logo
Greenland government calls Trump's acquisition talks 'unacceptable'

Greenland government calls Trump's acquisition talks 'unacceptable'

Yahoo16-03-2025

The government of Greenland called President Donald Trump's comments about taking control of the country "unacceptable" in a statement Friday.
Officials noted the statement was prompted by Trump's meeting with the NATO secretary general Thursday, when he reportedly "reiterated his desire for annexation and control of Greenland."
In response, the leaders of all political parties elected to Inatsisartut, the Parliament of Greenland that includes the Demokraatit, Naleraq, Inuit Ataqatigiit, Siumut and Atassut parties, issued the statement on X.
Greenland Pm Seeks Independence Following Trump Acquisition Comments
"We — all the party leaders — cannot accept the repeated statements regarding annexation and control of Greenland," leaders wrote. "We find this behavior toward friends and allies in a defense alliance unacceptable."
They added they "must underscore that Greenland will continue serving ITS people through diplomatic relations, in accordance with international law."
Read On The Fox News App
Amb. Carla Sands: Trump Administration's Focus On Greenland — Why We Hope To Strengthen Our Relationship
The document was signed by Greenlandic politicians Jens Frederik Nielsen of the Demokraatit party, Pele Broberg of the Naleraq, Múte B. Egede of the Inuit Ataqatigiit, Vivian Motzfeldt of the Siumut and Aqqalu C. Jerimiassen of the Atassut.
"We all support this wholeheartedly and strongly distance ourselves from attempts to create discord. Greenland belongs to the Greenlandic people, and we (as leaders) stand in unison," they wrote.
In the country's recent parliamentary elections, the Demokraatit party defeated Greenlandic Prime Minister Múte Egede's party, Inuit Ataqatigiit.
Independence from Denmark became a core election issue in Trump's continued comments about U.S. acquisition of Greenland.
Trump tried in his first term to buy the mineral-rich, key geographical territory in what he called a "large real estate deal."
Trump: Us Considering Possibly Buying Greenland
Greenland Prime Minister Múte Egede said in January the country was "not for sale and will never be for sale."
American interest in Greenland dates back to the 1800s.
In 1867, the State Department looked into purchasing Greenland and Iceland, but after World War II, Denmark rejected a proposed $100 million deal from President Harry Truman.
Acquiring the land would mark the largest expansion of American territory in history, topping the Louisiana Purchase.
The White House did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment.
Fox News Digital's Rachel Wolf contributed to this story.Original article source: Greenland government calls Trump's acquisition talks 'unacceptable'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Withdraws From Agreement With Tribes to Protect Salmon
Trump Withdraws From Agreement With Tribes to Protect Salmon

New York Times

time7 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Trump Withdraws From Agreement With Tribes to Protect Salmon

President Trump moved on Thursday to withdraw from a Biden administration agreement that had brokered a truce in a decades-long legal battle with tribes in the Pacific Northwest. The federal government has been mired in legal battles for decades over the depletion of fish populations in the Columbia River Basin, caused by four hydroelectric dams in the lower Snake River. Native American tribes have argued in court that the federal government has violated longstanding treaties by failing to protect the salmon and other fish that have been prevented by the dams from spawning upstream of the river. That legal fight is now expected to resume, with no brokered agreement in place. In its statement announcing the withdrawal, the White House made no mention of the affected tribes and portrayed the issue falsely as revolving around 'speculative climate change concerns.' The tribes had called for the dams to be breached as a way to restore the salmon population, a proposal that has faced intense pushback because of the potential costs. A study found that removing the four dams was the most promising approach to restoring the salmon population, but also reported that replacing the electricity generated by the dams, shipping routes and irrigation water would cost between $10.3 billion and $27.2 billion. The 2023 agreement from the Biden administration, a memorandum of understanding with the tribes that brokered a 10-year truce in the legal battles, committed $300 million to Washington, Oregon and the tribes to restore the wild salmon population. The Biden administration allocated another $60 million to the effort last year. But the Biden administration did not take a position on the most contentious proposal of breaching the dams. The agreement called for additional study of the proposal and committed to supporting clean energy projects that could replace the power generated by the dams. However, the Biden White House noted in a statement that any decision and authority to breach the dams 'resides with Congress.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Judge orders Trump to return National Guard to California's control
Judge orders Trump to return National Guard to California's control

Axios

time9 minutes ago

  • Axios

Judge orders Trump to return National Guard to California's control

A federal judge on Thursday granted California Gov. Gavin Newsom's request to block the Trump administration from federalizing the National Guard for deployment to Los Angeles amid protests over federal immigration raids. The administration filed a notice of appeal appeal soon after the ruling. The big picture: The administration has activated some 4,000 National Guard members and mobilized hundreds of Marines in response to protests in the area sparked by federal immigration raids. Newsom has slammed the move as "purposefully inflammatory" and has been locked in a tense standoff with President Trump for days. The unrest has spread, with demonstrations denouncing the administration's mass deportation push popping up coast to coast. Driving the news: U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer said in a Thursday evening order in response to Newsom's request for emergency relief that the Trump administration's actions were "illegal." Catch up quick: On June 10, Newsom requested a temporary restraining order to "prevent the use of federalized National Guard and active duty Marines for law enforcement purposes on the streets of a civilian city." The request did not seek to bar the Guard from protecting federal buildings or property but rather sought "narrow relief tailored to avoid irreparable harm to our communities and the rule of law." Breyer did not initially intervene in that request and granted the Trump administration more time to respond to the governor. The other side: The Justice Department in a Wednesday filing argued that Trump had" every right under the Constitution and by statute to call forth the National Guard and Marines to quell lawless violence directed against enforcement of federal law."

Stock market today: Dow, S&P 500, Nasdaq futures sink, oil surges as Israel launches strike against Iran
Stock market today: Dow, S&P 500, Nasdaq futures sink, oil surges as Israel launches strike against Iran

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Stock market today: Dow, S&P 500, Nasdaq futures sink, oil surges as Israel launches strike against Iran

US stock futures fell Thursday as an Israeli attack on Iran shook global markets, leading oil prices to spike as the Israeli defense minister declared a state of emergency. Futures attached to the Dow Jones Industrial Average (YM=F) dropped 1.1%. S&P 500 futures (ES=F) plunged 1.3%, and those attached to the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 (NQ=F) sank 1.5%. On Thursday night, Israel conducted what it called a "preemptive strike" against Iran, citing fears over development of nuclear weapons in Tehran. Explosions erupted across the Iranian capital, reports said. Crude oil (CL=F) soared 6% as the strikes hit the fourth largest producer in OPEC+. The safe-haven asset of gold (GC=F) jumped as much as 1%. Israel's defense minister suggested the country was bracing for retaliation. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Israel took "unilateral action," saying the US was not involved in the strikes and warning Iran against targeting US interests and personnel. The dramatic developments came after a day where stocks crept higher despite questions around President Trump's domestic agenda, as he hinted at steps that could rattle markets. The president floated hiking auto tariffs just a day after he said he would impose unilateral tariff rates on countries within two weeks. Separately, he reiterated his call for a jumbo rate cut from the Federal Reserve, adding that he "may have to force something" amid easing inflation. Read more: The latest on Trump's tariffs Overall, stocks have edged up this week as a trade deal between China and the US, as well as unexpected signs of softening inflation, boosted investor sentiment. On Friday, Wall Street will get insight into how consumers are faring amid tariff uncertainty with the latest University of Michigan survey. Next week, Wall Street's attention will shift to the Fed with policymakers set to issue their next decision on interest rates on Wednesday. Analysts expect the central bank to hold rates steady. Israel has attacked Iran in the largest recent escalation of tensions in the region. Markets reacted swiftly to the news, with the three major gauges all plunging over 1%. Gold (GC=F) and oil prices surged with investors scurrying to safer assets, hoping to avoid the worst of a financial shake up. Iran is the fourth largest producer of oil within OPEC+, and the attack has caused prices to surge over 5%. Brent crude (BZ=F) futures jumped 5.5% to $73.27 a barrel while West Texas Intermediate surged 5.9% to $72.05 a barrel. Gold (GC=F) popped 0.9% to $3,434.40 an ounce. A retaliatory attack from Iran against Israel is expected imminently, with a 'special situation' being declared by the Isreali defense minister. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Israel took "unilateral action", clarifying that the US was not involved in the strikes ahead of a sixth meeting between the US and Iran on Sunday. Israel has attacked Iran in the largest recent escalation of tensions in the region. Markets reacted swiftly to the news, with the three major gauges all plunging over 1%. Gold (GC=F) and oil prices surged with investors scurrying to safer assets, hoping to avoid the worst of a financial shake up. Iran is the fourth largest producer of oil within OPEC+, and the attack has caused prices to surge over 5%. Brent crude (BZ=F) futures jumped 5.5% to $73.27 a barrel while West Texas Intermediate surged 5.9% to $72.05 a barrel. Gold (GC=F) popped 0.9% to $3,434.40 an ounce. A retaliatory attack from Iran against Israel is expected imminently, with a 'special situation' being declared by the Isreali defense minister. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Israel took "unilateral action", clarifying that the US was not involved in the strikes ahead of a sixth meeting between the US and Iran on Sunday. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store