logo
Washington sets record for concealed pistol licenses

Washington sets record for concealed pistol licenses

Axios2 days ago
More Washingtonians than ever have a license to carry a concealed weapon, state data shows.
Why it matters: The rise comes as state legislators have moved to tighten rules surrounding gun purchases.
A new state law, which goes into effect in 2027, will require Washington residents to receive live-fire training, be fingerprinted and get a permit before buying guns, a change expected to affect thousands of potential buyers each year.
Driving the news: Washington reached 709,334 active concealed pistol licenses (CPLs) at the end of June, an all-time high, Christine Anthony of the Department of Licensing tells Axios.
That's an increase of more than 10,000 since December, per state data.
By the numbers: About ​​20% of CPL holders in Washington are women.
King County, the state's most populous county, also has the highest number of CPLs, nearly 114,000.
Pierce County posted the biggest one-month gain, from May to June of this year, with 882 licenses.
What they're saying:"Long story short, people are arming up, and they're going to keep doing so ahead of the new restrictions," Dave Workman, editor in chief of TheGunMag, a publication of the Bellevue-based Second Amendment Foundation, tells Axios.
With a state population of close to 8 million, "that means possibly 1 out of every 10 people you pass on any given day is licensed to carry concealed, and may even be armed," he says.
The other side: Renée Hopkins, CEO of the Washington-based Alliance for Gun Responsibility, which backed the permit-to-purchase law, said the organization advocates for safe and responsible firearm ownership.
"While we acknowledge more guns pose a greater threat to our communities, CPL holders tend to be responsible gun owners," Hopkins tells Axios.
Between the lines: Washington — among the top 10 states for the highest percentage of residents holding a concealed carry license — is a " shall issue" state, meaning the state must issue gun licenses to people who meet the requirements and pass a background check.
What we're watching: Whether demand for concealed pistol licenses keeps rising as the 2027 permit-to-purchase law approaches — and what legal challenges emerge against the law.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bessent Says ‘No Rush' to Choose Successor to Fed Chair Powell
Bessent Says ‘No Rush' to Choose Successor to Fed Chair Powell

Bloomberg

time13 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Bessent Says ‘No Rush' to Choose Successor to Fed Chair Powell

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said that there's 'no rush' to identify a successor to Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, and that a nominee could potentially come from current board members or the heads of the district banks. 'There are a lot of strong candidates, including several who are on the main board and perhaps regional bank presidents,' Bessent said on Bloomberg Television's Surveillance program Wednesday. He didn't identify any specific names.

Global climate action is at stake in the UN top court's biggest ever decision
Global climate action is at stake in the UN top court's biggest ever decision

Chicago Tribune

time14 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Global climate action is at stake in the UN top court's biggest ever decision

THE HAGUE, Netherlands — The UN's highest court is handing down a historic opinion on climate change Wednesday, a decision that could set a legal benchmark for action around the globe to the climate crisis. After years of lobbying by vulnerable island nations who fear they could disappear under rising sea waters, the U.N. General Assembly asked the International Court of Justice in 2023 for an advisory opinion, a non-binding but important basis for international obligations. A panel of 15 judges was tasked with answering two questions. First, what are countries obliged to do under international law to protect the climate and environment from human-caused greenhouse gas emissions? Second, what are the legal consequences for governments when their acts, or lack of action, have significantly harmed the climate and environment? 'The stakes could not be higher. The survival of my people and so many others is on the line,' Arnold Kiel Loughman, attorney general of the island nation of Vanuatu, told the court during a week of hearings in December. In the decade up to 2023, sea levels rose by a global average of around 4.3 centimeters (1.7 inches), with parts of the Pacific rising higher still. The world has also warmed 1.3 degrees Celsius (2.3 Fahrenheit) since preindustrial times because of the burning of fossil fuels. Vanuatu is one of a group of small states pushing for international legal intervention in the climate crisis but it affects many more island nations in the South Pacific. 'The agreements being made at an international level between states are not moving fast enough,' Ralph Regenvanu, Vanuatu's minister for climate change, told The Associated Press. Any decision by The Hague-based court would be non-binding advice and unable to directly force wealthy nations into action to help struggling countries. Yet it would be more than just a powerful symbol, since it could serve as the basis for other legal actions, including domestic lawsuits. 'What makes this case so important is that it addresses the past, present, and future of climate action. It's not just about future targets — it also tackles historical responsibility, because we cannot solve the climate crisis without confronting its roots,' Joie Chowdhury, a senior attorney at the Center for International Environmental Law, told AP. Activists could bring lawsuits against their own countries for failing to comply with the decision and states could return to the International Court of Justice to hold each other to account. And whatever the judges say will be used as the basis for other legal instruments, like investment agreements, Chowdhury said. The United States and Russia, both of whom are major petroleum-producing states, are staunchly opposed to the court mandating emissions reductions. Simply having the court issue an opinion is the latest in a series of legal victories for the small island nations. Earlier this month, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights found that countries have a legal duty not only to avoid environmental harm but also to protect and restore ecosystems. Last year, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that countries must better protect their people from the consequences of climate change. In 2019, the Netherlands' Supreme court handed down the first major legal win for climate activists when judges ruled that protection from the potentially devastating effects of climate change was a human right and that the government has a duty to protect its citizens.

Exclusive: Emmer says Epstein is a "non-issue"
Exclusive: Emmer says Epstein is a "non-issue"

Axios

time14 minutes ago

  • Axios

Exclusive: Emmer says Epstein is a "non-issue"

House Majority Whip Tom Emmer (R-Minn.) called the push to force release of the Epstein files a "non-issue" at an Axios News Shapers event Wednesday. Why it matters: The issue has paralyzed the House and led GOP leaders to cut this week's business short and leave town early for the August recess before things escalated further. "It's kind of funny if it was so important, then why weren't Democrats clamoring for this for the 4 years under Biden?" told Axios' Hans Nichols. Democrats — and some Republicans — have every been using multiple tools to try and force their GOP colleagues on the record about Epstein as President Trump pressures GOP leaders to make the issue go away.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store