Asbestos: More than 280 dumping incidents in NI since 2019
A spokesperson added: "Asbestos is particularly dangerous when disturbed, making its professional removal a highly specialised, complex and delicate operation crucial for public safety."In July the issue of asbestos material made headlines after it emerged a bonfire site in Belfast contained asbestos.The NIEA subsequently removed about 20kg of the material from the site between the Donegall Road and the Westlink in the south of the city.People in the area questioned why the asbestos had not been removed from the site before issues around the bonfire emerged.Environment Minister Andrew Muir defended the NIEA's handling of removing the material, accusing political opponents of "finger pointing".On Friday, Muir confirmed that the presence of asbestos at the site in Belfast was under criminal investigation.
Widespread problem
There have been more than 3,000 illegal dumping incidents recorded across Northern Ireland between 2019 and 2024 with material including everything from scrap metal to tyres.But new figures obtained by BBC News NI showed that, after mixed waste and general construction waste, asbestos was the most common illegally-dumped material in Northern Ireland.The law in Northern Ireland states that a licensed removal contractor must be used to dispose of asbestos, but it can often be an expensive process.
Failure to dispose of asbestos legally can result in prosecution and it is also the legal responsibility of the landowner to secure their land to prevent any illegal waste dumping.Antrim and Newtownabbey Council Area had the highest number of illegal asbestos dumping incidents, with 44 recorded since 2019.
In 2022 MPs called for a 40-year deadline for all asbestos to be removed from public and commercial buildings.Alan Lewis, a director at G&L consultancy in Northern Ireland, a company in Northern Ireland that provides asbestos management and removal services, said a lot of time and effort went into making asbestos removal safe."[We use] full enclosure air locks, negative pressure units, to keep the fibres within the area you're working in and drawing them out safely," he said."All asbestos waste needs to be packaged, labelled, taken from site and taken to the appropriate hazard waste disposal site."Reacting to the asbestos dumping figures he said: "Those numbers are high and I understand why people are concerned."When it comes to illegal dumping, you could have situations where asbestos is being transported and not contained properly, broken up on transit and dumped on the side of the road."
A spokesperson for the Health and Safety Executive Northern Ireland said the removal of asbestos was considered "a specialist activity which requires planning, surveying and assessing".Long-term, high-level exposure is needed to cause asbestosis and long-term, low-level inhalation exposure may cause lung disorders, such as asbestos-related cancer - mesothelioma.Symptoms of mesothelioma can take decades to develop, and it is almost always fatal.
'Shocking'
The charity Mesothelioma UK said the latest figures on the illegal dumping of asbestos were "extremely concerning"."We urge the UK government to establish a national task force to review and address every aspect of our shameful asbestos legacy," chief executive Liz Darlison said."The UK has the highest incidence of mesothelioma in the world, it is preventable and safe management and disposal of asbestos is at the root of the problem."Between 2014 and 2023, there were 699 asbestos-related deaths in Northern Ireland.Niamh Hagan's father died in 2022 soon after being diagnosed with mesothelioma.
Tony Rodgers had worked as a social worker all his life and his family said they had difficulty pinpointing any obvious exposure to asbestos."It really came as shock for our whole family when we found out that the type of cancer dad had was almost always caused by exposure to asbestos," Ms Hagan said.
She said the amount of asbestos being illegally-dumped was disgraceful."As someone who has lost one of the people I loved most in the world because of an asbestos-related illness, those statistics just make me cross, it's shocking," she said."It's scary to think that there are places where this dangerous material is just being dumped and members of the public aren't aware aware of it, that anybody could just stumble across."
BBC News NI previously reported that millions of pounds had been spent on removing asbestos from healthcare buildings and schools in Northern Ireland.The government has also paid out more than £40m in compensation for asbestos-related illnesses in Northern Ireland since 2011.In March this year the BBC launched a podcast called Assume Nothing: Killer Dust.It investigated the history and use of asbestos in the UK.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
30 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
GPs warned using AI to record patient notes can lead to dangerous inaccuracies
GPs have been warned to look out for 'inaccurate or fabricated' information when using AI to write their medical notes. Family doctors are increasingly using tools that listen to their consultations with patients and automatically add summaries to their records. But the Royal College of GPs has warned AI can misinterpret the nuance of conversations, with potential dangerous consequences. The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) also says there is a 'risk of hallucination which users should be aware of, and manufacturers should actively seek to minimise and mitigate the potential harms of their occurrence'. The safety watchdog is now urging GPs to report issues with AI scribes through its Yellow Card Scheme, which is typically used to report adverse reactions to medicines. This should include 'suspected inaccuracies', trade publication GP Online reports. The British Medical Association's GP Committee said earlier this year that 'the adoption of passive scribes in general practice has gathered significant pace', with practices using standalone systems or tools rolled out with other common software. Dr Phil Whitaker, a UK GP who recently moved to Canada, wrote in the New Statesman that an AI tool he used was 'not to be trusted'. He said it misinterpreted conversations with patients who asked him about his move from the UK - and recorded notes suggesting patients had recently moved to Canada instead. He added: 'I've caught it recording findings of examinations I haven't performed and detailing advice I haven't given. 'The company that makes it advises users to check its output carefully. 'For me, the time spent reading and editing outweighs any productivity gains.' And an article published by Fortune last month outlined a case in which 'a patient in London was mistakenly invited to a diabetic screening after an AI-generated medical record falsely claimed he had diabetes and suspected heart disease'. However, despite this growing use of AI and the recognition of potential problems, the MHRA said a search of its database revealed 'no adverse incident reports related to the use of AI scribes'. The government's 10-Year Health Plan says it intends to 'accelerate the adoption and spread of AI technology, such as AI scribes, by streamlining AI regulation'. A new national procurement platform will be set up next year to support GP practices and NHS trusts to adopt new technology safely. Professor Kamila Hawthorne, chair of the RCGP, said: 'AI has enormous potential for transforming the future of our health and patient care. Fewer than one in three Britons are comfortable with the prospect of using new AI features in the NHS App to diagnose their issues, a poll reveals. Health secretary Wes Streeting announced plans to revamp the app as part of Labour's 10-Year Health Plan so every patient could have a 'doctor in their pocket'. But a new survey found 44 per of the public are 'uncomfortable' with trusting the diagnosis and management of their conditions to artificial intelligence, with this figure rising to 60 per cent among pensioners. Only 31 per cent of the 2,030 respondents to the Savanta poll, for the Liberal Democrats, said they are 'comfortable' with the idea. Helen Morgan, the Liberal Democrat's health spokesperson, praised Labour for tackling bureaucracy but added: 'Making the NHS more efficient is of course welcome but it cannot come at the cost of leaving people behind as they try to grapple with digitised services rather than a real life doctor. 'Ministers need to allay these fears by offering support to those who are not digitally literate and older people to ensure that these sweeping changes benefit everyone.' Speaking at the Plan's launch last month, Mr Streeting said: 'The NHS App will become a doctor in your pocket, bringing our health service into the 21st century.' It will use patients' medical records and artificial intelligence to provide instant answers to users' questions and direct them to the best place for care. Dennis Reed, director of Silver Voices, which campaigns for elderly Britons, said at the time 'Elderly people will be sceptical about whether the plan will be delivered and concerned that greater reliance on the app could exclude them from accessing timely care. 'For some, the doctor in their pocket will be padlocked.' 'However, its use is not without risks and so its implementation in general practice must be closely regulated to guarantee patient safety and the security of their data. 'GPs are always open to introducing new technologies that can improve the experience of patients and help cut the administrative burden, and an increasing number of GP practices are now using AI scribing tools to improve the quality and efficiency of their consultations. 'While these tools can offer real benefits, particularly at a time of significant GP workforce pressures, there are some important concerns - particularly around data security of sensitive patient records, data controllership and the risk of inaccuracies. 'We are aware that AI scribes can produce inaccurate or fabricated details, and that they can also misinterpret the nuance of conversations. 'It is important that clinicians review AI-generated documentation for accuracy before adding it to the patient record.' The MHRA said: 'The MHRA is aware of this potential issue in AI enabled tools generally and this includes AI scribe tools. 'We recommend that GPs and healthcare professionals only use tools which are registered medical devices which have been determined to meet the required standards of performance and safety. 'Recently published MHRA guidance clarifies how these technologies qualify as medical devices and while this is specific to digital mental health, the principles apply across digital health applications. 'While not published by the MHRA, NHS England guidance encourages the use only of registered medical devices when used in a clinical context. 'We strongly encourage that all suspected adverse incidents, including suspected inaccuracies are reported to the MHRA via the yellow card scheme.' The watchdog said the yellow card scheme website had been updated to include 'a standalone page for software and AI as medical device'. Earlier this year, the BMA advised practices to pause use of AI scribes until they had carried out data protection and safety checks and sought assurances that the products meet NHS standards.
BBC News
30 minutes ago
- BBC News
Stoke on Trent charity 'stunned' by care board funding cut
Two Stoke-on-Trent charities that support older people have said they face the threat of closure due to NHS funding Beth Johnson Foundation's (BJF) dementia advocacy service and Saltbox's CareLink befriending and health intervention service said they both had their annual grants cut by the Integrated Care Board (ICB).Sue Read, CEO at the Beth Johnson Foundation, said she was "stunned" by the Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent ICB said 18 of 21 voluntary, community and social enterprise (VCSE) grants had been retained, and it had funded a six-month transition period until the end of September for three that were not. It said this was to support the organisations in finding a more suitable income ICB added it also offered support to service users of the organisations, which remained open during the transition. The third charity affected is Moorlands Home Link, which provides day care, meals on wheels and other services for more than 130 clients across the Staffordshire Moorlands. 'People will slip through the cracks' "The ICB claims that our dementia service can be provided by other organisations, which is untrue," said Ms Read."Older people with dementia advocacy needs simply do not meet the criteria of other charitable advocacy organisations, so there will not be any appropriate, local organisations to refer current and future community members to."She said she believed transitional conversations with the ICB had been "ineffective" in exploring how older members would be supported after funding ended."We worry about who would co-ordinate such a diluted service in the future, or whether older community members with dementia advocacy needs will simply fall through the cracks," she CareLink service provides phone calls, health intervention and crisis support, as well as befriending and a falls prevention service."What is becoming clear is that it is a dangerous business being an older person in Stoke-on-Trent," said CEO Lloyd Cooke."The ICB appears to have little regard for long-standing preventative services which provide a safety net to elderly, vulnerable residents and has based its assessment of our effectiveness as a service on a misinformed and flawed process. "We have been given no opportunity to challenge this or to appeal the decision." The ICB added that, as a result of the review, more than £2m in funding would continue to be invested into VCSE said it would also invest a further £2.2m into tackling and reducing health inequalities and enhancing health outcomes. It added savings of about £410,000 would be made by the grant review, which would be ringfenced to invest back into the VCSE sector. Follow BBC Stoke & Staffordshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
'Inadequate' Bradford care provider put into special measures
A care provider in Bradford has been placed into special measures following an inspection by the Care Quality Commission (CQC).Alchita Care Limited, which provides domiciliary care services, was inspected by the watchdog between 9 June and 10 July, with a report later giving it an overall rating of "inadequate". In the report, the CQC said: "At this assessment, we found breaches of the legal regulations in relation to safe care and treatment, need for consent and good governance."Alchita Care Limited was approached for comment and did not wish to provide a response. "Information within care plans was not always reflective of people's needs and contained inconsistent and out of date information," the report said. "We found multiple issues with medicines management including medicine records containing gaps and important information missing."The watchdog's report said support for staff was "not robust", despite most workers being positive about the help they had received. "They did not have access to policies and procedures to support them in their roles and they did not have access to accurate and up to date information to provide the right care to people," it added. The CQC will conduct regular reinspections to monitor the care provider's progress, it said, and assess whether the required improvements were being made. Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
