Bill banning sales tax on firearm purchases dies in Wyoming House committee
CHEYENNE – A Senate bill that would have removed sales tax from firearm purchases in Wyoming was killed in the House Revenue Committee Thursday morning, largely due to concerns of 'piecemealing' tax exemptions.
Senate File 58, 'Elimination of sales tax on firearms,' sponsored by Sen. Jared Olsen, R-Cheyenne, would have exempted sales taxes on firearms and ammunition purchases, including archery equipment.
'It's a fundamental right that is enshrined in the U.S. Constitution, and it's also in the Wyoming Constitution,' Olsen told committee members. 'Because it is a fundamental right, I believe that it should be as affordable and accessible as possible to the average Wyomingite.'
The bill is also a reflection of Wyoming values, Olsen said. Taxes are a form of policy, and 'what we choose to tax … is a reflection of our public policy, our beliefs, our morals (and) our values.'
However, House committee members worried about the slew of tax relief and tax exemption bills already floating around the session. Rep. Robert Wharff, R-Evanston, said his personal goal from the start of the session was to avoid piecemeal legislation.
Rep. Robert Wharff, R-Evanston (2025)
Rep. Robert Wharff, R-Evanston
'It's something I definitely want to look at, but I feel a little conflicted, because this is one that really benefits me,' Wharff said. 'I look at all the other exemptions that I voted against, and I feel like I need to vote against this one.'
Reps. Gary Brown, R-Cheyenne; Kevin Campbell, R-Glenrock; and Liz Storer, D-Jackson, echoed similar concerns on piecemealing tax policy. Glenrock said he believed this bill should be studied when the Legislature is out of session, a season formally known as the interim. Brown added that this bill could create a 'back door' to tracking the sale of firearms by exempting them as a taxable good.
Rep. Kevin Campbell, R-Glenrock (2025)
Rep. Kevin Campbell, R-Glenrock
Storer emphasized there's a 'whole slew' of bills creating tax exemptions and property tax reductions already being considered this legislative session.
'This feels like this bill is going in the wrong direction, just adding another one to the pages and pages of exemptions that we have,' Storer said. 'We (should) think about how to look at our tax policy holistically and really take a deep dive before going in this direction.'
Rep. Liz Storer, D-Jackson (2025)
Rep. Liz Storer, D-Jackson
Storer sponsored a bill this session that created a Taxation and Revenue Task Force, composed of representatives from town and county governments, local school districts, special districts, cities and towns, revenue and constitutional experts, and members of the general public. This task force would be designed to analyze current revenue levels and sources for local municipalities and make recommendations to legislative leadership and the governor.
However, Storer's bill made it through the first two readings in the House of Representatives before it died on the third and final reading in a 25-36 vote, with one excused.
Rep. Clarence Styvar, R-Cheyenne, was the only one who openly spoke in favor of Olsen's bill.
'I think we just need to go ahead and get it out on the floor and see where it lands from there,' Styvar said. 'But I think it's a good concept. It's a good idea. It'll give everybody something to think about going down the road.'
The bill died in a 3-5 vote, with 'no' votes from Storer, Wharff, Brown, Campbell and Committee Chairman Rep. Tony Locke, R-Casper.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
31 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Newsom says Trump purposely 'fanned the flames' of L.A. protests in address to California
Gov. Gavin Newsom Tuesday night accused President Trump of intentionally fanning the flames of the Los Angeles protests and 'pulling a military dragnet across' the city endangering peaceful protesters and targeting hardworking immigrant families. The Democratic governor's comment's were a forceful rebuke to the president's claims that deploying the California National Guard and U.S. Marines to the city was necessary to control the civil unrest. 'Donald Trump's government isn't protecting our communities – they're traumatizing our communities,' Newsom said. 'And that seems to be the entire point.' The governor posted his video address to California on social media hours after Trump said he sent in troops to protect immigration agents from 'the attacks of a vicious and violent mob' in a speech at Fort Bragg in North Carolina. The picture Trump painted of the federal government's role in the protests against immigration raids marks a sharp contrast to Newsom's assertion that state and local law enforcement were successfully keeping the peace before federal authorities deployed 'tear gas, 'flash-bang grenades' and 'rubber bullets' on Angelenos exercising their Constitutional right to free speech and assembly. Then Trump 'illegally' called up the California National Guard, Newsom said. 'This brazen abuse of power by a sitting president inflamed a combustible situation, putting our people, our officers, and even our National Guard at risk,' Newsom said. 'That's when the downward spiral began. He doubled down on his dangerous National Guard deployment by fanning the flames even harder. And the president, he did it on purpose.' The governor, who has become a target for Republicans and a central figure in the political and legal battle around the protests, has said for days that an 'unhinged' Trump deployed federal troops to intentionally incite violence and chaos, seeking to divert attention away from his actions in Washington and assert his 'dictatorial tendencies.' Newsom and Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta filed a request for a restraining order earlier Tuesday asking a federal judge to call off the 'Department of Defense's illegal militarization of Los Angeles and the takeover of a California National Guard unit.' The request came the day after California filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration alleging that the deployment of the guard without the governor's consent violated the U.S. Constitution. After returning to Washington, Trump commented on the 'good relationship' he's always had with Newsom, before blaming the governor for the unrest. 'This should never have been allowed to start, and if we didn't get involved, Los Angeles would be burning down right now,' Trump said, and then made a reference to the deadly wildfires in the Los Angeles area in January. 'Just as the houses burned down.' He said the military is in the city to deescalate the situation and control what he described as paid 'insurrectionists,' 'agitators' and 'troublemakers.' 'We have a lot of people all over the world watching Los Angeles,' Trump said. 'We've got the Olympics, so we have this guy allowing this to happen.' On Monday, Trump said his top border policy advisor Tom Homan should follow through on threats to arrest the governor. Newsom immediately jumped on the comment, comparing the federal administration to an 'authoritarian regime.' 'I never thought I'd hear those words. Honestly, Democrat, Republican. Never thought I'd hear those in my lifetime to threaten a political opponent who happens to be sitting governor,' Newsom said. House Speaker Mike Johnson declined to answer a question about whether Newsom should be arrested on Tuesday and instead said the governor should be 'tarred and feathered.' Newsom took a shot at Johnson during his address, saying the speaker has 'completely abdicated' his responsibility for Congress to serve as a check on the White House. He warned that 'other states are next.' 'At this moment, we all need to stand up and be held to account, a higher level of accountability,' Newsom said, imploring protesters to exercise free speech rights peacefully. 'I know many of you are feeling deep anxiety, stress, and fear. But I want you to know that you are the antidote to that fear and anxiety. 'What Donald Trump wants most is your fealty. Your silence. To be complicit in this moment. Do not give into him.' Staff writer Laura Nelson and Washington Bureau Chief Michael Wilner contributed to this report.
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
75 Democrats Express 'Gratitude' to ICE in Antisemitism Vote Amid LA Riots
Seventy-five Democrats broke ranks on Monday, joining Republicans in voting for a House resolution condemning antisemitism and expressing "gratitude" for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and other law enforcement personnel. Why It Matters Monday's vote comes as Los Angeles is reeling from days of political unrest after ICE raided several downtown city neighborhoods and arrested more than 50 people, sparking widespread anti-ICE demonstrations. The arrests are part of the Trump administration's broader crackdown on undocumented migrants, which has also swept up people who are legally permitted in the United States and resulted in the deportations of those who haven't been convicted of a crime. President Donald Trump deployed 4,000 National Guard troops to L.A. since the protests started unfolding and mobilized 700 Marines to respond if the strife escalates. Local officials and California Governor Gavin Newsom said they do not want a military presence in the city and the L.A. police chief said it creates logistical challenges for safely handling the protests. What To Know Monday's resolution condemned this month's antisemitic attack in Boulder, Colorado, in which the suspect, Mohamed Sabry Soliman, faces 118 criminal charges. Soliman is accused of targeting a march calling for the return of Israeli hostages in Gaza. The resolution also "affirms that free and open communication between State and local law enforcement and their federal counterparts remains the bedrock of public safety and is necessary in preventing terrorist attacks; and expresses gratitude to law enforcement officers, including U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement personnel, for protecting the homeland." Of the 212 Democrats in the House, 113 voted against the resolution, which was introduced by Republican Representative Gabe Evans. Seventy-five Democrats voted in favor of the measure, including Representative Joe Neguse, of the district in which the Boulder attack occurred. Six lawmakers—five Democrats and one Republican—voted "present." A second, more broadly focused antisemitism resolution led by Representatives Jeff Van Drew, a Republican from New Jersey, and Neguse, received much wider bipartisan support, passing 400-0. Two lawmakers voted "present": Representatives Rashida Tlaib, a Democrat from Michigan, and Republican Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia. Adams, Alma (NC-12) Auchincloss, Jake (MA-4) Beatty, Joyce (OH-3) Bell, Wesley (MO-1) Bishop, Sanford (GA-2) Brown, Shontel (OH-11) Budzinski, Nicole (Nikki) (IL-13) Bynum, Janelle (OR-5) Cherfilus-McCormick, Sheila (FL-20) Cohen, Steve (TN-9) Courtney, Joe (CT-2) Craig, Angie (MN-2) Cuellar, Henry (TX-28) Davids, Sharice (KS-3) Davis, Donald (NC-1) Elfreth, Sarah (MD-3) Frankel, Lois (FL-22) Gillen, Laura (NY-4) Gluesenkamp Perez, Marie (WA-3) Golden, Jared (ME-2) Gonzalez, Vicente (TX-34) Goodlander, Maggie (NH-2) Gray, Adam (CA-13) Harder, Josh (CA-9) Hayes, Jahana (CT-5) Horsford, Steven (NV-4) Hoyer, Steny (MD-5) Kaptur, Marcy (OH-9) Keating, William R. (MA-9) Kennedy, Timothy (NY-26) Krishnamoorthi, Raja (IL-8) Landsman, Greg (OH-1) Lee, Susie (NV-3) Lynch, Stephen (MA-8) Magaziner, Seth (RI-2) Mannion, John (NY-22) McBath, Lucy (GA-6) McClain Delaney, April (MD-6) McDonald Rivet, Kristen (MI-8) Meng, Grace (NY-6) Min, Dave (CA-47) Morelle, Joseph (NY-25) Moskowitz, Jared (FL-23) Moulton, Seth (MA-6) Mrvan, Frank (IN-1) Neal, Richard (MA-1) Neguse, Joe (CO-2) Pallone, Frank (NJ-6) Panetta, Jimmy (CA-19) Pappas, Chris (NH-1) Pettersen, Brittany (CO-7) Riley, Josh (NY-19) Ruiz, Raul (CA-25) Ryan, Patrick (NY-18) Schneider, Brad (IL-10) Schrier, Kim (WA-8) Scott, David (GA-13) Sewell, Terri (AL-7) Sorensen, Eric (IL-17) Soto, Darren (FL-9) Stanton, Greg (AZ-4) Stevens, Haley (MI-11) Subramanyam, Suhas (VA-10) Suozzi, Thomas (NY-3) Swalwell, Eric (CA-14) Sykes, Emilia (OH-13) Thanedar, Shri (MI-13) Torres, Norma (CA-35) Torres, Ritchie (NY-15) Tran, Derek (CA-45) Vasquez, Gabriel (Gabe) (NM-2) Vindman, Eugene (VA-7) Wasserman Schultz, Debbie (FL-25) Whitesides, George (CA-27) Wilson, Frederica (FL-24) What People Are Saying House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries criticized Evans' resolution, telling reporters: "Who is this guy? He's not seriously concerned with combating antisemitism in America. This is not a serious effort. Antisemitism is a scourge on America. It shouldn't be weaponized politically." Evans responded to Jeffries on X: "I served our nation in uniform in the Middle East, as a cop in Colorado, & now as a Congressman. This wildly offensive sentiment from Democrat's Leader is why antisemitism persists. The Left is unserious about finding real solutions." Representative Dan Goldman of New York, who is Jewish, criticized the resolution during floor debate: "You weren't here, Mr. Evans, last term, but there were about 10 antisemitism resolutions that effectively said the same thing solely to score political points. We Jews are sick and tired of being used as pawns." Van Drew defended Evans' measure: "Yes, it is different than mine. Mine focused purely on antisemitism here in the world. But he brings up a valid point not only for Jews, but for many innocent victims... Illegal immigration is not a good thing." David Axelrod, ex-adviser to former President Barack Obama, posted to X: ".@BarackObama deported far more illegal immigrants than Trump, targeting those w/criminal records & the newly arrived. It was done carefully, responsibly & lawfully. What we're seeing in LA is calculated to provoke & escalate. It's a made-for TV reality show, produced by Donald J. Trump." Greene wrote on X after voting "present": "Antisemitic hate crimes are wrong, but so are all hate crimes. Yet Congress never votes on hate crimes committed against white people, Christians, men, the homeless, or countless others." What Happens Next California sued the Trump administration over its deployment of the National Guard to L.A., accusing Trump of an "unprecedented power grab" because he bypassed Newsom to send in the guardsmen. The last time a U.S. president circumvented a governor to deploy the National Guard was in 1965, when Lyndon B. Johnson sent troops to Alabama to protect civil rights activists.
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
How to win friends and influence climate policy
With help from Josh Siegel MAKING LIMONADE: Senate Democrats elevated one of their most progressive environmental champions when they picked Sen. Monique Limón as their next chamber leader Monday — showing it's still very possible to win friends and influence climate policy even in an era when the zeitgeist seems to have moved on to basic cost-of-living concerns. The Santa Barbara Democrat, elected to the state Assembly in 2016 and state Senate in 2020, will take on her new role in early 2026 before being termed out in 2028. Her path to the top has gone straight through the upper chamber's negotiations on the biggest climate bills of recent years, where she's gained a reputation as a detail-oriented policymaker who seeks wide input while remaining a staunch environmental justice ally. In a brief interview Tuesday, Limón signaled a willingness to follow the larger body's consensus even if it strays from her progressive leanings, bringing up her vote for a bill last year that sought to regulate warehouses despite opposition from community and environmental justice groups who saw it as greenwashing. 'I felt that moving something forward, even if it wasn't to the liking of those that I typically side with, was much more important for the state than waiting another year to be able to do it,' she said. 'There's these big things I've done, but at the end of the day, the leader of the house is really the vehicle to try to get to where the state wants, and that I think is important.' Her balancing of her environmental bona fides with wider political demands will perhaps most be put to the test on housing, which the Senate has remained divided on despite a push by the Assembly to waive environmental rules to spur more building. Limón has declined to support several measures aimed at boosting housing in recent years, in contrast to other lawmakers seen as pro tem contenders, Sens. Lena Gonzalez and Angelique Ashby — leaving YIMBY groups quiet or openly skeptical of her new role Monday. Most immediately, she'll have to exercise her newfound influence in the upper chamber's deliberations on the extension of the state's cap-and-trade program. She's seen as one of the most likely to push for reforms to the program, having been one of the sole Democrat votes against a 2017 deal on cap and trade in line with criticism from environmental justice groups. But her new role supercharges already-delicate negotiations with her counterparts in the Assembly and the governor's office. She has a track record of bringing together broad climate coalitions: Last year, she co-authored Prop 4, last year's $10 billion climate bond, which had the support of dozens of water, agriculture, energy and environment groups. But she's also not afraid of rocking the boat, including by authoring a bill to rein in the voluntary carbon offset market that drew opposition from everyone from the California Air Resources Board to the California Chamber of Commerce. She also has a track record of making enemies of oil and gas groups, including an early-career bill to ban new offshore oil drilling in state waters and pending legislation this year to slow a Texas-based oil company's restart of offshore oil drilling. She co-authored a bill to phase out neighborhood oil drilling in 2022, which became final in 2024 after oil groups agreed to pull a referendum on the bill from the ballot. Limón's new reach came through Tuesday morning, when she presided over her first Senate Natural Resources and Water Committee meeting since the vote. From her position as chair, she got farming and tribal groups to promise to negotiate over a bill to regulate flows on the Scott and Shasta rivers — and got called out by Republican Sen. Shannon Grove, who asked her to use her newfound influence to pressure the State Water Resources Control Board to act more quickly on the rivers. — CvK Did someone forward you this newsletter? Sign up here! DAYS NUMBERED: President Donald Trump is about to kill California's electric vehicle rules. Trump plans to sign a trio of resolutions Thursday to revoke the state's zero-emission sales mandates for cars and heavy-duty trucks, Sen. Shelley Moore Capito ( and Rep. Kevin Kiley (R-Calif.) confirmed. The signings will finalize his administration's months-long effort to thwart California's nation-leading vehicle emissions standards through an unprecedented congressional maneuver that triggered pushback from the Senate parliamentarian. We know what's going to happen next: California Attorney General Rob Bonta has already vowed to sue once Trump signs the resolutions. Daniel Villaseñor, a spokesperson for California Gov. Gavin Newsom, said the state is ready. 'If it's a day ending in 'y,' it's another day of Trump's war on California. We're fighting back,' Villaseñor said in a statement. — AN WHAT'S THAT SMELL?: The fight over a purple San Diego congressional seat could come down to raw sewage. Jim Desmond, a San Diego County supervisor, has become a regular on Fox News and other conservative outlets about sewage flowing from Mexico through the Tijuana River and into California — just as he's mounting a campaign to replace Democratic Rep. Mike Levin, Timothy Cama reports for POLITICO's E&E News. Desmond has framed Levin's efforts to raise funds for infrastructure upgrades to a major sewage treatment plant that straddles the border as letting Mexican officials off the hook. 'My opponent is proud of the strategy of throwing more money into the processing of the sewage,' Desmond said. Levin countered that Desmond has only recently started talking about the issue and has proposed a dam along the river that's criticized by air and water experts. 'What he's done since then is talk in the media and point fingers, and frankly, offer a ridiculous, counterproductive idea,' Levin said. — AN CASH PROBLEMS: Pacific Gas & Electric is among the growing chorus of utilities, consumer advocates and environmentalists pleading with the Trump administration to finalize $23 billion in loans for energy infrastructure projects. The funding awarded in the waning days of the Biden administration — much of which would go to Midwest states that voted for Trump — could help finance investments in transmission lines, batteries, renewable energy and natural gas infrastructure, Brian Dabbs and Jason Plautz report for POLITICO's E&E News. But they still need approval from Trump's Department of Energy. A DOE spokesperson said it's 'conducting a department-wide review to ensure all activities follow the law, comply with applicable court orders and align with the Trump administration's priorities.' The stakes are high for PG&E customers. Jennifer Robison, a spokesperson for the utility, said that leveraging a low-cost $15 billion loan guarantee could save ratepayers $1 billion in interest costs over the life of the loan. The utility cited 'uncertainty' around the loan alongside tariffs and wildfires in a recent filing among the reasons it was asking for a slight rate increase. — AN — Opponents of Sen. Josh Becker's SB 540, to set up a Westwide electric grid, are circulating this New York Times story on the unpopularity of the Northeast's grid manager. — Tech giants like Google and Meta are fighting to save renewable energy subsidies in the tax and spending bill winding its way through Congress. — Listen to our editor Debra Kahn discuss why carbon capture could survive the GOP megabill on the POLITICO energy podcast.
