Hong Kong's oldest pro-democracy party is shutting down as Beijing leaves no room for dissent
CNN —
Hong Kong's oldest and largest pro-democracy political party is moving to disband as Beijing's sweeping crackdown on the city leaves even moderate opposition groups with no room to operate.
The Democratic Party, one of the leading voices of opposition in the semi-autonomous city for the past three decades, has started the process of dissolution following recent warnings from Chinese government officials, two of its veteran members told CNN.
'The message was that the party has to be disbanded or there will be consequences,' said one of them, Yeung Sum, a former Democratic Party chairman.
Fred Li, a former lawmaker, said a Chinese official told him that the party should not remain until the end of this year, when an election will be held.
Founded by liberal lawyers and academics three years before the former British colony's 1997 handover to China, the Democratic Party had campaigned for universal suffrage and on matters from labor rights to conservation during a period when such issues were openly discussed in the city.
Widely seen as moderates willing to work with Beijing, Democratic Party leaders had spearheaded a significant voting bloc in the city's legislature and were regularly afforded space to critique local government policy, until mass pro-democracy protests in 2019 ushered in a new and more restrictive political era.
Beijing's crackdown in the years since, including the prosecution and jailing of pro-democracy leaders, has left the once-influential party rudderless as it contends with sweeping national security legislation and 'patriots only' electoral reforms enacted in 2021 that make it nearly impossible for opposition candidates to stand for the city's legislature.
Democratic Party chairman Lo Kin-hei told a news conference last Sunday that 90% of about 110 party members had voted to delegate power to a committee to start the dissolution process, adding he hoped a final vote would take place in the coming months.
'I hope Hong Kong's political parties… will continue to work for the people,' Lo said. 'We have always hoped to serve the Hong Kong people, and to do things that are good for society.'
Democratic Party chairman Lo Kin-hei, left, and Mok Kin-shing, vice chairman, speak at a press conference at the party's office in Hong Kong on April 13, 2025.
Chan Long Hei/AP
The Democrats' move to disband demonstrates Beijing's unwillingness to allow even the mildest of dissenting voices to be heard in Hong Kong, say analysts.
John Burns, emeritus professor at the University of Hong Kong (HKU), said the party had 'symbolized the promise of some kind of democratic development in Hong Kong, leading to universal suffrage as promised in the Basic Law,' referring to the city's mini-constitution.
'A dissolution of the party reflects official Hong Kong's turn away from popular participation, locally accountable government, and increased transparency toward more authoritarian rule,' Burns said.
Eric Lai, a research fellow at the Georgetown Center for Asian Law, said the Democrats' move 'shows there are no more feasible ways for groups to exist as an opposition party.'
'It's self-conflicting for the government to suggest that nothing has changed,' he said.
In a statement to CNN, a city government spokesperson said decisions by individual groups 'to disband or suspend operation are completely unrelated to the freedom or rights enshrined in Hong Kong law.'
Criticism of the government remains permitted in Hong Kong, 'however strong, vigorous or critical' it may be, so long as it is 'based on facts,' the spokesperson said. The Hong Kong government would 'continue to resolutely discharge the duty of safeguarding national security,' they added.
No space for compromise
The Democrats had enjoyed relative political freedom following Hong Kong's return to Chinese rule, even holding more seats than any other party in the mostly pro-Beijing legislature until 2004.
The party's leaders were often the figureheads of major demonstrations, including an annual June 4 vigil to commemorate the Tiananmen Square massacre and a well-attended pro-democracy march held every July. (Neither event would be permitted on the Chinese mainland, and both are now effectively banned in Hong Kong).
But support for the Democrats plunged in 2010 after its leaders negotiated directly for universal suffrage with officials from Beijing's liaison office in Hong Kong – a move seen as a betrayal by other pro-democracy groups.
The party was then pushed further to the sidelines by the emergence of a new generation of pro-democracy leaders and student activists during months-long protests for universal suffrage in 2014.
Democratic Party candidates for legislative elections show thank-you messages outside the legislature in Hong Kong on September 17, 2004.
Martin Chan/South ChinaDemocratic Party lawmaker Roy Kwong Chun-yu addresses crowds at a protest in Hong Kong on June 16, 2019.
Geovien So/SOPA Images/LightRocket/Getty Images
However, when anti-government demonstrators returned to Hong Kong's streets en masse in 2019, the Democrats' popularity resurged as many of its leaders stood on the front lines of the massive – and sometimes violent – protests that rocked the financial hub.
Later that year, the Democratic Party was the biggest winner in local district council elections. But its participation in the protests also drew the ire of Hong Kong authorities and Beijing, paving the way for its demise.
'The party made mistakes when it failed to draw a clear line between itself and radical separatists calling for Hong Kong's independence from 2014-2020,' said Burns, from HKU. 'Authorities have punished the party, jailing and chasing out Democratic Party leaders.'
Over the past five years, the space for the Democrats to maneuver has been increasingly squeezed by Chinese authorities.
In 2020, Beijing imposed a sweeping national security law on Hong Kong, introducing the maximum sentence of life imprisonment for four main crimes of secession, subversion, terrorism and collusion with foreign forces.
A year later, the Chinese government rewrote Hong Kong's electoral rules to require candidates to seek nomination from pro-Beijing groups, essentially excluding the opposition from elections. A legislature filled with Beijing loyalists last year unanimously passed a law expanding the scope of national security offenses.
Beijing and the Hong Kong government argued that the electoral changes had enhanced democracy and have repeatedly defended the security laws as restoring order and returning prosperity to the city. But critics say they have curtailed freedoms and had a 'chilling effect' on civil society, including independent institutions and the media.
Steve Tsang, director of the China Institute at SOAS University of London, said political and social protests seen as challenging state security are 'becoming increasingly if not well-nigh impossible.'
'Many other elements of civil rights, including that of speech and organizing political parties have also been severely curtailed,' he added.
Last year, five former Democratic Party lawmakers were among 45 opposition figures sentenced to prison terms of up to 10 years after they were found guilty of subversion for taking part in an election primary in 2020.
National security police have also placed HK$1 million ($129,000) bounties on pro-democracy activists who fled overseas, including an Australia-based former Democratic Party lawmaker accused of secession, subversion and collusion with a foreign country.
Meanwhile, the trial of media tycoon and outspoken democracy supporter Jimmy Lai is ongoing, more than four years after he was detained on charges of colluding with foreign forces, which he denies.
The Democratic Party's announcement last weekend follows the dissolution of almost 100 civil and pro-democracy organizations in Hong Kong in the wake of Beijing's crackdown.
The party had tried to survive as a civic group in recent years but struggled to raise funds as multiple private venues canceled their events, often at the last minute.
Former Democratic Party lawmaker Emily Lau said the party's move to disband was 'very sad.'
'We've been around for over 30 years, and we've got the support of many Hong Kong people,' she told CNN outside court in February, before another former party lawmaker was jailed on charges of rioting during the 2019 protests.
'I don't know what they are thinking in Beijing. We have demonstrated, not just words, but by action, that we are reasonable. We are willing to talk, to negotiate, to compromise, reach a deal and go forward.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al-Ahram Weekly
8 hours ago
- Al-Ahram Weekly
When nukes do the talking - World - Al-Ahram Weekly
Trump deployed two nuclear submarines last week in an escalation of the war of words between the US and Russia over Ukraine. Last Thursday, former president of Russia Dmitry Medvedev, now deputy chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, wrote on X that 'Trump's playing the ultimatum game with Russia: 50 days or 10… He should remember two things: first Russia isn't Israel or even Iran. Second, each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war. Not between Russia and Ukraine, but with his own country. Don't go down the Sleepy Joe road!' The next day US President Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social that 'based on the highly provocative statements of Dmitry Medvedev, I have ordered two nuclear submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that. Words are very important and can often lead to unintended consequences; I hope this will not be one of those instances. Thank you for your attention to this matter!' Two days later, the Russian Interfax news agency reported that Russian and Chinese vessels were moving in a joint detachment including a large Russian anti-submarine ship and two Chinese destroyers in the Sea of Japan. It said diesel-electric submarines from the two countries were also involved, as well as a Chinese submarine rescue ship. The manoeuvres are part of the Maritime Interaction 2025 exercises that are scheduled to end this week. It is unlikely that these exercises are directly related to the statements made by Trump and Medvedev. However, the deployment of the two US nuclear submarines remains a noteworthy development, as they have long been among the most important deterrent tools in the United States armoury. This is due to their exceptional ability to travel in ocean waters undetected, their unlimited range thanks to nuclear propulsion, and their lethal firepower, whether through cruise missiles or nuclear missiles. The locations of these submarines are usually highly classified. Looking at the current deployment areas of the US Navy, the Sea of Japan appears to be devoid of US destroyers, according to USNI News produced by the US Naval Institute. This is due to the eastward movement of the USS Carl Vinson carrier and its escort group. The only remaining vessel is the USS Tripoli amphibious assault ship, which is capable of carrying various types of helicopters as well as F-35B and Harrier jets belonging to the Marine Corps. Therefore, the submarines are likely to be present in the Sea of Japan to gather additional intelligence, at the very least, on the exercises being conducted by Russia and China. The operation requires coordination among destroyers, maritime patrol aircraft, helicopters, and submarines. It is somewhat out of the ordinary and not entirely routine. In July, Reuters reported that 'Trump announced new weapons for Ukraine… and threatened sanctions on buyers of Russian exports unless Russia agrees a peace deal, a major policy shift brought on by frustration with Moscow's ongoing attacks on its neighbour.' A White House official said Trump was referring to 100 per cent tariffs on Russian goods as well as secondary sanctions on other countries that buy its exports. Eighty-five of the 100 US senators are co-sponsoring a bill that would give Trump the authority to impose 500 per cent tariffs on any country that helps Russia, but the Chamber's Republican leaders have been waiting for Trump to give them the go-ahead for a vote. Starting this month, US news outlets also reported that the US and NATO are developing a novel funding mechanism for transferring weapons to Ukraine, known by the acronym PURL (Priority Ukraine Requirements List). Despite this, Trump has been consistently leaving the door open to Russia by insisting on providing only defensive weapons, specifically the Patriot system, which remains one of the most sought-after systems by the Ukrainian leadership in their effort to defend Ukrainian airspace from the ongoing missile attacks on their cities. Trump also refuses to approve the transfer of long-range offensive weapons, particularly the JASSM and ATACMS missiles, which would allow the Ukrainian Army to strike deep into Russian territory with greater effectiveness and destructive impact compared to the limited effect of suicide drones. Undoubtedly, the new defensive systems will strengthen Ukraine's air-defence network, especially if the new mechanism succeeds in sustaining the logistical supply of missiles for the batteries. However, on the battlefield, they may not significantly alter many outcomes, particularly after the recent advances on multiple fronts in eastern Ukraine, which has turned into a brutal battleground between Russian and Ukrainian forces. The Russian military retains a greater ability to replenish its losses in both weaponry and personnel compared to the Ukrainian side. A Ukrainian spokesperson said that 'Russian forces have lost 50,000 personnel in the Toretsk direction in more than six months of fighting, of which more than 20,000 were killed in action.' According to the US-based Institute of War (ISW) last Sunday, 'geolocated footage published on August 2 indicates that Russian forces recently advanced north of Oleksandro-Kalynove (northwest of Toretsk).' The classical Chinese writer Sun Tzu once wrote that 'strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat.' Although he wrote this in 500 BCE, it is an accurate description of the Ukrainian battlefield since the war began in 2022. The Ukrainians have mastered the art of finding tactical solutions, but they rely entirely on US and European weapons and supplies. This dependence has prevented them from developing an effective strategy to expel Russian forces. In contrast, the Russian side has had the upper hand in creating a comprehensive strategy to replenish its weapons stockpiles, maintain combat momentum, and bring about the attrition of the Western-supplied arsenals used by the Ukrainian Army. Nevertheless, Russian battlefield tactics do not guarantee rapid or decisive advances, which increases Russian losses in both personnel and equipment. Last weekend, Trump said his envoy Steve Witkoff would travel to Russia in the coming days as the president called for an end to the conflict in Ukraine, according CNN. The contours of Trump's strategy to end the war are becoming clearer, as he seeks to strike another deal with the Russian side, wielding the threat of sanctions rather than offensive weapons or direct harm. This shifts the ball into Moscow's court. Will it accept the terms of the American proposal, or choose to continue the war, especially given the absence of any battlefield deterrent preventing Russian forces from advancing in eastern Ukraine? The coming weeks may prove decisive in answering this question. * A version of this article appears in print in the 7 August, 2025 edition of Al-Ahram Weekly Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link:
Al-Ahram Weekly
10 hours ago
- Al-Ahram Weekly
UK using US contractor to conduct Gaza spy flights: The Times report - War on Gaza
The UK military has used US contractors to conduct spy flights over Gaza for Israel due to a shortage of British aircraft, The Times reported on Thursday. The UK government acknowledged this year that it conducts such flights over the war-ravaged Palestinian territory but insisted they were "solely in support of hostage rescue". The spy flights appear increasingly at odds with the UK government's growing public frustration with Israel over the war in Gaza, and increasing international demands for a ceasefire. Last week, Britain announced it would formally recognise a Palestinian state if steps, including a ceasefire, were not taken by mid-September. It has been said that the flights are part of its response to October 7, 2023. The Royal Air Force (RAF) had been using its Shadow R1 reconnaissance aircraft to film over Gaza, aiding the search for the captives, but turned to a US firm after the planes were reassigned or needed maintenance, according to The Times. The Nevada-based company being used is a subsidiary of Sierra Nevada Corporation, one of the world's largest military contractors, the newspaper said. It is likely to be seen as further evidence that Britain's military has been pared back too drastically over recent decades, primarily due to budget pressures. Relying on private sector contractors, which use an RAF base in Cyprus in the eastern Mediterranean, can have pitfalls. The flight path of a US-operated sortie last month over the largely destroyed Gaza city of Khan Yunis became public following what The Times called a "schoolboy" error. It said the plane's transponder had not been fully turned off, which meant it could be identified on flight-tracking websites and platforms as flying over southern Gaza. The UK defence ministry declined to comment, citing the need to protect operational security around intelligence matters. It reiterated that Britain conducts surveillance flights over Gaza to help Israel locate captives and only passes on intelligence related to that. In March, armed forces secretary Luke Pollard told MPs, "These flights are solely in support of hostage rescue". Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link:
Egypt Independent
14 hours ago
- Egypt Independent
Under attack from all sides, armed clans try to protect aid coming into Gaza
Securing the trucks carrying aid into Gaza is a tight balancing act for the Abu Mughsaib clan. Getting too close to the Israeli military checkpoints can turn deadly. But staying too far away gives looters a chance to get to the precious cargo first. 'This is the biggest challenge we face. We cannot approach army positions any closer, as doing so would put us at risk,' a member of the group that acts as a protection for the trucks told CNN. Two weeks ago, Hamas killed one of his team members and last month two were injured by Israeli fire, he said. As law and order further breaks down and famine takes hold across Gaza, agencies trying to get aid to warehouses and distribution points in the territory rely on groups such as Abu Mughsaib. 'Once the trucks enter (Gaza), we receive them before they are intercepted by looters or overwhelmed by crowds,' said the man, who asked to remain anonymous for security reasons. 'As for our weapons, they are simple family-owned firearms, and we also carry sticks and batons.' Aid convoys are increasingly being attacked by armed looters seeking to resell the aid at exorbitant prices, as well as crowds of starving people who are just hoping to feed their families. The UN said this week that it was still struggling to deliver aid to where it is needed most, and blamed Israel for delaying convoys by making the procedures too cumbersome. Palestinians hold onto an aid truck returning to Gaza City on July 22. Jehad Alshrafi/AP/File While the World Food Program said on Sunday that Israel has agreed to streamline the process and allow the use of alternative routes, the UN says a large proportion of trucks are still being blocked. Faced with allegations of purposefully starving the Gaza population, Israel has in turn blamed the UN, saying it is not distributing the supplies properly, and Hamas, which it accused of stealing aid. In the absence of official security, the Abu Mughsaib clan and other groups are stepping in. A member of the clan told CNN that international organizations including the World Health Organization had asked for security in delivering their aid. 'After we succeeded, our family-based group was formally established to serve that purpose,' the clan member told CNN, adding that the family is part of the Tarabin tribe, a prominent Bedouin family. 'We coordinate with a few other families and handle the securing of aid deliveries,' he said, adding that unlike other groups, the Abu Mughsaib are not working with either Israel or Hamas. A spokesperson for WHO said the organization works with 'various community elders' and the health ministry in Gaza to ensure that 'when critical aid is passing through… communities are informed and understand the items are lifesaving medical aid.' Palestinians carry aid supplies which they received from the US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, in the central Gaza Strip on July 31. Reuters Accompanying the trucks is a risky business. The clan sent one video to CNN, which it said shows its members escorting a convoy of 10 trucks delivering aid. It shows armed men – some of whom are masked and some wearing high-vis vests – sat on top of the vehicles speeding along the Salah al-Din road in Deir al-Balah, shooting in the air. People can be seen running alongside the road, but nobody tries to intercept the convoy. The clan also said it has partnered with a third-party transport company in Gaza, which it claimed moves aid for humanitarian groups including the World Central Kitchen. A spokesperson for the World Central Kitchen said the organization does not work with the Mugaiseb Clan. The clan member who spoke to CNN said that while they do receive payments from some groups, they sometimes provide protection for free. 'Like with the World Health Organization, when it involves medicine or infant formula, we work on a voluntary basis. For private sector shipments and commercial goods, we are paid in return for the risks we take. Some organizations also provide small payments to cover fuel, ammunition, and similar costs,' he said. The UN said that the time-consuming approval process to get aid into Gaza often leaves trucks stuck in one location for a long time, attracting large crowds of people. Olga Cherevko, from the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), was accompanying one such convoy as it tried to deliver aid from the Kerem Shalom border crossing earlier this week. She said the convoy was held for two and half hours at an Israeli checkpoint. 'By the time we were allowed to pass, we were met on the road by tens of thousands of hungry and desperate people who directly offloaded everything from the backs of our trucks,' Cherevko said. According to its own data, the UN and its partners have offloaded 2,134 trucks of aid at Gaza crossings since May 19, when Israel partially lifted a blockade that was imposed in March. While the UN said a vast majority of them, some 2,010 trucks, had been collected, only 260 arrived at their intended destinations. More than 1,750 were intercepted – either peacefully by hungry people or forcefully by armed gangs. Israel has accused Hamas of stealing aid, but an internal US government review found no evidence of widespread theft. More than 1,060 people have been killed and 7,200 injured while trying to access food in Gaza since May, according to the United Nations. Most died in the vicinity of distribution points set up by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), a controversial private venture backed by the United States and Israel. Palestinians carry aid parcels west of Beit Lahia in Gaza on July 29. Omar al-Qatta/AFP/Getty Images/File 'Worst case scenario of famine' Far too little aid is reaching those most in need, according to humanitarian agencies. Eyad al-Masri, a 31-year-old father of two with a third child on the way, used to buy food from people who got it at the notoriously dangerous aid distribution points. The prices were high, but still lower than at the market. But on Saturday, with no money left, he decided to go to the point near Netzarim in central Gaza himself. His is a common story. The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC), a UN-backed initiative said Tuesday that 'worst-case scenario of famine' is unfolding in Gaza. The health ministry in the territory also said on Tuesday that 900,000 children are going hungry, and 70,000 already show signs of malnutrition. 'I felt I had no other choice,' al-Masri told CNN. 'When the trucks arrived, I was shocked by the number of armed thieves, some carrying knives, others with firearms, operating in large groups.' Al-Masri managed to get a box of food, and was overjoyed at the prospect of giving his children and pregnant wife at least some of what they so desperately needed. 'But as I was leaving the area, a man armed with a knife came at me and tried to take the box by force,' Al-Masri said. He offered to split the contents, but the attacker insisted on taking the entire thing. 'When I refused, he stabbed me multiple times in the head,' he said. Running after the thief, al-Masri didn't realize he was bleeding. He was focused on getting at least some of the food back – which he eventually managed with the help of others. 'There are starving people who come to these distribution areas, but they can't get anything because of the armed groups,' he said. The Abu Mughsaib clan member said attacks against his group are coming from all sides – from other families, organized gangs of looters, Hamas and the Israeli army. He said that in July, a member of the escort team was shot dead by Hamas, who later said the killing was a mistake. Palestinians mourn outside the Al-Shifa Hospital morgue, where the bodies of people killed while seeking aid the previous day were brought, in Gaza City on July 31. Bashar Taleb/AFP/Getty Images 'A month ago, (the Israeli army) opened fire on a vehicle carrying members of our escort team, injuring two of our men,' he added. He added, however, that the group will continue to provide security for as long as necessary. 'Vulnerable people urgently need food and medicine. We are not an alternative to any authority, nor do we aim to replace anyone,' he said. But he admitted the group's power only goes as far. 'We are under strict instructions not to harm any civilians. … Even if they manage to seize a truck in such cases, we let them take it without confronting them.' CLARIFICATION: This story has been updated to reflect the World Central Kitchen's statement that it does not work with the Mughsaib clan.
