Inditex's early summer sales fall short of expectations, shares dip
Agencies
Fast-fashion giant and Zara owner Inditex missed analysts' expectations for first quarter sales and early summer trading on Wednesday, as tariff fallout weighed over its efforts to maintain strong growth.
Concerns about resurgent inflation and an economic slowdown triggered by U.S. President Donald Trump's erratic tariff rollout have already dampened shopping enthusiasm in the U.S. and other major consumer markets.
The weaker-than-expected numbers, which sent Inditex's shares down 4.6% on Wednesday, offer a first glimpse of the impact of global trade tensions on the fast-fashion industry ahead of the second quarter earnings season.
The tariff environment is difficult to predict, but Inditex is well-placed to weather it, Gorka Garcia-Tapia, the Spanish company's head of investor relations, said in an investor call.
'We have such a global presence, and therefore we have a lot of experience over the last few decades with regards to managing changes in tariff regimes,' he said, adding that Inditex's diversified sales and sourcing give it flexibility.
'We have that focus on proximity sourcing.
I think that all that, regarding the U.S., really helps us out.' Inditex reported a slower start to its summer sales, with currency-adjusted revenue growth of 6% from May 1 to June 9, compared to analysts' expectations of 7.3%, and down from 12% growth in the same period a year ago.
Revenues for the first quarter ending April 30 were 8.27 billion euros ($9.44 billion), falling short of the analysts' average estimate of 8.36 billion euros, according to an LSEG poll.
Garcia-Tapia said that net income increased 0.8% in the quarter, to 1.3 billion euros. The company expects its growth margin to remain stable, as stated.
Inditex did not provide an explanation for the weaker sales growth. In a statement, it called its performance 'solid,' having labelled it 'very robust' at its previous results announcement in March, when annual sales were up 10.5%.
'We need to take a step back and look at mid single-digit growth as actually being quite good in this environment,' said Bernstein analyst William Woods.
Inditex's competitors have also experienced a sluggish spring.
H&M's sales have struggled, growing by just 1% in March compared to 4% in the same period a year earlier. Its December-February revenue grew by 2%, below analyst forecasts. H&M will report results for the second quarter on June 26.
Rainy weather in Inditex's home market, Spain, which accounts for 15% of its global sales, also likely hurt the company's performance, according to Bernstein analysts.
Spain has experienced one of its wettest-ever springs, with Madrid recording three times its usual levels of rainfall for the season.
With volatility in foreign exchange markets driven by trade risks, Inditex said currency fluctuations will have a bigger impact than expected, predicting a 3% adverse effect on its 2025 sales, compared with the 1% it flagged in March.
Inditex is testing its low-priced, Gen Z-focused brand Lefties in markets beyond Spain, Portugal and Mexico, CEO Oscar Garcia Maceiras said. It also plans to open new stores for its Oysho brand in the Netherlands, he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Qatar Tribune
3 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
US tariffs could be launchpad for Europe's single market needs
Agencies Materials group Umicore can spend at least a month on tackling a complex array of national shipment rules only to bring electronic scrap and other waste from across the European Union to its Belgian recycling plant. The problem is not just Umicore's, as businesses across Europe grapple with internal obstacles that can be as damaging as tariffs. Analysts, however, say U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs have provided the necessary push to make the bloc the single market it aspires to be. Umicore's difficulties are particularly significant in that the company recycles 17 of the 34 minerals identified by the EU as critical for its green and digital transition. Chief Executive Bart Sap says a shipment may need to go by rail in one country, then transfer to a boat in another, with a wealth of diverse documentation along the route. 'With that ununified waste market, the internal hurdles are so high that actually 73% of waste is being exported,' he told Reuters in an interview. Diverging waste shipment regulations are one of the many internal barriers that add cost and complexity to doing business within the EU. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has estimated EU internal barriers are the equivalent of tariffs of 44% for goods and 110% for services, well above the U.S. tariffs of 25% on steel and cars and 10% on many other goods. A similar study in 2021 concluded that barriers for goods flow within the U.S. amounted to a 13% tariff. For goods, EU barriers include restrictions on retailers' ability to source products or sell them in other EU countries and a jumble of rules on labelling. AkzoNobel, Europe's largest paint maker, complains it cannot just sell the same tub across the 27-nation bloc, placing the blame not on different languages but varying rules. These include separate recycling logos in France and Spain and some EU countries requiring air quality information. The Dutch company says it cannot fit all the necessary information on smaller tubs, and that frequent rule changes force it to keep investing in packaging updates. QR codes could be a solution, it says, something the EU will start requiring from 2027. For services, the single market is even less developed. Laws on setting up foreign subsidiaries diverge, declarations for posting workers abroad vary and 5,700 professions are regulated across the bloc, meaning doctors, nurses, engineers or accountants in one EU country cannot easily work in another. The barriers do not just add cost and complexity. They stifle Italian Prime Minister Enrico Letta, who produced an influential report on the EU single market last year, said EU companies suffered a 'stunning size deficit' relative to rivals and that market divisions prevented them from building scale. A core problem is vested interest in sectors protecting regulated professions from competition and as national supervisors prove resistant to an EU-wide capital market that could rival U.S. investments in newer companies and infrastructure. 'These are low-hanging fruit economically, because basically they're free. It's essentially changing the regulation. But that doesn't mean they're necessarily politically easy,' said Niclas Poitiers, research fellow at think tank Bruegel. The debate on a unified capital market has dragged on for over a decade as EU members have squabbled over issues such as supervision and insolvency rules. However, a deeper single market has gone from a nice-to-have to a must-have as the impact of Trump's tariffs on exports has highlighted the need to remove obstacles to compete with global rivals. The Commission says it is prioritizing removing what it calls the 'terrible ten' most harmful single market barriers, including recognition of professional qualifications and fragmented rules on labelling and waste. Letta, dean of IE University in Spain and president of the Jacques Delors Institute think tank, said he was encouraged by Commission initiatives to tackle the most critical unfulfilled parts of the single market – services and capital. They include the promotion of a savings and investment union and removing barriers to business in legislative proposals are due in 2025 and 2026. Aslak Berg, research fellow at the Centre for European Reform think tank, said the Commission seemed to be serious about reforms that made a difference, but needed to get EU members on said there were two grounds for optimism. Firstly, EU capitals were aware of the need for change.
Qatar Tribune
3 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
Markets shaken as Trump threatens new unilateral tariffs
Agencies Investors were rattled on Thursday after Donald Trump said he would impose unilateral tariffs on partners in the next two weeks, reigniting trade war fears soon after reaching a deal with China to dial down tensions between the superpowers. The mood was also shaded by geopolitical concerns after the US president said personnel were being moved from the Middle East as nuclear talks with Iran faltered and fears of a regional conflict grew. The equity losses snapped a recent rally fueled by talks between Beijing and Washington in London that saw them hammer out a framework agreement to move towards a pact to reduce levies. Investors have been on edge since Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariff blitz on April 2 that sent shockwaves through stock and bond markets and stoked global recession fears. Days later he announced a pause in those measures until July 9 to allow for countries to cut deals with the White House, sparking relief rallies that have pushed some markets towards all-time highs. However, he once again shook confidence by saying on Wednesday that he intended to send letters telling governments what levies Washington would be imposing. 'We're going to be sending letters out in about a week-and-a-half, two weeks, to countries, telling them what the deal is,' he told reporters. 'At a certain point, we're just going to send letters out. And I think you understand that, saying this is the deal, you can take it or leave it.' While some analysts indicated that previous threats had been rowed back, the comments added to the ongoing uncertainty about Trump's policies, reviving fears about sky-high levies and the impact on the economy. They also came not long after he had flagged the London agreement, and posted on social media that 'President Xi and I are going to work closely together to open up China to American Trade', referring to his counterpart Xi Jinping. Stephen Innes at SPI Asset Management said: 'Whether this is a hardball negotiation tactic or a pressure valve reset ahead of another 90-day extension is anyone's guess—but traders are reading it as another layer of headline risk. 'The market knows the Trump playbook: bark, delay, then deal. But the closer we get to the cliff's edge, the more likely someone slips.' Most Asian markets fell on Thursday, with Tokyo, Hong Kong, Wellington, Sydney, Taipei, Mumbai, Bangkok and Jakarta in the red after a broadly healthy run-up this week. London was flat as data showed the UK economy shrank more than expected in April, while Paris and Frankfurt fell. There were gains in Singapore, Seoul and Wellington. Shanghai was barely moved. The weak performance followed losses on Wall Street, where trade worries overshadowed another below-forecast inflation reading that provided fresh speculation the Federal Reserve will cut interest rates. Oil prices slipped more than one percent after Wednesday's surge that came after Trump said US personnel were being moved from the potentially 'dangerous' Middle East as Iran nuclear talks stutter. The move came as Tehran threatened to target US military bases in the region if a regional conflict broke out. The US president said the staff were 'being moved out because it could be a dangerous place'. 'We've given notice to move out and we'll see what happens.' With regard to Iran, he added: 'They can't have a nuclear weapon, very simple. We're not going to allow that.' Trump had until recently expressed optimism about the talks, but said in an interview published on Wednesday that he was 'less confident'.
Al Jazeera
5 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
In nixing EV standards, Trump strikes at two foes: California and Elon Musk
United States President Donald Trump has signed a series of congressional resolutions to roll back standards in California that would have phased out petrol-powered cars and promoted the use of electric vehicles (EVs). But Thursday's signing ceremony gave Trump a platform to strike blows against several of his political foes, including the Democratic leadership of California and ally-turned-critic Elon Musk. Musk famously leads the electric vehicle company Tesla. California, meanwhile, has long been a Democratic stronghold, and since taking office for a second term in January, Trump has continuously sparred with its governor, Gavin Newsom. Thursday's resolutions gave Trump a chance to skewer one of Newsom's signature environmental achievements: a state mandate that would have gradually required new cars in California to produce zero greenhouse gas emissions. That goal was meant to unfold in stages. By 2026, 35 percent of all new cars sold would be emission-free vehicles. By 2030, that number would rise to 68 percent. And by 2035, California would reach 100 percent. But Trump argued that California's standards would hamper the US car industry and limit consumer choice. Already, 17 other states have adopted some form of California's regulations. 'Under the previous administration, the federal government gave left-wing radicals in California dictatorial powers to control the future of the entire car industry all over the country — all over the world, actually,' Trump said on Thursday. ' This horrible scheme would effectively abolish the internal combustion engine, which most people prefer.' But critics point out that many carmakers did not necessarily oppose California's mandate: Rather, automobile companies like General Motors had already put in place plans to transition to electric-vehicle manufacturing, to keep up with global trends. Already, California and 11 other states have announced they will sue to keep the electric vehicle mandate in place. Here are three takeaways from Thursday's signing ceremony. The decision to roll back California's electric-vehicle standards was only the latest chapter in Trump's long-running beef with the state. Just last week, protests broke out in the Los Angeles area against Trump's push for mass deportation, as immigration raids struck local hardware stores and other workplaces. Trump responded by deploying nearly 4,000 National Guard members and 700 Marines to southern California, in the name of tamping down protest-related violence. Though Thursday's ceremony was ostensibly about the electric-vehicle mandate, Trump took jabs at the state's management of the protests, blaming Governor Newsom for allowing the situation to spiral out of control. 'If we didn't go, Los Angeles right now would be on fire. It would be a disaster. And we stopped it,' Trump said, accusing Newsom of having 'a faulty thought process' and trying to protect criminals. Trump also drew a parallel to the wildfires that ravaged the Los Angeles area in January, whose flames were whipped and spread by dangerous wind conditions that kept aerial support out of the skies. 'Los Angeles would be right now burning to the ground just like the houses burned to the ground,' Trump said, referencing the wildfires. 'It's so sad, what's going on in Los Angeles.' California's electric-vehicle mandate, he argued, would have likewise spurred another emergency. 'Today, we're saving California, and we're saving our entire country from a disaster. Your cars are gonna be thousands of dollars less,' Trump said. 'Energy prices would likewise soar as the radical left forced more electric vehicles onto the grid while blocking approvals for new power plants,' he continued. ' The result would be rolling blackouts and a collapse of our power systems.' Earlier this week, Newsom and California Attorney General Rob Bonta dismissed Trump's concerns as little more than an attack on state rights. 'Trump's all-out assault on California continues — and this time he's destroying our clean air and America's global competitiveness in the process,' Newsom said in a statement. 'We are suing to stop this latest illegal action by a President who is a wholly-owned subsidiary of big polluters.' Newsom has also denounced the deployment of troops to Los Angeles as an 'unmistakable step toward authoritarianism' and has sued to limit that action as well. As Trump continued to outline his reasoning for peeling back the EV mandates, his speech briefly veered into another area of conflict: his recently rocky relationship with Musk. A billionaire, Musk leads several high-profile companies with government contracts, including the rocket manufacturer SpaceX and the satellite communication firm Starlink. And then, of course, there is Musk's car company Tesla, which produces electric vehicles. Musk was one of the largest donors in the 2024 elections, spending north of $280m to back Trump and other Republicans. Trump, for his part, featured Musk on the campaign trail and named him the leader of the newly created Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) shortly after his election. In January, Musk joined the Trump administration as a 'special government employee', an advisory role with a time limit of about 130 days per year. As he reached the end of that term, Musk became increasingly outspoken about Trump's signature budget legislation, the One Big Beautiful Bill. While the bill would have cemented Trump's 2017 tax cuts and funnelled more money into immigration enforcement, it would have also increased the national debt by trillions of dollars. Musk also objected to the 'pork' — the extra spending and legislative provisions — that were packed into the lengthy, thousand-page bill. The billionaire took to social media to call the bill a 'disgusting abomination', as the two men entered into an increasingly heated exchange of words. Trump called Musk 'crazy', and Musk suggested Trump should be impeached. The billionaire has since said he 'regrets' some of his remarks. On Thursday, Trump repeated his assertion that Musk's outburst was the result of his policies towards electric vehicles, something Musk has denied. Early in his second term, Trump pulled the plug on a goal set under former President Biden to have 50 percent of all new vehicles sold be electric by 2030. 'On my first day in office, I ended the green new scam and abolished the EV mandate at the federal level,' Trump said on Thursday. 'Now, I know why Elon doesn't like me so much. Which he does, actually. He does.' He continued to muse on their unravelling relationship, saying that Musk 'never had a problem' with his electric vehicle policies. 'I used to say, 'I'm amazed that he's endorsing me,' because that can't be good for him,' Trump said. 'He makes electric cars, and we're saying, 'You're not going to be able to make electric cars, or you're not gonna be forced to make all of those cars. You can make them, but it'll be by the market, judged by the market.'' Trump added that he feels Musk 'got a bit strange' but that he still likes the car company Tesla — and 'others too'. Amid the talk about his feuds with Musk and California, Trump also dropped a possible bombshell: More automobile tariffs may be on the way. Already, Trump has relied heavily on tariffs — taxes on imported products — to settle scores with foreign trading partners and push for greater foreign investment in domestic industries, including car manufacturing. 'If they want a Mercedes-Benz, you're going to have it made here. It's OK to have a Mercedes, but they're going to make it here,' he said on Thursday. 'Otherwise, they're going to pay a very big tariff. They already are.' Currently, automobiles imported to the US from abroad are subject to a 25-percent tax, a cost that critics say is passed along to the consumer. But Trump warned on Thursday that he is prepared to go higher, as he has done with taxes on steel and aluminium. ' To further defend our auto workers, I imposed a 25-percent tariff on all foreign automobiles. Investment in American auto manufacturing is surging because of it,' Trump said. 'Auto manufacturing — all manufacturing — is surging. I might go up with that tariff in the not-too-distant future. The higher you go, the more likely it is they build a plant here.' Trump pointed to his negotiations over steel imports as a success story. 'American Steel is doing great now because of what we did. If I didn't put tariffs on steel, China and a lot of other countries were dumping steel in our country,' he said. 'Garbage steel, dirty steel, bad steel, not structurally sound steel. Real garbage.' But by raising tariffs from 25 to 50 percent earlier this month, Trump said he protected the US steel industry. He also shared details about a deal that would see the Japanese company Nippon invest in the company US Steel. 'We have a golden stock. We have a golden share, which I control — or the president — controls. Now, I'm a little concerned whoever the president might be, but that gives you total control,' Trump said. 'It's 51-percent ownership by Americans.' US industry leaders had been concerned that the deal with Nippon would see further erosion of the US manufacturing industry, which suffered from decades of foreign competition. The deal with Nippon has been previously described as a takeover, prompting concerns about the future and independence of the US steel industry.
