Fnac Darty met en œuvre un programme de rachat
Fnac Darty implements a share buyback program
Fnac Darty has announced the implementation of a share buyback program for a total of 600,000 shares as part of the share buyback program authorised at the Shareholders' Meeting of May 28, 2025.
A first buyback mandate has been granted to investment services provider NATIXIS for a maximum amount of €5 million.
This initiative follows on from the Board of Directors' decision to allow share buyback in the proportion necessary to offset the dilution caused by the vesting of free shares allocated to the Group's employees and Corporate Officers.
CONTACTS
ANALYSTS/INVESTORS
Domitille Vielle — Head of Investor Relations — domitille.vielle@fnacdarty.com — +33 (0)6 03 86 05 02
Laura Parisot — Investor Relations Manager — laura.parisot@fnacdarty.com — +33 (0)6 64 74 27 18
PRESS
Bénédicte Debusschere – Head of Media Relations and Influence – benedicte.debusschere@fnacdarty.com – +33 (0)6 48 56 70 71
Pièce jointe
20250611_Fnac_Darty_CP_SBB_vFR vDef
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
4 minutes ago
- Euronews
Monthly rents in European city centres: 2020 vs 2025
As rent prices across the bloc keep climbing, the biggest jump in costs over the past five years was detected in Southern and Eastern Europe. This is according to a recent Deutsche Bank report, which scrutinised 67 cities worldwide and 28 in Europe. According to Eurostat, house prices increased by 27.3% between the first quarters of 2020 and 2025, while rents rose by 12.5% from June 2020 to June 2025. But this report indicates that rent increases in city centres were significantly greater than this average. So, as of 2025, which European cities have the most expensive rents? Where are rents the most affordable? And which cities have seen the largest increases since 2020? Athens is the cheapest, London the most expensive In 2025, the monthly rent for a three-bedroom flat in the centre of 28 cities in Europe ranges from €1,080 in Athens to €5,088 (or £4,278) in London. European cities can be grouped into three categories based on rent levels: After London, the most expensive places to rent in Europe are Zurich, Geneva, and Amsterdam, all above €3,800. Swiss cities are the priciest, with rents over €4,250. Dublin, Luxembourg, Paris, Copenhagen, and Munich also have high rents, all above €3,000. These cities are major financial, political, or international centres, driving strong demand for housing. Several well-developed cities have mid-range rents between €2,000 and €3,000. Milan, Edinburgh, and Lisbon are on the higher end of this range. Madrid, Stockholm, Berlin, Frankfurt, and Barcelona are a bit more affordable, with average rents around €2,500. Birmingham, Brussels, Vienna, and Prague are closer to €2,100. These cities offer relatively lower living costs compared to the top tier. Only five European cities have average rents below €2,000. In addition to the lowest, Athens, they include Budapest (€1,225), Istanbul (€1,614), Warsaw (€1,881), and Helsinki (€1,928). These figures show that Western and Northern Europe have the highest rents. Strong economies, high living standards, and housing shortages are key factors in these cities. Southern and Central Europe have more mixed rent levels, while Eastern and Southeastern Europe remain the most affordable. When non-European countries are included in the report, New York stands out as an outlier with average rents of €7,676 ($8,388), while Cairo is the cheapest at just €377. Average salaries in the city centres of Dubai and Sydney exceed €4,000. This makes them more expensive than most European cities. Rents in Toronto, Seoul, Tokyo, Moscow, and Shanghai fall into the mid-range at around €2,500. Rents for a one-bedroom apartment in the centre Rent for a one-bedroom dwelling mostly follows the same pattern as three-bedroom. However, some cities change places in the ranking. The price ratios are also different. Still, London (€2,732 or £2,297) remains the most expensive in Europe, while Athens (€595) is the cheapest. In general, one-bedroom apartments cost about half as much as three-bedroom ones. This share rises to 64% in Oslo and 62% in San Francisco, but drops to 37% in Seoul. That's why San Francisco surpasses London in one-bedroom rent prices globally. Where rents increased the most The report shows figures in US dollars, but we converted them to euros for a fairer comparison. Changes may differ when viewed in local currencies. Between 2020 and 2025, monthly rent for a three-bedroom apartment in city centres across Europe increased by between 3% in Helsinki and 206% in Istanbul. In general, Southern and Eastern Europe experienced the strongest rent increases. Lisbon (81%), Prague (73%), and Edinburgh (71%) followed Istanbul, each with rises of over 70%. Rents also rose significantly in Spain—by 65% in Barcelona and 59% in Madrid. Athens and Warsaw were the other two European cities that saw just over 50% increases. Rent changes vary by apartment size For a one-bedroom apartment in the city centre, the highest and lowest rent increases across Europe between 2020 and 2025 were still seen in Istanbul (191%) and Helsinki (18%). The increase in Helsinki was higher compared to that for a three-bedroom flat (3%). In some cities, the rent increase was higher for three-bedroom apartments—such as Istanbul (15 percentage points more), Prague (23 pp), and Amsterdam (10 pp). Other cities saw greater increases for one-bedroom flats, including Milan (20 pp) and Warsaw (10 pp). 'Big cities, bigger housing costs' shows how housing prices can vary significantly within a country. For example, housing in London is 50% more expensive than the UK average. Income levels matter when discussing rent affordability. 'Europe's cities ranked by rent-to-salary ratio' article compares average incomes with rental costs.
France 24
33 minutes ago
- France 24
Tunisia plastic collectors spread as economic, migration woes deepen
The 40-something-year-old said he starts the day off at dawn, hunching over bins and hunting for plastic before the rubbish trucks and other plastic collectors come. "It's the most accessible work in Tunisia when there are no job offers," Jabbari said, weighing a day's haul in Bhar Lazreg, a working-class neighbourhood north of the capital, Tunis. The work is often gruelling, with a kilogramme of plastic bottles worth only 0.5 to 0.7 Tunisian dinar -- less than $0.25. In Tunis, it's common to see women weighed down by bags of plastic bottles along the roadside, or men weaving through traffic with towering loads strapped to their motorcycles. "Everyone does it," said Jabbari. 'Supplementary job' Hamza Chaouch, head of the National Chamber of Recyclable Waste Collectors, estimated that there were roughly 25,000 plastic collectors across Tunisia, with 40 percent of them in the capital. Yet, with the job an informal one, there is no official count of how many plastic collectors operate in Tunisia. One thing is certain: their number has increased in recent years, said Chaouch, who also runs a plastic collection centre south of Tunis. "It's because of the cost of living," he explained. "At first, it was people with no income, but for the past two years, workers, retirees and cleaning women have also turned to this work as a supplementary job." Around 16 percent of Tunisians lived under the poverty line as of 2021, the latest available official figures. Unemployment currently hovers around 16 percent, with inflation at 5.4 percent. The ranks of these recyclers have also grown with the arrival of migrants from sub-Saharan Africa -- often hoping to reach Europe but caught in limbo with both the EU and Tunis cracking down on Mediterranean crossings. Tunisia is a key transit country for thousands of sub-Saharan migrants seeking to reach Europe by sea each year, with the Italian island of Lampedusa only 150 kilometres (90 miles) away. Abdelkoudouss, a 24-year-old from Guinea, said he began collecting plastic to make ends meet but also to save up enough money to return home after failing two crossing attempts to Europe. For the past two months, he has worked at a car wash, he said, but the low pay forced him to start recycling on the side. "Life here is not easy," said Abdelkoudouss, adding he came to the capital after receiving "a lot of threats" amid tension between migrants and locals in Sfax, a coastal city in central Tunisia. 'Just trying to survive' Thousands of migrants had set up camp on the outskirts of Sfax, before authorities began dismantling the makeshift neighbourhoods this year. Tensions flared in early 2023 when President Kais Saied said "hordes of sub-Saharan migrants" were threatening the country's demographic composition. Saied's statement was widely circulated online and unleashed a wave of hostility that many migrants feel still lingers. "There's a strong rivalry in this work," said Jabbari, glancing at a group of sub-Saharan African migrants nearby. "These people have made life even more difficult for us. I can't collect enough plastic because of them." Chaouch, the collection centre manager, was even more blunt: "We don't accept sub-Saharans at our centre. Priority goes to Tunisians." In contrast, 79-year-old Abdallah Omri, who heads another centre in Bhar Lazreg, said he "welcomes everyone". "The people who do this work are just trying to survive, whether they're Tunisian, sub-Saharan or otherwise," he said. "We're cleaning up the country and feeding families," he added proudly.
Euronews
34 minutes ago
- Euronews
On defence, France and Germany are inching closer but remain far apart
Germany is becoming more French - and vice versa - when it comes to defence but big differences in the state of their public finances and strategic thinking mean the so-called Franco-German engine is unlikely to be able to power a big shift in the way the EU as a whole does defence. "From a longer historical point of view, the degree of convergence (between the two countries) is arguably higher than it has been for, I would say, decades," Jacob F. Kirkegaard, a senior fellow at the Brussels-based Bruegel think tank, told Euronews. Both capitals see Russia as their biggest long-term threat, and both have pledged to pour hundreds of billions of euros into their military and defence industrial base. In Berlin, this has been dubbed a "Zeitenwende" (or historical turning point) while Paris said its latest military programmation law is "the ultimate strategic move". This convergence was driven by Russia's ongoing full-scale invasion of Ukraine, which brought back conventional war to European soil, Donald Trump's return to the White House, which has put in doubt continued long-term US commitment to Europe's security, and a change of leadership in Germany. The new chancellor, Friedrich Merz, "basically took what I can only describe as a Gaullist stance", Kirkegaard said, by saying that "Europe needs to prepare for a future without a US security guarantee". 'France is converging with Germany' Yet one example of how this rapprochement in defence remains a laborious process came last week when France's Emmanuel Macron and Merz sought to diffuse tensions over a joint €100 billion project to develop a sixth-generation fighter jet. At the core of the dispute is the demand by France to secure 80% of the workshare for the new Future Combat Air System (FCAS), negating previous agreements that it would be split equally between the two countries and Spain, which is also part of the project. The French demand, however, "should not be as surprising as it seems", Rafael Loss, a policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR), told Euronews, given that one of the major differences between France and Germany is how differently they view their military and the purpose they serve. The armed forces in France are part of the national foreign policy - as recent deployments in the Sahel attest - with the country's overseas territories and its possession of the nuclear weapon adding to its global perspective. "That's why the French military is much more comfortable with acting unilaterally or outside of EU, NATO contexts (than Germany's), and this then extends to the kinds of capabilities that the French armed forces prefer acquiring," Loss said. "Everything that relates to the French nuclear deterrent has to work when France is alone. And that means that FCAS, which is supposed to replace the Rafale fighter bombers going forward in carrying French nuclear weapons, French military and political leadership will not accept a situation where they're dependent to produce this capability because the nuclear deterrent depends on that capability." "French industry will need to be able to produce this aircraft by themselves if push comes to shove. They're willing to cooperate when strategic orientations align, but ultimately they have to produce everything independently of others. And again, that's something that many in Germany and across Europe haven't quite realised," he added. Still, Loss continued, "France is converging with Germany" with the "realisation that for the sake of European security, it needs to show that it invests in its partnerships and relationships with Europeans, especially those on the eastern flank". 'A big wasted opportunity' But the other major hurdle for the two to advance a common defence agenda at the EU level is the stark difference in their respective fiscal space. Germany's debt-to-Gross Domestic Product (GDP) ratio stood at 62.3% in the first quarter of the year. France's was at 114.1%, well above what the bloc's rules mandate (60%). This structural divergence means that as European countries aim to significantly ramp up their defence spending and military capabilities to deter a possible Russian attack towards the turn of the decade, Germany can afford to invest heavily in defence, while France cannot. For instance, Germany has asked to make use of a proposal by Brussels to loosen fiscal rules for defence spending, something France, which is targeted by an excessive deficit procedure, cannot do. France, which has consistently invested in defence over the last few decades, has less ground to cover, so to speak, but the sums advanced by the German government (including a €500 billion fund to boost the military and the country's infrastructure) should mean it catches up quickly. But their public finances also "fundamentally place them on different sides of negotiating tables" at the EU level, Kirkegaard said. The European Commission has put forward a plan to rearm Europe that it hopes will prompt member states to invest up to €800 billion before 2030. But most of that money is expected to come from member states' coffers, which in the case of France, are quite depleted. Given the scale of the task ahead, the Commission has been asked to come up with "innovative" financing options for defence. Macron has called for one of those options to be joint EU borrowing, something Germany has flat-out rejected. For Kirkegaard, this means that the crisis ushered in by Russia's war on Ukraine, is "a big wasted opportunity" for the bloc. "This crisis, the war in Ukraine, will not lead to materially more EU institutional or fiscal integration. It will lead to an expansion of the EU with Ukraine and maybe other countries but that's a different type of change to the EU and that's also very different than the last many big crises we've had," he said.
