Tesla loses billion-dollar revenue source as US ditches fuel economy fines
US President Donald Trump's July 4 (2025) bill ended penalties for automakers that do not meet North America's world-leading CAFE (Corporate Average Fuel Economy) standards, first introduced in 1975. It acts retrospectively, with automakers not liable for any penalties incurred from and including 2022.
According to Reuters, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is 'working on its reconsideration of fuel economy rules'.
CarExpert can save you thousands on a new car. Click here to get a great deal. Supplied Credit: CarExpert
The same bill also terminated US federal tax credits for new and used EVs of between $US4000-$7500 (A$6137-$11,507), which will end on September 30, 2025.
The US Department of Transportation (DOT) describes CAFE's purpose as 'to reduce energy consumption by increasing the fuel economy of cars and light trucks'.
It adds: 'When these standards are raised, automakers respond by creating a more fuel-efficient fleet, which improves our nation's energy security and saves consumers money at the pump, while also reducing greenhouse emissions'.
The removal of fines is a boost for the bottom line of some of the world's largest car manufacturers, including Ford, General Motors (GM) and Stellantis – the latter of which has US brands including Jeep, Chrysler, Dodge and Ram under its umbrella. Supplied Credit: CarExpert
According to Reuters, Stellantis paid almost $US600 million (A$921m) in CAFE fines between 2016 and 2020, while GM paid $US128.2 million (A$196.7m) in penalties between 2016-2017.
Tesla, on the other hand, has now suffered a major blow to one of its most important revenue streams. The EV company raked in $US2.76 billion (A$4.23bn) in 2024 alone from selling 'carbon credits' to other automakers, including credit revenue collected in other markets such as Europe.
The company's 2024 credit revenue represented a 54 per cent year-on-year increase, yet it wasn't enough to prevent a fall in profit from $US15 billion (A$23bn) in 2023, to $US7.1 billion (A$10.89bn) for the 2024 calendar year, when the Toyota RAV4 also poached the title of world's best-selling car from the Model Y by fewer than 3000 sales.
The EV brand was already under stress from the first recorded annual sales decline in its history – with deliveries sliding by 1 per cent in 2024 – even before the elimination of revenue from carbon credits. Supplied Credit: CarExpert
'If things go bad for Tesla and they don't sell enough cars this year, they might not have enough credits for what they promised Stellantis and the others,' Peter Mock, managing director of the International Council on Clean Transportations (ITCC) told Politico in March. 'Tesla is under pressure.'
With these credits disappearing in the US, the pressure on Tesla has now increased.
Under CAFE, fuel economy (and therefore emissions) was averaged across all models sold by a manufacturer, with those exceeding the limits able to buy 'credits' from those that haven't.
Doing so allows automakers in breach to lower their average fuel consumption figure to reduce or avoid fines.
EV-only brands such as Tesla and Polestar were able to make considerable profit from US credits, while also 'pooling' credits with automakers struggling to meet ever-tightening emissions laws in Europe. Supplied Credit: CarExpert
It's a similar arrangement to Australia's New Vehicle Efficiency Standard (NVES), which was introduced this year with fines for automakers that exceed average CO2 emissions targets across their model ranges, in the form of penalties or credits for each sold vehicle under those limits respectively.
NVES and the CAFE regulations have nearly identical goals, and have attracted the same arguments for and against on both sides.
Likewise, NVES allows carbon credits to be traded between brands to reduce fines – although Polestar Australia boss Scott Maynard recently said their monetary value is debatable after Polestar announced its best start to a year with a 51 per cent global sales increase in the first half of 2025.
In the first half of 2025, Tesla remained Australia's most popular EV brand, with the Model Y mid-size SUV being the best-selling EV followed by the BYD Sealion 7 medium SUV and Model 3 sedan in third.
Tesla is due to announce its global sales figures for the second quarter of 2025 tomorrow (July 23).
More: Everything Tesla
More: What the first federal emission standard means for Aussie car buyers
More: Polestar boss says new Australian emissions regulations 'didn't kill the weekend'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
6 minutes ago
- ABC News
Tesla to become a $US500 stock, says tech analyst
MD and global head of tech research of Wedbush Securities, Dan Ives, says Elon Musk is focusing on autonomous driving and an AI future for Tesla.
SBS Australia
an hour ago
- SBS Australia
US hails move to drop 'absurd' beef ban, as Labor says 'nothing suspicious'
The United States has hailed Australia's decision to drop a partial ban on beef imports as a "major trade breakthrough" for Donald Trump and his administration, as the federal government faces questions over whether the move was made to appease the president. The Opposition has also raised biosecurity concerns over Thursday's announcement, with the federal government insisting the decision followed a decade-long science-based review. Many Australian cattle producers will have been left blindsided by the decision, an industry group says, but the level of American product arriving in Australia is expected to be very low. "American farmers and ranchers produce the safest, healthiest beef in the world. It's absurd that non-scientific trade barriers prevented our beef from being sold to consumers in Australia for the last 20 years," US agriculture secretary Brooke Rollins said in a statement. "Gone are the days of putting American farmers on the sidelines. This is yet another example of the kind of market access the president negotiates to bring America into a new golden age of prosperity, with American agriculture leading the way." Agriculture Minister Julie Collins says Australia would "never compromise" on biosecurity. Source: AAP / Mick Tsikas The US has been able to send beef to Australia since 2019, but any beef raised in Canada or Mexico before being slaughtered and processed in the US was previously barred due to biosecurity concerns. One concern was that Mexico's livestock tracking system could inadvertently lead producers to import beef from parts of the continent where there were disease outbreaks. But the latest announcement will lift the ban on beef sourced from Canada or Mexico after the US introduced more robust movement controls in late 2024 and early 2025, allowing for improved identification and tracing throughout the supply chain. The change is widely viewed as a bargaining chip Australia could use while attempting to push for tariff exemptions from the US. 'Nothing suspicious' about beef ban lift "It looks as though it's (biosecurity) been traded away to appease Donald Trump," Littleproud told ABC's Radio National on Thursday. He said the government has been "flat-footed" in negotiations and was now risking biosecurity to play "catch-up". Trade Minister Don Farrell said the timing had nothing to do with US calls, saying: "There's nothing suspicious about this". "If we want to export our beef overseas, then we have to accept that other countries will want to import their beef into Australia," he told Sky News. The Opposition has also raised biosecurity concerns, with frontbencher James Paterson calling on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to "stand up ... and explain" to Australia's beef farmers that the government hasn't "watered down" biosecurity. "The prime minister himself has said [in April] that we couldn't relax the restrictions on the importation of US beef because of serious biosecurity concerns," Paterson said. "So if the government has found some way of dealing with that issue, protecting our domestic agricultural industry from the introduction of foreign diseases and pests, then they should say so." Nationals leader David Littleproud has demanded further information about the decision, accusing the government of using the beef industry to play "catch up" in negotiations with US President Donald Trump. Source: AAP Agriculture Minister Julie Collins said it was something Australia would "never compromise" on. "The US beef imports review has undergone a rigorous science and risk-based assessment over the past decade," Collins said. "The Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry is satisfied the strengthened control measures put in place by the US effectively manage biosecurity risks." Australian producers may feel 'blindsided', but industry figures not rattled Cattle Australia CEO Will Evans believed the move would not have been made unless the government had the utmost confidence in the science, but said some would still be unhappy with its decision. "There's going to be a lot of people today who feel blindsided by this, there's going to be a lot of people who are going to feel really frustrated and threatened by this," he told ABC radio. "We need to talk to them. "The US is an incredibly important trading partner — we need to maintain access and we need to maintain relationships with them." Evans said the industry had "put faith" in the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry's expertise, with the deal largely favouring Australian exporters. "They've made this assessment themselves. They've said: 'look, we've looked at this. We've looked at the best science. This is a decision we feel comfortable with'," he said. Some have raised worries US beef could impact Australia's domestic market, but industry representatives remain relatively unperturbed. "It's a bit like selling ice to Eskimos," Australian Meat Industry Council CEO Tim Ryan told the ABC. Evans said the domestic beef industry is self-sufficient and any imports of US beef are "unlikely to have any effect on the market here". The US beef industry can't supply domestic demand, he said. The US remains one of the main export markets for Australian beef. — With additional reporting by the Australian Associated Press.
9 News
an hour ago
- 9 News
Shopping centre cages Tesla after it overstays its welcome
Your web browser is no longer supported. To improve your experience update it here A Tesla in an Adelaide shopping centre car park has been locked up in a cage after the vehicle overstayed its welcome. The electric vehicle was put on charge at the Burnside Village car park but then abandoned three weeks ago. A note was left by centre management and the car was fenced in but some shoppers thought caging the car was a step too far. A Tesla in an Adelaide shopping centre car park has been locked up in a cage after the vehicle overstayed its welcome. (9News) "We kindly wish to remind you that this car park is private property and is intended for use by customers during the centre's trading hours only," the note said. "Overnight parking is not permitted, and vehicles left in the car park outside of these hours may be subject to further action. "We appreciate your support and cooperation in helping us maintain a safe and accessible environment for all centre visitors." A note was left by centre management and the car was fenced in. (9News) The centre has told 9News that a business linked to the car's registration has been notified and intends to collect it soon. Some shoppers thought the cage for the car was too far. "There should be adequate signage to say do not leave your car overnight, further action of consequence could arise," shopper Mike Mundy said. CONTACT US Auto news: BYD speaks out about their ongoing battle with Tesla.
