wildfires
The U.S. Forest Service built the fire sciences lab in 1960, inspired by a forest fire that killed 13 firefighters. The facility includes a 66-foot-high combustion chamber that allows for intense burn tests in controlled conditions. Today, about 80 employees are carrying on that mission of wildfire research, and keep coming back to one controlling principle.
"We're definitely part of the problem," said fire scientist and lab leader Mark Finney.
Finney believes we still don't implement some of the basics that could limit the flames, like clearing away dead and dry vegetation with more prescribed burns — including near urban areas. In his view, some smaller wildland fires should also be left to burn to eliminate fuels that would feed larger fires.
"The harder we fight fire, the harder we try to remove fire, the more the fuels build up in a given location...we've actually created conditions that make those fires worse," Finney said.
The fire lab allows the uncontrollable to be controlled and studied. Finney took CBS News to a silo where his team assembled dry logs and lit them on fire to simulate wind-fueled flames on the forest floor.
What they're learning in the lab has never been more important, following a slew of massive wildfires — including ones that recently destroyed thousands of homes in the Los Angeles area.
The California governor's office called the fires "unprecedented," but Finney disagrees.
"It's the same fire events over and over again. And yet, decades go by and those lessons and those impacts are often forgotten," Finney said.
He hopes what the team learns from studying the flames can change the way we approach wildfires.
When asked how to convince a community that lighting a fire near their homes is a good idea, Finney said, "The question is, what risks do you want? To experience the very low risk of having problems with prescribed burning, or do you want to basically roll the dice and just wait until circumstances overwhelm emergency response?"
He continued, "We've proven that we can't eliminate fire. The only choices we really have are when to have it and what kind to have."
That will require a change in perspective — looking at fire as an ally, not an enemy.
Judge blocks deportation of pro-Palestinian activist who helped lead Columbia University protests
Wildfire researchers replicate "firenado" and other fire conditions in Montana lab
Reporter's Notebook: "Animal spirits" and the stock market
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Officials will use trail cameras, elk teeth to track Michigan's elk herd. What to know
State officials are trying out new ways to keep an eye on Michigan's elk population — from elk teeth to trail cameras. As researchers with the Michigan Department of Natural Resources seek to identify the best method for tracking the state's elk population, they're adding new techniques, photographing elk with trail cameras and analyzing elk teeth, the DNR said in a news release. The DNR also plans to keep doing its biannual aerial surveys. The next one is in 2026. The department will then examine how the camera and aerial survey methods match up by results and cost-effectiveness, per the DNR. "We will compare the results from these different survey methods and balance the precision of the estimates they provide with the resources they require," said Angela Kujawa, a DNR wildlife biologist. Here's what to know about elk in Michigan. What are elk? Elk are the second-largest animal species in the deer family, per the U.S. Forest Service. How will the DNR use cameras to survey elk? The Michigan DNR will introduce trail cameras as a new option to track the state's elk population, per the news release. The DNR will collect data from the cameras each summer from 2025-2027 and analyze the photos using AI technology and human review in partnership with the Michigan Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit at Michigan State University, the release said. Any pictures of humans will be deleted. The analysis will include using MegaDetector, an open-source program to detect photos of animals; uploading the photos to Wildlife Insights, a cloud-based platform, to detect photos of elk, with a human checking the photos; and the MSU Cooperative Team seasonal staffers verifying the technology accurately detected photos of elk, per the release. Where are the trail cameras? The DNR's Wildlife Division has set up about 200 battery-powered cameras in and around Michigan's 1,100 square miles of core elk range in the northern Lower Peninsula in preparation for the next survey, the DNR said. The department placed most cameras on state-managed land, while DNR researchers also worked with landowners and put cameras on private land, per the DNR. The cameras were placed on trees about 40 inches off the ground, the release says. The devices take pictures using infrared and motion detection and store the photos on SD cards. How will the DNR use elk teeth to survey population? DNR researchers will analyze elk teeth from animals hunted this fall and winter for statistical population reconstruction, a low-cost method to survey Michigan's elk population, the release said. This would be in addition to the aerial survey and trail camera options. The DNR will consider whether results are accurate and if so, it could use this technique annually and allow for holding the other survey about every three to five years instead of biannually, per the release. How does the DNR track Michigan elk? The DNR has been doing aerial surveys every other year for over 20 years to gauge the state's elk herd, the department said. The aerial survey typically include two planes flying each day with two DNR observers on board each plane over the course of eight days, the release said. However, lack of adequate snow cover during the January survey time recently has complicated efforts, leading to an uncertainty rate of about 25%, per the DNR. What is happening to the aerial survey? The DNR will continue the aerial survey, holding its next one in 2026 as the department looks into the best option for estimating Michigan's elk population, per the release. What is the DNR's broader plan for tracking elk? The various methods factor into Michigan's elk management plan as officials seek to maintain a sustainable elk population and habitat balance, the release said. The DNR plans to compare outcomes after testing these new techniques to decide which is the best option, considering cost and results, per the release. "That management plan really guides the information we need to manage our elk herd," said Tyler Petroelje, the DNR's northern Michigan wildlife research specialist. "And so we have a responsibility to follow the management plan to estimate elk abundance with the best tools that are available." How many elk live in Michigan? The Michigan elk population is estimated at 1,146, as of the most recent aerial elk survey conducted by the DNR in 2024. The survey's plus/minus 262 confidence interval means the total population could range between 884 to 1,408. Why is it important to know Michigan's elk population? The DNR must keep track of the size of the elk herd in Michigan to know how many elk hunting licenses to issue per year, the release said. The department holds annual hunting seasons to effectively manage the state's elk population. In 2025, period 1 of elk hunting runs from Aug. 26-29, Sept. 12-15 and Sept. 26-29 and period 2 of elk hunting from Dec. 13-21, per the DNR's website. What's the history of elk in Michigan? Michigan's current elk population comes from reintroducing elk in 1918 after the state's native herd disappeared around 1875, the DNR says. Population growth led to limited hunting in the mid-1960s, though factors like reduced habitat quality and poaching brought a severe decline by the mid-1970s, per the DNR. Rehabilitation efforts led to a population rebound by 1984, though this prompted hunting to resume amid elk damage to forests and agriculture, the DNR said. How can you see elk in Michigan? If you're looking to catch a glimpse of elk in the wild, fall breeding season is a great time, Pure Michigan recommends. You can find elk feeding in open grassy areas in northern Michigan in September and October, with dawn and dusk being the best viewing times. Remember never to approach the elk. Be sure to bring along binoculars, snacks, drinks, a paper map and have a full tank of gas. Check out this elk viewing guide to prepare for your adventure. Contact Jenna Prestininzi: jprestininzi@ This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: How elk teeth, trail cameras will help DNR survey Michigan elk herd Solve the daily Crossword
UPI
a day ago
- UPI
Study shows rising popularity of over-the-counter birth control pill
Two years after U.S. approval of the first over-the-counter birth control pill, new research shows many people who face barriers to care are turning to it. File Photo by Billie Jean Shaw/UPI Two years after U.S. approval of the first over-the-counter birth control pill, new research shows many people who face barriers to medical care are turning to it. The study, published Monday in JAMA Network Open, included data from 986 people ages 15 to 45 across 44 states. All had obtained the pill -- known as Opill -- either online or from a pharmacy. Researchers found many switched from less effective birth control methods or from using no contraception at all. There was a 31.8% increase in use among people who had previously used no birth control, and a 41% increase among those who had relied on methods like condoms or emergency contraception. Opill, made by drug company Perrigo, is a progestin-only pill that can be bought without a prescription. When the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved it in 2023, it said the move could help lower barriers to access. At that time, the FDA noted that nearly half of the 6.1 million pregnancies in the U.S. each year are unintended, CBS News reported. "This is one of the first studies to show that over-the-counter birth control pills are reaching the very people they're meant to help -- those who face the greatest barriers to care," said lead study author Dr. Maria Rodriguez, a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at Oregon Health & Science University in Portland. The study found that people using the OTC pill were more often uninsured, younger (15 to 20 years of age), and living in rural areas. The top reason people gave for choosing the OTC pill was that it did not require a doctor's appointment. Others said they did not have a regular physician. "At a time when pregnancy is becoming even more dangerous in the United States -- especially for people of color, those with low incomes and those living in rural communities -- our findings underscore that OTC contraception is a powerful tool for reproductive autonomy," Rodriguez said in a news release. An outside expert who reviewed the findings agreed. Dr. Jessica Shepherd is a board-certified OB/GYN and chief medical officer of the online health company Hers. "While greater access to contraception without prescriptions can be life-changing for women with limited resources, it also highlights how deeply the repercussions of unplanned pregnancies still ripple through health care systems and communities," she told CBS News. "Unplanned pregnancies often result in higher maternal and infant health risks, financial strain and long-term socioeconomic challenges-consequences that weigh most heavily on women who already face barriers to care," Shepherd added. More information Learn more about how Opill works. Copyright © 2025 HealthDay. All rights reserved.
The Hill
3 days ago
- The Hill
Critics shouldn't block NASA's nuclear path to a moon base
Sean Duffy, NASA's interim administrator, proved that the U.S. is serious about establishing a lunar base when he announced the deployment of a 100-kilowatt nuclear reactor on the moon by 2030. The idea, although a sound one, is not without its critics. The announcement that the first element of a lunar base will be a nuclear reactor was logical. Nuclear power, unlike solar, is available 24/7 and thus does not require backup batteries during periods when the sun is not available. That the reactor is first means that every other element of the lunar base can be hooked up and powered up immediately. As NPR notes, a 100-kilowatt reactor on Earth would be able to power 70 to 80 private homes in the United States, so it could power a decent-sized lunar base. It would have to withstand the extremes of heat and cold on the moon, not to mention the possibility of moonquakes and meteor strikes. Instead of water to cool it, the reactor would simply radiate the heat it creates into space. The cost would be about $3 billion. Space lawyer Michelle Hanlon describes some of the legal aspects of placing a nuclear reactor on the moon, especially in context of the space race with China. While the Outer Space Treaty prohibits claims of national sovereignty on the moon, the establishment of a nuclear reactor, especially with a lunar base attached to it, grants the nation-state that does it some measure of control over the surrounding territory. Its Article IX requires that states act 'with due regard to the corresponding interests of all other States Parties to the Treaty.' The practical effect of the Article IX provision is that the first country to establish a lunar base on the moon's south pole would be able to claim control over some prime real estate, important where ice mining is likely to be an essential enterprise. Duffy is therefore correct that the U.S. and its allies should be first with a nuclear reactor and a lunar base before China can establish its own and thus exert control. The idea of a nuclear-powered lunar base is not without its critics. For example, a CBS News host opined that colonizing the moon was akin to the colonization of native peoples on Earth by European powers. Celebrity astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson set him straight by pointing out that no native peoples exist on the moon or anywhere else in the solar system beyond Earth. The exchange elicited eyerolling on the Fox News show 'The Five.' But even there, some griping occurred. Dana Perino, who used to work for President George W. Bush, expressed considerable ennui about the whole concept of space travel. From the perspective of someone who has seen a space shuttle launch in person and watched men walk on the moon live on television, the attitude seems to be bizarre and dispiriting. Tyrus, the former wrestler turned social and political commentator, trotted out the 'let's solve problems on Earth before we go into space' trope that has been around since the beginning of the space age. The obvious answer has always been, 'Do both.' Ross Marchand, writing for Real Clear Science, noted the $37 trillion national debt and then claimed that building a lunar base would be just too expensive. He undermined his argument by comparing the 100-kilowatt lunar nuclear power plant to the 1-gigawatt reactors that exist on Earth and cost $10 billion to build (largely because of permitting and environmental regulation problems). Then he increased the estimated cost by a factor of 10 'or more.' Although NASA projects often do suffer cost overruns, $3 billion to $100 billion would be a little much, even for the space agency with its history of inefficiency. Marchand also trotted out the 'robots can explore space cheaper and better than humans' claim that was soundly debunked by the late, great lunar geologist Paul Spudis. In fact, returning to the moon and going on to Mars also polls well and has bipartisan political support, even it still has its critics. No great endeavor ever undertaken since the beginning of civilization has not had people saying it can't or shouldn't be done. The International Space Station, for example, drew fierce opposition and was almost cancelled more than once. The orbiting space laboratory is currently churning out a stream of scientific discoveries and technological innovations, confounding its early critics, who are long since forgotten. The lunar base and even Elon Musk's planned Mars colony will undergo a similar process. Future generations will find it difficult to imagine a universe where humans just occupied one world. Mark R. Whittington, who writes frequently about space policy, has published a political study of space exploration entitled ' Why is It So Hard to Go Back to the Moon? ' as well as ' The Moon, Mars and Beyond,' and, most recently,' Why is America Going Back to the Moon? ' He blogs at Curmudgeons Corner.
