Rep. Newhouse promises support for WA school board fighting state's transgender laws
Central Washington Rep. Dan Newhouse said in a Wednesday social media post that he had met with Kennewick School Board member Josh Miller to hear about their Title IX complaint against the state, Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction and Superintendent Chris Reykdal.
'I informed them I am currently working with the White House and Department of Justice to open a federal investigation into this unacceptable standard that continues to threaten the safety of young female athletes in Central Washington,' Newhouse, R-Sunnyside, posted on Twitter/X.
His support is the most prominent the school board has received since filing the complaint on March 27.
The meeting also comes as Newhouse receives criticism for not holding a district town hall to discuss DOGE cuts affecting federal workers and programs.
The board believes the state's policies 'directly harm' young women, and that they jeopardize the district's federal resources by being at odds with President Donald Trump's executive actions opposing 'male competitive participation in women's sports.'
The threat to school funding is tangible as discussions around gender and Title IX interpretations erupt nationwide.
This week, the U.S. Department of Agriculture froze some school funds to Maine public schools over its refusal to ban trans girls from sports, according to a Reuters report.
But gender expression and identity are protected classes under Washington state law, meaning schools cannot discriminate against students.
OSPI says all public school students have the right to be treated in ways that align with their gender identity. That means students can engage with or use whichever restroom, locker room, pronouns, dress code or athletics programs aligns with their expression.
Kennewick's complaint highlights the case of a transgender teen from East Valley High School in Spokane who won the 2024 girls state 400-meter dash, resulting in the team winning the girls 2A track title.
For the past two decades, the state's premier organizer of high school sports, the Washington Interscholastic Activities Association, has prohibited the discrimination of student-athletes based on their preferred identity, allow trans students to compete.
Reykdal said there are about five to ten student athletes across Washington state who are transgender, a portion of about 0.004% of the quarter-million student athletes, per FOX 13.
But the Kennewick board argues it is 'demeaning, unfair and dangerous' to girls sports, and denies young women the 'equal opportunity to participate and excel in competitive sports.'
'(OSPI) has mandated that the Kennewick School District revise its gender-inclusive schools policy and procedures to conform to statewide model policy that directly violates Title IX,' the board writes in its complaint, noting a compliance deadline of May 23.
'In doing so, Washington state and the state superintendent, Chris Reykdal, have blatantly disregarded directives of the United States Department of Education, and the lawful executive orders issued by our current president, creating discriminatory and unsafe environments detrimental to our children and particularly damaging to our girls and young women,' it continued.
Of the Kennewick School District's $322 million annual budget, about 10% comes from federal funds while nearly 50% comes from OSPI through student apportionment.
Since last week, school board leaders have been on a media blitz to discuss their fight against Washington's policies.
On Monday, board President Gabe Galbraith and Vice President Micah Valentine appeared on Fox News' program 'Fox & Friends First' to make their plea for federal intervention.
Galbraith also called into 770 KTTH's 'The Jason Rantz Show' in Seattle this week.
He said they feel they have the federal law on their side, which is why the board is pushing for Trump's interpretation of Title IX. But if the outcome of their complaint favors state law, Galbraith said they would abide by Reykdal.
'Whichever one comes out on top as the rule of the land, then that's what we would ultimately obviously need to follow so that we're not breaking any laws,' he told Rantz.
Galbraith says it's a '90-10 issue' in Kennewick, and there has been 'no issues' with administrators or teachers support.
'Ultimately, it's been positive and the community's behind us,' he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
10 minutes ago
- The Hill
Amid bitter partisanship, permitting reform is a golden opportunity for bipartisanship
With states now fighting over redistricting maps, America's two political parties will need an opportunity to work together again. Permitting reform is one issue that is just right for this, even amidst an apparent trifecta. Strengthening American energy production has long been a bipartisan issue, as it fosters economic growth, protects national security, and increases the energy supply to drive down or stabilize utility costs for U.S. households in the face of growing demand. There has never been a better time for it. Done right, it secures American global leadership for another century. While recent debates around tax credits have made this issue seem increasingly partisan, reforming our existing energy permitting process is something on which lawmakers on both sides of the aisle largely already agree. Congress should capitalize on consensus to pass comprehensive permitting reform legislation. Debates surrounding energy tax credits in the One Big, Beautiful Bill Act, in particular, brought energy production back into the spotlight this year. Reconciliation can leave bitter feelings, but permitting reform has a chance to offer both parties something they dearly want — energy dominance, reduced emissions, fewer arcane rules, and less back and forth political games undermining the development of new energy projects. All energy production would benefit from permitting reform. America's permitting system should be a gateway for energy projects. Right now, it's a bottleneck. Unpredictable processes and delays in approval are bringing new developments to a grinding halt. With the rise of AI and a digital world that increasingly relies on data centers, global energy demand has spiked. Congress is now tasked with ensuring that American energy production can keep pace with this demand and not fall behind foreign adversaries vying for our position as the global leader in innovation and technology. But as of late, lawmakers have remained stagnant on addressing permitting reform. Yet, while demand for all energy production is on the rise, Democrats have a lot less to fear from loosening rules than they may think. The vast majority of projects stuck in grid connection queues are renewable — over 95 percent of proposed new generation capacity is solar or wind. Much-needed reform to the approval process could free up all new projects, strengthen American energy dominance and unleash clean energy all at once. Permitting reform has long been a bipartisan issue. Last year, Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.), then-ranking member of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, and then-Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee Chairman Joe Manchin ( introduced the Energy Permitting Reform Act of 2024 aimed at streamlining and expediting the approvals process. While this legislation was not ultimately passed, it is a prime example of members reaching across the aisle to drive movement on this front. Most recently, a bipartisan group of governors made an urgent call for permitting reform. 'It shouldn't take longer to approve a project than it takes to build it,' said Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt (R). He also highlighted the bipartisan nature of the issue, 'Democrats and Republicans alike recognize permitting delays weaken U.S. economic growth, security and competitiveness. Governors from both parties are working together to inject some common sense into our permitting process.' Voters in both parties agree. Recent polling conducted by Cygnal found that two-thirds of respondents agree that Congress should modernize permitting rules to accelerate completion of energy projects and reduce long-term cost pressures. Some conservative stalwarts will never support anything they see as helping clean energy, while some environmental activists are more concerned with punishing fossil fuel companies than they are with actually addressing climate change. These short-sighted visions represent the horseshoe of scarcity, decline and pessimism that has plagued American energy politics for decades. They believe we can succeed only by taking from the other side. America cannot afford delay. A dangerous world requires energy dominance in all industries, including new ones like clean energy. Moreover, Americans deserve to know that they will have reliable, accessible energy needed to power their businesses and residences. Permitting reform will make energy access more reliable, more abundant, cheaper and much cleaner. All Americans, and our planet, will win. The only losers will be those profiteering from political polarization. With some energy tax credits phasing out sooner than originally planned, many energy producers want to act swiftly to get new projects up and running. The permitting process, as it stands, is their biggest obstacle. As we head into the fall, our lawmakers should keep the cross-partisan opportunity on permitting reform top of mind. Liam deClive-Lowe is the co-founder of American Policy Ventures, an organization that builds projects to help policymakers collaborate and get things done.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Blue states plan new tax hikes on wealthy residents in response to Trump's federal tax legislation
Blue states around the U.S. are planning tax hikes on wealthy residents to bring in additional revenue through a variety of proposals, including one state's so-called "Taylor Swift tax." The moves come after the enactment of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) by President Donald Trump and Republicans in Congress, which permanently extended many of the 2017 tax cuts and included other new tax relief provisions as well as spending cuts to programs such as Medicaid. Democrats argue these tax hike proposals are needed to help plug gaps in state budgets and offset any lost federal dollars for Medicaid and other programs. The state of Rhode Island enacted a new tax this summer that will impose a special levy on vacation homes valued at $1 million or more, which has become known as the "Taylor Swift tax" due to the music star owning a home in an affluent part of Westerly, Rhode Island, The Wall Street Journal reported. Taylor Swift: Here's How The Pop Superstar Achieved Billionaire Status Rhode Island's "Taylor Swift tax" imposes a tax of $2.50 for every $500 of assessed value above $1 million, which a analysis estimated would result in an additional $136,000 in property taxes on her luxury home in the Watch Hill neighborhood that's valued at $17 million. Read On The Fox Business App Montana wants to increase property taxes on non-primary residences, adopting a new reform that will reduce property tax rates for owner-occupied primary homes while hiking the rate to 1.9% for second homes or short-term rentals, with industrial properties also set to face higher levies. Lawmakers want to provide not only a tax break to about 230,000 homeowners, but incentivize owners of vacation properties or second homes to sell those properties to inject more inventory into a tight real estate market, reported. Mamdani's Rise In Nyc Mirrors Economic Flight To The South, Study Shows This spring, Maryland enacted a new tax policy that raises income tax rates on residents earning over $500,000 a year to narrow the state's budget deficit. Another state in the Northeast is also mulling a tax hike on wealthy residents, with lawmakers in Connecticut considering legislation that would raise income tax rates on individuals earning $250,000 or more, or twice that amount for couples, to help offset an anticipated decrease in federal funding. How Much Can People Save On Taxes By Moving To Florida? The state of Washington this spring passed a budget that will raise its capital gains tax from 7% to 9%, though the tax's structure excludes real estate sales and focuses on other transactions like those involving stocks, bonds or business interests. Washington doesn't have an income tax, and the state constitution prohibits one. Washington has in the past seen wealthy residents depart the state to avoid the high tax burden, such as when Amazon founder Jeff Bezos left for low-tax Florida. That phenomenon has occurred in other high-tax states, such as California, New York, New Jersey and Illinois, which have seen wealthy residents and corporations leave in favor of states with lower article source: Blue states plan new tax hikes on wealthy residents in response to Trump's federal tax legislation Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Why congressional stock-trade ban efforts are about to heat up
September is shaping up to be a big month for efforts to ban stock trading in Congress. Rep. Anna Paulina Luna says she's going to try to force a vote via a discharge petition. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent recently said he'd start pushing for a ban too. Get ready to hear a lot more about banning congressional stock trading. A top Trump administration official says he's going to start pushing for a ban. Two House Republicans are, in different ways, gearing up to force a vote on the issue. And all the while, lawmakers keep failing to report millions of dollars' worth of stock trades on time. "We've got to move," Republican Rep. Chip Roy of Texas said on Fox Business earlier this month, saying that while he had given House GOP leadership "grace" as they worked to get the "Big Beautiful Bill" through Congress, that time is now over. "I'm going to demand that we vote on this, this fall." It all comes after an explosive Senate hearing on a stock trading bill last month, where Republicans went after one another over whether President Donald Trump himself should be banned from trading stocks. That led to Trump branding Sen. Josh Hawley as "second-tier," though the Missouri Republican later told BI that he was able to smooth things over with Trump later. "He told me he wants a stock trading ban," Hawley said in July. "He remains committed to getting a stock trading ban, so we'll work with him to do that." Potential House drama over a 'discharge petition' Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, a Florida Republican known for challenging her own party's leadership, has said she'll start the process of forcing a vote on a stock trading ban when lawmakers return from the August recess. "I won't sit idly by while members of Congress trade stocks, especially those on committees with direct influence over relevant industries," Luna wrote on X last month. "That's corruption at its core, and it needs to stop." Luna has said she'll try to use what's known as a "discharge petition" to bring up a stock trading ban bill authored by Republican Rep. Tim Burchett of Tennessee. Under that process, the bill would have to be brought to the House floor for a vote — with or without the support of House leaders — if Luna is able to collect signatures from 218 members, a majority of the 435 seats in the House. Not everyone who supports a stock trading ban is on board with Luna's approach. Roy, the co-sponsor of a different stock trading ban bill that has bipartisan support and has been around for years, told Fox Business that a discharge petition is "not the best way" to get it done. "I want the speaker, and Republicans, to control this," said Roy. "Republicans need to control the floor, do our job, bring this to a vote." Roy has been working with a bipartisan group that includes Democratic Reps. Seth Magaziner of Rhode Island and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York to put forward a consensus stock trading ban bill. But after months of discussions, they have yet to release legislative text. That's led Luna to largely dismiss their effort. "Allegedly, there were 'talks' happening? With who?" Luna wrote on X on Thursday. "They were never going to bring a VOTE to the floor. I don't care if this upsets people." The Florida congresswoman's effort is worth taking seriously: she has used this legislative tool before to bring up a bill on proxy voting over the objections of Speaker Mike Johnson, bringing the House to a halt for a full week in April. Lawmakers keep reporting trades late Johnson has said he's supportive of a stock trading ban — though he has "sympathy" for arguments against it. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries began forcefully supporting it this year in the wake of well-timed tariff trades by some lawmakers. Even Trump has backed it, though some Republicans are wary of applying the bill's restrictions to him. This week, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent got in on the action, saying he himself would begin pushing for a ban on lawmakers trading individual stocks. "I don't think we have the perfect bill yet," Bessent told Bloomberg this week. "But I am going to start pushing for a single-stock trading ban." Meanwhile, several lawmakers in have been found in violation of the STOCK Act in recent weeks, disclosing millions of dollars worth of trades long after the 30-45 day deadline for doing so. Rep. Lisa McClain of Michigan, the fourth-highest ranking House Republican, was late to disclose over 500 trades made by her husband from March 2024 through June 2025, totalling at least $1.5 million. Republican Rep. Dan Meuser of Pennsylvania failed to disclose that his wife sold between $750,000 and $1.5 million in NVIDIA stock last year. And Sen. Markwayne Mullin of Oklahoma was late in disclosing millions of dollars made by him and his wife since 2023. Lawmakers are only required to disclose asset ranges on their reports, so we don't know the exact value of the trades. Those lawmakers and their spokespeople blamed errors made by third-party financial managers and lack of awareness of the trades for the late disclosures. A spokesperson for McClain told BI that the congresswoman "promptly filed the necessary paperwork immediately after being made aware of the transactions made in managed accounts and remains committed to transparency and adherence to all House financial disclosure rules and regulations." "I take compliance with all House rules seriously and expect the same from those managing my accounts," Meuser told BI through a spokesperson. "This was a simple, automatic filing that should have occurred without error. The mistake was made solely by my brokerage and benefited me in no way." Mullin's office did not respond to BI's request for comment, but a spokesperson told NOTUS that the senator doesn't trade himself, but relies on a third-party broker. Read the original article on Business Insider Sign in to access your portfolio
