Who monitors the M48 Severn Bridge and ANPR cameras?
Its remit includes controversial and arguably ineffective policies, such as the enforcement of Severn Bridge weight limits through Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) cameras. Until now, the absence of such cameras had raised questions. However, the group's internal slideshow confirmed that ANPR cameras are now operational - a detail which is also missing from online sources. According to the body's slideshow, ANPR cameras have been in place since the end of June.
Previous weight limit enforcement problems: https://www.southwalesargus.co.uk/news/25210580.chepstow-severn-bridge-misinformation-policing-weight-limit/
The steering group includes fourteen members:
Three officials from National Highways
Representatives from Welsh Government
Officers from Monmouthshire and Gloucestershire county councils
One regional government officer
A director from a UK government-funded transport advocacy group
Additional members from business organisations.
Despite internal claims about ANPR monitoring, it remains unclear whether the use of the Severn Bridge by HGVs is being actively tracked. A senior councillor recently stated that enforcement of weight limits, by ANPR cameras, falls to the back-office functions of Avon and Somerset Police, who oversee policing on the bridge. The South Wales has submitted freedom of information requests in respect to summonses, but the information is unlikely to be available, given how current the data is.
You can read the latest possible enforcement failures here: https://www.southwalesargus.co.uk/news/25279665.severn-bridge-weight-limit-compared-steelworks-closure/
The group's presentation outlines two sets of plans for restoring the bridge:
Short- to medium-term fixes, expected to continue until late 2026
Long-term solutions, beginning in 2027, broken down into: Measures: continuation of current maintenance efforts Interventions: structural reinforcements, particularly to the bridge's cables
When asked who was responsible for democratic oversight, National Highways responded:
'National Highways has set up a dedicated steering group to support, assist and advise on the future of the bridge, drawing on expertise from freight representatives and key authorities. We remain committed to finding a timely and effective solution that ensures the safety and longevity of this iconic structure. Regular briefings will be provided to MPs, local councils and stakeholders, and no payments are made to members of the group.'
Despite its connections with the UK Government and overlap with regional and local authorities, the steering group lacks elected officials and, to date, there is no clear mechanism for holding it to account, raising ongoing concerns about transparency and democratic oversight.
Bulwark and Thornwell councillor Sue Riley commented: 'I am aware of the steering group but have no clear idea who is on it beyond Paul Matthews, CEO, nor do I understand its remit. I cannot go so far as to call it a quango because I have no idea of its purpose or the agenda of those involved. It is certainly not democratic and is not, as far as I'm aware, engaging with residents or local members.'
Newport councillor Steve Cocks simply added 'I have no knowledge of it,' a view echoed by Newport Conservative councillor William Routley, who expressed concerns about unelected officials increasingly gaining power over democratic bodies.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
3 days ago
- BBC News
Cutting North West Relief Road "a missed opportunity", Shropshire HGV driver says
After decades of talking about a bypass to complete a ring of A roads around Shrewsbury, the project is over, or "dead in the water", according to Shropshire Council's new Kidd said the council could not afford to pay for the road after the Labour government insisted that it was not willing to meet a funding shortfall of £ the route was far from universally popular, the latest news has been met with disappointment and frustration from some residents, who have said the North West Relief Road (NWRR) was desperately needed to solve some of the town's traffic driver Kyle Longmuir said the bypass would have taken some of the heavy goods vehicles off the existing A roads, which are already too congested. "It can be quite dangerous and you try not to get frustrated when people overtake you," said Mr Longmuir, from Shawbury."When it's busy it's slow and people make silly mistakes when there's more traffic around because people are impatient."If we could have a better flow of traffic, then people would make less questionable decisions and we wouldn't have as many accidents." Residents living in villages north of Shrewsbury were hoping that the NWRR would have stopped drivers using the area as a cut-through, or "rat run".Tamarin Bibow, who lives in Ruyton-XI-Towns with her husband and young family, addressed Shropshire councillors last month and asked the new administration to outline plans to tackle the problem."We suffer personally, as do may local residents, from serious pollution, both noise and air quality, resulting from traffic forced to come through our village," she said."Most of these vehicles use the rat run only because drivers see no practical alternative."The council said it would continue to assess the weight, width and speed restrictions in the area. What now for Shrewsbury's traffic woes? Both Shropshire Council and Shrewsbury's Labour MP Julia Buckley have co-signed a letter to the government to say that the council can no longer afford to build the road, which was estimated earlier this year at £ council is waiting to find out if it has to pay the government back the £54.4m it was awarded in 2019 to contribute towards the project, then valued at £ than £20m of the Department for Transport funding has already been spent, largely on design engineer consultancy fees. Shropshire Council hopes the debt is written off and that it can keep the remaining money to spend on improving congestion elsewhere in the council's Liberal Democrat leader Heather Kidd said Shrewsbury could not afford to wait years for improvements to get under said the council was willing to contribute capital funding towards improvements to the existing A roads around the town, which are managed by National Highways. "I have met with National Highways and Midlands Connect because the Dobbies island is a significant problem for the whole area and it stacks up traffic in either direction," she said."My concern is that their schemes take a long time to come to fruition, so we need to lobby further and use our MPs to make sure it's speeded up."There are things that can be done in the short-term, which will get people on and off that road quicker."Ms Kidd would also like to see improvements to the roundabout where Welshpool Road joins the A5, to the west of Shrewsbury, and the Battlefield roundabout, which links the A53 with the A49 north of the town."We also need to encourage traffic out of the town centre, but until we've done much more around the inner ring-road and A5 and so on, it's going to be difficult," she leader admitted that there was no quick fix and that significant improvements would take years to happen. Shropshire Council is being supported by Shrewsbury's Labour MP, who said she wanted the local authority to keep hold of some of the remaining government grant so it could be reinvested in traffic improvement schemes elsewhere in the Buckley said: "My dream investment with that cash is the roundabout at Battlefield where we've got the enterprise park."She said the roundabout was too small for the volume of traffic."The field next to it is up for sale and I would love to double the size of the roundabout, open up access, and then double the size of the business park," she plans to improve travel and traffic in Shrewsbury have been outlined in the Shrewsbury Moves include improvements to park and ride services, public transport and the pedestrianisation of large parts of the town those plans, Shrewsbury would be divided into three "loops" and the road layout would restrict general traffic passing through the town via the Welsh, English and Kingsland bridges or past the railway station. That would put more traffic on the inner and outer ring roads, but Paul Carvell from the Shrewsbury Business Improvement District said he believed there was enough capacity on those to cope. Follow BBC Shropshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Spectator
7 days ago
- Spectator
Can Reform beat the blob?
Shortly after he was elected as Britain's youngest council leader last month, 19-year-old George Finch of Reform UK had a conversation with Monica Fogarty, the chief executive of Warwickshire county council, about which of them was really running the show. In Finch's telling, this was a watershed moment: he offered a 'professional working relationship' but the relationship quickly soured. 'I know you're trying to get rid of me,' Fogarty said, according to Finch. 'Well, you can't get rid of me. The way it works around here is: your councillors play ball.' Finch allegedly replied: 'Are you joking? You have to work with us. It's not the other way around. We've been put here by the electorate. You haven't.' He says now: 'The old Tory leader just gave her loads of delegated powers.' Reform has just marked 100 days run-ning 12 town halls across the country, a period which has seen clashes between elected councillors and the permanent bureaucracy. These have been most acute in Warwickshire, ground zero in Reform's fight to show it can get things done in the face of resistance from 'the blob' of permanent officials. In Warwickshire, Finch and Fogarty first fell out when Finch demanded the removal of the Pride flag from council HQ. Fogarty refused, though the flag came down at the end of Pride month. When told she did not have the necessary planning permission to fly the flag, Fogarty said there was no formal policy for doing so. Finch is pushing for a ban, which requires a vote in full council. The confrontation turned ugly after Finch says council legal advisers told him he wouldn't have a leg to stand on if Reform opposed plans to remodel a junction, sending HGVs past a school to an industrial zone. 'You can't stop it,' he was told. 'You'll go into judicial review.' When the issue came up in council and an amendment was tabled to delay the plans, only at that point did the legal adviser reverse the advice and tell Finch he could defer a decision. His councillors told him he had been 'stitched up' by officials who had wanted to push the plan through. Reform backed the delay. Farage's team point to Fogarty's background as a race relations officer to say she was ideologically opposed to a crackdown on diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policies. Finch says: 'When it came to policy on DEI and net zero, it was literally like Yes Minister. Officials said: 'Are you sure this is what you want to do? Voters might not like it.' But this is why we were elected.' When Finch asked to look at Fogarty's employment contract, he was at first told she didn't have one. After three weeks, a document appeared with details redacted. Warwickshire county council declined to provide a response prior to publication to any of Finch's claims. Warwickshire is not the only battlefield. In Kent, where Reform is imitating Donald Trump's Doge unit to slash waste, officials resisted moves to scrap a net-zero renewables programme that involved the purchase of a fleet of electric vehicles and was to cost nearly £40 million. Luke Campbell, the Olympic gold-medallist boxer elected mayor of Hull and East Yorkshire, told the Telegraph that officials were blocking his agenda. They say his 'one-man band' approach created a 'toxic working environment'. These clashes are a sign of what a Reform government might be up against if they win national power in 2029. Official resistance takes several forms: an ideological opposition by left-wing local officials to the policies of the populist right; a belief in experience over politicians who have not run a bath, let alone a £1 billion budget; a preference for process over political pronouncements; and a power struggle between those who have a public mandate and those who think they know best. Simon Case, who worked for David Cameron, Theresa May and Boris Johnson in No. 10 and who wrestled with Dominic Cummings's efforts to reform/blow up Whitehall, admits there can be ideological differences: 'You have to spend a lot of time as cabinet secretary, reminding the whole system of what the civil service code says, which is that you're there to support the government of the day, no matter how uncomfortable that is. Ultimately, if you don't want to work for them, resign.' He commends Oliver Robbins, the permanent secretary at the Foreign Office, who recently wrote to his staff telling them to resign if they didn't like Labour's policy on Gaza. Case has publicly recommended that the civil service admit Reform to contact talks with mandarins 12 months before the 2029 general election, if there is any prospect of them even sharing power. He says there is an onus on officials to anticipate 'cultural changes', as well as policy changes, to 'learn the language' of the 'new boss class'. When he presided over the transition from Tories to Labour, Case told civil servants: 'Here's a bunch of people who aren't going to talk about 'levelling up' any more. They care about exactly that same thing, but don't call it 'levelling up'. Read the speeches and read the manifesto so you understand their way of thinking.' But he also urges Farage not to assume that he can simply transpose the lessons of Warwickshire on to Whitehall. 'Politicians across the political spectrum are united in their frustration that the British system isn't delivering,' Case says. 'The really interesting question for Reform is will they do the homework required to understand immediately the changes they need to make in how government works? Nigel Farage probably never spends time at the Institute for Government [thinktank] – but read what the IfG says about what is wrong with government, what is wrong with the bureaucracy and the laws that have put unaccountable officials in charge of things instead of politicians.' Case says 'most of the time' clashes between officials and ministers come about because civil servants say: 'Here are all the reasons why you can't do what you want to do because you don't actually have the power to do it.' The main target for Reform is the European Convention on Human Rights, which lets judges defy ministers and voters on migration. But huge power also resides with quangocrats in arms-length organisations. Morgan McSweeney, Starmer's chief of staff, complains that 60 per cent of government press officers are working against his own spin-doctors for taxpayer-funded organisations with agendas of their own. Case can see a scenario in which a prepared Reform government produces a great repeal bill with the Brexit slogan 'Take back control'. He explains: 'If they did their homework, you could remove all of those obstacles at a stroke. It's not just the top things, like scrapping the Office for Budget Responsibility, but here are all the people who can block planning applications for motorways or power stations. Here are all the statutory consultees every time you launch a new business support programme.' Reform's voters tend to think the system has failed and want to destroy it rather than make it function better. But Labour voters also thought the system had failed and they are now being let down by Starmer's inability to deliver the change he promised. McSweeney spent the pre-election period working on how to win rather than how to govern, wrongly assuming Sue Gray was taking care of that. Since he replaced her in October he has, an ally says, become 'infected with governmentitis' – a near manic obsession with how the system fails. Farage's attention is now on how to secure national power for the first time, but if the opportunity is presented to him, it will be because everything else has failed and the whole country – as well as his voters – will need him to make a success of it. As America's founding father Benjamin Franklin put it: 'Fail to prepare and you prepare to fail.' If Farage does not develop a plan for governing as well as winning, it won't just be the blob that is to blame.
The Herald Scotland
12-08-2025
- The Herald Scotland
MPs call for free bus travel for under-22s in England
Free bus travel is offered to under-22s in Scotland. People aged 16-21 in Wales are entitled to a one-third discount on fares, and from next month will be able to travel for £1 per journey. Parts of England offer discounted or free bus travel for young people, such as London for 16 and 17-year-olds. People are entitled to free bus travel in England when they reach the state pension age, which is currently 66 but will rise from next year. Bus fares in England for all passengers are capped at £3 until March 2027. In a report on buses, the select committee said: 'England's patchwork of local youth concessions contrasts with national schemes in Scotland and Wales. 'A coherent national approach to ensure fair access across England is essential if the Government is serious about driving economic growth, which depends on removing barriers to education, training, and employment for the next generation.' The report described public transport as a 'major barrier to employment for young people', especially in places with limited services. It added: 'In some areas, transport is restricting opportunity rather than enabling it.' The committee urged the Government to reform the way local bus services are funded, with longer-term settlements. It also called for a national ambition for a minimum level on public transport connectivity. Department for Transport (DfT) figures show the number of bus journeys taken in England outside London fell by 22% from 4.6 billion in 2009 to 3.6 billion in 2024. Labour MP Ruth Cadbury, who chairs the committee, said: 'Those most affected by unreliable or even non-existent buses include the young, who need them to get to school, college, university and their first jobs. 'Denying young people these experiences denies them their life chances. 'We call for a universal, free bus pass for all under-22s to equalise opportunity. 'While the bus fare caps have been beneficial, the Government has yet to spell out a coherent strategy of what they aim to achieve, and whether more targeted options could produce better outcomes. 'While the Government's Bus Services Bill contains positive ideas, the Transport Committee's report says ministers should go further to get bums back on seats.' The Bill, which is going through Parliament, will lead to an overhaul of buses, such as by giving all local transport authorities new powers to run their own services. It will also reduce some of the red tape involved in bus franchising, including reducing the minimum period between local areas taking control of services and being allowed to start operations. A DfT spokesperson said: 'After decades of decline, we're providing a record £1 billion in multi-year funding to improve the reliability and frequency of bus services across the country. 'Our landmark Bus Services Bill will protect routes and prevent services from being scrapped, bringing buses back into local control, and will put passengers at the heart of services. 'We have also stepped in to prevent a fare hike for passengers by extending the £3 fare cap until March 2027.'
