Textile bodies demand continuation of original EFS
The presser held at PHMA House with leaders of different textile associations strongly opposing the imposition of Sales Tax at the import stage under the scheme, warning it would undermine the purpose of facilitating exporters. The forum called on the Government of Pakistan to continue the scheme under section 880(1)(b) of SRO 957(I)/2021, which allows local input goods liable to sales tax to be supplied against zero-rated invoices. This provision, they said, ensures liquidity, competitiveness, and formalization across the export-oriented industry value chain.
'EFS is inevitable and a lifeline for enhancing national exports,' the associations declared in a unified voice. They urged the reinstatement of local procurement under the scheme to support the entire textile value chain, enabling a level playing field and a win-win for all stakeholders.
Export Facilitation Scheme be retained in FY26 budget
They explained that the scheme was launched in 2021 after wide consultation with stakeholders to simplify and streamline export procedures. EFS merged all previous schemes into one, reduced documentation requirements, and introduced a single-window digital system through WeBOC and Pakistan Single Window (PSW). The fully automated system includes real-time audits and helps regulate compliance costs.
According to the forum, since its inception, the EFS has played a crucial role in easing liquidity pressures and supporting exporters' competitiveness. The press conference was addressed by leaders including Jawed Bilwani (Chief Coordinator, Value-Added Apparel & Textile Associations Forum), Muhammad Babar Khan (Central Chairman, Pakistan Hosiery Manufacturers & Exporters Association), Ijaz Khokhar (Former Chairman, Pakistan Readymade Garments Manufacturers & Exporters Association), Rafiq Godil (Former Chairman, Pakistan Knitwear & Sweater Exporters Association), Farooq Rahman Dittu (Pakistan Cotton Fashion Apparel Exporters Association), Ather Bari (Chairman, Towel Manufacturers Association), Irfan Merchant (Chairman, Denim Manufacturers & Exporters Association), Khurram Mukhtar (Former Chairman, Pakistan Textile Exporters Association), Hamid Arshad Zahur (Chairman, Pakistan Tanners Association), and other representatives from major exporting cities including Karachi, Lahore, Faisalabad, and Sialkot.
Jawed Bilwani stressed that EFS has been critical in supporting not only textiles but other export sectors as well. He pointed out that all associations, including APTMA, initially welcomed EFS. In an Inter-Ministerial Committee chaired by Planning Minister Ahsan Iqbal, APTMA representatives agreed that the scheme should continue in its original form. However, APTMA later parted ways and demanded the imposition of Sales Tax at the import stage under EFS—a move that Value-Added Associations rejected strongly.
He warned that imposing Sales Tax at the import stage would defeat the very objective of EFS, causing severe liquidity issues and harming exporters' competitiveness. Bilwani also revealed that APTMA, in the same committee meeting, admitted their yarn quality—produced from contaminated local cotton—is not on par with imported yarn. He stated that even the top 100 textile exporters, including composite units under APTMA, support the continuation of EFS in its original form with local procurement allowed on zero-rated invoices.
He added that the upcoming federal budget should also include the reinstatement of Regionally Competitive Energy Tariffs and Final Tax Regime (FTR) to ensure financial viability and export growth.
Speaking at the press conference, PHMA Central Chairman Muhammad Babar Khan rejected APTMA's 'misleading' demand to impose Sales Tax at the import stage under EFS. He said that spinning is only a sub-sector of the textile industry, while the value-added sector remains committed to supporting the entire value chain. He urged the Government to create policies that benefit all textile sub-sectors equally, from garments to spinning and ginning.
Babar Khan highlighted that rising manufacturing costs have hurt all textile sectors. The apparel and garment sector contributes the highest value addition, up to 70 percent, and needs EFS to remain unchanged to stay competitive. He questioned why APTMA, after supporting EFS from 2021 to February 2025, has suddenly changed its stance. He urged APTMA to drop their unjustified demand for Sales Tax at import-stage and return to supporting the reinstatement of local procurement in the scheme.
Babar Khan recalled the key strengths of EFS: a strategic and fully automated system built with input from all textile associations to reduce compliance burdens and simplify export operations. The scheme offers end-to-end traceability and operates in a fully digital environment through WeBOC and PSW.
The association leaders agreed that countries like Bangladesh and Vietnam also rely heavily on imported raw materials to manufacture export garments. Their governments offer facilitation schemes similar to EFS, making it crucial for Pakistan to maintain parity. They stated that collecting Sales Tax from exports only to refund it later serves no real purpose and often leads to long refund delays, further straining exporters' liquidity.
They emphasized that EFS should remain unchanged and that the FBR should focus on expanding the tax base instead of burdening existing exporters. Exporters' Sales Tax refunds have already been delayed for months, and adding more taxes will only increase their hardships.
The associations repeated their firm demand to continue EFS in its original form as of 2021—before the 2024-2025 Federal Budget—with local procurement allowed under section 880(1)(b) of SRO 957(I)/2021, which permits local input goods subject to Sales Tax to be supplied against zero-rated invoices. This, they said, is necessary to ensure liquidity, competitiveness, and formalization of the export value chain. The continuation of EFS in its original form has also been recommended by the Inter-Ministerial Committee chaired by the Federal Planning Minister, under the Prime Minister's direction.
Other PHMA representatives present at the event included Former Chairmen Chaudhry Salamat Ali, Farrukh Iqbal, Kashif Zia, Sr. Vice Chairman Hazir Khan (Faisalabad), Former Chairman Shahzad Azam Khan and Zonal Chairman Abdul Hameed (Lahore), Tariq Bhatti and Khawaja Musharraf (Sialkot), PRGMEA Northern Zone Representatives Sohail Afzal and Ayazuddin, and numerous top exporters from Karachi, Lahore, Faisalabad, and Sialkot.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
a day ago
- Business Recorder
Spun yarn varieties: New customs' values on imports notified
ISLAMABAD: The Directorate General of Customs Valuation Karachi has issued new customs values on the import of polyester spun yarn, viscose spun yarn, acrylic spun yarn and blends thereof from China, Thailand, Indonesia and Vietnam. In this regard, the directorate has issued a valuation ruling number 64 of 2025. The ruling revealed that the Customs values of Polyester Spun Yarn, Viscose Spun Yarn, Acrylic Spun yarn and blends thereof were determined under Section 25A of the Customs Act, 1969 vide Publication Value Reference No.02 dated December 29, 2022. Subsequently, representations were received from the Pakistan Yarn Merchants Association (PYMA) and other stakeholders requesting re-determination of Customs values for the subject items, as more than 90 days had elapsed since the issuance of the aforementioned Publication Value Reference. Yarn, grey cloth, raw cotton removed from EFS purview It was contended that the values determined therein were no longer reflective of prevailing international market prices. Accordingly, the Directorate has undertaken a fresh exercise for re-determination of Customs values of the subject goods. The importers, during the course of consultation, informed that a consensus-based formula for the valuation of Polyester Spun Yarn, Viscose Spun Yarn. and Acrylic Spun Yam had earlier been developed in coordination with the Department. However, they stated that this formula had now become obsolete due to a significant decline in the import volume of various yarn types. It was further asserted by the importers that, despite repeated representations and efforts on their part, the Customs values of the subject items had not been revised since 2022. As a result, the Computed Value Method under Section 25(8) of Customs Act was considered and found inapplicable since the exact data regarding cost of production at the country of export was not available. Keeping all the factors in view and after carefully analyzing all the available information from different sources, the Customs values of subject items were determined where the international market prices of raw material i.e. Polyester, Viscose, and Acrylic staple fibers, used in the production of Polyester, Viscose and Acrylic Spun yarn, were obtained from CCF Group. Thereafter, conversion cost (conversion of PSF to Polyester Spun Yarn, VSF to Viscose Spun Yarn and ASF to Acrylic Spun Yarn of assorted counts) were calculated count-wise from the prices available on reputable international publications to arrive at the customs values of 100% Polyester Spun Yarn and Viscose Spun Yarn. Similarly, the conversion costs of blended Polyester, Viscose and Acrylic Spun Yarns were calculated and the same were added to arrive at customs values of blended Polyester, Viscose and Acrylic Spun Yarns. Besides, the conversion cost of converting and Viscose Spun yarns into multiple folded (2ply and 3ply) have also been determined prices available on reputable international publications. The conversion costs so calculated added to the values of Polyester and Viscose Spun Yarn, the new ruling added. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
June 2015 to June 2022: Aptma urges Ogra to defer RLNG bills' payment
ISLAMABAD: The All Pakistan Textile Mills Association (Aptma) has urged the Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority (Ogra) to defer the payment of RLNG bills covering the period from June 2015 to June 2022, citing the need for clarity and reconciliation. In a letter addressed to the Ogra chairman, Aptma Secretary General Shahid Sattar stated that member mills have received RLNG bills amounting to hundreds of millions of rupees. These bills reflect the actualization of provisional charges over a span of seven years and have been issued with a payment deadline of just two working days—by Tuesday, August 12, 2025. 'We strongly protest this action, as no prior explanation, detailed calculations, or breakdowns of these substantial bills have been provided. No reconciliation of the amounts has been carried out,' Sattar wrote. The Aptma emphasised that consumers must be afforded a fair and reasonable period to review such significant charges, in line with relevant laws and regulations. Sattar highlighted that between 2015 and 2022, RLNG rates for the industry were fixed or capped—at $6.5/MMBtu for some periods and $9/MMBtu for others. 'There is no explanation of how these capped rates were treated in the calculation of arrears. It is inconceivable that bills of this magnitude have been issued without transparent justification or supporting data,' he noted. He warned that in the current economic climate, the sudden imposition of these massive bills could lead to the collapse of the manufacturing sector due to a lack of liquidity. The Aptma has requested the Ogra to grant at least 20 days for the textile industry to reconcile its actual RLNG consumption against the amounts billed. 'We also request that detailed bills be issued to all consumers, clearly indicating their monthly RLNG consumption, the additional charges levied month by month, and the applicable provisional and actualized RLNG rates,' Sattar concluded. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
3 days ago
- Business Recorder
Public choice at work? The end of EFS?
SRO 1395(I)2025 is not the end of the EFS. It is certainly the end of the beginning of the end of the EFS. SRO 1395(I)25, July 29, 2025, excludes 'Raw cotton, yarns, and fabrics' from the purview of the EFS. Imported cottons, yarns, and fabrics will now be at par with local produce and attract a 'refundable' 18 percent GST. The Public Choice Theory provides a framework about how private, material, bureaucratic and even ideological interests, of bureaucrats, politicians etc., work their way into full-blown public policies resulting in stunting and killing public goods and policies-like the inevitable demise of the EFS. EFS, July 2021 was launched, recognizing that the domestic fiscal constraints must not burden exporters as they compete internationally with competitors with no such baggage. The EFS intended to immunize exporters from the chronically 'kadak', cash-deficient FBR's penchant for meeting its revenue requirements by illegally denying refunds to EFS registered exporters. EFS meant no pay-ins, no refunds. Exporters and few in Islamabad were happy. However, many in Islamabad had different thoughts. FBR, like all, would like to retain control over the refund pipeline. EFS had blown that 'Nordstream 2' of coveted refunds which FBR would tap during lean days when these funds could buy the Republic a day or more. Via denial and delay of refunds, FBR perhaps got away, when needed, by passing off the cash thus withheld as 'revenues' to the 'gullible' multilateral overlords who often took it with a soup ladle. The good FBR was thus doing a sacred work. There is, however, reportedly another cohort who had seen slammed shut doors and tunnels to the cavernous corrupt bowels of the 'refund industry', i.e., the bad FBR. Oddly such officers doing a sacred work saving the Republic are no different from accountants in 'kadak' corporates who routinely stretch payables to meet 'priority' financial commitments. There is, perhaps, no daylight between 'kadak' cadres in public and private worlds. Kudos, however, and now commiserations, to the Ministry of Commerce and the few good men at FBR who had enacted the EFS SRO in 2021whose unravelling is an education in itself. How do you dismantle a scheme which is wildly popular with exporters and the Ministry of Commerce? Public Choice offers a possible explanation. A few quarters after EFS' enactment, the press had suddenly started carrying stories of EFS frauds. Must not FBR be apprehending the fraudsters? Many exporters' associations approached FBR to work with them to make EFS more robust, but to no avail. The 'good' and the 'bad' FBRs were at least indifferent or positively upset with EFS. Here is one way this fraud might have happened. Those who imported 60s yarn under EFS, made a killing by illegally selling it locally, pocketing the unpaid GST and then exporting some 20s yarn-based product claiming it was a twisted/tripled 3×60s! Local 20s was purchased GST free, under EFS! Fraudsters made a killing. Industry wanted to plug the leakage, FBR instead blew the pipeline. It was in this backdrop, last year and literally out of the left field, FBR rendered local yarn purchases ineligible for EFS. If an EFS registered exporter wanted to purchase local cotton yarn, it had to pay GST while it could import the same product GST free! EFS fraud tales-many, even most could be true-set the stage with a sinister hum of expectations. A few rent-an-associations also played their quisling parts. Local yarn manufacturers cried at this obvious miscarriage of justice. Exclusion of local yarns from EFS created a genuinely aggrieved party who just wanted re-inclusion into EFS. They were dragged, stomped on, slapped around until the aggrieved confederates sued for peace and on July 29 were served the textile equivalent of the Treaty of Versailles. Now, many are happy at their own defeat. Imposition of GST on cotton yarns is not a victory for spinners and not for the value-added champions. All exporters are losers. All manufacturers are losers. It is like on account of few purse snatching incidents, the city police banned pillion riding. Spinners and a few more, in their desperation — they were hurting bad — were offered Hobson's choice. They had to take it. Today it is yarns and fabrics tomorrow it will be something else. The real losers, however, mostly textiles exporters, continue to congregate in a motley crew of cults and associations whose chaotic best has never been good enough. The unravelling of EFS is the latest epiphany of the 'Entrepreneurs as Chor' creed which the tax collectors, ageing accountants and highly paid bankers who enjoy a revolving door access to the top echelons continue to believe and mean. Still, EFS, has perhaps been the most notable success that the Ministry of Commerce had notched in its long history of lost battles with the FBR. In Islamabad, tomorrow always trumps the future. EFS is not the first pro-exports government initiative to go down. It is high time that FBR evolved into a learning organization, learning by doing, driven by data, in perpetual consultation with entrepreneurs whose competitiveness depends on lifesavers like EFS. FBR can then use data to 'Rank and Yank' exporter population. For now, it is curtains for EFS. Textile exports of USD 1.5b per month or so is our fate. On a good day, that is. This tactical victory for some in the textile value chain is a strategic rout for the entire textile value chain. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
