logo
SNP warned not to ‘squander' £9.1bn boost after Chancellor Rachel Reeves unleashed £300bn UK-wide splurge

SNP warned not to ‘squander' £9.1bn boost after Chancellor Rachel Reeves unleashed £300bn UK-wide splurge

Scottish Suna day ago

LABOUR challenged the SNP not to 'squander' a £9.1billion boost to Holyrood's coffers after the Chancellor turned on the taps at her spending review.
Rachel Reeves unveiled a £300billion UK-wide splurge in a bid to appease voters after her party's rocky first year in power.
2
Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar labelled the extra money as 'game-changing'
2
Finance Secretary Shona Robison claimed that if Ms Reeves was being fair, she'd have sent an extra £1bn a year to Holyrood
Announcing her long-term spending plans for the years from 2026, she confirmed major investment in defence and nuclear power plus a three per cent above-inflation increase to NHS spending down south.
Ms Reeves admitted 'too many people in too many parts of our country' were yet to feel the benefits of the 'change' they voted for when Labour swept back into power last July.
The knock-on effect of the Chancellor's funding pledges means a massive cash boost for the Scottish Government to spend as it sees fit.
Nats ministers will get an average annual boost of £2.4billion on day-to-day spending and £400million for major projects in the years to 2029.
That's on top of the £4billion-plus yearly bonus delivered last October from the first Budget of Sir Keir Starmer's government.
Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar labelled the extra money as 'game-changing'.
He said: 'These plans will bring billions of pounds of investment to Scotland — on top of the record Budget settlement.
'But the massive increase in funds must not be squandered by the SNP government, which has a track record of waste and failure.'
Scottish Secretary Ian Murray said voters would face a clear choice at next May's Holyrood election.
He said: 'It's either a third decade of the SNP, who've squandered their opportunity over the last 18 years and squandered the £4.9billion extra the UK Government gave earlier.
Top 5 takeaways from Spending review
'Or a government that's committed to investing in public services and infrastructure, renewing Scotland and working with a UK Labour government to deliver jobs right across the country.'
But experts warned the extra cash could be swallowed by Scottish Government pledges such as pay hikes for public sector workers and higher devolved benefits.
FUEL AID HOPE
NATS' Finance Secretary indicated the SNP might dish out more cash to pensioners after Labour's winter fuel payment U-turn.
But Shona Robison refused to commit to passing on all of an estimated extra £120million from Westminster to struggling Scots OAPs.
Labour has now said older people down south with an income below £35,000 will receive the handouts, following an outcry when they were axed.
Experts reckon the extra funds now due to Holyrood will be enough to cover £100 payments Nats have already pledged to pensioners.
Asked if the payments could be increased, Ms Robison said: 'There's other things we need to fund as well which is why we're looking at the options. We'll deliver the best deal for pensioners.'
Nats ministers are already set to spend £2billion more on welfare by the end of the decade than they receive from Westminster.
But SNP Finance Secretary Shona Robison claimed that if Ms Reeves was being fair, she'd have sent an extra £1billion a year to Holyrood.
She said: 'This review is business as usual from the UK Government, which is yet again treating Scotland as an afterthought and failing to provide the funding we need.
'Had our resource funding for day-to-day priorities grown in line with the UK Government's overall spending, we'd have £1.1billion more to spend on our priorities over the next three years. In effect, Scotland has been short-changed by more than a billion pounds.'
But despite the extra cash, an expert warned SNP policy decisions mean tax rises or spending cuts may be needed to balance Scotland's books by 2027/28.
David Phillips, associate director at the Institute for Fiscal Studies, said the winner of next year's election 'will face tough choices' due to increased NHS, benefits, and public sector pay costs.
Earlier, Ms Reeves told the Commons her plans were the start of Labour's project to 'renew Britain'.
She vowed to back the Acorn carbon capture project in Aberdeenshire.
But official documents raised questions about how the scheme, to store gas emissions under the North Sea, would be funded.
NUCLEAR SWIPE AT FM & CO
RACHEL Reeves slammed the SNP's opposition to arms factories and nuclear power as she confirmed defence spending hikes.
The Chancellor announced an £11billion boost for the armed forces plus a £600million increase for security and intelligence agencies.
She also confirmed a £250million redevelopment of the Faslane base on the Clyde, where new nuclear submarines will be stationed.
It means defence spending will be upped to 2.6 per cent of GDP by April 2027.
Ms Reeves blasted Nats' opposition to nuclear weapons and munitions.
She said: 'Investment in Scotland, jobs in Scotland, defence for the United Kingdom, opposed by the Scottish National Party, delivered by this Labour Government.'
Sir Keir Starmer previously set out the UK Government's Strategic Defence Review in a speech in Glasgow last week.
Nats and Labour clashed as the No10 chief claimed Nats' goal of scrapping Trident nuclear missiles would make Scotland less safe.
Sir Keir said: 'Imagine the effect that would have on the safety and security of the UK and of Scotland.'
They concluded: 'A final investment decision will be taken later.'
Scottish Tory finance spokesman Craig Hoy warned UK taxes will probably have to rise at the Budget this autumn.
He said: 'This spend-now-tax-later statement will offer no comfort to those betrayed by the first year of a disastrous Labour Government.
'Taxes remain sky-high and the Chancellor will almost certainly have to hike them further to pay for her spending plans, breaking yet another of her promises.'
Mr Hoy added: 'Scots are saddled with two failing, high-tax, left-wing governments — one at Westminster and the other at Holyrood.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kendall to add protections to welfare Bill amid backlash to cuts
Kendall to add protections to welfare Bill amid backlash to cuts

Leader Live

time28 minutes ago

  • Leader Live

Kendall to add protections to welfare Bill amid backlash to cuts

The package of measures is aimed at reducing the number of working-age people on sickness benefits, and the Government hopes they can save £5 billion a year by the end of the decade. The proposals include tightening of the eligibility criteria for personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability benefit in England, and cutting the sickness-related element of universal credit (UC). Dozens of Labour MPs last month urged the Prime Minister to pause and reassess planned cuts, saying the proposals are 'impossible to support'. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall told the Guardian there will be extra protections added to the Bill when it is published next week. She said: 'When we set out our reforms we promised to protect those most in need, particularly those who can never work. 'I know from my 15 years as a constituency MP how important this is. It is something I take seriously and will never compromise on. 'That is why we are putting additional protections on the face of the Bill to support the most vulnerable and help people affected by the changes. 'These protections will be written into law, a clear sign they are non-negotiable.' A Government impact assessment published alongside the reforms warned some 250,000 people, including 50,000 children, across England, Scotland and Wales, could fall into relative poverty after housing costs as a result of the changes.

Kendall to add protections to welfare Bill amid backlash to cuts
Kendall to add protections to welfare Bill amid backlash to cuts

Glasgow Times

time43 minutes ago

  • Glasgow Times

Kendall to add protections to welfare Bill amid backlash to cuts

The package of measures is aimed at reducing the number of working-age people on sickness benefits, and the Government hopes they can save £5 billion a year by the end of the decade. The proposals include tightening of the eligibility criteria for personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability benefit in England, and cutting the sickness-related element of universal credit (UC). Dozens of Labour MPs last month urged the Prime Minister to pause and reassess planned cuts, saying the proposals are 'impossible to support'. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall told the Guardian there will be extra protections added to the Bill when it is published next week. She said: 'When we set out our reforms we promised to protect those most in need, particularly those who can never work. 'I know from my 15 years as a constituency MP how important this is. It is something I take seriously and will never compromise on. 'That is why we are putting additional protections on the face of the Bill to support the most vulnerable and help people affected by the changes. 'These protections will be written into law, a clear sign they are non-negotiable.' A Government impact assessment published alongside the reforms warned some 250,000 people, including 50,000 children, across England, Scotland and Wales, could fall into relative poverty after housing costs as a result of the changes.

Fresh ageism row for the BBC after four axed senior journalists lodge discrimination claims
Fresh ageism row for the BBC after four axed senior journalists lodge discrimination claims

The Sun

timean hour ago

  • The Sun

Fresh ageism row for the BBC after four axed senior journalists lodge discrimination claims

FOUR senior journalists have lodged complaints with the BBC in a fresh ageism row. Their separate — but coordinated — discrimination claims come as the broadcaster merges its home and foreign newsdesks. 2 Bosses hope slashing 130 jobs will help save £700million. But the four, said to have worked in warzones and the aftermath of terror attacks, fear they have been earmarked for compulsory redundancy. Their move follows a group of BBC News presenters going to an employment tribunal over ageism allegations. Martine Croxall, Karin Giannone, Kasia Madera, and Annita McVeigh settled their three-year dispute in March, with the terms not disclosed. The latest cases involve employees aged over 50 and thought to have more than 100 years of experience between them. Sources said they believe the process of applying for the new jobs concentrates only on their work over the past two years — and so is weighted towards younger candidates. Marks were also said to be deducted if applicants failed to mention keywords such as 'digital' or 'live page'. It is reported one of the individuals is a representative of the National Union of Journalists, which has hit out at the compulsory redundancies. Last night, the BBC said: 'Restructuring in BBC News is taking place according to established BBC policies. 'We conduct all processes in a thorough and fair manner, and we are committed to supporting our staff throughout, including through comprehensive redeployment assistance.' 2

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store