
Can Netanyahu Now Become a Statesman?
The Israeli strategist Yehoshafat Harkabi once observed that in military doctrine, the enemy is a target to destroy, but in statesmanship, the enemy is a political entity to engage. Israel's tragedy today is that its leaders see only targets. Statesmanship — the work of building a future beyond the battlefield — has all but disappeared.
This is the moment to move on from intense military operations to political statecraft. As this latest round of hostilities with Iran draws to a close after the formidable U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, Israel is still mired in a grinding war of attrition in Gaza. This should be a stark reminder to its leaders that only diplomacy can end wars, and that advancing toward a resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a prerequisite to a better future.
Israel and the United States have good reason to confront Tehran, which armed and funded proxies from Lebanon to Yemen while evidence mounted that Iran was marching steadily toward a military nuclear capability. But military strikes alone cannot end this threat. Despite the remarkable Israeli and U.S. military achievements, the odds are long that the two countries can either fully dismantle those nuclear capabilities or remake Iran's regime. Without diplomacy, there is no path from confrontation to resolution — only continuing conflict or even escalation.
Similarly, it is high time to seek a comprehensive agreement over Gaza. After the 2020 Abraham Accords, Israel bet that it could reshape the Middle East while bypassing the Palestinian issue. That illusion was shattered on Oct. 7, 2023, when Hamas launched the single deadliest assault on Israel ever. Some 50 hostages remain in Hamas's hands.
Israel's initial military response was justified. But more than 20 months on, it remains without a political strategy. Who will govern a demilitarized Gaza in need of reconstruction when the war ends? What political horizon exists for Palestinians and Israelis? What framework for security and peace should be put in place to secure better regional harmony? Israel's refusal to answer these questions has deepened a humanitarian catastrophe, and pushed the country toward diplomatic isolation.
In both conflicts, Israel has failed to define what a military victory looks like. Is the goal to eliminate, destroy, cripple Hamas? Exile its leaders? Erase the threat of Hezbollah? Populate the Gaza Strip with Jewish settlements, as suggested by the radical factions of the Israeli government? Eliminate or just delay Iran's nuclear program? Eradicate Iran's ballistic and cruise missiles capabilities? Absent clear policy goals, even successful military operations lead nowhere.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNN
16 minutes ago
- CNN
Rep. Josh Gottheimer: Americans don't like Trump's big policy bill
Democratic Rep. Josh Gottheimer tells CNN's Wolf Blitzer what he's hoping to learn about the US strikes on Iran and weighs in on Trump's big policy bill as it faces a major setback in the Senate.


Bloomberg
25 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
China Confirms US Trade Framework as Trump Pursues More Deals
It's been a week of wins for US President Donald Trump. A ceasefire between Israel and Iran, NATO agreed to increase defense spending to 5% of GDP, and China on Friday saying it has further confirmed details of a trade framework with Washington under which it will deliver key rare earths. Officials from both countries have maintained close contact after holding trade talks in London earlier this month, a spokesperson for the Chinese Commerce Ministry said. The China deal, which US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said had been signed two days ago, codifies the terms laid out in trade talks between Beijing and Washington, including a commitment from China to deliver rare earths used in everything from wind turbines to jet planes.


New York Times
30 minutes ago
- New York Times
The G.O.P. Scramble Over Trump's Policy Bill, and Tracking Major Supreme Court Rulings
Hosted by Will Jarvis Produced by Will Jarvis and Ian Stewart Edited by Ian Stewart and Jessica Metzger Featuring Catie Edmondson Top Senate Official Rules Against Several Key Provisions in G.O.P. Policy Bill, by Catie Edmondson and Margot Sanger-Katz With Flu Shot Vote, Kennedy's Vaccine Skepticism Comes Full Circle, by Sheryl Gay Stolberg Trump Justice Dept. Pressuring University of Virginia President to Resign, by Michael S. Schmidt and Michael C. Bender U.S. Approves $30 Million for Contentious New Gaza Aid Group, by Ephrat Livni The Lethal Risk of Seeking Food in Gaza, by Rawan Sheikh Ahmad and Adam Rasgon Supreme Court Rules Planned Parenthood Cannot Sue Over S. Carolina Defunding Effort, by Adam Liptak The Major Supreme Court Decisions in 2025, by Adam Liptak, Abbie VanSickle and Alicia Parlapiano Honey, We Shrunk the Cod, by Emily Anthes Tune in, and tell us what you think at theheadlines@ For corrections, email nytnews@ For more audio journalism and storytelling, download the New York Times Audio app — available to Times news subscribers on iOS — and sign up for our weekly newsletter.