Social Security changes in 2025: How old you need to be for full benefits in Minnesota
A record number of Americans are turning 65 each year through 2027. However, that's not old enough to receive full Social Security benefits. In 1983, Congress passed a law that gradually raised the full retirement age from 65 to 67 to account for longer life expectancies and help sustain Social Security funds. As of this year, 67 is officially the milestone age for full benefits, applying to those born in 1960 or later.
About 1.2 Minnesota residents receive Social Security as of November 2024 according to government statistics. Minnesota exempts some or all federally taxable Social Security benefits from state benefit taxes.
More: Retirees in Minnesota may lose some Social Security benefits at tax time: What to know
Everyone can start receiving reduced Social Security benefits as early as age 62. However, waiting until full retirement age results in a larger monthly payment. Since the full retirement age has gradually increased, knowing your specific eligibility age is crucial to maximizing your benefits for yourself and your survivors.
Waiting until full retirement age ensures you receive 100% of your benefits. Additionally, "it also means your spouse may receive higher spousal and/or survivor benefits," said Ben Rizzuto, wealth strategist at Janus Henderson Investors.
The FRA adjustment is one of five changes to Social Security that took effect in 2025. The others are a cost-of-living adjustment, increased work credit requirements, a higher payroll tax ceiling, and higher earnings test limits.
More: 4 restaurants under 1 roof The House Food and Tap opens in St. Joseph, bringing 4 restaurants together under one roof
Your FRA, also known as normal retirement age, depends on your birth year:
1943-1954: 66 years.
1955: 66 years and two months.
1956: 66 years and four months.
1957: 66 years and six months.
1958: 66 years and eight months.
1959: 66 years and 10 months.
1960 or later: 67 years.
You can also use the Social Security Administration's tool to calculate your full retirement age by entering your birthdate. Note: If you were born on Jan. 1 of any year, your full retirement age aligns with the previous year.
Yes, you can claim Social Security benefits as early as age 62, but your benefit will be permanently reduced. The reduction is calculated based on how many months before FRA you begin collecting benefits.
For example, if you turn 62 in 2025, your benefit would be about 30% lower than waiting until 67.
Some financial experts, including Dave Ramsey, suggest considering early Social Security collection and investing the money. While the monthly check would be smaller, investing it in the stock market—historically averaging a 10% annual return—could offset the reduction.
For those retiring early due to health issues, SSA recommends applying for Social Security disability benefits. These benefits equal a full, unreduced retirement benefit and automatically convert to regular Social Security at full retirement age.
Delaying Social Security beyond your full retirement age can significantly boost your monthly check. For each full year you delay, up to age 70, your benefit increases by 8%.
"This is where a lot of value can be gained by waiting to file for benefits," Rizzuto said. "However, someone needs to ensure they have assets and income to support themselves before they take Social Security."
Additionally, continuing to work past your full retirement age can further increase benefits, as each extra year of earnings is factored into your Social Security record. Higher lifetime earnings generally result in higher monthly benefits.
Although benefits increase until age 70, most Americans claim Social Security early. A 2024 Employee Benefit Research Institute survey found:
The median retirement age is 62, despite many intending to wait until at least 65.
The median age at which people start collecting Social Security is 64, though most plan to wait until 65.
35% of retirees leave the workforce earlier than expected due to health issues or disabilities.
An additional 31% retire due to workplace changes, while 35% retire because they can afford to.
Social Security benefits adjust monthly. As of January 2025, the average benefit was $1,976, according to SSA.
For comparison, in 1975, the average benefit was just $207.
Contributing: USA Today Network.
This article originally appeared on Kitsap Sun: How old you need to be for full Social Security benefits
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
My mother-in-law thought the world's richest man needed Apple gift cards. How on Earth could she fall for this scam?
We just found out that my 75-year-old mother-in-law is a victim of an online scammer. Her cognition is clearly impaired. She has several health problems. We are getting power of attorney and access to her bank accounts. She is definitely lonely. That, I believe, is the root cause. But that's not an excuse to believe that the world's richest man needs you to send him Apple AAPL gift cards. Her siblings are all shocked that she would believe this. How could this happen? Her only income is Social Security and a small pension. Her only asset is her home. It's paid off. My husband had a brief meeting with a lawyer who offered to transfer the deed to my husband to avoid the five-year look-back rule etc. (His mother agreed to it.) My mother-in-law currently gets a large senior tax break on her property taxes of $4,000 a year, which will go away if we transfer the deed. Should we put the house in a trust? What happens to the proceeds when sold? Israel-Iran clash delivers a fresh shock to investors. History suggests this is the move to make. 'I'm 68 and my 401(k) has dwindled to $82,000': My husband committed financial infidelity and has $50,000 in credit-card debt. What now? I'm in my 80s and have 2 kids. How do I choose between them to be my executor? Here's why stocks, bitcoin and gold are racing to record highs at the same time. It hasn't happened in over 10 years. Walmart's stock looks like it's in trouble. What the chart says may come next. Daughter-in-Law Related: I'm 57 and ready to retire next year on $7,500 a month, but my wife says no. Who's right? You have answered your first question. Loneliness and impaired cognition is a potent combination for scammers and fraudsters. Your mother-in-law wants to believe there's another person out there in the ether who takes an interest in her, and 'sees' her literally and figuratively, but her ability to process what is real and what is fake may also be impaired. The smartest people can fall victim to scams at a vulnerable moment and suspend their disbelief, as if watching a play, until it's too late. There have been cases recently where older people were scammed of six figures by thieves using AI and/or pretending to be famous people. In January, a French woman said she was conned out of €830,000 (approximately $868,000) by someone pretending to be the actor Brad Pitt. She received even more online abuse from people mocking her. She told reporters: 'I came forward because I am not the only one.' While your husband's power-of-attorney document will expire after your mother-in-law's death, estate plans often include what's called a 'durable' power of attorney. This permits the trusted individual (in this case, your husband) to retain power of attorney if and/or when your mother-in-law can no longer make decisions for herself. A conservatorship is an involuntary process and takes place when a person is unable to take care of their finances. Each state has its own rules for guardianships and conservatorships. To apply to be a conservator, your husband would need to file a petition with the probate court in the county where your mother-in-law lives and detail all the responsibilities, powers and duties he intends to take on for her. He would also need to submit a plan for her care. That does not, from what you say, appear to be required in this case. Your mother-in-law or her POA should also freeze her credit with all three major credit bureaus — Experian EXPGF, TransUnion TRU and Equifax EFX EFX — so no one can take out loans or open accounts in her name. People 60 and older are five times as likely as younger consumers to report losing money to tech-related scams, according to the Federal Trade Commission. Phone scams are the No. 1 scam affecting older people, followed by computer-related fraud. You should consult an attorney who specializes in elder law. A person's home is generally exempt as long as it is a principal residence and your equity doesn't exceed a certain amount. Other exemptions, depending on where you live, include one automobile as long as it's used to get to and from work, used to obtain medical treatment or is essential because you have a disability. Personal property used as investments — such as artwork — may not be exempt. The laws on property also vary, depending on where she lives. Several states, including Florida, New York and California, have rules that exempt a primary residence from assets calculated by Medicaid under certain circumstances. In many states, your mother-in-law or her spouse (if he were alive) would need to live in the home or have plans to return to it (if it's empty) if you wish the property to remain exempt from Medicaid. While one's primary home is generally not counted toward Medicaid's asset limit, it is not exempt from Medicaid's Estate Recovery Program, the American Council on Aging says. Your state Medicaid agency may attempt reimbursement of care costs through whatever estate of the deceased remains, and that includes the home. Furthermore, if your mother-in-law signs over her home to your husband, he will lose his step-up in-basis tax advantage. As you suggest, some people plan ahead by establishing an irrevocable trust before the five-year look-back rule. By transferring your assets into an irrevocable trust, you no longer own them and, therefore, they are exempt from Medicaid. 'They also protect assets for one's children and other relatives, which is a win-win for Medicaid applicants and their families,' says the American Council on Aging. A Medicaid Asset Protection Trust (or irrevocable income-only trust) can protect the assets of a person who wishes to apply for Medicaid, as long as this is done before the look-back period. You can include stocks and bonds, bank accounts and CDs, and secondary properties. With a MAPT, you are giving up control of these assets. Medicaid can challenge the trust, and the challenge can be complex and expensive. It will be an easier path ahead if your mother-in-law is open to help. Related: My wife asked for a divorce after 21 years. She wants to buy a house with our savings, but promises to help pay my mortgage. Previous columns by Quentin Fottrell: My husband will inherit $180K. I think we should invest the money. He wants to pay off his $168K mortgage. Who's right? 'I'm at a loss': My boyfriend of nearly 10 years is naming his elderly parents as beneficiaries and giving them power of attorney. Am I right to be upset? 'We have no prenuptial agreement': Will my wife be able to take my money if I transfer it to my retirement account? . My friend, 83, wants to add me to his bank account to pay his bills. What could go wrong? 'It might be another Apple or Microsoft': My wife invested $100K in one stock and it exploded 1,500%. Do we sell? My life partner is 18 years my senior. He wants to leave his $4.5 million fortune to me — not his two kids. Do we tell them? 'I prepaid our mom's rent for a year': My sister is a millionaire and never helps our mother. How do I cut her out of her will? 'I am getting very frustrated': My mother's adviser has not returned my calls. He manages $1 million. Is this normal?
33 minutes ago
Republican enthusiasm for Musk cools after his feud with Trump, a new poll finds
WASHINGTON -- Tech billionaire Elon Musk has lost some of his luster with Republicans since his messy public falling-out with President Donald Trump last week, a new survey finds. Fewer Republicans view Trump's onetime government efficiency bulldog 'very favorably' compared with April, according to the poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research. Though most Republicans continue to hold a positive view of Musk, their diminished fervor suggests his vocal opposition to Trump's signature spending and tax cut legislation — and Musk's subsequent online political and personal taunts — may have cost him some enthusiasm within the party. 'Some things have happened lately that have changed how I feel about him a little,' said Alabama Republican Katye Long, whose feelings for Musk have cooled to 'somewhat favorable.' 'I liked what he was doing when he was helping. But now I feel like he's kind of hurting,' said the 34-year-old automotive component factory employee and mother of three from Woodstock, Alabama. 'I also don't feel like he matters that much. He's not actually part of the government. He's just a rich guy who pushes his opinions.' Musk's overall popularity hasn't shifted, the poll found, and most of the shift among Democrats and Republicans was between 'very' and 'somewhat' strong opinions. Americans are less likely to view him favorably than his electric vehicle company, Tesla. That said, about half of Americans have a negative opinion of Tesla, highlighting another challenge for Musk when the company has dropped in value and been the target of protests in the U.S. and Europe. About one-third have a favorable view of Tesla, while about 2 in 10 don't know enough to say. Even a subtle shift in the intensity of Republicans' feelings about Musk could be important as the electric car and aerospace mogul weighs a second political act after spending about $200 million in service of Trump's 2024 election effort. After decrying the GOP's massive tax and budget policy bill as 'a disgusting abomination,' Musk wrote on X, his social media platform, 'In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people.' The poll suggests the messy feud with Trump may have rubbed some Republicans the wrong way, as the share of Republicans viewing Musk as 'very favorable' has dropped from 38% in April to 26% now. At the same time, antipathy toward Musk among Democrats has waned a little. About two-thirds, 65%, of Democrats have a very negative view of Musk, down slightly from about three-quarters, 74%, in April. Musk's bitter back-and-forth with Trump has business implications, too. Tesla was already struggling with a backlash against Musk's association with Trump. Sales across Europe plunged by half in May, even as growth in the electric car market accelerated. Then the company's shares plunged in value when Musk began sparring publicly with the president. Victoria Brown, of Kansas City, Kansas, rated Tesla 'somewhat unfavorable' because she objects to how Trump is conducting his administration and links the company's owner with the president's agenda. 'I don't favor Trump. So, pretty much the fact that they have been working together means I don't care too much for Tesla,' said Brown, 63, a political independent and an insurance agent. While the intensity of people's feelings about Musk may have changed, their overall opinions have not. About one-third of U.S. adults have a favorable opinion of Musk, compared with about 6 in 10 who hold an unfavorable view, while about 1 in 10 don't know enough to say. That's unchanged from the April poll. The new poll was conducted June 5-9, after Musk left his government role and began attacking Trump's marquee legislative priority. Musk's public clash with Trump began four days after Trump honored Musk effusively during an Oval Office event discharging him from duties as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency. After first tearing down the budget bill, Musk two days later complained he had never seen the language, and he aimed his fire at Trump, suggesting the president didn't sufficiently appreciate the role Musk assumed as the chief benefactor to Trump's reelection effort. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Musk wrote. 'Such ingratitude.' Musk went on to claim without evidence that the federal government was concealing information about Trump's association with infamous pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Musk deleted the post, and early Wednesday he stepped back from his attacks on Trump, writing on X that he regretted some of his posts and they 'went too far.' Tesla endured a difficult first quarter in 2025, with its sales falling while the world's leading electric car manufacturer faced protests in showrooms. The new poll also shows that Tesla is viewed far more negatively than some of its peers — notably, Ford, Toyota and General Motors. Only about one-third of U.S. adults have a 'very' or 'somewhat' favorable view of Tesla. About half of U.S. adults have an unfavorable opinion of Tesla, including 30% of Republicans. Democrats, at 66%, are more than twice as likely as Republicans to have a negative view of Tesla. But even among Republicans, Tesla is viewed less favorably than the other brands. Marisa Mills is no Musk fan. The 41-year-old teacher from Oakland, California, objects to his association with Trump and what the Democrat sees as their misguided notion that government is always well served by operating like a business. And yet she was once proud to have Tesla building cars in her own county. She soured on the company in 2020, when Musk sued Alameda County over its workplace restrictions during the coronavirus pandemic, before he moved the company to Texas in 2021. 'My government is supposed to serve the people, not his company. We were all glad to see him go,' Mills said. 'I do regret that we now have feelings of regret for the Tesla car product. We were once so proud.' ___ Beaumont reported from Des Moines, Iowa. ___ The AP-NORC poll of 1,158 adults was conducted June 5-9, using a sample drawn from NORC's probability-based AmeriSpeak Panel, which is designed to be representative of the U.S. population. The margin of sampling error for adults overall is plus or minus 4 percentage points. ___ The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. The AP is solely responsible for all content. Find the AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at
Atlantic
38 minutes ago
- Atlantic
Aging in America Is About to Get Worse
At the core of every joke about Baby Boomers lies a seed of jealousy. Unlike younger generations, they have largely been able to walk a straightforward path toward prosperity, security, and power. They were born in an era of unprecedented economic growth and stability. College was affordable, and they graduated in a thriving job market. They were the first generation to reap the full benefits of a golden age of medical innovations: birth control, robotic surgery, the mapping of the human genome, effective cancer treatments, Ozempic. But recent policy changes are poised to make life significantly harder for Baby Boomers. 'If you're in your 60s or 70s, what the Trump administration has done means more insecurity for your assets in your 401(k), more insecurity about sources of long-term care, and, for the first time, insecurity about your Social Security benefits,' Teresa Ghilarducci, a labor economist at the New School, told me. 'It's a triple threat.' After more than half a century of aging into political and economic trends that worked to their benefit, the generation has become particularly vulnerable at exactly the wrong moment in history. Perhaps the biggest threat to Boomers in the second Trump administration is an overhaul of Social Security, which provides benefits to nearly nine out of 10 Americans ages 65 and older. In an emailed statement, Social Security Commissioner Frank Bisignano wrote, 'I am fully committed to upholding President Trump's promise to protect and strengthen Social Security. Beneficiaries can be confident that their benefits are secure.' But in February, DOGE announced plans to cut Social Security staff by about 12 percent and close six of its 10 regional offices; a quarter of the agency's IT staff has quit or been fired. Social Security's long-term outlook was already troubled before Trump, and these drastic reductions make the understaffed agency even less equipped to support those who rely on it. Shutting down field offices means seniors can't get help in person; less staffing means longer wait times when they call and more frequent website crashes. 'When you add hurdles, or cause a slowdown in terms of processing claims, you see losses in terms of benefits,' Monique Morrissey, a senior economist at the Economic Policy Institute, told me. In fact, shutdowns of field offices during the first two years of the coronavirus pandemic corresponded with decreased enrollment in both Social Security and Social Security Disability Insurance, which is available to Americans under 65 who can no longer work for physical or mental reasons. Social Security cuts will most hurt low-income Boomers, who are the likeliest to rely on benefits to cover their whole cost of living. But even those with more financial assets may depend on Social Security as a safety net. 'It's important to understand that many seniors, even upper-income seniors, are just one shock away from falling into poverty,' says Nancy J. Altman, the president of Social Security Works, an organization that advocates for expanding the program. As a whole, seniors have more medical needs and less income than the general population, so they're much more financially vulnerable. If you're comfortably middle-class in your early 60s, at the height of your earning potential, that's no guarantee that you'll remain comfortably middle-class into your 70s. In the next few years, Boomers who face more medical bills as they stop working might find, for the first time in their life, that they can't easily afford them. Middle-income seniors are also likely to feel the impact of a volatile market. 'They tend to have modest investments and fixed incomes rather than equities, so the type of wealth that will erode over a high-inflation period,' Laura D. Quinby, who studies benefits and labor markets at the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College, told me. After Trump announced 10 percent tariffs on all imported goods in April, the three major stock indexes dropped 4 percent or more. They've since recovered, but the erratic market—whipped around by Trump's shifting proclamations about tariffs—scares many middle-class Boomers, who are watching their retirement savings shrink. In the near future, older Americans might find themselves paying more for medical care too. Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' which has passed in the House but awaits a vote in the Senate, would substantially limit Medicare access for many documented immigrants, including seniors who have paid taxes in the United States for years. The bill would also reduce Medicaid enrollment by about 10.3 million people. Although Medicaid is for people with limited incomes of all ages, it supports many older Americans and pays for more than half of long-term care in the U.S. Most seniors require some sort of nursing home or at-home medical care; one study found that 70 percent of adults who live to 65 will require long-term services and support. That support may soon be not only more expensive, but harder to come by. The long-term-care workforce is disproportionately made up of immigrants, so the Trump administration's immigration crackdown is likely to reduce the number of people available to take care of seniors—and increase how much it costs to hire them. 'If you have no money, you'll be on Medicaid in a nursing home, and that's that. But if you're trying to avoid that fate, you're now going to run through your money more quickly and be more vulnerable,' Morrissey said. Seniors with some financial security are more likely to live long enough to contend with the diseases of old age, such as Alzheimer's and dementia. The Trump administration has cut funding for promising research on these diseases. 'Going forward, you'll find less treatments reaching fruition,' Thomas Grabowski, who directs the Memory and Brain Wellness Center at the University of Washington, told me. For now, the UW Memory and Brain Wellness Center, where Grabowski works on therapies for Alzheimer's, has stopped bringing in new participants; as time goes on, he said, they'll have to tighten more. (Kush Desai, a White House spokesperson, told me in an email that the cuts to research funded by the National Institutes of Health are 'better positioning' the agency 'to deliver on medical breakthroughs that actually improve Americans' health and wellbeing.') Changes at the UW Memory and Brain Wellness Center could have dramatic effects on current patients, including Bob Pringle, a 76-year-old who lives in Woodinville, Washington. In April, he started getting infusions of donanemab, an anti-amyloid medication approved by the FDA last year. The drug doesn't cure Alzheimer's; it's designed to slow the disease's progression, though the utility of donanemab and other Alzheimer's drugs remains controversial among experts. Pringle, for one, has found donanemab helpful. 'With the medication, my decline is a gentle slope, rather than a rapid decline,' says Pringle, whose mother died of Alzheimer's and whose sister lives in a memory-care facility. 'You're always hopeful that somebody with a bigger brain than you have is working on a cure, and the medication gives us some time until then,' Bob's wife and caretaker, Tina Pringle, told me. 'But right now, because of the funding cuts, our outlook is grim.' The unknowability of the future has always been a scary part of getting older. The enormous upheaval that the Trump administration has created will only magnify that uncertainty for Boomers. After a historical arc of good fortune, their golden generation has to contend with bad timing. Younger generations, including my own, shouldn't gloat, though: Cuts to Social Security and a halt to medical research could well worsen the experience of aging for generations to come. Younger Americans will likely grow old under challenging conditions too. Unlike the Boomers, we'll have plenty of time to get used to the idea.
