Latest news with #media
News24
an hour ago
- General
- News24
Cop kills one, injures two others, before turning gun on himself
Chelsea Ogilvie/News24 Be among those who shape the future with knowledge. Uncover exclusive stories that captivate your mind and heart with our FREE 14-day subscription trial. Dive into a world of inspiration, learning, and empowerment. You can only trial once.
Bloomberg
3 hours ago
- Business
- Bloomberg
YouTube's Victory in the TV Wars Depends on Parents
Here's a stat that might come as a shock to casual observers of the media ecosystem: The media company that commands the largest percentage of our eyeballs is not the mighty Netflix Inc., the Walt Disney Co. juggernaut or the omnipresent Inc. Prime. It's YouTube. The platform represents 12.4% of audiences' time spent watching television, according to Nielsen Holding Ltd.'s Media Distributor Gauge report for April. That beats Disney's 10.7% (which includes not only the platforms and channels that bear its name but ESPN and Hulu to boot), nearly doubles the 6.8% and 6.7% for Fox and Warner Bros. Discovery, respectively, and pummels the puny 3.5% share for Amazon. But before we hail the platform as another nail in traditional TV's coffin, it needs to accomplish something else: earn the trust of its users, particularly parents.
Associated Press
4 hours ago
- General
- Associated Press
Elon Musk shows up with black eye in Oval Office send-off
The Associated Press is an independent global news organization dedicated to factual reporting. Founded in 1846, AP today remains the most trusted source of fast, accurate, unbiased news in all formats and the essential provider of the technology and services vital to the news business. More than half the world's population sees AP journalism every day.
The Guardian
5 hours ago
- Business
- The Guardian
‘One day I overheard my boss saying: just put it in ChatGPT': the workers who lost their jobs to AI
Mateusz Demski, 31, journalist, Kraków, Poland I've been a freelance journalist for 10 years, usually writing for magazines and websites about cinema. I presented a morning show on Radio Kraków twice a week for about two years. It was only one part of my work, but I really enjoyed it. It was about culture and cinema, and featured a range of people, from artists to activists. I remember interviewing Ukrainians about the Russian invasion for the first programme I presented, back in 2022. I was let go in August 2024, alongside a dozen co-workers who were also part-time. We were told the radio station was having financial problems. I was relatively OK with it, as I had other income streams. But a few months later I heard that Radio Kraków was launching programmes hosted by three AI characters. Each had AI-generated photographs, a biography and a specific personality. They called it an 'experiment' aimed at younger audiences. One of the first shows they did was a live 'interview' with Polish poet Wisława Szymborska, winner of the 1996 Nobel prize for literature, who had died 12 years earlier. What are the ethics of using the likeness of a dead person? Szymborska is a symbol of Polish intellectual culture, so it caused outrage. I couldn't understand it: radio is created by people for other people. We cannot replace our experiences, emotions or voices with avatars. One of my colleagues who was laid off is queer. One of the new AI avatars was called Alex, a non-binary student and a 'specialist' in queer subjects. In Poland, we are still fighting for queer rights, and as journalists it's incumbent on us to have real representation when reporting on this. For my colleague and the LGBTQ+ community, it was shocking and damaging to hear their lived experience and knowledge being imitated by AI. Some of us who had been laid off started a petition against the station, calling for regulation and to get the AI shows taken off air. We got tens of thousands of people to sign – actors, journalists, artists, but also listeners. Hundreds of young people didn't want to listen to an AI show. The station has since scrapped the avatars, largely because of the success of our campaign. It's now student-run. The station claim this is about offering mentorship, but it's also a cheaper alternative to hiring qualified journalists. I guess it's better than AI, though. There are still no clear regulations covering its use in Poland. I'm not campaigning for regulation because I lost my job to AI: I'm campaigning because I'm worried about the ethics of all of this; about misinformation and deceiving listeners.I'm a realist – I'm not completely against AI. I think it can be used responsibly to do the boring bits of our job. But we can't substitute complex thinking with machines. AI can't replace our curiosity, creativity or emotional intelligence. Lina Meilina, 30, illustrator, Bandung, Indonesia I've been drawing and painting since I was a kid. Even in kindergarten, I was doodling. By elementary school I was drawing comics and my teachers knew I had potential. I have strict, traditional parents who told me art wouldn't make me any money, but I wanted to follow my dreams. Now I make anime-style illustrations, and most of my income comes from commissions: I draw bespoke characters for clients, and also create my own. Even before AI tools arrived, it wasn't easy. Indonesia doesn't take artists seriously and copyright laws are weak. I've seen people steal my work and put it on merch to sell on retail websites such as AliExpress. I have to get them taken down myself, screenshotting pages one by one to report them to the site's admin. Now, AI makes it harder to prove ownership, because it can take your art and make slight changes, so it's not a direct copy. I first learned about generative AI a few years ago, watching a YouTuber introduce viewers to the software Midjourney, which generates images based on prompts. He asked the program to produce an image in the style of comic book artist Alex Ross. The finished work was good, with Ross's distinctive hyper-realistic style and colour palette. I remember thinking, 'Oh shit, this is going to be a disaster.' Since last year, when AI really took off, my workload has plummeted. I used to get up to 15 commissions a month; now I get around five. People can take your art and feed it into an AI program to create work. A follower of mine recently used AI to portray my characters doing something inappropriate. I tried to report it, but the platform said it didn't violate its copyright policy. One of the main platforms freelance artists use to get work recently launched a campaign called 'Nobody cares if you use AI', encouraging clients and artists to embrace AI tools. Well, I care, as do a lot of my colleagues. Even the Indonesian government is using AI art: they recently released a video promoting a scheme that provides free lunches for students. It's a great initiative, but it breaks my heart that they used AI instead of commissioning a talented Indonesian artist. I used to work in a small studio as a storyboard artist for TV commercials. Since AI appeared, I've seen colleagues lose jobs because companies are using Midjourney. Even those who've kept their jobs have had their wages reduced – and pay in south-east Asia is already low. Maybe my mum was right that I shouldn't be an artist. I've had to look for other sources of income – at the moment, I make cosplay props on commission. I love illustrating, but if I keep losing clients because of AI, I'll probably go into prop-making full-time. Annabel Beales, 49, copywriter, Southampton, UK I landed my dream job in 2023, writing content for a garden centre. I mostly did search engine optimisation, and wrote gardening tips for their magazine and blog. My colleagues were friendly and the hours were flexible. I've always loved reading and writing. I was brought up on a farm with no television, so I was always at the library, reading Judy Blume books. If I didn't like the ending, I would rewrite it. But I never thought then that I could pursue writing as a career: where I'm from, it was hard to break into anything creative – people either worked as nurses or at the local car manufacturer. Even though I wanted to be a writer, my mum had always told me to have a back-up plan. Copywriting didn't come to me straight away, so I did secretarial work for years, and admin roles in the public sector. I'd heard of some friends who needed a copywriter for their businesses, and I was interested in writing professionally, so I enrolled on an online course. It cost a month's wages and took eight months to complete, but I enjoyed the creativity. I got the gardening centre job a few months later. I'd interview different experts to write blogs on topics such as growing potatoes or planting trees. I threw myself into it and passed my probation. Around eight months in, I noticed I was getting less work. One day, I overheard my boss saying to a colleague, 'Just put it in ChatGPT.' The marketing department started to use it more often to write their blogs, and they were just asking me to proofread. I remember walking around the company's beautiful gardens with my manager and asking him if AI would replace me, and he stressed that my job was safe. Sign up to Inside Saturday The only way to get a look behind the scenes of the Saturday magazine. Sign up to get the inside story from our top writers as well as all the must-read articles and columns, delivered to your inbox every weekend. after newsletter promotion Six weeks later, I was called to a meeting with HR. They told me they were letting me go immediately. It was just before Christmas. Thankfully, I got a temp role doing admin work in January, but going back to that after having my dream writing job was devastating. The company's website is sad to see now. It's all AI-generated and factual – there's no substance, or sense of actually enjoying gardening. AI scares the hell out of me. I feel devastated for the younger generation – it's taking all the creative jobs. I'm now a PA in cancer research in the university sector. I feel more settled, but I regret going into copywriting. I got the job at the gardening centre at a time when my mum was terminally ill. I remember asking her whether I should take it, as it would mean I wouldn't be able to spend as much time with her. She told me to follow my dreams and go for it. I thought I'd be there for years, working as a copywriter until I retired. Looking back, I wish I had spent more time with my mum instead. Richie Tavake, 31, voice actor, San Francisco, US I've spent 10 years training to be a voice actor. It takes skill – it's my job to bring honesty to the story I tell. I recently played the main character, Jessie, in a survival video game. Jessie crash-lands on a snowy mountain – as his voice, I have to consider whether he's injured, how he feels and the shock he's in. My mum encouraged me to try acting classes while I was at university, as it was something I had always talked about doing. Immediately, I was hooked, and after a few semesters I decided to pursue it professionally. I started training seriously while taking customer service jobs to support myself. My first gig in a professional studio was an Animal Farm audio drama in 2023, in which I played Napoleon. It was a great experience to get mic'd up and perform with a whole cast. The effect of generative AI in my industry is something I've felt personally. Recently, I was listening to an audio drama series I'd recorded and heard my character say a line, but it wasn't my voice. I hadn't recorded that section. I contacted the producer, who told me he had input my voice into AI software to say the extra line. But he hadn't asked my permission. I later found out he had uploaded my voice to a platform, allowing other producers to access it. I requested its removal, but it took me a week, and I had to speak to five people to get it done. The Screen Actors Guild, SAG-AFTRA, began a strike last year against certain major video games studios because voice actors were unhappy with the lack of protections against AI. Developers can record actors, then AI can use those initial chunks of audio to generate further recordings. Actors don't get paid for any of the extra AI-generated stuff, and they lose their jobs. I've seen it happen. One client told me straight out that they have started using generative AI for their voices because it's faster. But when characters are written and voiced well, people relate to them. Take Batman, who was voiced by the late Kevin Conroy in the animated series. People appreciated his work because he brought the character to life. When done right, people will value it and pay money for it. There is also the issue of diversity. I'm American-Samoan and I wouldn't be happy to hear a Samoan voice generated by AI – it could be inaccurate and even offensive. It's just a bunch of numbers and words imitating a culture I was brought up in. A great example of this is Ghost of Tsushima, a video game that's based in Japan. All the cast were of Japanese heritage: they were in tune with the culture and they brought so much honesty to the story. AI can't replicate that. It's a machine; it doesn't have that background and it never will. Jadun Sykes, 28, graphic designer, Wakefield, UK As a kid I was always arty – sketching, making Play-Doh sculptures. I studied game design and art at college, and went down an Adobe Photoshop rabbit hole. It was fun and I was good at it, so I decided to turn it into a career, starting at the company when I was 21. They sell a platform that creates landing pages and email layouts. I'd design the templates and do bespoke work for clients. When generative AI came along, the company was very vocal about using it as a tool to help clients get creative. As a company that sells digital automation, developments in AI fit them well. I knew they were introducing it to do things like writing emails and generating images, but I never anticipated they'd get rid of me: I'd been there six years and was their only graphic designer. My redundancy came totally out of the blue. One day, HR told me my role was no longer required as much of my work was being replaced by AI. I made a YouTube video about my experience. It went viral and I received hundreds of responses from graphic designers in the same boat, which made me realise I'm not the only victim – it's happening globally, and it takes a huge mental toll. I went to college, I studied, I did six years of work. Was it all for nothing? After I was let go, I spent months looking for a job. I didn't find work in graphic design, but did get a job as a content creator at a PC manufacturer. I make videos of the production line, interview staff members and do some social media. I'm not worried here: my employers don't agree with replacing human roles with AI. I may use it to edit pictures but only to enhance something a human created – say, to remove cables in the back of a product image. We would never post an image entirely generated by AI, which is what my old company is doing. My advice to every graphic designer is to learn as many skills as possible. You have to be prepared.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Business
- Yahoo
Lorraine Kelly ‘left insulted' by GMB offer ahead of major presenting shakeup
Lorraine Kelly was 'left insulted' by an offer made by ITV in relation to her daytime series Lorraine. Last week, it was revealed that the channel is shortening Kelly's show by half and will reallocate those 30 minutes to Good Morning Britain instead, as part of a cost-cutting drive. From January 2026, Kelly's breakfast programme, which she has hosted for the past 15 years, will air from 9.30am until 10am for 30 weeks – instead of filling its usual 9-10am slot. Meanwhile, Good Morning Britain will run from 6am until 9.30am instead of 6am to 9am. It's now been claimed that Kelly, who appeared at Hay Festival earlier this week, was originally told that ITV wanted to merge her show with GMB – an idea that she reportedly rejected. According to MailOnline, the host 'was pulled into a meeting with bosses where she was told about Good Morning Britain'. 'It was proposed that her show would merge with GMB so that she presented the last 30 minutes of the broadcast, which is what happened when a reduced team were working during lockdown.' It's claimed Kelly 'told them no and said it wasn't even a possibility'. The reshuffle was made weeks later. A source told the outlet: 'The entire thing has been an insult and she's certain to leave when the year-long contract ends.' Kelly's programme will only run seasonally, with Good Morning Britain entirely taking over her original slot for the remaining 22 weeks of the year. The TV host will present her programme five days a week, with her Friday stand-ins Ranvir Singh and Christine Lampard no longer needed. This Morning and Loose Women will be unaffected by the scheduling changes and remain in their usual respective time slots. A source close to ITV told MailOnline: 'We were very open about the challenges in the industry and so several options were discussed – the key was ensuring Lorraine was retained and was as comfortable as possible in a changing landscape. 'Her show is still hugely valued – the show recently had its highest audience share in four years and still reaches 2.7 million people. Kevin Lygo, Managing Director of ITV's Media and Entertainment Division, said: 'Daytime is a really important part of what we do, and these scheduling and production changes will enable us to continue to deliver a schedule providing viewers with the news, debate and discussion they love from the presenters they know and trust as well generating savings which will allow us to reinvest across the programme budget in other genres. 'These changes also allow us to consolidate our news operations and expand our national, international and regional news output and to build upon our proud history of trusted journalism at a time when our viewers need accurate, unbiased news coverage more than ever.' It comes after ITV announced earlier this year that it would be minimising its soap schedule to try to reduce costs on Coronation Street and Emmerdale. From January 2026, the two much-loved dramas will air as half an hour episodes in a so-called soap 'power hour' from Monday to Friday each week. RedBird IMI and Banijay have reportedly approached the broadcaster with offers for its ITV Studios production arm, which makes programmes including the reality dating show Love Island, talent competition The Voice, and Jilly Cooper adaptation Rivals, among others. Andrew Cosslett, ITV chairman, said at the broadcaster's AGM last week, per The Sun: 'If someone approaches the company with an offer to talk, that's something we have to take seriously because we're representing your interests. 'And it's very clear from the room that there is a high level of interest in the share price and the value of the business. So we have to accommodate any requests and conversations that take place. 'But our current strategy is very clear and it's making the best of what we have in combination.' The Independent has contacted Kelly and ITV for comment.
