logo
High court directs Punjab vigilance bureau to probe fraudulent sale of defence airstrip in Ferozepur

High court directs Punjab vigilance bureau to probe fraudulent sale of defence airstrip in Ferozepur

Time of India30-04-2025

Chandigarh: Punjab and Haryana high court has ordered the chief director of Punjab Vigilance Bureau (VB) to probe the fraudulent sale of an airstrip used by the armed forces since 1937 in Punjab's Ferozepur area.
Reprimanding the Ferozepur deputy commissioner (DC) for not taking any action, the HC observed on Wednesday that the least that can be expected of the bureaucracy is not to create unjustified hindrances for soldiers. The airstrip was used by the armed forces in the wars of 1962, 1965, and 1971.
"It is rather unfortunate that the Army, tasked with protecting the sovereignty of the nation, was constrained to approach the govt of Punjab to have the matter inquired into. Such reckless behaviour on the part of DC Ferozepur can cause a breach that would endanger the lives of the citizens and greatly compromise national security," Justice Harpreet Singh Brar of the HC ordered.
In its detailed order, Justice Brar asked the chief director of Punjab VB to personally verify the veracity of the allegations and, if required, take necessary action. He was asked to conclude the probe within four weeks.
The HC passed these orders while hearing a petition filed by Nishan Singh seeking directions for an inquiry into the sale of land being used by the armed forces, by CBI or any other independent agency.
The court was informed that a certain piece of land was acquired in the Fattuwala village of Ferozepur by the Union of India in 1937-38. The land was used by the Indian Air Force (IAF) as an airstrip and advanced landing ground. However, as per the plea, in connivance with the revenue officials, the land was unlawfully sold in 1997 through five sale deeds, executed after forging the revenue record.
Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the original owner of the land, Madan Mohal Lal, expired in 1991. However, the sale deeds were executed in 1997, and the names of Surjit Kaur, Manjit Kaur, Mukhtiar Singh, Jagir Singh, Dara Singh, Ramesh Kant, and Rakesh Kant were shown as owners in the Jamabandi from 2009-10. However, the Army never transferred the land to them.
In this regard, a detailed letter was sent twice in March and April 2021 by the Ferozepur Cantonment administrative commandant to the Ferozepur commissioner (revenue), requesting him to hold an inquiry as this fraud had compromised the security and defence of the nation.
The high court on Dec 21, 2023, directed the Ferozepur DC to conclude an inquiry within a period of six weeks.
According to the petitioner, as the DC failed to take any action, the Army had to approach the Punjab governor in Feb last year, requesting him to address the Army's concern .

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

HC drops drug trafficking case against actor's son over unfair merging of charges
HC drops drug trafficking case against actor's son over unfair merging of charges

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

HC drops drug trafficking case against actor's son over unfair merging of charges

Mumbai: Calling it "preposterous", Bombay high court on Monday dismissed a drug trafficking case registered in 2021 against Dhruv Tahil, son of actor Dalip Tahil . The court held the law prohibits a merging of several minor aberrations over 18 months into one charge, a move that led to Tahil "being charged with an offence of a higher magnitude". Holding the Bandra Anti-Narcotic Cell's action as impermissible after analysing sections 218 and 219 of the erstwhile CrPC, the HC said: "Prosecution cannot be permitted to decipher and follow its own procedure for levying of charge of such a serious nature which is impermissible under the provisions of (law)." Pointing out that Tahil was not even arrested in possession of contraband, Justice Milind Jadhav said: "Prima facie when section 218 (of CrPC) is read, such charge by prosecution on the face of record appears to be preposterous… The procedural law does not permit the prosecution to assimilate more than three charges into a singular charge over a period of 18 months to be tried together and invoke a singular precipitative action. " The ANC, Bandra unit, in May 2021 arrested Tahil, then aged 30, after a co-accused, Muzammil Shaikh, held in Bandra (E) with 35 gm of mephedrone (MD), alleged that he had "in the past" supplied to him and various others. Police said it recovered WhatsApp messages between Jul 2019 and Jan 2021, which allegedly pertained to purchase of 1 gm or 2 gm of MD on various occasions, totalling 44 gm from Shaikh worth roughly Rs 25,000, to justify its invocation of serious charges of drug trafficking against Tahil in alleged conspiracy with Shaikh. HC noted that for small quantities, the punishment is less -- maximum 1 year in jail; but for intermediate quantities (less than commercial) invoked against him, it is 10 years. Justice Jadhav said "the prosecution was aware" each single act of alleged procurement was "less than small quantities" and Tahil would get the benefit of doubt, and hence it combined all the alleged transactions without following the tenets of the exception carved under the law. Tahil had challenged a 2023 rejection of his discharge plea by a special NDPS court. Justice Jadhav, after hearing Tahil's counsel Ayaz Khan, who alleged non-application of mind by the police and "mala fide intentions" in invoking the charges, and after hearing prosecutor H Dedhia, said, "From the material available on record and invocations of charge… no case is made out for the applicant to stand trial." HC also said "the alleged WhatsApp chats... in my opinion cannot translate into admissible evidence" during trial. HC said the state failed to comply with CrPC mandate and it led to Tahil "being charged with an offence of a higher magnitude". That too, under a special law like NDPS, which attracts higher punishment and fine and stringent conditions to get bail, HC noted adding, stringent laws require reciprocal duty on police to strictly comply with the law and its aspects that may have a negative impact on the accused.

Bombay high court's Aurangabad bench hears Somnath Suryawanshi custodial death petition' Prakash Ambedkar seeks SIT probe
Bombay high court's Aurangabad bench hears Somnath Suryawanshi custodial death petition' Prakash Ambedkar seeks SIT probe

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Bombay high court's Aurangabad bench hears Somnath Suryawanshi custodial death petition' Prakash Ambedkar seeks SIT probe

Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar: Vanchit Bahujan Aghadi (VBA) chief Prakash Ambedkar on Monday raised the demand for a court-monitored independent SIT to probe into Somnath Suryawanshi's death in judicial custody on Dec 16, 2024. Ambedkar raised the demand as the Aurangabad bench of the Bombay high court heard a petition filed by Vijayabai Suryawanshi, mother of Somnath Suryawanshi (35). Somnath was arrested in connection with the protests that had turned violent over the desecration of the Indian Constitution monument in Parbhani. Appearing for the family in the court, VBA chief Ambedkar, besides demanding a court-monitored independent Special Investigation Team (SIT), also spoke about the "lack of a clear legal mechanism" to take further action under Section 196 of BNSS. The matter was heard by the HC division bench of Justice Vibha Kankanwadi and Justice Sanjay Deshmukh. Following the SOP, a CID committee was appointed by the state govt to investigate the custodial death and prepared a report. However, the high court during one of the earlier hearings stayed the CID's proceedings before the report could be finalised. Chief govt pleader Amarjeetsingh Girase, who represented the state during the hearing, said, "During the course of Monday's hearing, we on behalf of the state submitted that the inquiry by the SIT was completed. We (SIT) recorded the statements of more than 190 people and collected all relevant documents as well as electronic evidence crucial for this case. As the HC during the last hearing directed us not to finalise anything, today we sought permission to submit the final inquiry report. " While Ambedkar, who was present along with a battery of lawyers, strongly pitched for directives to the state to address "the legal gap" in BNSS. "There is a void in the law about what should follow after a judicial magistrate conducts an inquiry in custodial death cases. We urged the HC to address this legal gap," he told the media after the hearing. "The second major demand was for the formation of a court-monitored SIT to conduct an independent investigation. "Since the custodial death occurred while Somnath was in judicial custody, it is inappropriate for the same police machinery to carry out the probe. The court heard our request positively. We are expecting an order on this soon," he added. Authorities had initially attributed Somnath's death to cardiac arrest. A postmortem report, however, indicated injuries consistent with physical assault. Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar: Vanchit Bahujan Aghadi (VBA) chief Prakash Ambedkar on Monday raised the demand for a court-monitored independent SIT to probe into Somnath Suryawanshi's death in judicial custody on Dec 16, 2024. Ambedkar raised the demand as the Aurangabad bench of the Bombay high court heard a petition filed by Vijayabai Suryawanshi, mother of Somnath Suryawanshi (35). Somnath was arrested in connection with the protests that had turned violent over the desecration of the Indian Constitution monument in Parbhani. Appearing for the family in the court, VBA chief Ambedkar, besides demanding a court-monitored independent Special Investigation Team (SIT), also spoke about the "lack of a clear legal mechanism" to take further action under Section 196 of BNSS. The matter was heard by the HC division bench of Justice Vibha Kankanwadi and Justice Sanjay Deshmukh. Following the SOP, a CID committee was appointed by the state govt to investigate the custodial death and prepared a report. However, the high court during one of the earlier hearings stayed the CID's proceedings before the report could be finalised. Chief govt pleader Amarjeetsingh Girase, who represented the state during the hearing, said, "During the course of Monday's hearing, we on behalf of the state submitted that the inquiry by the SIT was completed. We (SIT) recorded the statements of more than 190 people and collected all relevant documents as well as electronic evidence crucial for this case. As the HC during the last hearing directed us not to finalise anything, today we sought permission to submit the final inquiry report. " While Ambedkar, who was present along with a battery of lawyers, strongly pitched for directives to the state to address "the legal gap" in BNSS. "There is a void in the law about what should follow after a judicial magistrate conducts an inquiry in custodial death cases. We urged the HC to address this legal gap," he told the media after the hearing. "The second major demand was for the formation of a court-monitored SIT to conduct an independent investigation. "Since the custodial death occurred while Somnath was in judicial custody, it is inappropriate for the same police machinery to carry out the probe. The court heard our request positively. We are expecting an order on this soon," he added. Authorities had initially attributed Somnath's death to cardiac arrest. A postmortem report, however, indicated injuries consistent with physical assault.

Indian Army begins 2-month nationwide tribute to Kargil heroes ahead of Vijay Diwas
Indian Army begins 2-month nationwide tribute to Kargil heroes ahead of Vijay Diwas

India Today

timean hour ago

  • India Today

Indian Army begins 2-month nationwide tribute to Kargil heroes ahead of Vijay Diwas

The Indian Army has commenced a series of commemoration events to honour the soldiers of the Kargil War, marking the run-up to the 26th Kargil Vijay Diwas on July 26, 2025. The two-month series of events aims to celebrate the courage, sacrifice and indomitable spirit of the brave hearts who defended India's borders during the 1999 Vijay Diwas is observed annually to commemorate the successful conclusion of Operation Vijay, when Indian forces reclaimed key positions in the Kargil-Siachen sector from Pakistani intruders. The war is remembered not only for its tactical and strategic surprises but also for the political restraint shown by limiting the conflict to the region and for the swift execution of a coordinated tri-services year's commemoration promises to be more engaging, with events designed to reflect the patriotic, adventurous and cultural spirit of the Indian Army, especially in the challenging terrain of Western Ladakh. Activities are being planned to involve local communities and pay tribute to the heroes and major operations of the war. A key highlight is the launch of a special outreach drive this week to honour the Next of Kin (NoK) of 545 Kargil War martyrs. In a first-of-its-kind initiative, Indian Army teams will visit families across 25 states, two Union Territories, and Nepal. During the visits, representatives will carry a letter of gratitude from the Indian Army, a memento, and details of benefits provided by central and state governments. They will also collect feedback on any issues being faced by the families and offer Army also plans to collect war-related memorabilia from the families, which will be preserved at the Kargil War Memorial in Dras, as a lasting tribute to their commemoration will culminate with a solemn wreath-laying ceremony at the Dras memorial on July 26, 2025. The Indian Army's tribute not only honours the past but is also intended to inspire present and future generations to uphold the values of service, courage, and InMust Watch

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store