Ismaili Muslims bid goodbye to late Aga Khan
The funeral prayers of late Prince Karim al-Hussaini Aga Khan IV, the 49th hereditary Imam of the Shia Ismaili Muslims, was held in Lisbon on Saturday.
Prince Karim al-Husseini, 88, died on Tuesday. He was regarded as a direct descendent of the Prophet Mohammed (Peace Be Upon Him) and enjoyed near divine status as the 49th hereditary imam of the Ismaili Nizaris.
Saturday's private ceremony at the Ismaili community centre in Lisbon was attended by more than 300 guests, including Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, Portuguese President Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa and former Spanish king Juan Carlos I.
Aga Khan IV died in the Portuguese capital, where he had established the global headquarters in 2015.
He held British and Portuguese nationalities, as well as honorary Canadian citizenship, a distinction rarely given.
The global Ismaili community assembled around the world in Jamatkhanas (places of worship and gathering) to witness the ceremony through a live transmission, and to pay tribute to their Imam's extraordinary life of leadership and service.
His Highness's casket was draped in a white cloth, with his personal standard embroidered in gold. It was carried into the ceremonial hall by volunteers from the Ismaili community, while prayers were recited invoking blessings on Prophet Muhammad and his progeny (peace be upon them). In accordance with Muslim tradition, verses from the Holy Quran were recited and, thereafter, guests filed past the casket to pay their last respects.
Throughout his life, His Highness emphasised that Islam is a thinking, spiritual faith, that teaches compassion and tolerance and upholds the dignity of humankind.
Guided by these ethical principles, he established the Aga Khan Development Network (AKDN) a group of private, international, non-denominational agencies, working to improve living conditions and opportunities for people in some of the poorest, most vulnerable parts of the developing world. He leaves a powerful legacy and platform for his successor, Prince Rahim al-Hussaini Aga Khan V.
Prince Karim Aga Khan IV will be laid to rest on Sunday (today), at a private burial ceremony in Aswan, Egypt. He will be interred in the mausoleum of his grandfather, the late Sir Sultan Mahomed Shah Aga Khan III, until a new mausoleum is constructed as his final resting place on land adjacent to the existing structure.
His eldest son, 53-year-old Rahim, will succeed him and take on the title of Aga Khan V.
The equivalent of an inauguration of the new Aga Khan will be held on Tuesday morning at the community's headquarters, a mansion in central Lisbon.
Born in Geneva on December 13, 1936, Al-Hussaini succeeded his grandfather, Mahomed Shah, as leader of the Ismailis in 1957, when he was only 20 years old.
His father, Ali, was excluded from the succession after his tumultuous marriage to US actor Rita Hayworth.
As Aga Khan, Al-Hussaini expanded the work of his grandfather, who created hospitals, housing and banking cooperatives in developing countries.
He invested part of the immense family fortune in the most deprived countries, combining philanthropy with business acumen.
To this end, he founded the Aga Khan Development Network (AKDN), a gigantic foundation which is thought to have 96,000 employees worldwide and which funds development programmes, mainly in Asia and Africa.
A keen racehorse owner, he continued the family tradition of breeding thoroughbreds in his eight stables in France and Ireland. His horses have many of the most prestigious races.
Federal Minister for Finance and Revenue Senator Muhammad Aurangzeb represented Pakistan at the funeral.
According to press release issued by finance ministry, during the meeting with Prince Rahim al-Hussaini Aga Khan V the minister expressed heartfelt condolences on the sad demise of late Prince Karim Aga Khan on behalf of the President, the Prime Minister and people of Pakistan.
The minister lauded the services of late Prince Karim Aga Khan and the Aga Khan Development Network which has a focus on development of human capacity, generating economic growth, building resilient communities and honoring cultural heritage.
He said the sad demise of Prince Karim al-Hussain was a monumental loss not only for his family, friends and followers but also for the underprivileged and destitute people of the world.He recalled late Prince Karim Agha Khan's special attachment to Pakistan and its people.
The government of Pakistan declared February 8 as the day of national mourning on the occasion of the funeral of Prince Karim Aga Khan, the press release said, adding Pakistani flag will remain on half-mast in the country and at Pakistan missions abroad.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
a day ago
- Express Tribune
India's deceit of nuclear programme
Deceitful history of Indian nuclear programme is well-known to the world. On 18 May 1974, India tested its Peaceful Nuclear Explosions (PNEs) at Pokhran under codename 'Smiling Buddha' and underscored this reality that the country had diverted its peaceful side of nuclear programme towards weapon-based nuclear programme. Indian nuclear programme is prestige-driven. Indian PM IK Gujral, during his meeting with US President Clinton in September 1997, asserted, "I told President Clinton that when my third eye looks at the door of the Security Council Chamber it sees a little sign that says only those with economic power or nuclear weapons are allowed. I said to him it's very difficult to achieve economic wealth." The debate surrounding development of India's nuclear programme revolves around the question of whether it was genuinely a peaceful programme with civilian applications or a clandestine effort to develop nuclear weapons. India's nuclear programme involved a pattern of exploiting civilian cooperation to build military capacity. The deception lies in how India used international support for peaceful purposes, while developing and later openly declaring nuclear weapons, without being held fully accountable like other NPT-defying nations. India began its nuclear programme in the 1940s and 1950s with so-called declared peaceful intentions. Homi Bhaba, famous Indian physicist, led the foundation of the Indian nuclear programme. Initially, the country gained international cooperation from Canada and the US under the promise that the nuclear material and technology would not be used for weapon purposes. However, India viciously diverted plutonium from a reactor supplied by Canada for 'Smiling Buddha' tests. Indian scientist Raja Ramanna, who led these so-called PNEs, lately confirmed this assertion in 1997: "The Pokhran test was a bomb, I can tell you now An explosion is an explosion and a gun is a gun, whether you shoot at someone or shoot at the ground I just want to make clear that the test was not all that peaceful." In 1968, US National Security Archives also recorded that, while visiting Trombay's Canada-India Reactor, Canadian inspectors were unnerved by data suggesting that India was heading towards developing a nuclear device. This declassified US State Department telegram revealed that Canadian nuclear experts told US diplomats about reactor fuel which had been irradiated at a low enough level to produce weapons grade plutonium. According to them, if India wanted, it could produce up to 12 kilogram of plutonium a year. Another set of US-declassified documents revealed that long before India detonated a nuclear device in May 1974, the US Intelligence Community was monitoring and analysing Indian civilian and military nuclear energy activities. US State Department official George McGhee indicated to Secretary of State Dean Rusk that people throughout the State Department seriously contemplated helping India to acquire a nuclear explosive. It was proposed that "it would be desirable if a friendly Asian power beat Communist China to the punch" by detonating a nuclear device first. Another CIA intelligence report observed in 1964 that India had all of the elements necessary to produce a nuclear weapon and it had a capability to assemble a bomb quickly. India did not plan to complete the work on a bomb initially because Indian government was convinced that the Chinese would not have an offensive capability for at least five years. India was relying on President Johnson's assurances for aid in the face of any threat by China. While mentioning Indian role towards nuclear non-proliferation regime, former Indian Ambassador and Permanent Representative to the Conference on Disarmament in Geneva Amandeep Gill added that India was championing the debate on asserting worldwide moratorium on nuclear testing. However, the world witnessed that the country later backed off from signing the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) as it tested its nuclear weapon device in May 1998. Furthermore, after the Indian PNE in 1974, a nuclear suppliers group named the London Suppliers Group (now the Nuclear Suppliers Group or NSG) was established to strengthen nuclear exports and safeguards which met for their first meeting in Nov 1974. Yet the NSG, at the behest of the Bush Administration, agreed in Sept 2008 to exempt India from some of its export guidelines. Ironically, the world remains ignorant of this fact that the very same NSG which was formed in response to 1974's nuclear tests granted a "clean waiver" to India. Since then, India has concluded numerous nuclear cooperation agreements with foreign states. An alarming situation is that these civil nuclear deals are helping India to freely build up its domestic uranium reserves for weapon grade nuclear material. Many studies acclaimed the fact that India operates world's fastest growing nuclear programme. For instance, a Harvard University study suggested that India has the capacity to produce 2261-2686 nuclear weapons. According to another study, India has sufficient material and technical capacity to produce between 356 and 492 nuclear weapons. A study published by Bulletin of Atomic Scientist estimated that India has the capacity to produce many more nuclear weapons than commonly thought: 1,044 nuclear weapons (914 plutonium-based and 130 uranium-based nuclear weapons), obtained from different reactors. Therefore, its unsafeguarded nuclear material and spent fuel pose serious regional and global concerns for proliferation. In addition, nuclear modernisation of India further makes it obvious that New Delhi is expanding its hegemonic designs beyond this region. India is in a process of increasing its ICBMs missile ranges including Agni V (5000km plus) and Agni VI (10,000km-12,000km). This indicates the country can potentially target US territory too. Similarly, India's entry into Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) is also providing an edge to India for extending its missile ranges and accessibility towards dual-use military technologies. It is certain that New Delhi's membership to the group disturbs the balance of power in the region as India is modernising its missile and space programme. As a result, contrary to ground realities, the US and other foreign states have turned a blind eye towards India. Washington is preparing India as a so-called 'net security provider' in Indian-Ocean Region - as a counterweight to China. For this, the last 10 years of Indo-US defense cooperation has been strengthening Indian military muscle and directly causing regional security implications. All in all, Indian brinkmanship to the South Asian region offers dangerous security implications. India's regional dominance is evident in its stance on military modernisation and strategic expansion. Post-Pahalgam incidents reveal that extra-regional forces have also played a crucial role in regional dynamics of South Asia. The BJP-led Hindutva leadership still remains vulnerable to potential nuclear risks in the region. Hence, a dialogue on regional peace and security in South Asia and resolution of the Kashmir dispute should be a priority for international community. Mahvish Malik The writer is a Visiting Senior Research Associate at Strategic Vision Institute, Islamabad
Express Tribune
a day ago
- Express Tribune
Imran Khan behind bars, PTI behind the Lines: what to expect on August 5
Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf has announced a nationwide protest on August 5 to demand the release of their imprisoned leader and former prime minister Imran Khan, and dozens of party activists convicted under anti-terrorism laws. Party spokespersons have framed the rallies as a fight for 'justice, not confrontation,' accusing the establishment of orchestrating politically motivated trials to sideline PTI from future elections The party's central vote banks in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa and Punjab have historically turned out in massive numbers, most notably during the no confidence demonstrations of April 2022 and 'fill the jails' campaign launched in Feb 2023. Yet this year, state measures like curfews in various parts of the country, mobile internet shutdowns, and the recent convictions of more than 100 PTI members are deterring people from showing up, and are raising fears of fresh crackdowns. Read: PTI alliance mobilises for August 5 'power show' Public sentiment is divided. Rural areas still rally behind PTI's narrative, but many urban middle-class citizens worry that more street action will aggravate economic woes and security disruptions. Analysts point to a growing faction within PTI openly voicing difference of opinion over protest tactics - an internal rift that could dampen turnout further unless leadership unites behind a clear strategy. Meanwhile, Imran is embroiled in multiple legal battles and remains incarcerated. In the Toshakhana case, he was accused of under-declaring and selling state gifts worth over Rs140 million while the Al-Qadir Trust case centers on a Rs7b land donation from developer Malik Riaz, for which the former premier was sentenced to 14-years in prison. Read more: Imran Khan, Bushra Bibi indicted in Toshakhana case Separately, Imran Khan was initially convicted for leaking a classified diplomatic cable (cipher case) and for an 'unlawful marriage' trial, both verdicts later overturned or suspended, though related appeals persist. Following his May 9, 2023 arrest, violent PTI-led protests led to over 150 anti-terrorism and incitement charges that carry long sentences, keeping him behind bars as these cases wind through the courts. Can PTI pull it off? As August 5 approaches, PTI's protest faces high expectations but also significant obstacles. The party's ability to translate loyalist energy into visible street action will depend on leadership cohesion, grassroots coordination, and how forcefully the state chooses to respond. Here's what our analysts had to say. Speaking to The Express Tribune, Prof Tahir Malik emphasized that 'there's been no real change in ground-level capacity since May 2023,' but warned that 'a divided leadership and a largely secretive strategy will hamper efforts to rally the masses'. He pointed out that recent 10-year sentences have 'made people fearful of getting arrested and convicted,' which will inevitably dampen turnout. Also read: 'No political space in sight for PTI' Meanwhile, Majid Nizami predicted a smaller turnout. 'Without clear coordination between Imran Khan's central command and party workers, turnout will shrink further,' he said. He noted the absence of any fully operational Federal Constabulary personnel despite high-profile announcements as evidence that security forces are likely treating August 5 'more as a routine matter,' deploying regular police units instead of the new paramilitary force. Both analysts foresee localized sit-ins and rural pickets rather than a single, sweeping demonstration. Prof Malik expects 'small-scale protests, more intense in villages than in cities,' while Nizami believes the event will amount to 'symbolic roadblocks and provincial pickets,' falling short of a mass-mobilization that could shift the country's political dynamics.
Express Tribune
a day ago
- Express Tribune
At least 14 civilians killed by Sudanese paramilitaries fleeing besieged city
A woman prays by one of the makeshift graves of those buried in Khartoum's southern suburb of al-Azhari on August 2, 2025 when the area was under control of the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) paramilitaries, which will be exhumed for reburial in the local AFP Listen to article Sudanese paramilitary fighters have killed at least 14 civilians trying to flee a besieged city in Darfur, a rights group said Monday, more than 27 months into their war against the army. The Emergency Lawyers, which documents atrocities in the war between the Rapid Support Forces and the Sudanese army, said that "dozens more were injured and an unknown number of civilians detained" in the paramilitary attack on Saturday on the outskirts of El-Fasher city, in the western Darfur region. The RSF has in recent days launched its latest attack on El-Fasher, the North Darfur state capital which it has besieged since May 2024 but has been unable to seize from the hands of the army. Read More: 74 migrants die as boat sinks off Yemen Just two days before Saturday's attack, the RSF's political administration urged residents to evacuate to Qarni village, where the Emergency Lawyers says the civilians were killed. "I call on you to leave El-Fasher and head to Qarni, the northwest gate of the city, where our forces and the Tasis alliance forces are located and will ensure your safety," the RSF-appointed Darfur governor Al-Hadi Idris said in a video address on Thursday. Tasis is an RSF-led political alliance which late last month named leaders of a government based in South Darfur state capital Nyala. Also Read: China and Russia start joint drills in Sea of Japan The UN has repeatedly warned of the plight of hundreds of thousands of civilians trapped in El-Fasher with virtually no aid or services. Families have survived on animal feed, a shortage of which was announced last week. Since April 2023, the war between the army and the RSF has killed tens of thousands, torn the country apart, and created what the UN has called the world's largest hunger and displacement crises. If the RSF captures El-Fasher, it will control all of Sudan's vast western region of Darfur and, along with its allies, much of the country's south.
