Limerick hospital offers 'sincere and heartfelt apologies' to mother of baby who died due to 'failure' in care
University Maternity Hospital Limerick has apologised to the mother of a little boy who died and acknowledged a breach in the hospital's duty of care to the baby, which resulted in a delayed diagnosis 'with devastating consequences'.
'We are deeply sorry for your loss and for the profound sorrow of being denied the opportunity to watch your beloved son grow and thrive,' the hospital said in a letter read out in the High Court.
The mother of the baby, who was 16 weeks old when he died, has settled a High Court action against the HSE over his death.
The mother or child cannot be identified by order of the court.
The family's counsel, Dr John O'Mahony SC with Doireann O Mahony BL, instructed by solicitor Brigid O'Donnell, told the High Court it was a sad and tragic case.
Counsel said when the little boy was born at the Limerick hospital in January 2021, he was doing well until two weeks later his condition deteriorated and tests including lumbar punctures showed he had an E coli meningitis infection and he was started on antibiotics.
Counsel said the baby's condition later suddenly deteriorated and he had a fever. He deteriorated further and needed to be intubated and ventilated.
An MRI scan showed global ischaemia, which is when blood flow to the brain is reduced. The baby later received palliative care and he died when he was 16 weeks old.
In the letter from the chief executive of HSE Midwest Acute Services Ian Carter, University Maternity Hospital, Limerick offered 'sincere and heartfelt apologies" to the mother and wider family 'for this failure'.
It said: 'On behalf of the management and staff at University Maternity Hospital, Limerick, I wish to acknowledge the breach in our duty of care to your baby, which resulted in a delayed diagnosis with devastating consequences for you and your extended family.'
It added: 'Please know that our thoughts are with you, and we extend our deepest sympathy to you and your family at this incredibly difficult time.'
In the proceedings, it was claimed there was an alleged failure to take any or any proper action which such was warranted by the baby's condition and an alleged delay had been caused in enabling the baby to receive proper urgent care and treatment for his condition.
It was further claimed there was an alleged failure to recognise the baby's obvious signs of sepsis when he was moved into intensive care on February 19, 2021, and to ensure the administration of the appropriate antibiotics urgently or in a timely fashion.
There was, it was claimed, an alleged delay in the administration of broad spectrum antibiotics when it ought to have bene known such a delay would expose the baby to a serious risk of injury or death.
The claims had been denied.
Noting the settlement and the division of the statutory mental distress solatium payment, Mr Justice Paul Coffey extended his deepest sympathy to the baby's mother and extended family.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
10 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Limerick hospital offers 'sincere and heartfelt apologies' to mother of baby who died due to 'failure' in care
University Maternity Hospital Limerick has apologised to the mother of a little boy who died and acknowledged a breach in the hospital's duty of care to the baby, which resulted in a delayed diagnosis 'with devastating consequences'. 'We are deeply sorry for your loss and for the profound sorrow of being denied the opportunity to watch your beloved son grow and thrive,' the hospital said in a letter read out in the High Court. The mother of the baby, who was 16 weeks old when he died, has settled a High Court action against the HSE over his death. The mother or child cannot be identified by order of the court. The family's counsel, Dr John O'Mahony SC with Doireann O Mahony BL, instructed by solicitor Brigid O'Donnell, told the High Court it was a sad and tragic case. Counsel said when the little boy was born at the Limerick hospital in January 2021, he was doing well until two weeks later his condition deteriorated and tests including lumbar punctures showed he had an E coli meningitis infection and he was started on antibiotics. Counsel said the baby's condition later suddenly deteriorated and he had a fever. He deteriorated further and needed to be intubated and ventilated. An MRI scan showed global ischaemia, which is when blood flow to the brain is reduced. The baby later received palliative care and he died when he was 16 weeks old. In the letter from the chief executive of HSE Midwest Acute Services Ian Carter, University Maternity Hospital, Limerick offered 'sincere and heartfelt apologies" to the mother and wider family 'for this failure'. It said: 'On behalf of the management and staff at University Maternity Hospital, Limerick, I wish to acknowledge the breach in our duty of care to your baby, which resulted in a delayed diagnosis with devastating consequences for you and your extended family.' It added: 'Please know that our thoughts are with you, and we extend our deepest sympathy to you and your family at this incredibly difficult time.' In the proceedings, it was claimed there was an alleged failure to take any or any proper action which such was warranted by the baby's condition and an alleged delay had been caused in enabling the baby to receive proper urgent care and treatment for his condition. It was further claimed there was an alleged failure to recognise the baby's obvious signs of sepsis when he was moved into intensive care on February 19, 2021, and to ensure the administration of the appropriate antibiotics urgently or in a timely fashion. There was, it was claimed, an alleged delay in the administration of broad spectrum antibiotics when it ought to have bene known such a delay would expose the baby to a serious risk of injury or death. The claims had been denied. Noting the settlement and the division of the statutory mental distress solatium payment, Mr Justice Paul Coffey extended his deepest sympathy to the baby's mother and extended family.
Irish Independent
20 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Majority of health staff will have to work weekends under new roster deal to reduce trolley crisis
A HSE spokesperson said it was 'confident' this was the case when asked what proportion of workers are obliged to work a five over seven-day week. The agreement means staff who joined or were promoted after December 16, 2008, can be asked to work new rosters that include extended hours or weekend working. Those who joined before this date have no liability to change their working arrangements unless they want to on a voluntary basis. The HSE expects the agreement to significantly improve services. The fact that staff will be entitled to premium pay is seen as a 'carrot' to attract volunteers. The spokesperson said staff will be asked to volunteer first to work the new arrangements. Agreement was reached after weeks of intense negotiations on 'principles' 'To deliver a quick and effective response, staff will be asked to volunteer in the first instance. If not enough staff volunteer, eligible staff will be identified,' he said. 'We are confident that the majority of staff have a contractual obligation to work an extended working day/week basis.' The spokesperson said plans are being devised to introduce extended working arrangements in the 'areas with most need'. 'These requirements will vary from site to site,' he said. In a message to members, Siptu said the extended services initiative is expected to be rolled out in the coming months. It said agreement with the HSE, Department of Health and health unions was reached after weeks of intense negotiations on 'principles' for extended services. The union said the agreement aims to enhance patient access to services by extending opening hours. It said unions secured key protections for its members. These include provisions to protect staff welfare, ensure safe working conditions and provide fair compensation for those participating in extended rosters. Siptu health divisional organiser Kevin Figgis said: 'The agreement marks a significant step forward in reshaping Ireland's healthcare services while balancing the needs of patients and staff. 'By ensuring robust protections and structured implementation, the HSE and the unions aim to deliver extended services sustainably, without compromising worker welfare or patient safety.' The INMO said the vast majority of its members already work a 24/7 roster. In a notice to members on the changes, it said the agreement does not mean that all services will be automatically changed. Health Minister Jennifer Carroll MacNeill welcomed the staff rostering agreement with health unions. She said she was told early on when she took office about MRI and CT scans not being operated in some hospitals at weekends. She acknowledged hospitals were hampered by a lack of digitisation and said a business case was currently with the Department of Health for the rollout of electronic records.
Irish Examiner
a day ago
- Irish Examiner
Woman sues Boots claiming she suffered brain bleed and stroke after taking migraine medication
A woman who claims she suffered a brain bleed and stroke after taking migraine medication she bought at a Boots pharmacy has sued the pharmacy giant in the High Court. In the proceedings, it is claimed that the medication was allegedly inappropriately sold to Sigrid O'Meara and there was an alleged failure to advise her that the migraine medication is contra-indicated with an anti-depressant drug she was taking. This is due to a significant interaction between the two medications which it is claimed can lead to significant increase in blood pressure and stroke. All of the claims are vehemently denied by Boots. It says it cannot remember Ms O'Meara but says protocol dictates that anyone purchasing that €11.99 migraine medication is referred to a pharmacist. Claimed medical side-effects Sigrid O'Meara had taken the migraine medication when she woke with a terrible headache on March 26, 2020. She took two tablets she had purchased from a Longford Boots pharmacy the previous October. It is further contended she felt dizzy and collapsed and had to be brought by ambulance to hospital. A scan showed she had a brain bleed and she was transferred to a Dublin hospital. She was discharged from hospital a month later and was recorded as having severe left leg weakness along with difficulties with her left arm and had to go for rehabilitation. Answering her counsel, Bruce Antoniotti SC instructed by Augustus Cullen and Law, Ms O'Meara told the High Court that communication is difficult for her and her speech in the German language is more badly affected. 'I text everybody,' she said. She agreed doctors said she won't be able to work again and she is unable to drive and has to sit down after walking. Sigrid O'Meara's claims Sigrid O'Meara, aged 63, from Ballincurry, Longford, has sued Boots Retail (Ireland) Ltd with a registered address at Citywest Business Campus, Citywest, Dublin. She claims she bought the migraine medication at Boots Pharmacy, Ballymahon Street, Longford. It is claimed that Ms O'Meara was caused to suffer a haemorrhagic stroke in March 2020 which it is contended was precipitated by her ingestion of a migraine medication which was allegedly inappropriately sold without the advice that it was contra-indicated to a prescribed drug she was already on. It is claimed at the pharmacy she was allegedly told that the migraine medication she required was no longer available in Ireland and an alternative medication for migraines and cluster headaches was allegedly offered. Ms O'Meara purchased a blister pack of two tablets and it is alleged that the pharmacist was not consulted. Boots disputes this and says, while they do not remember Ms O'Meara, protocol requires that anybody buying the migraine medicine has to be referred to the pharmacist. In the proceedings, it is claimed that a product which allegedly could impose a hazard to Ms O'Meara's health was supplied and there was an alleged failure by the pharmacy sales assistant at the time to ensure the pharmacist was advised that the supply of that particular migraine medication may be considered. It was further claimed that there was an alleged failure by the pharmacist to ascertain that the woman's headache had never been diagnosed as migraine by a doctor. It is contended in such circumstances the migraine medication she purchased should not have been supplied. Boots counter-claims All of the claims are denied and Boots says that Ms O'Meara was aware that the medication purchased at the pharmacy had never been diagnosed as suitable for her and that she had a significant history of migraines as well as other medical issues which Boots claims was her responsibility to notify and seek advice on. Boots say it had no other way of being aware Ms O'Meara was taking a form of medication which was likely to interact negatively with a variety of different medication. Ms O'Meara, Boots contended, is the author of her own misfortune and it claims there was alleged contributory negligence on her part in allegedly failing to disclose that she was taking another particular drug and allegedly failing to seek advice on the choice of medicines. The case before Ms Justice Denise Brett continues.
