
3 Dividend Growth Stocks to Buy in June and Hold Forever
High-yield dividend stocks are great, but you know what's even better? High-yield dividends that can grow rapidly.
Prologis (NYSE: PLD), MPLX (NYSE: MPLX), and McCormick (NYSE: MKC) present investors with an unusual opportunity. They've been offering yields that are more than double the market average, plus they tend to raise their payouts rapidly. Here's why there's a good chance they'll generate a double-digit yield on cost for investors who buy now and hold over the long run.
1. Prologis
Prologis is the largest owner of logistics-related real estate on the planet and offers a 3.6% yield at recent prices. At the end of March, it owned or had investments in a stunning 1.3 billion square feet of logistics real estate.
Prologis has one of the best credit ratings of any real estate investment trust (REIT), which enables it to borrow at interest rates its tenants can only dream of. For many businesses that own their logistics infrastructure, selling a building to Prologis and leasing it back is a great option for raising capital.
Amazon rents more space from Prologis than any other tenant. At just 5% of total rent, though, this REIT could maintain its dividend payout even if the everything store suddenly becomes the hardly anything store. A slew of businesses fueling the e-commerce transition enabled Prologis to raise its dividend payout by an impressive 11.7% annually over the past five years.
Sale-leaseback deals are already popular in the U.S., but this form of financing is still catching on in international markets. Currently, less than 30% of Prologis' net operating income is derived from international markets. Ex-U.S. operations playing catch-up could allow this REIT to continue its long history of big dividend payout raises.
2. MPLX
MPLX is a midstream energy business that pushes heaps of gas and crude oil through its growing pipeline operation. Until 2012, it was part of Marathon Petroleum, and the oil refining giant still buys a lot of the crude flowing through its pipes.
MPLX is an income-seeking investor's dream come true because the revenue its pipelines generate is relatively reliable. Extra visibility regarding demand through its Marathon Petroleum tie-up gives it an advantage that translates to rapid dividend raises.
At the moment, MPLX offers a huge 7.5% yield, and a new investor's yield on cost could quickly reach a double-digit percentage. The pipeline operator has raised its dividend payout by 8.1% annually over the past decade. With first-quarter net income rising 12% year over year, a big payout bump in the near term seems likely.
Before filling your retirement account portfolio with MPLX shares, it's important to realize this is a master limited partnership (MLP). Since MLPs are tax-advantaged entities, things can get complicated if your traditional IRA receives more than $1,000 annually from MLP investments.
3. McCormick
Investors who want to add some flavor to their portfolios should consider McCormick, the spice and flavorings giant. This company has paid a dividend every year since 1925, and it's raised its payout for 38 consecutive years.
If you look around your favorite grocery store, you'll find products from several businesses with decades-long dividend-raising track records. That said, I don't think any of them are raising their payouts as quickly as the spice king. McCormick's payout has risen by 8.4% annually over the past 10 years.
Rising commodity costs abroad have pressured earnings growth in recent quarters and pushed the stock down by about 31% from its peak in 2020. So far, 2025 hasn't been a great year for selling spices. In the first quarter, sales hardly budged year over year. Despite the temporary challenges, McCormick expects adjusted earnings to rise by 6% this year, at the midpoint of management's guided range.
At its depressed price, McCormick offers an unusually large 2.5% yield. This isn't a huge starting point, but steady movement in the right direction means patient shareholders could receive a double-digit yield on cost by the time they're ready to retire.
Should you invest $1,000 in Prologis right now?
Before you buy stock in Prologis, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Prologis wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $651,049!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $828,224!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is979% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to171%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of May 19, 2025
John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Cory Renauer has positions in Amazon. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon and Prologis. The Motley Fool recommends McCormick and recommends the following options: long January 2026 $90 calls on Prologis. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Globe and Mail
21 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Better Artificial Intelligence Stock: Nvidia vs. AMD
Even with new export controls cutting off a vital market in China, demand for advanced chips used to power artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure remains high. While there is a growing market for custom AI chips, the most commonly used chips for running AI workloads are graphics processing units (GPUs). This name stems from the fact that these chips were originally designed to speed up graphics rendering in video games. Due to their powerful processing speeds, GPUs are now used for a variety of high-power computing tasks, such as training large language models (LLMs) and running AI inference. The GPU market is basically a duopoly at this point, headed by Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) and Advanced Micro Devices (NASDAQ: AMD). The question many investors ask, though, is: Which stock is the better buy? Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More » The leader versus the challenger The unquestioned leader in the GPU space is Nvidia, which commands an over 80% market share. Not only is Nvidia larger than AMD, but it's also been growing its data center revenue more quickly. Last quarter, Nvidia grew its data center revenue by 73% to $39.1 billion, while AMD's data center revenue jumped 57% to $3.7 billion. Nvidia's advantage comes from its software platform, CUDA. It launched the free software platform all the way back in 2006 as a way to let developers program its GPUs for different tasks in an effort to expand beyond the video game market. The company pushed the use of the software to universities and research labs, which made it the software program upon which developers were taught to program GPUs. While AMD made some half-hearted efforts with software, it didn't launch a true CUDA competitor until around 10 years later with ROCm. By that time, CUDA had already become the default software used to program GPUs, and ROCm was still behind with less hardware support, limited documentation, and more difficulty to install and use. Meanwhile, Nvidia has since expanded upon its software lead through a collection of AI-specific libraries and tools built on top of CUDA, called CUDA X, which helps bolster the performance of its chips for AI tasks. Ultimately, CUDA has given Nvidia a big network effect advantage. The more CUDA is used, the more tools and libraries are built for it, making Nvidia GPUs all the stickier. While ROCm continues to improve, it still trails CUDA, especially for use in LLM training. However, where AMD has been able to gain more traction is in AI inference. Training AI models is a much more difficult task, which is why Nvidia has dominated this market and where its CUDA advantage really shines through. Inference, on the other hand, is easier, and there is more of a focus on things such as latency, power consumption, and cost. Due to its competitive positioning, AMD's GPUs tend to be less expensive than those from Nvidia, and while its ROCm software trails CUDA, it is generally considered good enough for running most AI inference workloads. The good thing for AMD is that the inference market is eventually expected to become the much larger of the two markets. In fact, some pundits, including venture capitalist and former Facebook executive Chamath Palihapitiya, have said the inference market could be up to 100 times larger than the market for training AI models. But whether the inference market becomes 2 times bigger or 100 times than the training market, AMD could have an opportunity to gain some market share. Which stock is the better buy? When it comes to valuation, both stocks trade in a similar range. Nvidia has a forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of just over 32 times this year's analyst estimates, while AMD is at 28 times. Nvidia, meanwhile, is growing its revenue more quickly. With their valuations similar, the key factor to which stock will outperform in the coming years will largely come down to growth. Nvidia is the clear leader in the GPU space and should continue to see strong growth as the AI infrastructure buildout continues. However, its AI data center revenue is now 10 times that of AMD. so the law of large numbers can come into play. As AI infrastructure begins to shift more toward inference, AMD should have a nice opportunity to take some market share. Nvidia still has the lead in inference, but the gap is narrower compared to training. AMD also doesn't need to take a lot a of share in what could be a rapidly growing market to really make a big difference off its much smaller AI data center revenue base. As such, there is a good possibility it could begin to grow more quickly than the much bigger Nvidia. If that happens, I think its stock will outperform. Ultimately, investors can own both stocks, which is probably a good idea. With AI infrastructure spending still appearing to be in its early days, both should be winners, although I do think AMD has more potential upside. The biggest risk, meanwhile, would be if AI spending unexpectedly starts to slow. Should you invest $1,000 in Nvidia right now? Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $651,049!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $828,224!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is979% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to171%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Geoffrey Seiler has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Advanced Micro Devices and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Globe and Mail
21 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
To prevent blackouts, Trump administration keeps another aging power plant online through summer
HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — The U.S. Department of Energy has ordered another power plant, this time an oil and gas plant in Pennsylvania, to keep its turbines running through the hottest summer months as a precaution against electricity shortfalls in the 13-state mid-Atlantic grid. The department's order to the grid operator, PJM Interconnection, regarding the Eddystone power plant just south of Philadelphia on the Delaware River, is the department's second use of federal power under President Donald Trump to require a power plant to keep operating on the mainland United States. Constellation Energy had planned to shut down Eddystone's units 3 and 4 on Saturday, but Trump's Department of Energy ordered the company to continue operating the units until at least Aug. 28. The units can produce a combined 760 megawatts. The department, in its order, cited PJM's growing concerns about power shortfalls amid the shutdown of aging power plants and rising electricity demand. PJM has projected significant growth in electricity use to power America's fast-rising demand for artificial intelligence and cloud computing platforms. Demand for electricity has spiked for the first time in decades. In addition to artificial intelligence, crypto mining, the broader electrification of society and bipartisan political pressure to bring manufacturing back to the U.S. are fueling new electricity demand. PJM last year approved Constellation's request to shut down the units, but it welcomed the department's order to keep them operating, saying it's a 'prudent, term-limited step' that allows PJM, the department and Constellation to study the longer-term need and viability of Eddystone's units. In a statement Monday, Constellation said it is 'pleased' to work with the department and PJM and is taking emergency measures to meet the need for power 'at this critical time when America must win the AI race.' It also said it is trying to accelerate its restart of Three Mile Island 's Unit 1 to bring it online in 2027, instead of in 2028, as part of a deal to supply data centers run by tech giant Microsoft with carbon-free energy. PJM, based in Pennsylvania, earlier this year won federal approval to fast-track the construction of new power plants that critics said would favor natural gas plants over clean energy projects that don't emit planet-warming greenhouse gases. PJM has said a power shortage could affect the grid as early as 2026 as demand grows for electricity at the same time that aging coal-fired plants and nuclear plants are retiring. Clean energy advocates blame PJM for creating the existing reliability problem by taking an unduly long time to study proposed wind and solar energy projects in its project queue. Proposals awaiting PJM's approval are more than 97% solar, wind or battery storage, according to federal figures. Less than 3% are natural gas. The department took a similar step last week, ordering Consumers Energy to keep the J.H. Campbell coal-fired power plant open in Michigan past its Saturday retirement. The grid operator there, the Midcontinent Independent System Operator, said the order was unnecessary, that there was no energy emergency there and that there should be enough energy in the region through the summer. An environmental advocacy group, the Delaware Riverkeeper Network, criticized the move to keep Eddystone operating as an "environmental injustice." Shutting down the units would reduce hazardous pollution and carbon emissions from the decades-old facility and help the region meet federal clean air standards for smog, it said. ___

CTV News
22 minutes ago
- CTV News
Alberta wildfires: Several oil and gas companies forced to move their employees as facilities are threatened
Cenovus Energy, MEG Energy Corporation and Canadian Natural Resources had to evacuate workers from sites due to wildfires. Kathy Le has the latest.