‘My pub takes less than 50p a week in copper coins. They're not worth my time'
Pub owner Tom Archer is examining a two pence piece with the kind of fascinated curiosity you might expect from someone who's found an ancient Roman coin in their back garden. He's put a few aside on the bar from the last time someone paid for a pint with a few coppers in The White Horse Inn, Essex.
'Honestly, we get less than 50 copper coins a week these days,' he says. 'I don't even put them in the till any more – they're not worth bagging up. So they just accumulate here and we dump them into charity boxes every so often.'
It seems faintly ridiculous that Archer would rather lose money on the price of a pint than cash the full sum up. But he reckons it actually costs him more to process copper coins than they're worth.
'Think of it this way,' he says. 'You have to allow for the time it takes to count up coppers and bag them up. Then I've got to go to a bank and pay them in – and the banks are shutting everywhere so it's a fair old route to find one.
'So if the minimum wage is £12.21, that's over a pound for every five minutes of effort. See what I mean – it genuinely is costing me more to pay someone to count a pound of coppers than they're actually worth. Just get rid of them, I say; I don't think anyone would truly miss them.'
Of course, contactless payments are largely the root cause of the decline in use of cash, and last July no new coins of any denomination were ordered by HM Treasury from The Royal Mint. Officials decided there were enough coins – an estimated 27 billion – in circulation. But while no one was suggesting pound coins were on the way out, the move caused enough debate for a Treasury spokesman to have to stress that they were not scrapping coppers.
But are they more hassle than they're worth? Archer's experience in The White Horse Inn is being repeated across the country. The Pavilion Cafe in Didsbury Park, South Manchester is a vibrant, popular place for coffees, lunches and summer ice-creams, a genuine community hub. Its duty manager Ayesha Malik takes time out from making a cappuccino to show me the till.
'See the 1ps and 2ps in there,' she points. 'They've literally not been touched for two weeks. I can't think of the last time anyone actually paid in coppers, and we've not given any change out in them either.'
Unlike Tom Archer, it's not that taking coppers to the bank is an added irritation for Malik and The Pavilion Cafe. It's that they just don't need to very often anyway. They just sit in the till as an unused float.
Malik rummages in the tip jar on the counter. 'Look, there's only one copper in there as well,' she says. 'People just don't have them in their pockets any more.'
What's interesting about the Pavilion Cafe's experience is that they're run by a charity called Didsbury Good Neighbours, set up specifically to offer support to older people in its community. The presumption might be that this particular age group would be put out by any changes to denominations – or indeed the move to a more cashless society.
'Far from it,' says Malik. 'We know our customers, and I'd say only 10 per cent of them use cash now anyway. They tell us it's far easier to use a contactless card rather than fiddling around trying to find the right coins. And for those that are happier using cash, we're pleased to welcome them – but it's higher denominations than coppers they tend to have anyway.'
All of which begs the question, who is actually using the millions of copper coins – which are actually made of copper-plated steel – currently in circulation? Archer's make their way to charity donation boxes, and Malik talks fondly of the museums that make a game out of rolling two pence pieces into a collection area. But even some charities are seeing copper use dwindle.
Caroline Tomlinson is CEO of award-winning Standish-based charity My Life, who work with people of all ages and abilities who need support. 'We are really fortunate to have great backing in the community for what we do,' she says. 'And we've always been really clear that our operating model wouldn't be reliant on charitable donations as people need our person-centred services to live their lives to the full.
'Still, we have collection boxes, and they've been used as a way to support and enhance still further what we do. They used to be full of copper coins. Now it's noticeable how much emptier they are.
'That's not just because of the cost of living and pressures on people's money – as acute as they are. My instincts are that people just don't have spare coppers in their pockets as much as they used to.'
Of course, one place you will still see copper coins is on the famous twopenny shove machines at traditional seaside resorts. Oddly, every arcade operator we speak to is reluctant to go on the record about their copper use. Perhaps they don't want to lift the veil on just how many 2ps it will take to tip the balance and shove a punter's precious stake back into the black.
'We must be keeping the Royal Mint in business,' jokes one employee of a traditional arcade in England's North West. 'What's telling is that you used to have people coming in with their own 2ps to slot in the machine. Now they have to ask us for a pound's worth, because they don't have many themselves.
'For a business like ours, we're used to having a high turnover of coppers so it's not really an issue to be banking them. But I don't use them in my local shop, either.'
Ultimately, then, any pang for copper coins is largely driven by nostalgia for those two penny slots or one penny chews. Go into any high street shop and it's striking that the days when, say, a £4.99 price point would be used as a psychological marketing tool to get something for under a fiver are well and truly over. Everything has been rounded down or up into multiples of five or ten. A pint of milk is 85p. The RPI for a loaf of bread has been at £1.40 for over a year now, rather than £1.39 or £1.37 as it was in the past. So the 1p and 2p are effectively redundant as change.
'Prices for pints in pubs now are in multiples of 20 pence,' confirms Archer.
The UK isn't alone in seeing a decline in the use of smaller coin denominations. Three weeks ago, the US treasury confirmed the end of the penny after Donald Trump had told Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent in February to stop minting the coins, calling them wasteful. It transpired that they cost more to produce than they were worth. Might the UK now follow suit?
An HM Treasury spokesman said that while they continue to monitor the amount of coins in circulation, they were confident there were still enough in the system to meet demand.
'Cash continues to be used by millions of people across the UK,' the spokesman said, 'and we have no plans to change the denominational mix of coins.'
Of course, it's the Royal Mint who ultimately manufacture coins in response to demand from the industry. What do they feel about the future of coppers?'It's not unusual for some denominations not to enter circulation in certain years,' said a Royal Mint spokesman.
'The existing 1p coins will be replaced with those bearing King Charles III's effigy over time as they become damaged or worn and to meet demand for additional coins. Ensuring that cash circulates effectively and is readily accessible across the UK is essential, and we're always looking at ways to support this.'
All of which means Tom Archer is likely to be popping coppers in an Essex charity box for a while yet. Even he, though, maintains cash still has a place.
'I'd say about 20 per cent of our income is in cash now, and actually it is useful; it means we can pay our casual staff – legally of course – that way,' says Archer. 'And also, you do have the issue of what happens when you have a power cut or a payment system blackout.
'So it's important that you do have both – it's just the denominations are wrong at the moment.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Popular restaurant forced to close today as 'emergency announcement' issued
HEREFORD'S Beefy Boys restaurant has had to close today (June 8) due to an issue in its kitchen. The Old Market burger joint said in an "emergency announcement" on social media that there had been an issue with its extraction system, and that it had been forced to close until tomorrow (June 9) for an engineer to fix it. The post explained that phone calls are being made to every customer who had booked in for today. Read more City burger joint described as 'orgasmic' by TikTok star Reviews reveal why cafe rated 'best in Herefordshire' is so loved I tried this new city cafe and this is what I thought It added: "We have tried our best to sort it but we cannot get it fixed. We have made the decision to shut for the rest of today. We apologise for any inconvenience." The Beefy Boys said "normal service should resume tomorrow". The Beefy Boys also has restaurants in Cheltenham, Shrewsbury and Bath, and recently announced that a new site in Oxford would be coming soon.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Billionaire takes on Heathrow with plan for cut-price expansion
A billionaire hotel entrepreneur is spearheading a rival proposal to expand Heathrow, as he vows to deliver the project more cheaply than the airport would. Surinder Arora is drawing up plans for the project after Mike Kane, the aviation minister, said last week that the Government was open to alternative bids to build a third runway. As one of the biggest landowners at Heathrow through his eponymous property empire, Mr Arora has teamed up with US engineering giant Bechtel to forge ahead with his development bid. 'The Government has asked for submissions this summer and we will be there,' he told The Telegraph. Mr Arora welcomed the comments from Mr Kane, who has confirmed that ministers had 'asked for Heathrow or a third party' to present alternative runway proposals. 'It's exactly what we've been asking for,' said Mr Arora, who previously led a rival expansion bid in 2018. 'We have said previously that we could do Heathrow between 32pc and 34pc cheaper,' he said. 'Obviously, times have moved on, but I think we will look to push on that. 'We can deliver the whole thing, and without a shadow of a doubt, we'd build it cheaper than Heathrow Airport Limited. 'This will give the airlines and passengers the chance to make a choice.' Mr Arora signalled that he has already enlisted hundreds of consultants to work on the project, which could include plans for a shorter third runway. However, he has vowed to listen to what airlines want before submitting his proposal. The possibility of a shorter airstrip at Heathrow has emerged as a potential alternative to the airport's more ambitious plans, which some claim could cost up to £ a runway could both slash costs and shave years off the project's completion date by removing the need to divert the M25, Britain's busiest motorway, under the new strip. Like Mr Arora, Heathrow is also working on a proposal. But this is expected to include plans for a full-length runway. While that blueprint is enshrined in an Airports National Policy Statement (ANPS) adopted by Parliament in 2018, estimated costs are understood to have swelled from £14bn at 2014 prices to between £42bn and £63bn. A truncated runway would impose limits on the planes able to use it, but would nevertheless find favour with airlines that have pushed back against paying for the pricier option. The boss of one major carrier, speaking at the IATA industry gathering in Delhi last week, said the latest costing for the full-scale plan would require what he called an 'eye-watering' increase in ticket prices of between £75 to £100. Sir Tim Clark, head of Emirates, the world's biggest long-haul airline, said at the same event that he was against diverting the M25 and would back a shorter runway 'for landing purposes or single-aisle aircraft, anything to declutter what's there'. Heathrow Reimagined, a campaign group that includes British Airways (BA) and Virgin Atlantic, said it 'welcomes competition and alternative proposals designed to increase capacity at the airport more efficiently'. BA, which operates about half of the flights at Heathrow, declined to specify its favoured option but said 'a solution should consider the airport boundaries, runway length, total project cost and the impact on consumers.' Willie Walsh, the former chief of parent group IAG, said in 2017 that spanning the motorway would add unnecessary cost and complexity. 'Airlines were never consulted on the runway length and they can operate perfectly well from a slightly shorter runway,' he said. According to stipulations in the ANPS, Heathrow's third runway should have a length of 'at least 3,500m' that would be able to handle 260,000 extra flights or more each year. However, a strip measuring 3.2km could accommodate 90pc of flights, according to the boss of a UK airline speaking at the same event in India, who described the prospect of diverting the M25 as 'scary'. Heathrow's northern runway stretches for 3.9km, making it the longest active landing airstrip in the UK, while the southern one measures almost 3.7km. Reports in March suggested that Heathrow itself was looking seriously at modifying its pending submission to the Government to feature a shorter runway in order to cut costs. However, Heathrow chief Thomas Woldbye denied that it was the case, saying that he intended to deliver the longer runway specified and that ripping up the busiest two-mile stretch of the M25 could not be avoided. What remains unclear is how much weight the Government will give to reducing delivery costs versus the extra time in planning that a radical alternative to the previous proposals might require. Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, said in January she wanted to see 'spades in the ground' on the project before the next general election and the start of flights by 2035. Departing from the requirements of the ANPS could mean that the planning process would be lengthier. The outcome of a Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) review of Heathrow's mechanism for charging airlines in the context of the third runway will also be of fundamental importance. Heathrow Reimagined is pressing ministers to abandon rules under which money spent on the airport can be charged directly to airlines through increased fees. While those fees are regulated by the CAA, carriers say the system provides no incentive for Heathrow to wring efficiencies from infrastructure projects. In his comments, reported in the London Standard, Mr Kane declined to say if Heathrow shareholders, airlines or passengers should foot the bill. Meanwhile, a Labour insider said Mr Kane's comments were intended to convey a willingness to introduce competition into the runway process, rather than a pledge to do so. However, it appears the ball may already be rolling. 'Heathrow is a huge business, and competition is a good thing,' said Mr Arora. 'We're not here to slow or delay things. We will do whatever is necessary.' The Department for Transport said that while Heathrow Airport had previously been deemed the only credible party able to deliver the runway project in its entirety, it remains open-minded and will treat other proposals fairly. A spokesman said: 'There is no live planning application for Heathrow expansion at present, but when plans come forward, we will ensure any expansion is assessed against the Government's legal, carbon and environmental obligations.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Campaigners fly banner in protest over solar farm
Campaigners have flown a banner as part of a protest against plans for a 2000-acre solar farm. Hundreds of residents took part in a community walk on the Fosse Way in Wiltshire in opposition to Lime Down Solar Park. Island Green Power (IGP), which is behind the plans, wants to build solar panels on farmland near Malmesbury to produce enough energy to power 115,000 homes. The campaign group said it was not opposed to solar power, but it did object to the "industrial scale" of the Lime Down project. More news stories for Wiltshire Listen to the latest news for Wiltshire Plans were unveiled last March for one of the biggest solar parks in the country which would span across the villages of Hullavington, Stanton St Quintin, Sherston and Luckington in north Wiltshire. Members have organised events to draw attention to their campaign including a 3.5-mile (5.6km) walk along the Fosse Way, passing along countryside which would be affected by the plans. Campaigners flew a banner above the countryside reading: "No to corporate greed - Stop Lime Down." IGP said the Lime Down project would "support national and regional aims to decarbonise our electricity systems and bolster our energy security." Senior project manager Will Threlfall said: "We are grateful for the feedback we received to the previous stage of our consultation, which continues to inform the refinement of our plans for the project and is helping us to develop our proposals responsibly, and in a way that recognises local community and stakeholder views." It was expected to submit an application for development consent later this year. Follow BBC Wiltshire on Facebook, X and Instagram. Send your story ideas to us on email or via WhatsApp on 0800 313 4630. Solar park will 'completely swamp' nine villages Report suggests 88% against solar park plans Solar farm landowners urged to put 'community above profit' Solar developer no show at meeting 'appalling' Island Green Power