logo
Viceroy rebuts former Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud's legal opinion on its Vedanta report

Viceroy rebuts former Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud's legal opinion on its Vedanta report

Mint6 days ago
Mumbai: US-based short-seller Viceroy Research has disputed former Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud's legal opinion on its allegations of financial misconduct and misrepresentation against Vedanta Group.
Viceroy argued that Chandrachud's legal opinion did not answer questions raised by it with regards to dividend payments and alleged financial mismanagement at the mining and minerals conglomerate.
Justice Chandrachud's opinion 'fails to refute, investigate, or even engage with a single substantive financial allegation in our reports,' the short-seller said in a report on Monday, 21 July, its eighth note on Vedanta in 13 days.
Vedanta has consistently denied Viceroy's allegations, terming the accusations baseless.
Justice Chandrachud in his legal opinion to Vedanta, which was made public on Friday, said Viceroy's first report on billionaire Anil Agarwal's group, published on 9 July, lacked credibility, and the researchers behind the report had 'dubious credentials'. He said he relied on information shared by Vedanta to arrive at this opinion since Viceroy's website had no information in this regard.
The former Chief Justice also highlighted Viceroy's interest in profiteering from a possible rout in Vedanta Resources' commercial papers as a result of the short-seller's reports. He also said he suspected the timing of the report, coming just as India-listed Vedanta Ltd is headed for a demerger.
In April, Viceroy Research took a short position on the bonds of Vedanta Resources Ltd, the London-based unlisted holding company of the Vedanta Group, according to Fraser Perring, founder of Viceroy Research, who didn't disclose the quantum of his firm's exposure.
Viceroy argued that Chandrachud's legal opinion relied entirely on 'management representations without questioning', the short-seller said, adding that the opinion failed to dispute any of its findings, conclusions, or concerns.
'When faced with serious allegations backed by detailed financial evidence, the company responded not with transparency, but with a character assassination attempt dressed in legal language,' the short-seller said in its latest report.
Viceroy also claimed Vedanta had to pay for a legal opinion to defend its parent company against claims of stealing money or misusing the subsidiary's funds. Vedanta Resources holds a majority stake in India-listed Vedanta Ltd through several intermediaries. Hindustan Zinc Ltd is a subsidiary of Vedanta Ltd.
Justice Chandrachud declined to comment on the matter. He explained that his role was professional in nature and the opinion given was protected by professional privilege.
'It is inappropriate to discuss anything pertaining to it in the public realm,' he said.
Vedanta Group did not immediately reply to Mint's emailed queries on Viceroy's rebuttal.
In his legal opinion, Justice Chandrachud said the transactions disclosed in financial statements and regulatory filings by Vedanta showed there was transparency and compliance with regulations. Such disclosures should be presumed legitimate unless there was clear evidence to prove otherwise, he opined.
To this, Viceroy argued that mere disclosure did not confirm legality of the transactions.
Justice Chandrachud also said Viceroy Research's report contained serious allegations tarnishing the Vedanta Group's image and reputation. 'The report contains serious imputations such as 'ponzi scheme' and 'parasite', which have caused harm to querist's (here Vedanta Ltd) business and reputation,' he said, adding that Vedanta was well placed to seek legal remedies under such circumstances.
Former trial court judge Rishabh Gandhi said dismissing Chandrachud's report as just an opinion was reductive and misleading.
'A legal opinion—an opinion rendered by a legal expert based on applicable law and the facts presented—when issued by a highly regarded authority like the former Chief Justice of India, carries considerable legal and institutional credibility,' said Gandhi, who is also the founder of law firm Rishabh Gandhi & Associates.
Gandhi explained that most legal opinions are based on a detailed review of documents, statutory interpretation, and precedent, primarily to confirm legal compliance, and enforceability of corporate actions such as dividend declarations, inter-company transactions, or board resolutions.
Gandhi, however, clarified that while Chandrachud's legal opinion likely affirmed the legal permissibility of Vedanta's transactions and dividend policies under Indian corporate law, it did not address the broader concerns around financial prudence, related-party dynamics, or cash flow impact.
'If Vedanta wishes to credibly address Viceroy's allegations and rebut the perception that the legal opinion is merely a public relations exercise, it would be prudentto commission an independent financial or forensic audit,' Gandhi said.
Viceroy has accused Vedanta Group of alleged financial misconduct and misrepresentation, making empty promises to shore up share prices, manipulating asset values, raising off-balance sheet loans, and corporate governance lapses, Mint reported on 9 July.
At Vedanta's annual general meeting on 10 July, shareholders reposed their confidence in the company.
'Different investors have different concerns as they view things differently,' said Shriram Subramanian, managing director of proxy advisory firm InGovern. 'Viceroy is a short seller and has a thesis and a short position. Other investors and stakeholders may have a different thesis.'
If investors were truly concerned about Viceroy's allegations, Vedanta's stock would have seen a sharp decline, which hasn't happened, he said.
On 9 July, when Viceroy published its first report on the mining conglomerate, Vedanta Ltd shares declined as much as 8% intraday to ₹ 420.65 apiece before recouping some of the losses following a clarification from the company to settle at ₹ 441.30, down 3.29% on the NSE.
The shares have since recovered. On Monday, Vedanta ended 2% higher at ₹ 454.90 per share.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nuns' arrest in Chhattisgarh State-sponsored terrorism, says Hibi Eden
Nuns' arrest in Chhattisgarh State-sponsored terrorism, says Hibi Eden

The Hindu

time18 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Nuns' arrest in Chhattisgarh State-sponsored terrorism, says Hibi Eden

Terming the recent arrest of two Catholic nuns from Kerala in Chhattisgarh on charges of alleged religious conversion and human trafficking as an incident of State-sponsored terrorism, Ernakulam MP Hibi Eden said he would raise the matter in the Lok Sabha, along with the increasing number of attacks on members of minority communities in northern India. Uniformed forces like the Railway Protection Force (RPF) and the respective Government Railway Police (GRP) are behaving like affiliates of the RSS, he alleged. Nuns and other members of minority communities are increasingly being denied the rights guaranteed to them by the Constitution across the country. In this situation, the Lok Sabha must adjourn its sitting until the government makes a statement on the recent 'terror attack' targeting nuns—forcing them to hide their attire—and on the measures being taken to ensure the safety and security of religious minorities. Such incidents are a threat to the rule of law, he said. Sunday's arrest of the nuns raises serious questions about the safety and security of religious minorities in our country. Given the gravity of the situation and its potential implications for communal harmony and national security, it is imperative that the House discusses this matter at the earliest opportunity. The government's response to this incident, and the measures it proposes to prevent such events in the future, are of utmost importance, Mr. Eden added. Terming the arrest of the nuns as part of the 'Sangh Parivar agenda', the Kochi-based Archdiocesan Movement for Transparency (AMT) of the Syro Malabar Church said most Christians in northern India are living in fear of attacks. This is especially true in Chhattisgarh and Madhya Pradesh. Nuns and others from the community have been doing voluntary service in such remote areas, where the government machinery has little presence, said Riju Kanjookaran, spokesperson of the movement. 'CBCI inaction' Sadly, the Catholic Bishops' Conference of India (CBCI) is weak and unable to find solutions to such issues or initiate legal action. Their role ends with issuing a statement in the wake of such attacks. The CBCI has failed to initiate policy measures or bring international pressure to end such well-planned and coordinated attacks, he added.

Trump says US-EU trade deal is close — But sticking points remain
Trump says US-EU trade deal is close — But sticking points remain

Mint

time18 minutes ago

  • Mint

Trump says US-EU trade deal is close — But sticking points remain

US President Donald Trump on Sunday expressed optimism over reaching a trade deal with the European Union, even as the clock ticks toward an August 1 deadline that could trigger sweeping tariffs on EU exports to the United States. Speaking at the start of a high-stakes meeting with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen at his Turnberry golf resort on Scotland's western coast, Trump said there was a 'good chance' of striking an agreement, despite 'three or four main sticking points' — most notably around what he called 'fairness' in car and agricultural exports. US President Donald Trump on Sunday expressed confidence that the United States and the European Union could strike a trade deal, even as a looming August 1 deadline threatens to trigger sweeping tariffs on EU exports. Trump said at the start of a meeting with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen at his Turnberry golf resort in Scotland that 'three or four main sticking points' remain, with the key issue being 'fairness,' particularly regarding barriers to US car and agricultural exports. Von der Leyen acknowledged that talks were balanced on a knife's edge, saying there was a '50-50' chance of securing an agreement before the deadline. 'President Trump is a tough negotiator and dealmaker,' she said ahead of the meeting. 'If we reach an agreement, it will be the biggest deal either of us has done.' She also emphasised that any deal would need to be based on fairness and a rebalancing of the current trade relationship between the two economies. The high-stakes meeting comes amid escalating pressure from Washington, which has threatened to impose a 30% across-the-board tariff on EU goods unless a deal is reached. Currently, EU exports already face tariffs of 25% on automobiles, 50% on steel and aluminum, and an additional 10% on other goods. The European Commission, representing all 27 EU member states, has been striving to avoid further economic strain and prevent retaliation, while preserving a transatlantic trade relationship worth approximately $1.9 trillion annually. Sunday's face-to-face meeting between Trump and von der Leyen was a last-ditch effort to avoid a transatlantic trade rupture. A breakthrough, if reached, could avert what both sides view as a damaging trade war and offer a path forward for stabilizing US-EU relations amid broader geopolitical tensions.

Udaipur Files producer Amit Jani given 'Y' category armed security cover
Udaipur Files producer Amit Jani given 'Y' category armed security cover

Time of India

time36 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Udaipur Files producer Amit Jani given 'Y' category armed security cover

Amit Jani , producer of Udaipur Files - Kanhaiya Lal Tailor Murder , has been granted 'Y' category armed security cover of the Central Reserve Police Force amid the pending case over the film's release. Jani, in a tweet thanked Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah for the protection. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Management Data Analytics Data Science Finance Others MBA PGDM Design Thinking Technology Digital Marketing Operations Management Data Science Product Management Leadership Healthcare Project Management Cybersecurity MCA CXO healthcare others Degree Public Policy Artificial Intelligence Skills you'll gain: Duration: 9 Months IIM Calcutta CERT-IIMC APSPM India Starts on undefined Get Details Skills you'll gain: Duration: 10 Months IIM Kozhikode CERT-IIMK GMPBE India Starts on undefined Get Details Skills you'll gain: Duration: 11 Months IIM Kozhikode CERT-IIMK General Management Programme India Starts on undefined Get Details — AmitJaniIND (@AmitJaniIND) by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Suffering From Pain After Age 50? Do This Every Morning Wellnee Undo On Friday, a Supreme Court bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi said the filmmakers appeal against the high court order staying the release was infructuous as they accepted the July 21 order of the Centre clearing the release of the film subject to six cuts in its scenes and modifications in the disclaimer. The bench further had said it has not expressed any opinion on merit and the high court can adjudicate the issue of stay of release of film. Live Events It also directed Jamiat Ulema-i-Hind president Maulana Arshad Madani and Mohd Javed, who is an accused in the Kanhaiya Lal murder case, to move the high court against the Centre's decision. The Delhi High Court had stayed the film's release on a Madani's plea on July 10, invoking powers of the Central Government under Section 6 of the Cinematograph Act, 1952, till the representation is decided by the Central Government, for which the high court granted one week time. The filmmakers claimed to have received a Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) certificate with the board suggesting 55 cuts and the film was due to be released on July 11. Udaipur-based tailor Kanhaiya Lal was murdered in June 2022 allegedly by Mohammad Riyaz and Mohammad Ghous. The assailants later released a video claiming that the murder was in reaction to the tailor allegedly sharing a social media post in support of former BJP member Nupur Sharma following her controversial comments on Prophet Mohammed. The case was probed by the NIA and the accused were booked under the stringent Unlawful Activities Prevention Act , besides provisions under IPC. The trial is pending before the special NIA court in Jaipur. (With agency inputs)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store