No Increased Mortality Seen in axSpA Patients With Cancer
Results from this new analysis of data from Medicare claims linked to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database also showed that the rates of OS and CSS were significantly higher for patients with axSpA and concomitant colorectal cancer than for patients with colorectal cancer but not axSpA, even though past evidence suggested that for older patients with some other rheumatic diseases, there are worse cancer survival outcomes — for instance, patients with rheumatoid arthritis and concomitant breast or prostate cancer and those with systemic lupus erythematosus and breast cancer.
'We're not entirely sure why survival rates were higher in colorectal cancer patients with axSpA, but it's likely the use of [nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs] NSAIDs in the treatment of axSpA played a role,' study presenter Savannah M. Bowman, MD, of Baylor College of Medicine in Houston told Medscape Medical News at the Spondyloarthritis Research and Treatment Network (SPARTAN) 2025 Annual Meeting.
The hazard ratio (HR) for 5-year OS from colorectal cancer in patients with axSpA was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.62-0.83; P < .0001), and the HR for 5-year CSS was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.55-0.97; P = .03).
There were also no significant differences in OS and CSS in patients with axSpA and concomitant breast, prostate, or lung cancer compared with patients with cancer alone, with HRs of 0.87, 0.97, and 0.94, respectively.
When asked to comment on the study findings, John D. Reveille, MD, professor of rheumatology at the University of Texas McGovern Medical School, Houston, said that the better survival rates seen in patients with axSpA may result from the close monitoring they receive because of their increased risk for inflammatory bowel disease.
'It's likely these patients had colonoscopy [or other colorectal cancer screenings], and that this detected cancer earlier [than in patients without axSpA]. This would have resulted in better survival,' said Reveille, who was not involved in the study.
For the analysis, Bowman and study co-authors examined data from 6103 patients, with and without axSpA, and a primary diagnosis of breast, prostate, colorectal, or lung cancer between 2006 and 2019. Of these patients, 2061 had breast cancer, 1988 had prostate cancer, 1234 had lung cancer, and 820 had colorectal cancer. The mean age ranged from 74 to 77 years.
Patients in the axSpA cohorts were required to have two or more claims with a diagnosis of axSpA either 12 months before or after cancer diagnosis. They were matched to controls by gender, cancer type and stage, age at cancer diagnosis, and year of cancer diagnosis.
Patients with diagnostic claims for connective tissue diseases were excluded from the control cohorts.
Survival time was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank tests. Cox proportional hazard regression models were performed for each type of cancer and adjusted for competing risks for CSS.
'Further research is needed to explore the potential reasons for longer survival in elderly patients with colorectal cancer and axSpA compared to those without axSpA,' the investigators concluded.
Reveille agreed. 'The lack of previous research on colorectal cancer in axSpA patients suggests a need for further studies,' he told Medscape Medical News.
Bowman said she plans to use the IQVIA claims database to conduct the same analysis in younger patients. She would also like to analyze the impact of treatment with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, interleukin 17 inhibitors, and Janus kinase inhibitors on cancer outcomes in patients with axSpA.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Republicans respond to data showing 10M will soon lose Medicaid coverage
(The Center Square) – Democrats are sounding the alarm over a new analysis showing that the One Big Beautiful Bill Act will cause millions of Medicaid recipients to lose their current coverage. According to the Congressional Budget Office's newest estimate, Medicaid reforms in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act will result in roughly 10 million people losing eligibility for their current health care plan by 2034. 'This latest analysis by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office confirms that the deeply unpopular One Big Ugly Law is also deeply unfair,' House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., said in a response statement. 'The American people deserve better than this cruel Republican budget scam.' Republicans, however, have pointed out that the breakdown of the numbers offers a different perspective. Out of the 10 million affected, 5.3 million are able-bodied adults without dependents. Under the OBBBA, they could still remain on Medicaid, so long as they participate in work-related activities at least 80 hours per month. The work requirements would not apply to pregnant women; minors and seniors; foster youth under 26; Tribal members; the medically frail; those already meeting TANF or SNAP work requirements; caregivers with young dependents; or the currently and recently incarcerated. Another 3.7 million current Medicaid recipients set to lose coverage will still have access to some other form of government-sponsored health insurance. These individuals are primarily dual enrollees in Medicare and Medicaid, or those who are erroneously enrolled in Medicaid in more than one state. The former group would lose Medicaid but could retain Medicare, while the latter would be eligible to claim their Medicaid coverage only in their actual state of residence. The remaining 1 million impacted individuals are noncitizens who do not meet immigration status requirements for Medicaid enrollment. Those noncitizens have nonetheless received coverage under taxpayer-funded, state-sponsored Medicaid programs. 'The prolonged lie exacerbated by Democrats that 17 million individuals will lose health care coverage from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act has finally been dispelled,' House Committee on Energy and Commerce Chair Brett Guthrie, R-Ky., said Monday. 'It's easy to scare people with coverage loss estimates, but the facts are clear – the vast majority of these individuals are either choosing to lose coverage or aren't actually eligible for Medicaid, and nearly all are eligible for other forms [of] coverage.' Overall federal spending on Medicaid will still grow by 30% over the next decade, provided that Republicans refrain from further enrollee-reducing changes in another 'big, beautiful bill,' which GOP leaders are considering. Solve the daily Crossword
Newsweek
4 hours ago
- Newsweek
Mom Handed $100k Hospital Bill For Taking Baby to ER Sparks Fury
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A California mother said she received more than $100,000 in transport bills after her 6-month-old son, who had severe burns, required emergency services treatment, according to local news outlet ABC 7. The charges included a nearly $90,000 air-ambulance flight, lasting around 15 minutes, and a roughly $10,200 ambulance ride of approximately 0.3 miles between the helipad and the hospital entrance. The bills have since been waived, almost three years later, after ABC 7 On Your Side reached out to the relevant parties after the mother got in touch. Why It Matters The family's experience highlights the broader issue of high medical costs in the country—and how insurance companies do not always shield patients from very large transport and hospital charges, prompting further outrage at insurance companies more widely. California ranked top three for having the highest costs for on ground ambulance bills in 2022, according to the nonprofit health organization FAIR health, behind Utah and Wyoming. Meanwhile, the state, along with Minnesota, Illinois, and New Jersey, had employer-sponsored insurance prices for on ground ambulance bills that were more than three times the Medicare reimbursement rate, according to the Health Care Cost Institute. Since the incident, state-level protections have evolved as California has enacted AB 716 to limit surprise billing for ground ambulance services and to require insured patients to be charged in-network rates in many emergency scenarios. File photo: A Sacramento Fire Department Ambulance races to the scene of an emergency. File photo: A Sacramento Fire Department Ambulance races to the scene of an emergency. MattGush/Getty Images What To Know Antioch resident Jessica Farwell said her 6-month-old son, Brody, suffered second-degree burns in October 2022 after a rice cooker fell from a counter. She said Sutter Antioch Emergency Room staff treated Brody with fentanyl for the pain, and told her the hospital lacked a burn unit, but that no ground ambulances were available for multiple hours. Farwell said that doctors told her she had to transfer Brody to Shriners Children's Hospital in Sacramento, and an air transfer was arranged. She had asked to drive, which would have been a one hour 20 minute journey, but the doctors allegedly refused, per the ABC News report. Per the outlet, Farwell said she was told she would not get billed for the journey because it was being requested by the hospital. Once at the hospital in Sacramento, Brody's second-degree burns were treated and he was discharged the next day. It was a few months later when the bill for more than $100,000 in transport costs came through the mail, as well as additional waiting fees. Newsweek was unable to contact Farwell for comment or independently verify the bill. "I couldn't believe my eyes!" Farwell told ABC 7. "You look at the bills, and it's absolutely enraging—we got hit for a $600 waiting fee... there's a fee for it being a nighttime service... there's just every single fee you can think of!" Farwell told ABC News that her insurer covered less than half the helicopter charge and only a portion of the ambulance fee, leaving her to cover $57,929.80 for the flight and $7,327 for the ambulance. She said she spent almost three years trying to contact the hospital, the ambulance company, and her insurance to get the issue sorted but always got the "runaround." Farwell said that she started Googling for help when she started getting constant calls from collection companies, and ABC's 7 On Your Side came up, prompting her to get in touch. The local news outlet then reached out to the parties involved and got the bills waived in a few days, nearly three years after the incident. Social media users have taken to X to share their shock at Farwell's experience, with political commentator Colin Rugg, who has more than 1.8 million followers on the platform, writing the incident was "absolutely insane," while others deemed it "unbelievable." What People Are Saying Jessica Farwell, Antioch resident and mother of Brody, told ABC7: "They called and said it's done, we will never bill you again. They almost sounded apologetic. I hung up and told my husband. We just couldn't believe it! All it took was filling out a form on your guys' website. It's a miracle! "It just blows my mind I've been working on this for three years... and did not chip away at it... And within a couple of days you had people within the insurance company and the hospital actually trying to help! I have laid my heart out to these people for three years but then you guys get involved and they're scrambling—they're absolutely scrambling." Carmen Balber, executive director, Consumer Watchdog, told ABC7: "I understand ambulances are high-tech machinery. They are staffed by medical personnel who have specialized degrees. But at the end of the day, a 0.3-mile drive should never cost a patient $10,000!" Pro Transport-1, the ambulance company, said in a statement to ABC7: "While we feel this issue still 100 percent lies with the insurance company simply deciding to pass part of the bill to the patient, we will accept their partial payment and no longer seek the remaining balance of the bill for our services." John Simley, communications director for Blue Cross Blue Shield, told ABC7 in a statement: "We don't comment publicly on specific member issues. We are committed to increasing access to safe, appropriate, and effective health care based on the best available information and research, and in accordance with a member's benefit plan." What Happens Next The bills have now been waived after ABC 7 reached out to the relevant parties.
Business Wire
6 hours ago
- Business Wire
Anthem Blue Cross Commercial and Exchange Health Plans Awarded NCQA Health Equity Accreditation in California
WOODLAND HILLS, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Anthem Blue Cross is pleased to announce its Commercial and Covered California (Exchange) health plans in California have been awarded full Health Equity Accreditation by the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) through July 28, 2028. This nationally recognized accreditation is granted to organizations demonstrating leadership in closing health outcome gaps and providing culturally and linguistically appropriate services that promote equitable care across diverse populations. 'We are deeply grateful to NCQA for this accreditation—it's a powerful affirmation of our unwavering commitment to delivering high-quality, whole-person care to our California health plan members,' said Beth Andersen, President, Anthem Blue Cross Commercial Health Plans. 'This recognition underscores our dedication to meeting the needs of every member and driving fair and inclusive healthcare for every community across the state.' The accreditation applies to the following Anthem Blue Cross product lines in California: Commercial HMO/POS (Combined) Commercial PPO/EPO (Combined) Covered California Exchange EPO Covered California Exchange HMO NCQA's Health Equity Accreditation provides a trusted benchmark for consumers, regulators, and purchasers, identifying organizations that meet rigorous standards in addressing the needs of varied communities. Key components of the accreditation standards include: Fostering an internal culture that supports external efforts focused on improving access to care and wellbeing for every community. Collecting and using data to improve language services and provider network accessibility. Identifying and acting on opportunities to improve care quality for all populations and close health outcome gaps. 'Earning Health Equity Accreditation shows that an organization is making a breakthrough in providing excellent health care to all populations. I congratulate any organization that achieves this level of distinction,' said NCQA President Margaret E. O'Kane. 'Eliminating disparities in health care is essential to improving the quality of care overall.' This latest accreditation builds upon our commitment to improving health outcomes as Anthem's California Medi-Cal plan received NCQA's Health Equity Accreditation and Health Equity PLUS Accreditation in 2022 and 2023, respectively. With this achievement, all Anthem health plans in California—across Commercial, Medi-Cal, and Medicare lines of business—now hold NCQA Health Equity Accreditation. About Anthem Blue Cross As a long-time trusted health partner, Anthem Blue Cross has been providing high-quality, affordable health care for Californians for more than 86 years. Anthem Blue Cross is the trade name of Blue Cross of California. ANTHEM is a registered trademark of Elevance Health, Inc. Anthem Blue Cross and Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company are independent licensees of the Blue Cross Association. To learn more, visit Also, follow us on LinkedIn, X or Facebook.
