
Press Release: ECCO 2025: new duvakitug data reinforce best-in-class potential in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease
ECCO 2025: new duvakitug data reinforce best-in-class potential in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease
New detailed data from the RELIEVE UCCD study support overall efficacy and safety of duvakitug in all pre-specified subgroups across the different doses
New endpoints presented include findings on clinical and endoscopic outcomes and histological-endoscopic mucosal improvement
Findings to form the basis for a phase 3 program, anticipated to start in H2 2025
Paris and Parsippany, NJ, February 22, 2025. Sanofi and Teva Pharmaceuticals, a US affiliate of Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., today presented new, detailed results from the RELIEVE UCCD phase 2b study of duvakitug, a human IgG1-λ2 monoclonal antibody targeting TL1A, in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), the two most common forms of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). These results were shared in two oral presentations at the 20th Congress of the European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation (ECCO) in Berlin, Germany.
Ulcerative colitis
In the UC cohort of the RELIEVE UCCD study, 36% (450 mg dose) and 48% (900 mg dose) of patients treated with duvakitug achieved the primary endpoint of clinical remission (mMS)* at week 14 compared to 20% treated with placebo; placebo-adjusted rates were 16% (450 mg dose) and 27% (900 mg dose) (p=0.050 and 0.003, respectively).
In addition, higher clinical remission rates were observed for both doses of duvakitug versus placebo in both advanced therapy (AT) -experienced and AT-naïve subgroups of patients.
AT-experienced: 29% (450 mg) and 36% (900 mg), with placebo-adjusted rates of 22% (450 mg) and 29% (900 mg).
AT-naïve: 39% (450 mg) and 53% (900 mg), with placebo-adjusted rates of 12% (450 mg) and 26% (900 mg).
Additional endpoints observed*:
Clinical response (mMS): 81% (450 mg) and 70% (900 mg) compared to 52% treated with placebo.
Endoscopic improvement (MES): 45% (450 mg) and 50% (900 mg) compared to 23% treated with placebo.
Histological-endoscopic mucosal improvement (HEMI): 30% (450 mg) and 33% (900 mg) compared to 16% treated with placebo.
Walter Reinisch, MD, PhD,
Medical University of Vienna, and lead investigator of the RELIEVE UCCD study
'Patients, many of whom have spent years in a recurring cycle of remission and relapse, have been waiting a long time for better options in treating ulcerative colitis. We're highly encouraged by the significant treatment response, compared to placebo, seen in the study, both in advanced therapy naïve-and experienced patients,' said Walter Reinisch, MD, PhD, Medical University of Vienna, and lead investigator of the RELIEVE UCCD study. 'With this potential of duvakitug to reduce inflammation, we could truly transform treatment for patients with IBD in a safe manner.'
Crohn's disease
In the CD cohort of the RELIEVE UCCD study, 26% (450 mg dose) and 48% (900 mg dose) of patients treated with duvakitug achieved the primary endpoint of endoscopic response (SES-CD)* compared to 13% on placebo; placebo-adjusted rates were 13% (450 mg dose) and 35% (900 mg dose) at week 14 (p= 0.058 and <0.001, respectively).
In addition, higher endoscopic response rates were observed for both doses of duvakitug versus placebo in both AT-experienced and AT-naïve subgroups of patients.
AT-experienced: 11% (450 mg) and 48% (900 mg), with placebo-adjusted rates of 7% (450 mg) and 44% (900 mg).
AT-naïve: 47% (450 mg) and 47% (900 mg), with placebo-adjusted rates of 25% (450 mg) and 25% (900 mg).
Additional endpoints observed*:
Endoscopic remission (SES-CD): 17% (450 mg) and 26% (900 mg) compared to 9% treated with placebo.
Clinical remission (CDAI): 50% (450 mg) and 54% (900 mg) compared to 41% treated with placebo.
Clinical response (CDAI): 61% (450 mg) and 62% (900 mg) compared to 41% treated with placebo.
Clinical response (PRO2): 50% (450 mg) and 53% (900 mg) compared to 29% treated with placebo.
Vipul Jairath, MBChB, DPhil, FRCP, FRCPC
Professor of Medicine in the Departments of Medicine, Epidemiology and Biostatistics at Western University, and lead investigator of the RELIEVE UCCD study
'Every day, I see patients with Crohn's disease who continue to suffer from the often-severe symptoms of the disease despite available treatments,' said Vipul Jairath, MBChB, DPhil, FRCP, FRCPC, Professor of Medicine in the Departments of Medicine, Epidemiology and Biostatistics at Western University, and lead investigator of the RELIEVE UCCD study. 'The endoscopic response rates seen in this study support the potential of duvakitug as an effective new option for those who are in desperate need of relief.'
RELIEVE UCCD safety data summary
In both the UC and CD cohorts, duvakitug was generally well tolerated with no emergent safety signals observed. No dose-dependent or adverse event (AE) pattern was observed for treatment-related AEs, serious adverse events (SAEs), AEs leading to discontinuation or adverse events of special interest (AESIs).
Duvakitug is currently under clinical investigation, and its efficacy and safety have not been evaluated by any regulatory authority.
About inflammatory bowel disease
UC and CD, the two main types of IBD, are chronic inflammatory conditions of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract resulting in debilitating and persistent symptoms such as abdominal pain, diarrhea, rectal bleeding, fatigue and weight loss. Prolonged inflammation can lead to damage within the GI tract, including fibrosis, a common complication of IBD characterized by an accumulation of scar tissue in the intestinal wall, which may cause narrowing and obstruction often requiring hospitalization and surgery. There is currently no cure for IBD – the goal of treatment is to induce and maintain remission and prevent flares.
RELIEVE UCCD was a 14-week phase 2b, randomized, double-blinded, dose-ranging study to determine the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and tolerability of duvakitug in adults with moderate-to-severe UC or CD. The study was an innovative and efficient basket study design allowing the inclusion of patients with either type UC and CD. It is also the first and only randomized, blinded and placebo-controlled phase 2 study to investigate the impact of TL1A in CD.
In the study, patients who met pre-specified inclusion criteria were randomized to receive one of two duvakitug doses or placebo, administered every two weeks subcutaneously, in a 1:1:1 ratio for each indication (UC or CD) stratified by previous exposure to advanced IBD therapies for 14 weeks. The UC cohort comprised adults with moderately to severely active disease with inadequate response, loss of response or intolerance to previous conventional and/or advanced therapies (AT). The CD cohort comprised adults with moderately to severely active disease with documented inadequate response, loss of response or intolerance to conventional and/or ATs.
Primary efficacy endpoints are the number of participants who showed clinical remission (as defined by the modified Mayo score) in the UC cohort or the number of participants who showed endoscopic response (as defined by the SES-CD endoscopic score for CD) in the CD cohort. The study included sites in the US, Europe, Israel, and Asia.
About duvakitug
Duvakitug is a potential best-in-class human IgG1-λ2 monoclonal antibody that targets tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-like ligand 1A (TL1A), also known as TNF superfamily member 15 (TNFSF15). TL1A signaling is believed to amplify inflammation and drive fibrosis associated with IBD through binding its receptor, death receptor 3 (DR3).
Duvakitug is uniquely designed to inhibit preferentially TL1A signaling via DR3, with the potential advantage of reduced TL1A-DcR3 inhibition.
Duvakitug is currently in a phase 2b clinical study for the treatment of UC and CD, the two most common types of IBD. The safety and efficacy of duvakitug have not been reviewed by any regulatory authority.
About the Teva and Sanofi collaboration
Teva and Sanofi are collaborating to co-develop and co-commercialize Teva's duvakitug for the treatment of UC and CD. Each company will equally share the development costs globally, and the net profits and losses in major markets, with other markets subject to a royalty arrangement. Sanofi will lead the phase 3 clinical development program. Teva will lead commercialization of the product in Europe, Israel and specified other countries, and Sanofi will lead commercialization in North America, Japan, other parts of Asia and the rest of the world.
About Teva
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. (NYSE and TASE: TEVA) is a different kind of global pharmaceutical leader, one that operates across the full spectrum of innovation to reliably deliver medicines to patients worldwide. For over 120 years, Teva's commitment to bettering health has never wavered. Today, the company's global network of capabilities enables its 37,000 employees across 57 markets to advance health by developing medicines for the future while championing the production of generics and biologics. If patients have a need, we're already working to address it. To learn more about how Teva is all in for better health, visit www.tevapharm.com.
About Sanofi
We are an innovative global healthcare company, driven by one purpose: we chase the miracles of science to improve people's lives. Our team, across the world, is dedicated to transforming the practice of medicine by working to turn the impossible into the possible. We provide potentially life-changing treatment options and life-saving vaccine protection to millions of people globally, while putting sustainability and social responsibility at the center of our ambitions.
Sanofi is listed on EURONEXT: SAN and NASDAQ: SNY
Media Relations
Sandrine Guendoul | +33 6 25 09 14 25 | [email protected]
Evan Berland | +1 215 432 0234 | [email protected]
Nicolas Obrist | +33 6 77 21 27 55 | [email protected]
Léo Le Bourhis | +33 6 75 06 43 81 | [email protected]
Victor Rouault | +33 6 70 93 71 40 | [email protected]
Timothy Gilbert | +1 516 521 2929 | [email protected]
Investor Relations
Thomas Kudsk Larsen |+44 7545 513 693 | [email protected]
Alizé Kaisserian | +33 6 47 04 12 11 | [email protected]
Felix Lauscher | +1 908 612 7239 | [email protected]
Keita Browne | +1 781 249 1766 | [email protected]
Nathalie Pham | +33 7 85 93 30 17 | [email protected]
Tarik Elgoutni | + 1 617 710 3587 | [email protected]
Thibaud Châtelet | + 33 6 80 80 89 90 | [email protected]
Sanofi forward-looking statement
This press release contains forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts. These statements include projections and estimates and their underlying assumptions, statements regarding plans, objectives, intentions, and expectations with respect to future financial results, events, operations, services, product development and potential, and statements regarding future performance. Forward-looking statements are generally identified by the words 'expects', 'anticipates', 'believes', 'intends', 'estimates', 'plans' and similar expressions. Although Sanofi's management believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, investors are cautioned that forward-looking information and statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties, many of which are difficult to predict and generally beyond the control of Sanofi, that could cause actual results and developments to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied or projected by, the forward-looking information and statements. These risks and uncertainties include among other things, the uncertainties inherent in research and development, future clinical data and analysis, including post marketing, decisions by regulatory authorities, such as the FDA or the EMA, regarding whether and when to approve any drug, device or biological application that may be filed for any such product candidates as well as their decisions regarding labelling and other matters that could affect the availability or commercial potential of such product candidates, the fact that product candidates if approved may not be commercially successful, the future approval and commercial success of therapeutic alternatives, Sanofi's ability to benefit from external growth opportunities, to complete related transactions and/or obtain regulatory clearances, risks associated with intellectual property and any related pending or future litigation and the ultimate outcome of such litigation, trends in exchange rates and prevailing interest rates, volatile economic and market conditions, cost containment initiatives and subsequent changes thereto, and the impact that global crises may have on us, our customers, suppliers, vendors, and other business partners, and the financial condition of any one of them, as well as on our employees and on the global economy as a whole. The risks and uncertainties also include the uncertainties discussed or identified in the public filings with the SEC and the AMF made by Sanofi, including those listed under 'Risk Factors' and 'Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements' in Sanofi's annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2024. Other than as required by applicable law, Sanofi does not undertake any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking information or statements.
All trademarks mentioned in this press release are the property of the Sanofi group.
Teva Cautionary note regarding forward-looking statements
This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which are based on management's current beliefs and expectations and are subject to substantial risks and uncertainties, both known and unknown, that could cause our future results, performance or achievements to differ significantly from that expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. You can identify these forward-looking statements by the use of words such as 'should,' 'expect,' 'anticipate,' 'estimate,' 'target,' 'may,' 'project,' 'guidance,' 'intend,' 'plan,' 'believe' and other words and terms of similar meaning and expression in connection with any discussion of future operating or financial performance. Important factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include risks relating to: our ability to successfully develop duvakitug for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD); our ability to successfully compete in the marketplace, including our ability to develop and commercialize additional pharmaceutical products; our ability to successfully execute our Pivot to Growth strategy, including to expand our innovative and biosimilar medicines pipeline and profitably commercialize the innovative medicines and biosimilar portfolio, whether organically or through business development, and to sustain and focus our portfolio of generic medicines; the effectiveness of our patents and other measures to protect our intellectual property rights; and other factors discussed in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the third quarter of 2024, and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, including in the section captioned 'Risk Factors.' Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made, and we assume no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements or other information contained herein, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. You are cautioned not to put undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.
*P-values reported are one-sided at a significance level of 0.10.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Associated Press
12 hours ago
- Associated Press
Hematologists Set the Stage for Market Disruption as Next-Gen Hemophilia Therapies Gain Traction
EXTON, PA, June 12, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- As the hemophilia landscape continues to transform, new research from Spherix Global Insights reveals a market on the cusp of significant evolution driven by innovation, physician receptivity, and an increasingly nuanced approach to patient care. The latest Market Dynamix™: Hemophilia (EU) 2025 report, based on feedback from 160 hematologists across the UK, France, Germany, Italy, and Spain, illuminates shifting treatment preferences and the widening role for advanced therapeutic options across hemophilia A and B. The study captures a broadening treatment mindset in a market historically dominated by factor replacement therapies. Although conventional agents have provided stability for many patients, Spherix data highlight an increasingly urgent unmet need, particularly among patients with inhibitors. In fact, patients with inhibitors represent the group for whom hematologists see the greatest opportunity for innovation. Products such as Alhemo (Novo Nordisk) and Qfitlia (Sanofi) are already entering the physician consciousness as promising options, with early prescribing experiences for Alhemo in Germany showing favorable clinical feedback. Importantly, European hematologists are signaling readiness to embrace novel mechanisms that deliver sustained efficacy and reduce treatment burden. Beyond Alhemo and Hympavzi, there is rising anticipation for agents like Qfitlia and Mim8 (Novo Nordisk). Gene therapy, once seen as aspirational, is becoming a more realistic consideration, especially in hemophilia B where therapeutic alternatives remain limited. CSL Behring's Hemgenix and BioMarin's Roctavian are drawing interest, albeit tempered by concerns around cost and long-term outcomes. Spherix data reveal a market increasingly driven not just by efficacy but by lifestyle alignment and convenience. This reflects a maturation of brand expectations, where baseline efficacy is presumed and differentiation hinges on quality-of-life enhancements. The move away from standard half-life (SHL) and even extended half-life (EHL) products is evident, particularly in hemophilia A, where agents like Hemlibra (Roche/Genentech) and Altuvoct/Altuviiio (Sanofi) are rapidly becoming standard practice. Underlying these trends is a broader shift in therapeutic philosophy: goals focus less and less on symptom control (which is assumed) while disease modification becomes centrally important, mirroring changes seen in other chronic specialty markets. Hematologists are prepared to make transitions, especially when options can seamlessly accommodate inhibitor development without requiring treatment change. For Hympavzi, Alhemo, and Qfitlia, upcoming Launch DynamixTM tracking among US hematologists (available June 13th) underlines similar themes, with projected prescribing steadily rising for these novel agents. Additional metrics included in launch tracking include impact of product features and manufacturer programs on prescribing, assessment of likely patient groups for initial product trialing, and perspectives on which brand(s) are likely displaced by newer market entrants. Ultimately, as the treatment paradigm continues to evolve, biopharma stakeholders seeking success in the hemophilia space will need to align not only with clinical outcomes but also with patient-centric attributes now prioritized in physician decision-making. Market Dynamix™ is an independent service providing analysis of markets anticipated to experience a paradigm shift within the next three to five years. Insights highlight market size, current treatment approaches, unmet needs, and expert opinions on the likely disruption introduced by pipeline agents. Launch Dynamix™ is an independent service providing monthly benchmarking of newly launched products for the first eighteen months of commercial availability, augmented by a quarterly deep dive into promotional activity, barriers to uptake, and patient types gravitating to the launch brand. About Spherix Global Insights Spherix is a leading independent market intelligence and advisory firm that delivers commercial value to the global life sciences industry, across the brand lifecycle. The seasoned team of Spherix experts provides an unbiased and holistic view of the landscape within rapidly evolving specialty markets, including dermatology, gastroenterology, rheumatology, nephrology, neurology, ophthalmology, and hematology. Spherix clients stay ahead of the curve with the perspective of the extensive Spherix Physician Community. As a trusted advisor and industry thought leader, Spherix's unparalleled market insights and advisory services empower clients to make better decisions and unlock opportunities for growth. To learn more about Spherix Global Insights, visit or connect through LinkedIn. For more details on Spherix's primary market research reports and interactive dashboard offerings, visit or register here: NOTICE: All company, brand or product names in this press release are trademarks of their respective holders. The findings and opinions expressed within are based on Spherix Global Insight's analysis and do not imply a relationship with or endorsement of the companies or brands mentioned in this press release. Sarah Hendry, Hematology Franchise Head Spherix Global Insights 4848794284 [email protected]
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
Analysis-Kennedy's ouster of US vaccine advisers puts pharma ties under scrutiny
By Chad Terhune (Reuters) -U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s surprise ouster of a national vaccine advisory board, claiming it was "plagued with persistent conflicts of interest," puts new scrutiny on the group that recommends which shots should be administered to the American public. Kennedy said most vaccine experts on the 17-member Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) have received "substantial funding" from drugmakers. He did not provide examples of conflicts of interest for any individual adviser or say how that may have influenced specific recommendations. Committee members say their work with the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention follows rigorous vetting of their financial ties. They must abstain from votes on any vaccine for which they have a conflict, as well as any rival to that vaccine or any product from the same manufacturer, according to CDC rules. The agency's website lists one of the departing panel members as recusing herself over such conflicts. "To determine that the whole (advisory board), all 17 members, have conflicts of interest, that has not been shown by the evidence," fired board member Dr. Oliver Brooks told Reuters. "However, the decisions that have been made (by Kennedy) undermine confidence in the process and in vaccines." Six of the vaccine advisers fired by Kennedy received a total of $80 or less from drugmakers from 2017 to 2023, according to a Reuters review of the Open Payments federal database of industry payments to healthcare providers. Seven other panel members received between $4,000 and $55,000 from drugmakers for consulting, speaking fees, travel or meals over the period 2017 to 2023. Two of those experts had also worked with other scientists in industry-funded research projects worth several millions of dollars. Brooks, retired chief medical officer at Watts Healthcare in Los Angeles and former president of the National Medical Association, received nearly $44,000 in general payments from Sanofi, according to the government records. Most of the payments occurred in 2017 and 2018, with nothing after 2020. Brooks became a vaccine adviser in 2021, and did not disclose any conflicts that would preclude him from voting. He said the panel's sole aim is "to prevent vaccine-preventable illness." Sanofi declined to comment. At least three vaccine advisers were not health professionals tracked by mandatory Open Payments reporting. KENNEDY'S CONFLICT Kennedy, who has spent years sowing doubts about vaccine safety and efficacy contrary to scientific evidence, faced questions from Congress about his own potential conflicts of interest during a confirmation hearing. Kennedy said he would divest his financial interest in litigation against Merck over its Gardasil vaccine, which prevents cancers caused by the human papillomavirus, to his non-dependent, adult son. In posts on X this week, Kennedy said he would share "examples of the historical corruption at ACIP" and announced eight new panel members. Four of them had received nominal reimbursement for meals, according to Open Payments, while the remainder recorded no payments or weren't covered by the database. A 2009 federal inspector general's report criticized the CDC for lax enforcement of disclosures among its advisory panels. New research shared with Reuters suggests conflicts have since declined among vaccine board members. "People are more aware of these issues on advisory committees, so they're facing greater scrutiny there," said Dr. Genevieve Kanter, an associate professor of public policy at the University of Southern California who has studied conflicts among government health advisers. Kanter's analysis of vaccine panel disclosures found that, on average, 43% of panel members facing decisions on specific vaccines declared conflicts in 2000 compared to 5%, on average, at meetings over the last 10 years. Kanter said it will also be important to understand how the vaccine advisers assembled by Kennedy are vetted for conflicts. They are due to meet at the end of June. "We don't want to replace one conflict with another set of conflicts," she said. "If someone has a financial interest in treatments that are believed to be alternatives to vaccines for certain conditions, we want to know that." DISCLOSURE RULES ACIP members are required to divest all stock in vaccine makers and stop any active consulting work for those companies before joining the panel. They can't accept travel or food from vaccine companies or collect product royalties. Similar restrictions apply to family members. Committee members can keep working on vaccine clinical trials funded by industry and those research grants can help cover their salaries. They are required to file annual disclosures and recuse themselves from votes when specific conflicts arise. "ACIP members ... are carefully screened for major conflicts of interest and selected through a lengthy process," said the California Department of Public Health, whose immunization chief, Dr. Robert Schechter, was fired from the panel by Kennedy. One of the fired panel members, Dr. Bonnie Maldonado, is a pediatric infectious diseases specialist at Stanford University who has led vaccine studies worldwide. She participated in research that received $4.65 million in funding from Pfizer, most of it spanning 2021 to 2023. The studies involved vaccines for COVID-19, RSV and other diseases. Maldonado also received general payments from drugmakers, including $26,465 from Pfizer and nearly $7,000 from Merck. Maldonado abstained from a vote on COVID vaccine recommendations in June 2024, declaring a conflict of interest. In October, she did participate in a COVID-related vote. Maldonado didn't respond to a request for comment. Noel Brewer, a professor of public health at the University of North Carolina, is not a clinician and therefore not included in Open Payments. In a 2017 research paper, he disclosed receiving research grants from Merck, Pfizer and GSK and serving on a paid advisory board for Merck. The disclosures did not give details on the payment amounts. Spokespeople for the three vaccine makers were not immediately available for comment.
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
6 toilet habit changes you should always see a doctor about
No one enjoys talking about bowel movements. But ignoring the signs your body is trying to send you can mean putting off a diagnosis you really need to hear. Just ask TOWIE star Chloe Meadows. The reality TV regular recently shared on Dr Oscar Duke's Bedside Manners podcast that she'd spent a decade silently struggling with bleeding, stomach pain and extreme fatigue before finally getting a diagnosis: ulcerative colitis, a chronic condition that causes inflammation and ulcers in the colon. She lived with on-and-off symptoms for years, assuming they'd passed. It wasn't until age 26, when she became visibly unwell, that a blood test led her to A&E and finally, a diagnosis. Meadows' experience is an important reminder that when your toilet habits change – and stay changed – it's time to talk to your GP. Below, we break down six toilet-related red flags that experts say you should never ignore. And no, it's not just about your bowel movements; your wee, urgency levels, and even smells all matter, too. Whether you're suddenly constipated, dealing with constant diarrhoea, or noticing your stool looks different (narrower, paler or greasy), changes that last longer than a few weeks are worth investigating. The NHS advises that ongoing shifts in bowel habits could be linked to anything from diet and stress to Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS), coeliac disease or inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In some cases, persistent symptoms could be a sign of bowel cancer, so don't brush them off. When to see your GP: If your usual routine has changed for more than two to three weeks, especially if it's paired with stomach pain, fatigue, or weight loss. It might be bright red or dark and tarry; either way, it's not something to ignore. Bright red blood can come from piles or small tears, but darker blood might mean there's bleeding higher up in the digestive system. When to see your GP: If you see blood in your poo. You may be offered a stool test, or in some cases, a referral for further checks. If anything feels amiss and suddenly starts to sting, burn or feel uncomfortable, you might assume it's a urinary tract infection (UTI). And often, that's true. But it can also be a sign of kidney stones or bladder issues. Blood in your urine should also be taken seriously, even if it only happens once. When to see your GP: If you have pain while urinating, see blood or feel the urge to go far more often than usual. Needing the loo more often than usual (especially at night), feeling like you can't wait, or leaking a little when you cough, sneeze or laugh could signal an overactive bladder, prostate issues (in men), or pelvic floor dysfunction. These symptoms might feel embarrassing, but they're generally common and manageable with the right support. When to see your GP: If bladder leaks or urgency interfere with your daily life, or if you notice a sudden change in how often you need to go. A little mucus in your stool isn't always a worry, but frequent slimy stools can be a sign of infection or inflammation in your gut. When to see your GP: If mucus appears regularly, especially if it comes with bloating, pain or a change in bowel movements. If going to the toilet has become uncomfortable, painful, or feels like hard work, that's your body waving a red flag. Regular straining can cause or worsen hemorrhoids, but it might also signal bowel issues or even neurological problems affecting your pelvic floor. When to see your GP: If you're straining often, feel like you're not fully emptying your bowels, or notice pain during or after a bowel movement. If you're unsure, remember that everyone has their own baseline of what's 'normal'. However, there are a few simple signs to watch for as a guide. According to the Bladder and Bowel Health Service, healthy bowel movements should be soft, smooth and easy to pass; ideally at least three times a week. You should also be able to urinate without pain or discomfort. If you also notice you're often bloated, tired, straining, or notice blood or mucus, it's time to speak to your GP. Changes might be harmless, but they're always worth checking. Read more on bowel habits: This Poop Chart Will Tell You If Your Bathroom Habits Are Actually Healthy Or If You Need To See A Doctor ASAP (Buzzfeed, 4-min read) How 'blowing bubbles' and 'mooing' can help ease constipation, according to NHS doctor (Yahoo Life UK, 4-min read) Bowel cancer cases in young people rising sharply in England, study finds (PA Media, 4-min read)