USL liable to pay entry tax under Madhya Pradesh local area rule, holds Supreme Court
The Supreme Court has ruled that United Spirits (USL) is responsible for paying entry tax in Madhya Pradesh on goods entering local areas for use, consumption, or sale. The court upheld the High Court's decision, stating that USL's sales to warehouses triggered the entry of goods, justifying the entry tax levy.
IANS United Spirits Limited The Supreme Court on Monday held that United Spirits (USL) is liable to pay entry tax under the Madhya Pradesh Sthaniya Kshetra Me Mal Ke Pravesh Par Kar Adhiniyam 1976, which levied such tax on the entry of goods into a local area for use, consumption or sale.Upholding the Madhya Pradesh High Court's decision which favoured the state, the bench of Justices J B Pardiwala and K V Vishwanathan said that '…it is clear that the appellants (USL) by the sale to the warehouse caused to be affected the entry of goods and the entry was occasioned on the account of the sale into the local area for consumption, use or sale therein.'It is also not disputed that USL is a dealer as defined under the Madhya Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2002, the SC said, adding that the company's only contention that the State warehouse was also a dealer 'makes no difference' since it cannot be disputed that the company certainly occasioned the entry of goods and the levy of entry tax on them, which could always be passed on, was perfectly justifiable in law.According to the judges, we have no manner of doubt that there were two independent transactions, one between USL (manufacturers) and the State Warehouse and the other between the State warehouse and the retailers. 'Hence, it will be difficult to accept the contention of the State that the role of the State is only supervisory and the warehouses didn't purchase beer and IMFL from the manufacturer,' they said.However, the top court said that this does not resolve the issue in favour of USL as under Section 3 of the M.P. Entry Tax Act 1976, the incidence of taxation is on the entry in the course of business of a dealer of goods specified in Schedule II, into each local area for consumption, use or sale therein. The further requirement is that such tax was to be paid by every dealer liable to tax under the VAT Act who hasd effected entry of such goods.
USL had contended that no direct sales could be made by the manufacturer to the retailers and there was "no privity of contract" between them and the retailers and it was the state government warehouse which sold the goods to the retailers. It is the warehouse which caused the movement of the goods into the local area, it argued.However, the State government contended that it neither purchased nor sold liquor. The HC had correctly found that the warehouses neither purchased or sold liquor and that the department only supervised the sale made by the manufacturer to the retail contractors.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
4 hours ago
- NDTV
Delhi Govt Seeks Supreme Court Review Of Age-Based Vehicle Ban
The Delhi government has approached the Supreme Court seeking a review of the 'End-of-Life-Vehicles' (ELVs) ban. The government argues that it penalises middle-class vehicle owners without any scientific backing. It is to be noted that the government is required to phase out petrol vehicles older than 15 years and diesel vehicles older than 10 years in the national capital region under a 2018 Supreme Court order and a National Green Tribunal follow-up. Delhi government officials argued that these age-based standards overlook advancements in vehicle emissions technology, especially considering the April 2020 introduction of Bharat Stage VI (BS-VI) standards. Also Read: Tata Waiting Period Extends Over 6 Months; Check Details As per Indian Express, the application filed by Rekha Gupta government said, "the road-worthiness of a vehicle is a technical and scientific issue that must be linked to actual emissions as tested and recorded by mechanisms as set out under the Motor Vehicles Act, the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, etc., as opposed to blanket ban on the basis of age which is unlinked to actual emissions." Taking the argument further, Environment Minister Majinder Singh Sirsa mentioned that the government's review application emphasizes the need for data-backed assessment, rather than broad limitation, on the actual emissions produced by each vehicle, regardless of its age. Additionally, the government argues that owners of properly maintained vehicles are unfairly affected by the ban, which is implemented without considering maintenance, usage patterns, or PUC compliance, according to the plea. The Delhi government's petition highlights that around 2.8 million BS-IV and BS-VI vehicles are registered in the city. It argues that the current age-based ban could exclude compliant vehicles and calls for a scientific analysis by the Commission for Air Quality Management to assess if these bans effectively improve air quality in Delhi-NCR. This comes after a campaign targeting a fuel ban for older cars faced public backlash and was halted due to operational challenges.
New Indian Express
8 hours ago
- New Indian Express
ACME Solar signs pact with NHPC for 275 MW battery storage projects in Andhra Pradesh
VIJAYAWADA: ACME Solar Holdings has signed Battery Energy Storage Purchase Agreements (BESPA) with NHPC for two pioneering Standalone Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) projects, totaling 275 MW/550 MWh, in Andhra Pradesh. The agreements, finalised through wholly owned subsidiaries, mark a significant step in bolstering India's renewable energy infrastructure. The projects, secured via an e-reverse auction on June 24, carry tariffs of INR 2,10,000/MW/month for a 50 MW/100 MWh system and INR 2,22,000/MW/month for a 225 MW/450 MWh system. Supported by the Government of India's Viability Gap Funding (VGF) scheme, which provides up to INR 27 lakh per MWh or 30% of the project cost (whichever is lower), the projects are set to be commissioned within 18 months from the signing date. Following the issuance of the Letter of Award (LOA) on July 8, 2025, the swift transition to BESPA signing was facilitated by the pre-identification of State as the customer. The State will provide land and evacuation infrastructure, enabling faster project execution. These standalone BESS installations, a first-of-their-kind in the state, will enhance grid stability by storing power during off-peak hours and supplying it during peak demand, aiding the integration of variable renewable sources like solar and wind. Operating under a 'BESS as a service' model, the projects introduce a novel framework where capacity charges are payable, setting a precedent in India's energy sector. This initiative strengthens ACME Solar's portfolio by leveraging large-scale battery procurement and installation, positioning the company as a leader in innovative energy solutions.
India Today
8 hours ago
- India Today
Sam Altman warns ChatGPT is not your therapist and your secrets aren't legally private
If you've been spilling your heart out to ChatGPT, you might want to pause for a moment, or at least think carefully about what you're typing. OpenAI's CEO Sam Altman has recently admitted that, for now, AI chats don't enjoy the same confidentiality as a conversation with a doctor, lawyer or therapist. Appearing on comedian Theo Von's podcast This Past Weekend, Altman revealed that the AI industry simply hasn't caught up when it comes to protecting deeply personal conversations with users. And that could have consequences if those chats end up in talk about the most personal details in their lives to ChatGPT,' Altman confessed. 'People use it, young people, especially, use it as a therapist, a life coach; having these relationship problems and [asking] 'what should I do?' And right now, if you talk to a therapist or a lawyer or a doctor about those problems, there's legal privilege for it. There's doctor-patient confidentiality, there's legal confidentiality, whatever. And we haven't figured that out yet for when you talk to ChatGPT.'Altman warned that, as things stand, user conversations with ChatGPT could be disclosed if a court orders it. 'This could create a privacy concern for users in the case of a lawsuit,' he said, explaining that OpenAI would currently be legally obliged to produce those records. 'I think that's very screwed up. I think we should have the same concept of privacy for your conversations with AI that we do with a therapist or whatever — and no one had to think about that even a year ago,' he grey areasThe candid remarks come as OpenAI finds itself in the middle of a high-profile court battle with The New York Times. In June, the newspaper and other plaintiffs sought a court order demanding that OpenAI retain all user conversations, even deleted ones, indefinitely, as part of an ongoing copyright has described the request as 'an overreach' and confirmed it is appealing, arguing that allowing courts to dictate data storage would open the floodgates to future demands from law enforcement and legal OpenAI says deleted chats from ChatGPT Free, Plus and Pro accounts are removed from its systems within 30 days unless they need to be kept 'for legal or security reasons.'Unlike encrypted messaging apps such as WhatsApp, OpenAI's staff can access conversations. This is partly so that they can fine-tune the models and also keep an eye out for level of access has become a sticking point for some would-be users, particularly in a world where digital privacy is under increasing scrutiny. For instance, following the Supreme Court's overturning of Roe v. Wade in the US, millions of women moved away from unencrypted period-tracking apps towards safer alternatives such as Apple Not yetadvertisementAltman's warning might hit home for those who use ChatGPT as a sounding board for their emotional ups and downs. Without a legal framework, AI simply doesn't yet offer the same protection that a professional human counsellor does.'I think it makes sense to really want the privacy clarity before you use [ChatGPT] a lot, like the legal clarity,' Altman told Von, who admitted that he avoids using the chatbot much for exactly that while ChatGPT might feel like a non-judgemental friend, the legal system doesn't see it that way, at least, not yet.- EndsMust Watch
