logo
Reform-led councils in ‘paralysis' as dozens of meetings cancelled in first weeks

Reform-led councils in ‘paralysis' as dozens of meetings cancelled in first weeks

Independent06-06-2025
Councils taken over by Reform UK have been left in a state of 'paralysis' as dozens of key meetings are cancelled and newly elected councillors fail to show up.
Nigel Farage's party won huge victories in May's local council elections, gaining control of nine councils and minority control in a further three.
However, opposition councillors have claimed organisation and productivity have been a 'shambles' since the election, with some claiming the Reform representatives 'do not know what they're doing'.
Across the 12 Reform-controlled councils, 33 meetings have been cancelled or postponed within the first nine weeks since the election.
Additionally, at least 21 Reform councillors have missed their first meetings, despite the majority of these only having had one meeting to attend in their first month.
The worst-affected councils are Kent and Nottinghamshire, where Reform holds 57 and 39 seats respectively.
In Kent, nine out of the 22 meetings - 40 per cent - scheduled have been cancelled since the election up to July 4. That compares to just 15 per cent in 2024.
These include legally required meetings such as the governance and audit committee, a crucial part of local government structures, ensuring accountability and transparency of the council's finances.
Other meetings, such as the police and crime panel, were cancelled as membership of the committee was yet to be confirmed - something opposition councillors say suggests their Reform counterparts 'are not ready or prepared' for their roles.
In Nottinghamshire, four of the 10 meetings scheduled had been cancelled in the first nine weeks.
These include the governance and ethics committee and the overview committee, which is responsible for scrutinising the operation of the chief executive's department.
Opposition councillor in Kent, Rich Lehmann, said the cancellations were 'shocking' and made him question whether Reform was capable of leading the council.
'Reform did better than anyone expected, and clearly better than they expected as well,' he told The Independent.
'There's a general feeling among opposition councillors that a number of elected councillors are not ready or able to attend committee meetings that take place during the day.
'The fact they've not even named who is sitting on committees suggests they are having trouble filling committee places and that's why they're being cancelled.
'No one knows what's going on. There's a lot of confusion.'
Kent is the home of Reform UK's first Elon Musk-style Department of Government Efficiency (Doge) unit, which has been set up to look at 'wasteful spending' in councils.
The announcement on Sunday evening came as a surprise to many councillors, Mr Lehmann said, who claimed the move was a 'barrage of distraction' from the 'paralysis' the council is in.
It is understood that Reform UK councillors have chosen to cancel meetings with the intention of rescheduling them once they are more prepared. It is also understood that as the meetings were scheduled by the previous administration, they were not scheduled to the new Reform council's timetable.
In Nottinghamshire, the opposition Conservative group said the cancellations had sparked 'serious concerns about leadership, accountability, and the future of local service'.
'This is a shambolic start from Reform,' said Sam Smith, leader of the Conservatives.
'Scrapping every key meeting in their first full month in charge is not only reckless—it's dangerous. This puts public services at risk and shows just how unprepared Reform really are.'
He added: 'There's no excuse for this. They should be in their offices, speaking to officers, and getting to grips with their jobs. Instead, the car park is empty, and the council is effectively leaderless. This is what happens when you elect people who had no plan and no idea what the job involved.'
While local councils are independent bodies responsible for their own decisions, it is understood that the government expects them to operate within the law and to hold meetings in order to deliver for residents.
Kent County Council said some meetings, such as planning committees, were scheduled on an 'if required' basis, and were cancelled because there were no applications requiring an immediate decision.
A spokesperson said: 'Regarding the changes to the meeting calendar, a number of meetings were squeezed into June due to the election and induction period preventing them from being held in May as would be the case in a non-election year. Because there are no time-sensitive issues due at these June meetings, consideration is being given to deferring business to relevant July meetings to make best use of member and officer time.'
The Independent contacted Nottinghamshire Council's new Reform leader Mick Barton for comment. He did not respond but told Local Democracy Reporters the comments are 'political rhetoric from the opposition'.
He said: "That's absolute nonsense. We've only been here three weeks. We're still setting policies, we're having weekly cabinet meetings with officers to find out what we're going to be doing going forward."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ministers braced for further legal challenges after High Court Epping decision
Ministers braced for further legal challenges after High Court Epping decision

South Wales Argus

time3 minutes ago

  • South Wales Argus

Ministers braced for further legal challenges after High Court Epping decision

Reform UK leader Nigel Farage hailed the High Court decision in Epping as a 'victory' and said he hopes it 'provides inspiration to others across the country', while the shadow home secretary argued that residents have 'every right to object' to people being housed in their area. The 12 councils where Reform UK is the largest party are understood to be exploring the prospect of legal challenges following Tuesday's ruling. The Home Office had warned the judge that an injunction could 'interfere' with the department's legal obligations, and lawyers representing the hotel's owner argued it would set a 'precedent'. Epping Forest District Council had asked a judge to issue an interim injunction stopping migrants from being accommodated at the Bell Hotel. The hotel has been at the centre of a series of protests in recent weeks after an asylum seeker who was staying there was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl. Reacting to the news, Mr Farage said that 'young, undocumented males who break into the UK illegally should NOT be free to walk the streets anywhere. They must be detained and deported'. Chris Whitbread, leader of Epping Forest District Council, spoke to the media outside the Royal Courts of Justice in London on Tuesday (Yui Mok/PA) 'I hope that Epping provides inspiration to others across the country,' he said. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch suggested that the migrants housed at the hotel 'need to be moved out of the area immediately', while her shadow home secretary Chris Philp said that 'residents should never have had to fight their own government just to feel safe in their own town'. He said: 'Local residents have every right to feel safe in their own streets and every right to object when their community is treated as a dumping ground.' A Labour source said the move by the Tory-led council, who did not challenge the Conservative government when they were housing asylum seekers, was politically motivated and authority leaders were 'scared' of Reform. Asked on Tuesday why the council did not previously take legal action, Epping Forest District Council leader Chris Whitbread told the PA news agency: 'It goes back to 2020 when we were in the pandemic originally, and at that time, it was used for young families, women and children, which is completely different to having it used for single males. 'Obviously, we have always raised our concerns with the Home Office, whether it be the previous government or this government, we raised our concerns.' Border security minister Dame Angela Eagle said the Government will 'continue working with local authorities and communities to address legitimate concerns'. She added: 'Our work continues to close all asylum hotels by the end of this Parliament.' Lawyers for the Home Office had warned that an injunction 'runs the risk of acting as an impetus for further violent protests' (Jordan Pettitt/PA) Meanwhile, the council leader for Borough of Broxbourne Council, Corina Gander, told PA the High Court's injunction set a 'massive precedent' and the council would gather 'more detail about what Epping has done' before considering a bid to shut down another hotel housing asylum seekers. Lawyers for the Home Office had warned the court that an injunction 'runs the risk of acting as an impetus for further violent protests'. Edward Brown KC also said the injunction would 'substantially interfere' with the Home Office's statutory duty in potentially avoiding a breach of the asylum seekers' human rights. Several protests and counter-protests have been held in the town since a then-resident at the hotel was accused of trying to kiss a teenage girl. Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu has denied the charges against him and is due to stand trial later this month. Several protests and counter-protests have been held in the town (Yui Mok/PA) A second man who resides at the hotel, Syrian national Mohammed Sharwarq, has separately been charged with seven offences, while several other men have been charged over disorder outside the hotel. In a ruling on Tuesday, Mr Justice Eyre granted the temporary injunction, but extended the time limit by which the hotel must stop housing asylum seekers to September 12. He also refused to give Somani Hotels Limited, the hotel's owner, the green light to challenge his ruling, but the company could still ask the Court of Appeal for the go-ahead to appeal against the judgment. Piers Riley-Smith, for the company, asked the judge to be allowed to appeal against the ruling, citing its 'wide-reaching ramifications'. He said that there was a 'compelling reason for the appeal to be heard', including the 'precedent that would be set' by the ruling and the impact that it could have 'on the wider strategy of the (Home Secretary) in relation to the housing of asylum seekers in hotels as part of meeting their statutory duties'.

Swinney has ‘no intention' of reshuffling Scottish cabinet before May election
Swinney has ‘no intention' of reshuffling Scottish cabinet before May election

The Independent

time3 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Swinney has ‘no intention' of reshuffling Scottish cabinet before May election

John Swinney has made clear he has 'no intention' of reshuffling his cabinet team at Holyrood, despite a number of key figures in his government stepping down at next May's Scottish elections. More than 20 SNP MSPs are set to leave Holyrood when voters north of the border go to the poll next year. Mr Swinney's deputy First Minister Kate Forbes is among them, along with Finance Secretary Shona Robison, Transport Secretary Fiona Hyslop and Rural Affairs Secretary Mairi Gougeon. However, Mr Swinney made clear he has no plans to reshape his top team in the light of the planned departures. Speaking at an event in Edinburgh organised by the think tank Enlighten, Mr Swinney said: 'I have no intention of reshuffling my team before the election.' While he spoke about his 'regret' about fellow MSPs leaving Holyrood, including 'close colleagues, friends and confidantes', he said he had reshuffled his cabinet team after government minister Mairi McAllan returned to work earlier this year following her maternity leave. She was given the newly created post of housing secretary, with Mr Swinney tasking her with tackling the housing 'emergency' in Scotland. Asked if the impending departure of senior members of his government would bring about a reshuffle ahead of May's Scottish elections, the SNP leader said he had 'decided, actively and purposefully' that he had people in his cabinet with 'experience and expertise in a number of roles that would help me to deliver to government's programme before the election'. And he argued that if he was to 'put in a whole host of new faces' then 'it would take a while to get things back up to the level of delivery' So he insisted: 'I have no plans to reshuffle the government.' His comments came as he spoke of his 'regret' over SNP MSPs leaving Holyrood, with the First Minister saying he 'very much' regretted Ms Forbes' decision to quit the Scottish Parliament. She announced earlier this month she would not be running for election next year, saying she did not want to 'miss any more of the precious early years of family life'. Meanwhile, former first ministers Nicola Sturgeon and Humza Yousaf are also stepping down. Mr Swinney said: 'Some of my colleagues are stepping down because they have done a very long shift.' While he said he was the 'longest serving' parliamentarian at Holyrood, having been first voted in as an MP 28 years ago before being elected as an MSP in the first devolved elections, he noted a number of those quitting had also been first elected in 1999. However, he added some MSPs were leaving because of the 'tough' nature of politics. 'We have to acknowledge that for many, I think particularly younger women, the climate is horrendous,' Mr Swinney said. He continued: 'The social media endurance is hard to bear for some people, and it makes public service look frankly unattractive at times.' In these circumstances, he said, he tries to 'support my colleagues, understand and be an ally'. But the SNP leader added: 'Ultimately, I can not protect people from what is thrown at them, and some of the behaviours are appalling, so that affects a number of people as well.'

Campaigners fight Musk's plans for UK ‘energy power grab'
Campaigners fight Musk's plans for UK ‘energy power grab'

Telegraph

time4 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Campaigners fight Musk's plans for UK ‘energy power grab'

Thousands of activists are threatening to disrupt Elon Musk's bid to gatecrash Britain's energy market, urging regulator Ofgem to block the billionaire's plans. The campaign group Best for Britain, known for fighting against Brexit, has collected more than 8,000 letters from protesters who want to 'stop Musk's energy power grab'. Their opposition has emerged in response to Tesla's plans to launch its own electricity provider in Britain in the coming months, taking on the likes of Octopus Energy and British Gas. Details of Tesla's plans to sell power to UK households were first revealed in The Telegraph, which reported earlier this month that the US electric car maker had applied to Ofgem for an electricity supply licence. The public has until Friday to submit a response to Tesla's application, with Best for Britain attempting to build opposition by overseeing an online campaign against Mr Musk. In a pre-written letter which can be signed by activists, the campaign group says that the billionaire 'should not be allowed anywhere near our energy supply'. The group says that Mr Musk's recent work for Donald Trump and his cost-cutting department of government efficiency (Doge) 'should be unacceptable and disqualifying qualities for entrance into our energy markets'. Soros-backed group Best for Britain had previously campaigned against Brexit but has since reinvented itself as an 'internationalist' organisation and pollster. The group has been funded by George Soros, the Left-wing billionaire whom Mr Musk has repeatedly accused of funding anti-Tesla protests. Naomi Smith, Best for Britain's chief executive, said: 'We've all had a front row seat to Musk's malign influence: turning Twitter into an incubator for Right-wing hate, promoting baseless conspiracy theories and helping Trump secure a second term as US president – something that continues to change our world in profoundly dangerous ways. 'British people are rightly against Musk being anywhere near our electricity supply and that's why we are encouraging more people to make their views known before Friday by using our online tool to write to Ofgem and say they oppose this power grab.' Ofgem is supposed to consider each submission made to electricity licence applications. Best for Britain's boilerplate letter, which only requires signatories to write their name, states: 'Elon Musk's purchase of Twitter (now X) has enabled the rapid spread of misinformation, hatred and conspiracy theories in the UK and across the wider world.' It urges Ofgem to 'reject Tesla's application and protect our country from the influence of such a volatile individual', with thousands of letters set to be delivered to the regulator later this month. Tesla is seeking to push into Britain's electricity market after launching an energy supplier in Texas three years ago. Its operation could integrate with the thousands of households that already own Tesla Powerwall batteries in an attempt to create a 'virtual power plant' that can power houses at peak demand. The company also offers Tesla owners cheaper electric car charging. Sales of Teslas have slumped in Britain in recent months, which has been partly attributed to a backlash against Mr Musk's support for Mr Trump.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store