logo
Opinion - GHF is actually feeding Gazans, not letting Hamas extort them — and paying a price

Opinion - GHF is actually feeding Gazans, not letting Hamas extort them — and paying a price

Yahoo4 days ago
The likelihood of a ceasefire in Gaza could turn on whether Israel meets a core demand of Hamas to stop a successful effort to feed the Palestinian people.
The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation has distributed more than 60 million meals over the last five weeks without interference or diversion. This has severely undercut Hamas's revenue streams, because Hamas has for years stolen humanitarian aid and sold it at high prices, despite the daily struggle of the Palestinian people to meet their basic needs.
For Israel, the priority remains unchanged in the aftermath of the October 7, 2023 terror attacks: eliminate Hamas and free the hostages still held in its underground labyrinth.
At the same time, however, the world cannot ignore the immense suffering of Gaza's innocent civilians, most of whom are trapped by Hamas's control. Nor can Israel revert to the status quo ante, when Hamas was starving Gazans so it could finance terror.
The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, of course, has a singular mission: to feed the people of Gaza, safely and directly. It operates with transparency, logistical expertise, a commitment to human dignity, and yes, coordination with the Israeli government. Without that coordination, its food would face the same looting and diversion that plagues other aid organizations who see Israel as an obstacle.
For this success, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation has been rewarded with cheers from the Palestinian people in Gaza, as well as robust international condemnation from nearly everyone outside of the Trump administration, which has chipped in at least $30 million in support.
These critics claim that the foundation violates humanitarian principles by working with Israel. Their statements ignore the facts and focus instead on ideology. What they call 'neutrality' often serves as an excuse to avoid confronting the actions of Hamas, which routinely blocks aid and threatens aid workers.
Apparently, if you play by Hamas's rules — accept their fabricated statistics, their propaganda, and their theft of aid — you are considered 'legitimate' by much of the legacy media. But if you challenge that system by delivering aid efficiently, securely, and without Hamas' interference, you become the villain.
Even worse, Hamas has now turned its violence against Palestinian civilians for working with the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. Recently, Hamas attacked a bus of Palestinian foundation volunteers. According to regional reports, a Hamas unit killed or detained dozens of aid workers. Its operatives have also attacked American aid workers with explosives packed with ball bearings then before retreated into crowds of aid seekers, all in the hope of drawing fire and creating an international incident.
Despite the violence, the United Nations has remained nearly silent. The European Union has offered no meaningful condemnation. Some affiliated agencies have continued to question the foundation's mission while ignoring the violence. Only the U.S. has led with clarity in its condemnations.
The U.N., the International Red Cross and other captains of civil society insist on a sacrosanct neutrality that is effectively moral blindness. There are good and evil in this world. Feeding starving civilians is good; stealing the aid and murdering the people who feed them is evil.
People of faith should recognize that the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation is delivering help where others have failed and doing so in the face of violence and death-threats. It deserves our support, not our suspicion. The values behind this work are not abstract. They reflect the deepest commitments of the Judeo-Christian tradition: charity, mercy and human dignity.
While the ceasefire negotiations are underway, the UN, EU and international aid organizations should publicly pledge to work with GHF. If they will not assist, they should at least stop obstructing those who will. The time for moral equivocation has passed.
Congress will soon hold hearings on the delivery of humanitarian aid in Gaza, too. Lawmakers should examine not only the work the foundation has done, but also the failure of other agencies to condemn or confront Hamas. If these groups continue to undermine the foundation or turn a blind eye to violence against its staff, American policymakers should reconsider how humanitarian dollars are allocated. Those who cannot condemn terror should not be trusted to address suffering.
The tools of compassion are challenging the forces of cruelty. Feeding the hungry is a sacred duty and now, thanks to the foundation, the people of Gaza are enjoying reliable access to food.
Hamas's opposition to feeding Palestinians must be understood. Aid organizations failing to fulfill their mission to bring aid to the people need to be named. And those who place bounties on their heads must be condemned and isolated. In a conflict filled with gray zones, this is a line the world must be willing to draw.
Rabbi Abraham Cooper is a senior leader with the Simon Wiesenthal Center and chairman emeritus of the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The endless quest to see an end to suffering in Gaza
The endless quest to see an end to suffering in Gaza

Boston Globe

timean hour ago

  • Boston Globe

The endless quest to see an end to suffering in Gaza

In 1945 the United States demanded unconditional surrender of implacable foes and implemented horrible devastation in Dresden, Germany, and in Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan. That suffering should be recognized, but should the United States have accepted a temporary cease-fire with Adolf Hitler or Hideki Tojo? Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up The Globe, to borrow the words of Jeremiah 6:14, heals the wounds of the people lightly, 'saying 'Peace, peace,' when there is no peace.' Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, wrong on so many things, is correct in demanding the disarming of Hamas, the exiling of its leaders, and some new form of governance. Advertisement Alan J. Schlesinger Newton Hamas's strategy has been effective As I continue to follow the ongoing tragedy in Gaza, I have asked myself: What is Hamas's strategy? I think the answer, in a word, is martyrdom. From their perspective, it all makes a terribly perverse kind of sense. To paraphrase what Lloyd Austin, then secretary of defense, Advertisement The taking of noncombatant hostages by the weaker side of a conflict violates every international norm, yet the subsequent negotiation often favors the captors in driving public opinion. I'm reminded how in 1979 it was considered then-president Jimmy Carter's fault that the United States hadn't yet gotten back the US hostages taken by Iran. It helped cost him reelection in 1980. Stuart Schulman Arlington

Iran faces August deadline to accept comprehensive nuclear deal or face renewed UN sanctions
Iran faces August deadline to accept comprehensive nuclear deal or face renewed UN sanctions

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Iran faces August deadline to accept comprehensive nuclear deal or face renewed UN sanctions

Iran has until the end of August to agree to a nuclear deal with the United States and its allies, Fox News has learned. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and the foreign ministers of France, Germany and the United Kingdom set the de facto deadline, according to three sources with knowledge of a call Wednesday among the officials. If Tehran fails to agree to a deal, it would trigger the "snapback" mechanism that automatically reimposes all sanctions previously imposed by the United Nations Security Council. Iran's Leader Threatens 'Even Bigger Blow' Against Us; Trump Says He's In 'No Rush' To Talk The sanctions were lifted under the 2015 Iran deal. The Trump administration has tried pressuring Iran to accept a deal to walk back its nuclear program after U.S. and Israeli strikes targeting nuclear sites. Read On The Fox News App United Against Nuclear Iran, a nonprofit that opposes Tehran's effort to develop a nuclear weapon, applauded Wednesday's news. Iran Vows Retaliation If Un Security Council Issues Snapback Sanctions On Anniversary Of Nuclear Deal "Tehran has learned that, for the Trump administration, a deadline means a deadline," UANI Chairman and former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush and CEO Ambassador Mark D. Wallace said in a joint statement. "After failing to agree to a deal within 60 days of diplomacy, the United States and Israel undertook targeted military action against the regime in June. Consequently, Tehran should take this new deadline seriously." On Monday, Iran warned it would retaliate if the U.N. Security Council imposes the snapback sanctions. "The threat to use the snapback mechanism lacks legal and political basis and will be met with an appropriate and proportionate response from the Islamic Republic of Iran," Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei claimed during a press conference, according to a Reuters report. Baghaei didn't specify how Tehran would article source: Iran faces August deadline to accept comprehensive nuclear deal or face renewed UN sanctions Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store