Q&A On Full Capital Expensing: Taxpayers' Union Urges Government To Adopt Policy In Budget 2025
Press Release – New Zealand Taxpayers' Union
Nicola Willis and Christopher Luxon want a growth budget. Full capital expensing is how they make that happen.
Following growing public discussion over the weekend and the Prime Minister's remarks on Newstalk ZB this morning, the Taxpayers' Union is once again calling on the Government to adopt full capital expensing as a centrepiece of Budget 2025.
James Ross, Spokesman for the Taxpayers' Union, says: 'Full capital expensing is a proven, pro-growth reform that would immediately boost business investment and productivity. With the economy under strain, this is the kind of smart, targeted tax change New Zealand needs right now.'
'Nicola Willis and Christopher Luxon want a 'growth budget'. Full capital expensing is how they make that happen.'
Full capital expensing allows businesses to deduct the full cost of new capital investments from their taxable income in the year of purchase, rather than depreciating it over time. This would unlock much-needed economic growth, improve business cash flow, and ultimately benefit workers through higher wages and more jobs.
A Q&A briefing outlining the policy's benefits is included below.
The full discussion paper is available at https://www.taxpayers.org.nz/go_for_growth_report
Q&A: FULL CAPITAL EXPENSING: A PRO-GROWTH POLICY FOR NEW ZEALAND
The New Zealand Taxpayers' Union has been advocating for the adoption of full capital expensing in Budget 2025 as a targeted measure to boost investment, productivity, and long-term economic growth. This Q&A outlines the key aspects of the policy and its potential benefits for the New Zealand economy.
What is full capital expensing?
Full capital expensing allows businesses to immediately deduct the full cost of new capital investments (such as machinery, equipment, and technology) from their taxable income in the year the investment is made. This contrasts with traditional depreciation methods, where deductions are spread over several years.
How does full expensing benefit the economy?
By improving cash flow and reducing the after-tax cost of investment, full expensing incentivises businesses to invest more in productive assets. This leads to higher productivity, increased wages, and stronger economic growth. International evidence suggests that full expensing can generate more investment than an equivalent reduction in corporate tax rates.
Why does full capital expensing benefit businesses?
Businesses currently face opportunity costs through the impact of tax depreciation schedules returning invested capital slowly over a number of years. This means that they have less capital available to make further productive investments. Inflation also erodes the value of future refunds, so delayed deductions are worth less in real terms.
Why is this policy relevant now?
New Zealand is experiencing economic challenges, including stagnant incomes, declining GDP per capita, and rising unemployment. The Taxpayers' Union argues that full capital expensing is a timely and effective measure to stimulate investment and drive economic recovery.
How does full expensing compare to corporate tax cuts?
While both policies aim to stimulate economic activity, full expensing is more targeted toward encouraging investment in productive assets. Research indicates that full expensing delivers more than twice the GDP growth compared to corporate tax cuts of equivalent revenue cost.
What are the fiscal implications of full expensing?
Full expensing primarily affects the timing of tax deductions, leading to a short-term reduction in tax revenue but not increasing the total deductions over time. As investment and economic activity increase, tax revenues are expected to recover, potentially offsetting the initial fiscal impact.
Has full expensing been implemented elsewhere?
Yes, countries like the United States and the United Kingdom have adopted full expensing policies, resulting in increased business investment and economic growth. These international examples demonstrate the policy's effectiveness in stimulating economic activity.
What is the Taxpayers' Union proposing?
The Taxpayers' Union recommends that the New Zealand Government implement full capital expensing in Budget 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
38 minutes ago
- Scoop
Government Backs Voluntary Nature Credits
Press Release – New Zealand Government The development of a nature credit market is important to investors and New Zealands reputation. Associate Minister for the Environment The Government is supporting the expansion of a voluntary credits nature market through the running of pilot projects across New Zealand. Establishing a market that is durable, measurable and transparent will help farmers, landowners, iwi, and conservation groups unlock new income streams for looking after nature on their land, Associate Minister for the Environment Andrew Hoggard announced today at Fieldays. 'We want to connect those caring for the land with investors who support conservation. Nature credit markets help fund trusted environmental projects that actively protect and restore ecosystems.' Mr Hoggard said international and domestic investors—including corporates, banks, and philanthropists—are seeking high-quality nature and carbon credits that meet global standards. The development of a nature credit market is important to investors and New Zealand's reputation. 'New Zealand companies spent millions on carbon and nature credits mainly offshore last year. With the right framework, we can keep more of that investment at home.' The Government moved quickly to repeal the previous Government's direction to Councils to identify and map Significant Natural Areas (SNA) by suspending parts of the National Policy Statement – Indigenous Biodiversity. 'Farmers and other private landowners are doing their part to protect native biodiversity and want to do more. Supporting voluntary natural credits markets is a chance for the Government to show them the carrot, not just the stick. Privately funded pilot projects are underway to test how nature credit markets can work in the New Zealand context. As part of these pilots, we will test the role for Government which may include setting principles, and a framework for standards, to build market confidence and ensure quality.' Further details on the Government's role and the design of the expanded market will be announced in the coming months. Information about voluntary nature credits market pilots The pilots represent different land conditions, locations, types of market participants, and activities. They will help the Government understand how to meet the high standards of international markets, the role of Government, and what works best in New Zealand. This real-life experience will provide valuable insights as we move to the next stage of market design. Te Toa Whenua Northland, led by Reconnecting Northland. Transitioning around 100 ha from exotic forestry to native including pest control on iwi-owned land. Waituna Nature Credits Prototype Southland, led by Whakamana te Waituna Charitable Trust (Awarua Rūnunga, Ngai Tahu, Fonterra, Southland District Council, Environment Southland, and Department of Conservation). Restoring 400 ha of farmland at lagoon margins to lowland forest & wetlands (RAMSAR protected site). Waimanu Forest Gisborne Led by Aratu Forests. Converting a commercial forestry block to 50 ha of natives for biodiversity uplift and increased recreational and educational values. Scope to expand to up to 5,000 ha. Sanctuary Mountain Maungatautari insights Waikato, led by Sanctuary Mountain Maungatautari. Observing the current process of issuing credits for conservation and protection activities within the 3,360 ha inland ecological sanctuary. Existing Biodiversity Credits Market (BCM) project standard insights Led by Ekos. Offering market insights from an existing BCM provider. Includes understanding the journey of Reconnecting Northland's proof-of-concept project through this process. Adapted nature credits international standards Led by Boffa Miskell. Testing at-place an additional NZ BCM project standard that is adapting UK methodology to NZ environments as a competitor to domestic or international project standard/certification providers. Voluntary carbon market standard with biodiversity safeguards insights Led by AsureQuality. Testing its carbon project standard, which requires native revegetation, designed to be more applicable and affordable for the New Zealand context. Nature positive credit programme pilot Led by Silver Fern Farms. Testing a processor-led programme for market attraction, and potentially third-party investment, in on-farm nature restoration and enhancement activities that support commercial 'nature positive' claims. Nature-based markets pilots for rural landowners Led by Pāmu Farms. Exploring pathways to make nature-based markets accessible to a range of New Zealand farmers and landholders.
Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
A Bold Dream Gets A Cut As Predator Free 2050 Ltd Is Disestablished
The environmental sector worries that the future of a predator-free Aotearoa is in jeopardy after the Government swung the axe in the latest budget. It was billed as a 'moonshot' for New Zealand's environment - a bold, world-leading goal launched by Sir John Key in 2016, aimed at eradicating rats, possums and stoats from our islands by 2050. The vision has been clear - bring back birdsong to every valley, protect the flightless kiwi, and restore what once thrived. But today, the future of Predator Free 2050 looks uncertain. Predator Free 2050 Ltd, the Crown-owned company established to drive and fund large-scale eradication and breakthrough science, is now being disestablished, as announced as part of Budget 2025. Funding for the company will cease by the end of the year, with its responsibilities shifted to the Department of Conservation (DOC), which the government says will reduce duplication, increase efficiency and save about $12 million. "People are now worried for this programme," Newsroom environment editor David Williams tells The Detail. "They say without ongoing funding, we will not only not go forward, but we will go backwards. This programme needs funding, and that's up to the government." The government insists the broader goal of predator eradication remains. But Dr Kayla Kingdon-Bebb, chief executive of WWF New Zealand, is not entirely convinced. "New Zealanders believe in the Predator Free 2050 dream, and we want the government to get behind them too. But I'm not sure this will happen. "I've not been seeing a lot of enthusiasm for environmental outcomes from this government, full stop. We describe the government's policy agenda as a war on nature, and I think it is disappointing that a previous National government got so strongly behind this moonshot objective, and this government does not seem to care so much." Both Williams and Kingdon-Bebb say the country has "overwhelmingly" backed the Predator Free 2050 initiative, allowing it to "come a long way, in a relatively short time". Already, predator-elimination projects cover more than 800,000 hectares. "This is a big amount of land," says Williams. "And the goal is big ... but they have done well. "They also said they wanted to fund scientific research, and 15 or 20 projects have already had money to try and sort this problem out. "A lot of community groups have latched on to this - someone said to me that this is the one conservation project that has captured the imagination of New Zealanders more than any other." Kingdon-Bebb agrees. "It has certainly captured the hearts and minds like nothing else," she says. "We have seen an explosion of community trapping groups and landscape-scale projects over the last nine years, which has been amazing ... now I feel the government is taking its foot off the pedal. "What is apparent is that the government has had a look at the delivery model of the programme as a whole, which is complex. "So, if it is the case that the government has reviewed it and determined that a crown-owned corporation is not the best delivery methodology, I can accept that. "DOC has a lot of capability ... and perhaps it is appropriate for DOC to be coordinating this work, perhaps there was duplication of roles and functions and costs. "But where I would be concerned is that in the wider scale of what has happened in the last two budgets, the Department of Conservation will see, in total, about 300 million dollars in savings exacted from it. "So, it does beg the question whether a very stretched department can pick up the leadership of this initiative in a way we would want to see it done." Critics say that move will slow momentum, bury innovation under bureaucracy and confuse local projects already stretched thin. They also argue that across the country, hundreds of predator-free community groups, many driven by volunteers, will be left wondering what support will look like without the company's funding, research backing and strategic oversight. But the government insists the predator-free projects and contracts funded by the company are not affected and it is committed to the predator-free 2050 goal. Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here.
Scoop
2 hours ago
- Scoop
Biodiversity Credit Won't Fix Damage Done By Luxon Govt
Press Release – Green Party This is a bandaid on a gaping wound which does nothing to address a deepening crisis and runs the risk of being mere greenwashing, says the Green Party spokesperson for Agriculture Steve Abel. The Green Party says the Government's newly announced Biodiversity Credit scheme is a tiny positive that doesn't undo the biodiversity harm caused by the Luxon Government. 'This is a bandaid on a gaping wound which does nothing to address a deepening crisis and runs the risk of being mere greenwashing,' says the Green Party spokesperson for Agriculture Steve Abel. 'While credit schemes and covenants are an important pathway to protecting vital biodiversity on farmland, these alone are not nearly enough to address the biodiversity crisis in Aotearoa. 'One tiny step in the right direction does not make up for the significant damage this Government is doing to the environment in many ways including through cuts to the Predator Free programme, Department of Conservation funding, significant natural area identification, and Jobs for Nature. 'You cannot pretend to care for biodiversity while openly making policy that destroys it, targeting wetlands as a cash cow through tax deductibility, weakening or removing protections for freshwater, and allowing significant pollution to be permitted in our most vulnerable waterways. 'Furthermore, market and corporate driven biodiversity credits can be little more than a greenwashing tool – and there's proven to be very little demand without regulatory requirements for them. 'Protecting biodiversity is in everyone's interests, especially farmers. Our Green Budget proposed significant investment in supporting landowners to protect and restore their environments, rather than leaving it to the corporate world to pick up the slack in light of extensive government cuts,' says Steve Abel.
