Nashville kids receive new bikes through special donation
A total of 24 balance-to-pedal bikes, along with helmets, pedal conversion kits, bike racks and other equipment, was given to the school by All Kids Bike, according to a news release sent by the national nonprofit Thursday. The donation came with funding and other resources to teach the kids to ride the bikes as part of their physical education at the school. Glengarry Elementary School also received bikes through the program.
In the release, the organization said its goal is to "impart the joy of bike riding and promote essential life skills among young learners." The two Nashville schools are among 36 nationwide that received the same donation, which was made possible by a $324,000 gift to All Kids Bike from the HDR Foundation, the philanthropic arm of the American design and engineering firm.
a national engineering firm with an office in Brentwood.
Norman Binkley Elementary Principal James Urquhart said he's excited to see the school's kindergarteners and first graders learn through the new program.
"A very special thank you to HDR, our students will now have the opportunity to develop important physical skills, foster healthy habits, and build confidence through the All Kids Bike Program,' Urquhart said in the release.
Over the last three years, HDR has donated more than $800,000 to All Kids Bike.
"As a 100% employee-owned company, HDR is dedicated to this cause. It's close to home and to our hearts," Kyle Guthrie, who manages HDR's operations in Kentucky, Tennessee and Arkansas, said in the release. "With this grant, we'll assemble bikes and racks, deliver them to schools and join in the announcement. Seeing the joy on those faces when they see this gift to their school is priceless."
This article originally appeared on Nashville Tennessean: Nashville kids receive new bikes through special donation
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
6 minutes ago
- Newsweek
National Park Peak Set to Be Renamed
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Teton County Board of County Commissioners is proposing to change the name of Mount Woodring in Wyoming's Grand Teton National Park to Raven Peak, due to concerns about the mountain's namesake being charged with sexual assault in the 1930s. Newsweek reached out to the press office of the National Park Service and the U.S. Geological Survey via email for comment. Why It Matters Mount Woodring was named after the park's first superintendent, Samuel T. Woodring. Woodring was charged with assaulting and attempting to commit rape against an 11-year-old girl in 1934, according to court documents. The charges were dismissed a year later because the parents of the girl did not want to put their daughter through the trauma of testifying, the name change proposal form states. The name change was proposed by the Teton County Board of County Commissioners, which said that "the name Mount Woodring is offensive." The board said that there was a "need to adopt a new name at the earliest possible opportunity." Mount Woodring was included in the U.S. Geological Survey's list of "upcoming proposals of interest" last year. Mount Woodring of the Grand Tetons Peaks in Grand Tetons National Park. Mount Woodring of the Grand Tetons Peaks in Grand Tetons National Park. htrnr/Getty Images What To Know The Teton County Board of County Commissioners has suggested the name Raven Peak, as "ravens are commonly found in the Tetons, they are considered intelligent birds, and the raven is considered significant in most Native American cultures." The board said it felt that it was important to name the peak after an animal and not a person, because "the reputation of a person can change with the passage of time, whereas the status of a raven is not likely to change as years pass." "The hope is that Raven Peak will have staying power that helps to make it a fitting name," the proposal said. In its original letter to the U.S. Board on Geographic Names, there was also another possible name mentioned: Equality Peak. However, after listening to public feedback, the board found that there was "overwhelming support for the name Raven Peak," while the name Equality Peak was deemed "controversial" and met with "considerable opposition" by some members of the public. President Donald Trump has been an active proponent of historical monuments and military bases keeping their original names, signing an executive order in March titled "Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History." The administration wrote in the order: "Over the past decade, Americans have witnessed a concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation's history, replacing objective facts with a distorted narrative driven by ideology rather than truth." It added: "This revisionist movement seeks to undermine the remarkable achievements of the United States by casting its founding principles and historical milestones in a negative light." Earlier this year, he signed an executive order changing the name of Alaska's highest peak, Denali, back to its original name, Mount McKinley and renamed the Gulf of Mexico the "Gulf of America." What People Are Saying The Teton County Board of County Commissioners, in its letter: "Ravens live in our community and in Grand Teton National Park year-round and exhibit incredible intelligence, play an important role in our ecosystem, are adaptable – thriving at high and low elevations, often performing impressive acrobatic maneuvers – and are known to be highly social and playful. It is our community's sentiment that Raven Peak is an appropriate name for the mountain where these remarkable birds live and play." What Happens Next The final decision for the name change lies with the U.S. Board on Geographic Names, although Trump is able to override the board's authority should he decide to.
New York Times
4 hours ago
- New York Times
My Partner and I Aren't Excited to Move In Together. Is That Bad?
My partner and I have been seeing each other for two and a half years. We're planning to move in together next year, and if all goes well, to get married the year after that. The problem: Neither of us is super excited about moving in together. I like living alone, and I'm concerned about losing my independence. My girlfriend is concerned about having to deal with my small quirks. We've even discussed looking for a two-bedroom apartment, so we can have defined spaces to be alone. Make no mistake, we love each other deeply. And we recognize that there are many benefits to moving in together, such as advancing our relationship. Do we have a problem? BOYFRIEND I think you have the opposite of a problem: Through good communication, you and your girlfriend have identified an issue that was probably awkward to raise and to discuss. But you did it. Well done! To me, this bodes well for your relationship. And since there is no single answer here, let's consider a few options. Regardless of which apartment you plan to live in — hers, yours or one you haven't found yet — you can experiment now, in your current spaces, by designating zones and blocks of time in which you can be alone. Healthy couples are rarely together 24/7, and scheduling time and space for independence can be an important part of caring for yourself and your relationship. Now, this may be easier to pull off in a larger apartment, as you suggest, but you can still try it now. Let me add that there is no one way to advance your relationship, as you put it — and it certainly doesn't require shared real estate. I know a happily married couple who have lived in separate apartments in the same building for 30 years! This may not be your aim, but keep talking about what's working and what isn't. That's the important thing. It seems to me that you and your girlfriend are off to a healthy start. A Guest With Pre-Wedding Jitters Our adult son's girlfriend is transgender. This is not an issue for us. But we are all invited to our nephew's wedding, and his branch of the family is socially conservative. I have heard passing remarks from them over the years that indicate potential transphobia. The bridegroom's family has never met our son's girlfriend, nor do they know she is trans, but everyone has deep affection for our son. Do we owe the bridegroom or his parents any warning? Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Homeowner enraged after security video reveals neighbor's infuriating behavior: 'That couldn't have been any more intentional'
Homeowner enraged after security video reveals neighbor's infuriating behavior: 'That couldn't have been any more intentional' In a perfect world, neighbors would be helpful and understanding and have a strong sense of community. Perhaps, even, they would mind their own business. Unfortunately, not every person has it in them to be respectful, and no one gets to choose who their neighbors are. One Redditor caught their neighbor littering on their property. The neighbor's impertinence to the poster and carelessness with the already suffering environment caused outrage in the comments of the Reddit post. My neighbor throws trash in my french drain to clog it. I've explained very nicely to him that it protects my house foundation from water damage. byu/anselld inmildlyinfuriating "My neighbor throws trash in my French drain to clog it," the Reddit user said on r/mildlyinfuriating. The video attached shows a man approach the poster's property, aim for a specific spot on the ground, and throw a piece of trash on the drain. A French drain is a system with a pipe in a trench in the ground surrounded by gravel or rock. It redirects water away from a house's foundation and basement. It also reduces soil erosion, directly protecting topsoil and landscaping from impairment. "I've explained very nicely to him that it protects my house foundation from water damage," the poster noted. This seemingly intentional littering could be harmful not only to the homeowner's drainage system and the integrity of their home but to the environment, as well. Littering is the main cause of land pollution, and the 2020 Keep America Beautiful study says the billions of pieces of garbage across U.S. roads and waterways equate to a striking 152 pieces of litter per American resident. While 75-97% of surveyed Americans recognize the negative environmental, economic, and health impacts of litter, people still improperly discard their trash in streets or waterways. Non-confrontational communication about the dangers of littering could be effective in halting this disrespectful act against all living creatures, though not all people respond well to environmental education. Fortunately, all 50 states enforce penalties for littering. With this knowledge, one person commented, "Maybe a littering fine from the local sheriff's department will change his tune." Do you think America has a plastic waste problem? Definitely Only in some areas Not really I'm not sure Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. "Your neighbor hates your guts," another said. "That couldn't have been any more intentional." Join our free newsletter for easy tips to save more and waste less, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet. Solve the daily Crossword
