Trump budget proposes drastic cuts for US scientific research
WASHINGTON: The White House wants to reduce US health spending by more than a quarter next year, with the National Institutes of Health and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention facing the brunt of billions of dollars in cuts.
President Donald Trump's administration on Friday proposed a US$163 billion cut to the federal budget that would sharply reduce spending in areas including health, education, and housing next year, while increasing outlays for defense and border security.
The proposed budget requests US$93.8 billion for the Department of Health and Human Services - a cut of US$33.3 billion, or 26.2 per cent - from this year's budget of US$127 billion.
It includes a cut of US$18 billion, or 40 per cent of the money allocated to the NIH, leaving it with US$27 billion. The Trump administration wants to cut funding altogether for four of the agency's 27 institutes and centers while consolidating others into five new ones.
A total of almost US$1 billion would be eliminated for the National Institute on Minority and Health Disparities, Fogarty International Center, National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, and National Institute of Nursing Research.
Some of the NIH's remaining institutes and centers would be consolidated under five new ones: the National Institute on Body Systems Research, National Institute on Neuroscience and Brain Research, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institute of Disability Related Research, and National Institute on Behavioral Health.
Cutting NIH funding threatens research into cures for serious diseases, puts lives at risk, and delays diagnoses, treatments and cures, said George Vradenburg, chairman of UsAgainstAlzheimer, patient advocacy group.
'WHOLESALE GUTTING'
The proposal almost halves the CDC budget by almost US$3.6 billion, leaving it with a US$4 billion budget. It proposes merging various programs tackling infectious diseases, opioids, sexually transmitted infections and other areas into one grant program funded at US$300 million.
It calls for eliminating programs it described as "duplicative" or "simply unnecessary" like the National Center for Chronic Diseases Prevention and Health Promotion, National Center for Environmental Health, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Global Health Center, Public Health Preparedness and Response, and Preventive Health and Human Services Block Grant.
The administration did not propose cuts at the Food and Drug Administration. It proposed $674 million in cuts at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services but said benefits would not be affected.
The cuts follow a plan announced in March by Secretary for Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. seeking to reshape federal public health agencies by cutting 10,000 employees and centralizing some functions of the FDA, CDC and others under his purview. The job cuts include 3,500 at the FDA, 2,400 at the CDC, and 1,200 at the NIH.
"This isn't a reorganization; it's a wholesale gutting of programs that save lives and reduce healthcare costs for all of us. Eliminating these efforts would reverse decades of progress," former CDC Director Dr. Tom Frieden said of the proposed budget.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
a day ago
- The Star
Kennedy's firing of independent CDC advisers undermines vaccine confidence, experts say
A woman receives a booster dose of the COVID-19 vaccine at the Police hospital in Bangkok, Thailand, January 5, 2023. REUTERS/Athit Perawongmetha/File Photo CHICAGO (Reuters) -U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s dismissal of an independent panel of experts citing the goal of restoring trust in vaccines could undermine confidence in those available now, putting Americans at risk of preventable infectious diseases, public health experts and others said on Monday. Kennedy, a longtime vaccine skeptic, said in a commentary published in the Wall Street Journal that he was firing all 17 members of the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices (ACIP) at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention "to re-establish public confidence in vaccine science.' The committee reviews vaccines approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and makes recommendations to the CDC on their use. "I fear that there will be human lives lost here because of this," said Dr. Sean O'Leary, chair of the American Academy of Pediatrics' Committee on Infectious Diseases. "It is a special kind of irony that he is saying he is doing this to restore trust, given that he is, as an individual, more responsible for sowing distrust in vaccines than almost anyone I can name," O'Leary said. O'Leary said pediatricians have already been fielding calls from parents who are confused about conflicting announcements earlier this month narrowing the use of COVID-19 vaccines for healthy children and pregnant women. "This is only going to add to that," he said. A U.S. Department of Health and Human Services spokesman said the agency is prioritizing public health, evidence-based medicine, and restoring public confidence in vaccine science. The firing of the entire vaccine advisory committee comes just weeks before a scheduled public meeting in which advisers were expected to weigh in and vote on a number of decisions, including the 2025-26 COVID-19 vaccine boosters. The health agency said the committee will meet as scheduled on June 25-27, but it is unclear who would serve on that panel or how they have been vetted for conflicts of interest. The agency said it would replace them with new members currently under consideration. Fired ACIP member Noel Brewer, a professor of public health at the University of North Carolina, said it took about 18 months from the time he applied until he was serving as an ACIP member. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer decried the changes. "Wiping out an entire panel of vaccine experts doesn't build trust — it shatters it, and worse, it sends a chilling message: that ideology matters more than evidence, and politics more than public health," he said in a statement. Former CDC Director Dr. Thomas Frieden called out Kennedy's "false claims" in the Wall Street Journal piece, saying the panel was rife with conflicts of interest. Most of the panel was appointed last year, the CDC website shows. "Make no mistake: PoliticizingtheACIPas Secretary Kennedy is doingwill undermine public trust under the guise of improving it." (Reporting by Julie Steenhuysen in Chicago; additional reporting by Mike Erman in New York; editing by Caroline Humer and Stephen Coates)
The Star
2 days ago
- The Star
NIH scientists speak out over estimated $12 billion in Trump funding cuts
(Reuters) -Dozens of scientists, researchers and other employees at the U.S. National Institutes of Health issued a rare public rebuke Monday criticizing the Trump administration for major spending cuts that 'harm the health of Americans and people across the globe,' politicize research and 'waste public resources.' More than 60 current employees sent their letter to NIH director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and members of Congress who oversee NIH. Bhattacharya is scheduled to testify Tuesday at the U.S. Senate appropriations committee about his agency's budget. Overall, more than 340 current and recently terminated NIH employees signed the letter, about 250 of them anonymously. In their letter, NIH staff members said the agency had terminated 2,100 research grants totaling about $9.5 billion and an additional $2.6 billion in contracts since President Donald Trump took office Jan. 20. The contracts often support research, from covering equipment to nursing staff working on clinical trials. These terminations "throw away years of hard work and millions of dollars" and put patient health at risk, the letter said. NIH clinical trials "are being halted without regard to participant safety, abruptly stopping medications or leaving participants with unmonitored device implants." In a statement shared with Reuters, Bhattacharya said the employees' letter "has some fundamental misconceptions about the policy directions the NIH has taken in recent months ... Nevertheless, respectful dissent in science is productive. We all want the NIH to succeed." In prior remarks, Bhattacharya has pledged support for Kennedy's Make America Healthy Again agenda, and he has said that means focusing the federal government's "limited resources" directly on combating chronic diseases. At his Senate confirmation hearings in March, Bhattacharya said he would ensure scientists working at NIH and funded by the agency have the necessary resources to meet its mission. NIH is the world's largest public funder of biomedical research and has long enjoyed bipartisan support from U.S. lawmakers. The Trump administration has proposed cutting $18 billion, or 40%, from NIH's budget next year, which would leave the agency with $27 billion. Nearly 5,000 NIH employees and contractors have been laid off under Kennedy's restructuring of U.S. health agencies, according to NIH staff. A spokesperson for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, which oversees NIH, said the agency's staffing must evolve to meet changing priorities and to ensure good use of taxpayer dollars. The official also defended NIH's funding decisions, saying the agency was "working to remove ideological influence from the scientific process." Dr. Jenna Norton, a program director within NIH's division of kidney, urologic and hematologic diseases, was one of 69 current employees who signed the letter as of early Monday. She said speaking out publicly was worth the risk to her career and family. "I am much more worried about the risks of not speaking up," Norton said. "There are very real concerns that we're being asked to do likely illegal activities, and certainly unethical activities that breach our rules." The organizers of the letter allowed people employed at the NIH as of Jan. 20 to sign. They said 258 of the 342 people who signed the letter currently work at NIH, while others were recently terminated as probationary workers or 'subject to reductions in force.' In the letter, Norton and other NIH employees asked Bhattacharya to restore grants that were delayed or terminated for political reasons, where officials ignored peer review to "cater to political whims." They wrote that Bhattacharya had failed to uphold his legal duty to spend congressionally appropriated funds. One program director at the NIH's National Cancer Institute, who asked not to be identified for fear of retaliation, said she has repeatedly been asked to cancel research grants for no valid reason and in violation of agency rules. She said she fears she could become the target of lawsuits from grantees challenging those decisions. Dr. Benjamin Feldman, a staff scientist and core director at NIH's Institute of Child Health and Human Development, said he and other researchers want to work with Bhattacharya on reversing the cuts and restoring the NIH as a "beacon for science around the world." "This is really a hit to the whole enterprise of biomedical research in the United States," Feldman said. Dr. Ian Morgan, a postdoctoral fellow at the NIH, signed the letter and said he has heard from university researchers about patients losing access to novel cancer treatments in clinical trials due to the uncertainty over NIH funding. He also worries about the long-term effect from gutting NIH's investment in basic science research that can lead to lifesaving treatments years later. The NIH employees, based in Bethesda, Maryland, named their dissent the "Bethesda Declaration," modeled after Bhattacharya's Great Barrington Declaration in 2020 that called on public health officials to roll back lockdowns during the COVID-19 pandemic. "Our hope is that by modeling ourselves after the Great Barrington Declaration that maybe he'll see himself in our dissent," Norton said. (Reporting by Chad Terhune in Los Angeles; Editing by Michele Gershberg, Chizu Nomiyama and David Gregorio)
New Straits Times
4 days ago
- New Straits Times
Brain-eating amoeba linked to camper's death
TEXAS: A woman from the United States (US) died from an infection after using tap water from a recreational vehicle's water system at a campsite in Texas with a nasal irrigation device. US news outlet CBS News reported that the 71-year-old woman had previously been healthy before developing severe symptoms, including fever, headache and altered mental status, within four days of using the device. According to a report published by the US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the rare but often fatal brain infection, called primary amebic meningoencephalitis (PAM), was caused by the Naegleria fowleri organism. Despite medical treatment for a suspected PAM infection, she developed seizures and died eight days after the onset of symptoms. The US news outlet also reported that PAM is typically associated with recreational water activities, as the amoeba thrives in warm freshwater lakes, rivers and hot springs. Infection may occur if water containing the amoeba enters the nose and reaches the brain. The CDC recommends using distilled, sterile, or previously boiled and cooled tap water for nasal irrigation. When engaging in freshwater activities, the agency also advises using a nose clip or keeping one's head above water. The agency noted that the infection cannot be spread by drinking contaminated water or through person-to-person contact.
