Pope urges media to end divisiveness, calls for release of jailed reporters
VATICAN CITY, May 12 (Reuters) - Pope Leo, in his first address to the media, called on Monday for an end to a polarizing 'war of words' made of partisan and ideological attacks and not give space to fanaticism and hatred.
Speaking to thousands of members of the media from around the world who covered his election and the death of his predecessor, Leo also called for the release of reporters jailed for doing their jobs.
He added artificial intelligence had to be used with 'responsibility and discernment'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
39 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Who owns the news? It must not be a group of foreign powers
Who owns the news? Much of the Left has been obsessed with the issue for over a century. They have long railed against press barons and their supposed bias. So it is perhaps surprising that this Labour Government is taking such a lackadaisical approach to foreign states having substantial holdings in British newspapers. The last Conservative government back in December 2023 intervened to put on hold and scrutinise the proposed sale of The Telegraph to a company backed by Sheikh Mansour, the deputy prime minister of the United Arab Emirates. Columnists, including Charles Moore, The Telegraph's former editor, rightly argued that even if there was no actual interference in the newspaper's editorial line, there would be the perception that the paper would no longer be independent. This would fatally undermine the newspaper's standing by throwing away its reputation for fearless reporting, whatever the reality of the situation. The then government listened and last year, in the Digital, Media and Competitions Act, introduced a new regulatory regime to restrict foreign state ownership of newspapers and news magazines. But this Act only set out the broad principle, not the details of how it would be implemented. A total ban would come with its own problems. There would be little risk of editorial interference if, say, the sovereign wealth fund of Norway was a passive investor owning 3pc or 4pc in a UK-listed media company. During the consultations, it was proposed that a 5pc limit may be appropriate to allow for such holdings. Last month the new Government announced that the threshold would not be 5pc, but actually 15pc. I and many of my colleagues in the House of Lords have serious misgivings about this much higher limit, but it is one we can live with. However, there is another aspect of the draft regulations which is unacceptable. The 15pc threshold is not cumulative, it applies to each individual holding. This means that there would be nothing to stop multiple states each owning 15pc of a newspaper. It has been reported that after The Telegraph's proposed takeover by RedBird Capital, Sheikh Mansour intends to retain up to a 15pc stake in the newspaper. With the current proposals there would be nothing to stop, say, Saudi Arabia, Oman and Bahrain from each taking 15pc holdings. A cumulative 60pc of a British newspaper owned by foreign states is a very different proposition. The guarantees against foreign control would have evaporated. Has this potential scenario arisen as a result of an oversight by Lisa Nandy, the Culture Secretary? Alongside 50 of my fellow peers, I have written to Ms Nandy asking for clarification. Signatories include former chancellor Lord Lamont, former trade secretary Lord Lilley, long-time chairman of the 1922 committee Lord Brady, ex-director of public prosecutions Lord Macdonald and the current chairman of Ipso, the independent press regulator, Lord Faulks. Our fears could be easily assuaged by simply amending the proposed regulations to ensure that 15pc is a cap on total foreign ownership. If the move is deliberate, it raises serious questions about this Government's commitment to a free press. The statutory instrument implementing the Government's regulations has now been laid and will shortly come before both Houses of Parliament. If the proposals reach the Lords in their current form, I and many of my colleagues will not be able to support the measure. The Telegraph's ownership has been left in limbo for two years so far. It is time for the new regulatory framework to be put in place that will allow its smooth transfer to new owners. But this must be done in a way that entrenches the traditional freedoms of our press. The issues are much wider than the future of just one newspaper.
The Independent
43 minutes ago
- The Independent
Downing Street ‘welcomes' ECHR debate as Badenoch launches exit probe
Downing Street has welcomed discussion about changing how the European Convention on Human Rights operates. A Number 10 spokesman said on Friday it is 'important' there is discussion on how the system works, after Alain Berset, the secretary-general of the Council of Europe, said in a rare interview there should be 'no taboo' about changing the rules of the agreement. It comes as Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said the ECHR had become a 'sword used to attack democratic decisions' and launched a review into whether she would commit to leaving the agreement. Asked about Mr Berset's remarks, a Number 10 spokesman said on Friday: 'Border security is vital to national security, and we welcome efforts to ensure the European Convention on Human Rights is being applied correctly and allowing countries to protect their borders. 'It's important there is discussion on how the ECHR operates to ensure it can safeguard human rights while meeting the needs of democracies. The Prime Minister has been clear on this, it should be parliament that makes the rules on immigration and government that makes the policy.' On Friday, Mrs Badenoch announced a review to be spearheaded by her shadow attorney general Lord Wolfson, to look into whether the UK should withdraw from the treaty which underpins human rights law. 'The ECHR is now being used in ways never intended by its original authors,' she told a Westminster event. 'It should be a shield to protect, instead, it's become a sword, a sword used to attack democratic decisions and common sense. 'This use of litigation as a political weapon is what I am calling lawfare. It isn't just damaging our security, it's also damaging our prosperity.' She said she was tasking her shadow minister Lord Wolfson with examining 'what the unintended consequences might be' if the UK were to leave the ECHR. 'Because it is clear that the ECHR is a major issue, I'm not asking Lord Wolfson if we should leave, that's a political not a legal question,' she said. 'I'm asking him to set out how we would leave and to consider what the unintended consequences might be, not least in Northern Ireland, if we decide to go down this route, we must do so knowingly.' Shadow home secretary Chris Philp suggested earlier on Friday that the ECHR could not be reformed. He told the BBC: 'I don't really take that very seriously. There have been previous attempts to do it.'
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Return of Ukraine wheat and barley curbs gives small boost to EU farmers
PARIS/KYIV, June 6 (Reuters) - European farmers welcomed the European Union's re-introduction of quotas on Friday for Ukrainian wheat and barley as a small boost to their market, but they still face global price competition as Ukraine tries to export elsewhere. The European Union waived duties and quotas on Ukrainian agricultural products following Russia's full-scale invasion three years ago. It later capped volumes on some Ukrainian produce, including sugar, following an outcry from farmers over the price competition it posed. It did not limit volumes of wheat and barley, however, and more than 4 million metric tons of Ukrainian wheat were imported into the EU since the start of the 2024/25 season last July. Friday's expiry of the waivers means the EU has restored a pre-war regime of trade quotas, pending the conclusion of a new longer-term trade deal with Kyiv. The re-establishment of the quotas was "a crucial first step" towards rebalancing the market, French wheat farmers' union AGPB said in a statement. It reinstates a duty-free quota of 1 million tons annually for wheat and 350,000 tons for barley. Adjusted for the seven months left in 2025, that represents about 583,000 tons of wheat and 204,000 tons of barley available for the rest of the year. European farmers, also concerned by a planned EU deal with South America's Mercosur bloc, blame Ukrainian competition for pushing prices below their production costs, which have also been inflated by higher energy and fertiliser bills since the war. The quotas should shift Ukraine's exports away from Europe and keep more EU wheat at home, though the price benefit for farmers may be limited, traders said. One trader, speaking on condition of anonymity, said Ukrainian grain that is not shipped into the EU will still find its way to the global market. Reduced access to the massive EU market was a setback for Ukraine, but it should be able to pivot more towards North Africa and Southeast Asia, First Deputy Farm Minister Taras Vysotskiy told reporters. "We were there in 2021, and logistically it is not difficult. The question is the price," he said. The EU and Ukraine, meanwhile, are working on a broader trade accord. The EU's agriculture commissioner told Reuters the future deal would set quotas somewhere between current levels and the waivers. Ukraine's trade representative Taras Kachka flagged the risk of market tensions. "There will be no problems with corn supplies, but there are issues with wheat and barley, but we hope to reach acceptable volumes," he told a grain conference in Kyiv on Friday. Ukrainian corn (maize) is subject to a pre-war 650,000 ton annual quota from Friday. But unlike wheat and barley, no impact is expected since the EU has a general zero tariff on corn.
