Fish and chip shops 'could vanish' due to Nigel Farage's net zero opposition
Fish and chips are at risk of vanishing from the high street if Nigel Farage has his way, a senior Labour figure has warned.
British waters have seen record average temperatures over the first seven months of the year, leading to shifts in the species living in our waters, and creating challenges for fishing. Statistics also show the average price of fish and chips jumped from £6.64 in January 2020 to £10.09 in January 2025, despite industry attempts to ' cushion the blow ' for consumers.
Labour MP Bill Esterson, chair of the Energy Security and Net Zero Select Committee, has now accused Reform of ignoring the dangers of climate change, and argued it was seeing prices soar in a blow to business. He told The Mirror: "While Nigel Farage wants us to ignore climate change, part of the British way of life is under threat. The seas around the UK are warming up. Cod and haddock are moving to colder waters." It comes after a Reform UK police chief's 'dark heart of wokeness' claim comes under fire.
He continued: "The Labour government is taking climate action at home and abroad which will help limit the rise in sea temperatures. Reform needs to explain why they are happy for the British public to pay through the nose for our fish and chips, or possibly even lose our nation's favourite dish once and for all.'
Mr Farage has previously described the UK's net zero target as 'complete and utter madness', while his fellow Reform MP Richard Tice recently 'declared war' on green energy projects. National Federation of Fish Friers President Andrew Crook told The Mirror climate change could be a factor in the price increases, and that the UK's chippies were doing their best to keep prices down for customers.
He said: 'Most of the fish used in the nation's fish and chip shops comes from the Barents Sea and the waters around Iceland as the fish prefers deeper colder water than around the UK. We are currently feeling the effects of the quota for cod being reduced from 1m tonnes five years ago to 340,000 tonnes this year as scientists are trying to address a couple of poor year classes of fish.
'These could be caused by climate change, predation or another natural occurrence. In isolation we could handle it but we are seeing increases across the board and high tax burden which unfortunately has led to some increases but we are trying to cushion consumers as much as we can so they can continue to enjoy the nation's favourite dish.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
25 minutes ago
- Daily Record
East Kilbride Labour leader rallies town to ‘win our future back' ahead of Holyrood election
Joe Fagan said Scottish politics was not working for the Scottish people and called for new ideas to make East Kilbride 'new' again. Labour's candidate to become East Kilbride's next MSP rallied supporters to 'win the town's future back' – ramping up the campaign for the Holyrood election next year. Addressing supporters from the local Labour Party and beyond at East Kilbride Arts Centre, Joe Fagan said Scottish politics "was not working for the Scottish people" and called for new ideas to "make East Kilbride 'new' again" and put the Scottish Parliament back to work for Scotland. Rallying supporters, Fagan said: 'East Kilbride is where I live, where I grew up, where I went to school, where I first joined a trade union. It's the place I fight for week-in, week-out as a councillor and a local leader. It would be an honour to speak for my home town in the Scottish Parliament. And I promise then I when I speak for East Kilbride, we will not be ignored.' The East Kilbride MSP seat has been held by SNP MSP Collette Stevenson since 2021. Fagan is the councillor for East Kilbride Central North and Leader of Labour in South Lanarkshire. He grew up in St Leonards and East Mains and attended St Bride's High School. Analysing the problems facing the town, he said: 'East Kilbride is Scotland's first and most successful New Town, built on the promise of good jobs and good homes, where generations of working people came to make a better life and give a better start to their families. Many still do. The town is still growing. But it's not new anymore. 'East Kilbride was disfigured by the privatisation of our most important assets – our industrial estates and our town centre – when the Development Corporation was wound up by the Major Government 30 years ago. East Kilbride lost something of its identity when the Tories abolished our district council, as many suburban towns did, but few with as strong a sense of place or civic pride as East Kilbride. 'East Kilbride lost something of its community when the real consequence of the Right to Buy set in, unprecedented growth in a transient private rented sector now larger than the social rented sector in many of our most established communities. East Kilbride lost industries we built through the New Town years as the world changed and industrial policy was neglected. 'East Kilbride lost out to austerity as years of government funding cuts to councils deprived us of the resources we need to invest in the fabric of our town and in the quality of people's lives." East Kilbride and Strathaven MP Joani Reid; candidate for the neighbouring Clydesdale constituency, Lynsey Hamilton; and summer by-election winner Davy Russell MSP all joined the event to back East Kilbride Labour's campaign. Scottish Labour aim to build on their momentum following their win in the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election in constituencies across South Lanarkshire. Fagan added: 'I don't believe that the forces driving decline are unstoppable. I'm here to push back against them. I believe that the choices we make matter. The choices governments make matter. With the most consequential Scottish election in years almost here, it's time to make East Kilbride matter.' In a rallying call to supporters and undecided voters across the town, Fagan called for today's generation to 'win' the town's future back, saying: 'In 1947, East Kilbride was designated a New Town by the post-war Labour Government - a government and a generation with the vision to build the welfare state, to build industry, to build a National Health Service and to build a New Town for the future. Now it is for this generation to win our future back. 'New homes. New jobs. A new town centre. A new public transport system run for passengers, not for profit. A new deal for councils. A new deal for workers. New leadership for our NHS. New ambition for our schools. New direction for our country. Building back for East Kilbride. Fighting back for East Kilbride. Labour's leading the way - and it's the way to make this New Town new again.'
Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
Reform has to distance itself from extremists
According to the National – a worrying phrase, I admit, given the Scottish newspaper's obsessive adulation of anyone pro-Scottish independence and its obsessive hostility to anyone who opposes it – this weekend saw a Scottish Reform councillor share a platform with a member of a far-right group at a protest outside a Falkirk hotel housing asylum seekers. What is most interesting about this story is not the protest itself, or even the Reform councillor's presence. It is the response of Reform to one of its councillors sharing a platform with this person and saying or doing nothing about it. Despite the widespread labelling of anyone who believes that our borders should be controlled as far right, and despite the usual bias of the National, the facts it has reported seem clear. At the protest, Claire Mackie-Brown shared a platform with one Richard McFarlane, a member of Patriotic Alternative, which describes itself as a 'ethno-nationalist organisation that campaigns for the rights and wellbeing of White Britons.' Last year, the government's anti-extremism advisor described Patriotic Alternative as 'a racist and anti-Semitic far-right group founded in 2019 by former BNP youth leader Mark Collett.' Cllr Mackie-Brown can be forgiven if she had no idea who McFarlane was when he began to speak. But once he did, no one could have been in any doubt about his views. In his seven-minute speech he asserted that, 'we need to give them the fingers, and say we are white, we are British, we are proud'. He concluded: 'Keep Britain white, keep Britain British.' According to the protest organiser, neither the Reform councillor nor the Patriotic Alternative member were invited to speak: 'The microphone was open to anyone who wished to share their personal concerns or experiences. No speakers were formally invited or endorsed by the organisers it was a platform for local people. If individuals with affiliations to political groups or outside organisations chose to speak, that was entirely their choice and not something we had pre-arranged or promoted.' That's fair enough, and in those circumstances it's easy to see how a local residents' protest was overrun by the far-right. But that is far from being a one-off. One of the recurring themes of these protests up and down the country is how they attract the far-right. Which makes it all the more obvious, and all the more important, that mainstream politicians from mainstream parties should have a serious and convincing response when the far-right are present. At the very least, that needs to involve denouncing the racism and the white nationalism of extremists. Otherwise, it becomes easy to label all the protests as being far-right, and to label representatives of parties such as Reform which stand alongside them as being part of the far-right. As far as one can tell from reports, which have not been contradicted, that did not happen this weekend in Falkirk. Cllr Mackie-Brown appears to have said nothing in response. But while Cllr Mackie-Brown may have been out of her depth and blindsided by what she heard, one might expect that Reform itself would have a ready-made response to such issues. And it has: but the response is useless. Reform told the National: 'Councillor Claire Brown was there to represent Reform and her concerned constituents, she is not responsible for the other people attending and will continue to stand up for residents on this extremely important issue.' Of course she isn't responsible for the other speakers. No one has suggested she is. But as a representative of Reform, she – and anyone else in a similar situation – has to react. You can't simply pretend you are in a bubble, removed from scene, when someone you are standing with is ranting 'Keep Britain white.' It's a similar point to what has been happening on the 'Free Palestine' hate marches. The argument is made that the majority present are ordinary, decent people simply concerned about the deaths in Gaza. They may indeed be. But if you turn up at a march to discover that a proportion of your fellow marchers are Jew haters, chanting anti-Semitic slogans and waving anti-Semitic banners, then you have a choice. You can leave, distancing yourself. Or – as has been happening – you can continue on the march and, even worse, come back the following week, again saying and doing nothing to condemn the hate around you. And in doing so you not only remove any claim to decency, you become part of the problem. Reform has the same choice to make. Does it pretend that it is not part of the same protest when the far-right arrives? Or does it denounce and condemn racists for leaching onto a legitimate protest by ordinary and decent local residents? This will be a recurring theme for Reform as its elected officials and members – entirely legitimately – attend protests outside asylum hotels and are joined by far-right agitators. Unless Reform finds a way to properly distance itself from them, it will be tarred with their brush.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Sultana accuses Corbyn of ‘capitulation' over antisemitism in attack on new party co-leader
Jeremy Corbyn has been accused by the co-leader of his new party of 'capitulating' over antisemitism. Zarah Sultana said the former Labour leader was wrong to accept the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism and said he alienated voters by 'triangulating' on Brexit. In an extraordinary attack just weeks after the pair announced the formation of Your Party, a left-wing challenger to Labour, Ms Sultana said Labour under Mr Corbyn 'capitulated to the IHRA definition of antisemitism'. She told the New Left Review: 'It triangulated on Brexit, which alienated huge numbers of voters. It abandoned mandatory reselection of MPs for the trigger ballot compromise, keeping many of the party's undemocratic structures in place. 'It didn't make a real effort to channel its mass membership into the labour movement or tenants unions, which would have enriched the party's social base. 'When it came under attack from the state and the media, it should have fought back, recognising that these are our class enemies. But instead it was frightened and far too conciliatory.' In a bid to end the antisemitism crisis that gripped the party under his leadership, Mr Corbyn in 2018 announced it would adopt the IHRA definition. He had initially sought to resist calls to fully adopt the IHRA's definition of antisemitism, including by adopting just seven of its 11 examples of antisemitic behaviour. In her interview, Ms Sultana said the IHRA's definition of antisemitism 'famously equates it with anti-Zionism, and which even its lead author Kenneth Stern has now publicly criticised'. The Board of Deputies of British Jews said the IHRA definition is supported by the overwhelming majority of British jews. 'Calling the recognition of the IHRA definition of antisemitism a 'capitulation' is a grave insult,' a spokesman added. The spokesman said: 'Labour's real betrayal under Corbyn was unlawfully harassing and discriminating against Jews. Those who seek to delegitimise and misdefine the IHRA definition in this way prove themselves to be no friend to the Jewish community and also call into question their wider commitment to anti-racism, the wellbeing of the Jewish community and social cohesion.' Ms Sultana's criticism of Mr Corbyn's tenure as leader will heighten tensions between the pair as Your Party takes shape. The name is a holding title before a conference, expected this autumn, at which activists will decide a long-term name, leadership structures and ultimately who is in charge. Ms Sultana initially announced that the pair would be co-leaders, blindsiding Mr Corbyn who had not yet committed to the structure. The party has so far brought together pro-Gaza independent MPs, councillors and candidates who have opposed the Labour Party's stance on the ongoing conflict. The MPs who have joined unseated former Labour frontbencher Jonathan Ashworth and almost cost senior ministers Wes Streeting, Shabana Mahmood and Jess Phillips their seats. Others likely to join include Faiza Shaheen, who was deselected at the last minute by Labour for Chingford and Woodford Green but ran as an independent, preventing her former party from taking the seat off ex-Tory leader Sir Iain Duncan Smith.
