Rubio accuses Macron of ruining Hamas-Israel talks
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has blamed France's announcement on recognizing a Palestinian state for the collapse of ceasefire talks between Israel and Hamas.
The Palestinian group was "emboldened" by French President Emmanuel Macron's decision, Rubio claimed in an interview with the Eternal Word TV network on Thursday.
Macron announced that his country would recognize Palestine as a state in a surprise statement on X last month, adding that he would formally do so at the UN General Assembly in September in New York. France would be the first G7 country or member of the UN Security Council to do so.
The UK and Canada followed Paris' lead shortly afterwards, prompting criticism from the US and Israel.
"Talks with Hamas fell apart on the day Macron made the unilateral decision that he's going to recognize the Palestinian state," Rubio asserted.
He added that Hamas could be "emboldened" by plans to recognize Palestinian sovereignty. "If I'm Hamas, I'd basically conclude: 'Let's not do a ceasefire, we can be rewarded, we can claim it as a victory'," Rubio said.
Macron's statement came amid efforts by US President Donald Trump's administration to end hostilities between Israel and the militant group. In late July, West Jerusalem withdrew its negotiators after more than two weeks of indirect talks in Qatar. Israel said the decision was made after it was displeased with Hamas' response to its ceasefire proposal. Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff said that the group's position showed "a lack of desire to reach a cease-fire in Gaza."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Toronto Star
37 minutes ago
- Toronto Star
Israel plans to widen coming offensive beyond Gaza City into last areas not under its control
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says Israel plans to widen its coming offensive beyond Gaza City to the last areas not yet under Israeli control, and where most of Gaza's 2 million residents have sought shelter as the territory slides toward famine. The mobilization of forces is expected to take weeks, and Israel may be using the threat of a wider offensive to try to pressure Hamas into releasing more hostages or surrendering after 22 months of war sparked by its Oct. 7, 2023, attack into Israel.
Winnipeg Free Press
37 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Israel plans to widen coming offensive beyond Gaza City into last areas not under its control
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says Israel plans to widen its coming offensive beyond Gaza City to the last areas not yet under Israeli control, and where most of Gaza's 2 million residents have sought shelter as the territory slides toward famine. The mobilization of forces is expected to take weeks, and Israel may be using the threat of a wider offensive to try to pressure Hamas into releasing more hostages or surrendering after 22 months of war sparked by its Oct. 7, 2023, attack into Israel. Any expansion of Israeli operations is likely to bring even more death and destruction to the war-ravaged territory, around 75% of which is already largely destroyed and controlled by Israel. A wider offensive would also force more people to flee and further disrupt the delivery of humanitarian aid during a severe hunger crisis. The plans have also sparked controversy in Israel. Families of the remaining hostages fear another military escalation could doom their loved ones, while former senior security officials have said there is little to be gained militarily. Netanyahu says Israel will go into the central camps Israel announced last week its plans to take over Gaza City, where it has already carried out major raids and heavy bombardment throughout the war. On Sunday, Netanyahu told a news conference that operations would be expanded into the 'central camps' and beyond. He appeared to be referring to the built-up Nuseirat and Bureij camps in central Gaza that date back to the 1948 war surrounding Israel's creation. Israel has carried out near-daily airstrikes in the camps since the start of the war but no major ground operations. Netanyahu referred to Gaza City, the central camps and Muwasi — a vast cluster of displacement camps along the coast — as Hamas strongholds. These areas, along with the central city of Deir al-Balah, are the only parts of Gaza that have not been almost completely destroyed in previous Israeli operations. They are also areas where Hamas may be holding hostages in tunnels or other secret locations. An Israeli official, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss aspects of the plans that have not been made public, said the operation will not begin immediately and will take a significant amount of time to scale up. One indication will be the potential mobilization of thousands of reservists. The official said the announced plans were partly aimed at putting pressure on various parties. Few places left to flee Netanyahu said Israel will allow civilians to flee to 'designated safe zones,' where 'they will be given ample food, water and medical care, as we have done before.' He did not say where they would go. Israel designated Muwasi as a humanitarian zone earlier in the war. The barren stretch of sandy coastline was soon filled with tents housing hundreds of thousands of people with little in the way of food, running water, toilets or trash collection. Israel has regularly carried out airstrikes against what it said were militants hiding out there, often killing women and children. Last month, Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz reportedly floated the idea of transferring Gaza's population to a so-called 'humanitarian city' that the military would build on the ruins of the southernmost city of Rafah — now a largely uninhabited Israeli military zone — on the border with Egypt. Netanyahu has vowed to eventually relocate much of Gaza's population to other countries through what he refers to as voluntary emigration. The Palestinians and much of the international community see it as forcible expulsion because Israel's offensive has made much of Gaza uninhabitable. They fear that concentrating people in the south would be a step toward implementing such plans. A possible negotiating tactic Netanyahu has said he will end the war if Hamas gives up power, lays down its arms and releases the remaining 50 hostages — around 20 of whom are believed by Israel to be alive. Israel would still maintain open-ended security control over Gaza and facilitate the departure of those who wish to leave, according to Netanyahu. He has said Arab forces friendly to Israel would administer the territory, but none are known to have volunteered, aside from an Israeli-backed armed group known for looting aid. Hamas has said, in line with international demands, that it would release the remaining hostages in return for a lasting ceasefire and an Israeli withdrawal from Gaza. The militant group says it is willing to hand over power to other Palestinians but will not give up its weapons as long as Israel occupies lands the Palestinians want for a future state. Israel may hope that ratcheting up pressure will yield further concessions from Hamas in U.S.- and Arab-mediated talks that appear to have broken down last month. But the hostages are Hamas' only remaining bargaining chip, and it is unlikely to give them up if it believes that Israel will then resume the war, attempt to eradicate the group and carry out plans to depopulate Gaza. Israel ended a previous ceasefire in March that had facilitated the release of 25 hostages and the remains of eight others. Since then, it has imposed a 2 1/2 month blockade that pushed the territory toward famine, launched daily airstrikes across Gaza, expanded its buffer zone and ordered mass evacuations. Hamas has only released one hostage during that time, as a gesture to the United States. Hamas-led militants killed some 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and abducted 251 others in the 2023 attack. More than half of the hostages have been released in ceasefires or other deals. Israel's offensive has killed around 61,500 Palestinians, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. The ministry, which is part of the Hamas-run government and run by medical professionals, does not say how many of those killed were civilians or combatants, but it says women and children make up around half of the fatalities. The agency's numbers are considered a reliable estimate by the U.N. and independent experts. Israel disputes them but has not offered its own figures. ___ Associated Press Writer Melanie Lidman in Tel Aviv, Israel, contributed to this report. ___ Follow AP's war coverage at
Vancouver Sun
an hour ago
- Vancouver Sun
Why the French are outraged that Perrier filtered its water: 'This really is our Water-gate'
An iconic French brand dating back more than 160 years, Perrier's reputation has been rocked by a scandal. Last year, a joint investigation by Le Monde and Radio France revealed that at least a third of the country's mineral water brands — including Perrier, Contrex, Vittel and Hépar, owned by Nestlé Waters — had been illegally treated. According to the investigation, French President Emmanuel Macron's government knew about the practices and responded by 'quietly' easing the regulations. Here's what you need to know about the Perrier scandal, and why some are calling it France's 'Water-gate.' Discover the best of B.C.'s recipes, restaurants and wine. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of West Coast Table will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. At the heart of the controversy is whether brands such as Perrier can continue to market themselves as 'natural mineral water.' The 2024 Le Monde and Radio France investigation found that bottlers had been using illegal purification techniques for 'spring' and 'natural mineral' water for years, including carbon filters, micro-meshes and ultraviolet light. 'This really is our Water-gate,' Stéphane Mandard, a Le Monde journalist who worked on the investigations, told the BBC . 'It's a combination of industrial fraud and state collusion.' After a six-month inquiry, a French Senate report released in May supported Le Monde and Radio France's findings. 'Despite the fact that this method of disinfection is a fraud against consumers, authorities chose not to pursue legal action following these revelations. They decided not to inform the public of this fraud, not to inform European authorities, and not to inform local authorities who would have had direct oversight,' Alexandre Ouizille, a senator who led the committee on mineral water, said in a press conference. Natural mineral water costs 100 to 400 times more than tap water, and France is one of the world's largest producers, The Guardian reports. Unlike tap water, which is filtered and treated, mineral water can't be altered, according to European regulations. To be labelled 'natural mineral water,' rules prohibit it from being treated in any way that changes its characteristics. Ouizille said that France's agency in charge of fraud control estimated the total amount of the deception to be over 3 billion euros ($4.8 billion). Originating from protected, underground sources, mineral water traditionally didn't require treatment to make it safe to drink. This is no longer the case, experts say. Human activity and extreme weather, such as flooding, are resulting in increased groundwater contamination. In April 2024, Nestlé destroyed two million bottles of Perrier 'as a precautionary measure' because of bacterial contamination in one of its wells in Vergèze, southern France. 'The commercial model of the big producers has worked very well. But it is absolutely not sustainable at a time of global climate change,' hydrologist Emma Haziza told the BBC. 'When you have big brands that feel they have no choice but to treat their water, that means they know there is a problem with the quality.' Following the Le Monde and Radio France investigation, Nestlé Waters admitted using prohibited filters and ultraviolet treatment on mineral waters and paid a fine of 2 million euros ($3.2 million) to avoid legal action. The French Senate inquiry put the issue back in the spotlight. In February, Macron said , 'I am not aware of these things.' Adding that there hadn't been an 'agreement' with Nestlé and that 'there is no collusion with anyone.' However, the Senate report found that the government was involved in concealing Nestlé's prohibited water treatment methods. 'The presidency of the republic had known, at least since 2022, that Nestlé had been cheating for years,' the commission concluded . The findings have further rocked consumer confidence. 'I trust tap water more now,' one French grocery shopper told France 24 . Another said, 'I feel like we've been cheated.' The commission interviewed 120 people in its inquiry, including CEO Laurent Freixe and senior managers at Nestlé, the Swiss food and beverage giant. At a Senate hearing earlier this year, Freixe admitted that Perrier had used prohibited water treatments and that an official hydrologists' report recommended against renewing 'natural mineral water' status at the company's groundwater aquifer between Nîmes and Montpellier in southern France. On July 3, Nestlé said it had removed prohibited filtration devices but has yet to prove that Perrier springs can meet the legal 'natural mineral water' criteria, Le Monde reports. Perrier wells are located in a heavily populated, hot agricultural area that felt the effects of five years of successive droughts, Haziza told the BBC. Though Perrier may be the most prominent bottler to face issues, she expects more to follow. 'We can foresee that what has happened first at Perrier's site will happen to other producers in the years to come. That's why we need to move away from our current model of consumption.' Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our cookbook and recipe newsletter, Cook This, here .
