GOP lawmaker defends Trump tax bill to angry crowds at back-to-back town halls
"They were booing when I was saying, you know, 'We're preserving tax cuts,' and I can't believe people would boo tax cuts for themselves," Rep. Ashley Hinson, R-Iowa, told Fox News Digital on Thursday.
"I think there are a number of people who just show up to these town halls who want to disrupt. They didn't care what I had to say. They just want to boo and yell and be angry."
And there were a significant number of such people at both her town halls in Elkader and Decorah on Wednesday.
At both events, Hinson touted her support for Trump and House Republicans' budget reconciliation bill and promoted the Department of Government Efficiency's (DOGE) efforts.
Both issues drew largely negative reactions from people there, save for some exceptions.
At one point in the first town hall, a woman named Linda stood on behalf of another woman, Nicole, who was in a wheelchair and had "difficulty speaking." Nicole, who relied on federal health and food programs, was concerned about any cuts to those programs making her life more difficult, Linda said.
The crowd then cheered as Hinson pledged that Republicans were only reforming those programs, "so that people like you can continue to have access to the treatments and medications you need."
The goodwill was short-lived, however, when the next questioner accused Republicans of cutting university funding in favor of tax cuts for the wealthy – despite Hinson pointing out the bill does not change income tax brackets.
"It's an absolute crime," the man shouted.
The boos grew louder when Hinson accused top universities of "letting men play in girls' sports." People in the crowd could be heard screaming "stop it" and "stop spinning."
At her second town hall, the crowd jeered as Hinson emphasized her support for Trump.
"The president is, I believe, fighting for you and fighting for me. I'm fighting alongside of him. I think God saved President Trump's life in Butler," Hinson said before briefly pausing as the boos swelled.
"I think He saved his life in Butler, Pennsylvania for a reason. I think he is helping us to save this country," she continued.
Hinson was still unfazed by the protesters when she spoke with Fox News Digital the next day.
"I did exactly what I said I was going to do," Hinson said. "I feel good about what I was able to communicate and correct the record yesterday. And I will not only defend this agenda and answer any questions any day, any time of the week, but I think it is really important that I'm out there on offense, correcting the record."
The congresswoman said the disruptions grew so loud that it prompted a Vietnam War veteran to address her after one of the events and tell her, "I couldn't hear over all that, and I think that's a shame because I wanted to hear what you had to say."
"That's really the disservice. Again, these people who their only intent is to disrupt, someone like that man who served our country, who wanted to come hear what I had to say, had trouble hearing me," Hinson said. "People there want to be able to have civil discourse and ask the questions and hear my answers."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Democrat Sherrod Brown says he will try to return to US Senate in 2026
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Democrat Sherrod Brown of Ohio said on Monday he would try to return to the U.S. Senate seat in next year's midterm elections, a development that could bolster his party's chances of winning back control of the chamber. Brown, 72, said U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs and health-care cuts prompted him to return to politics. "I didn't plan to run for office again. But when I see what's going on, I know I can do something about it for Ohio," Brown said in a video posted to social media. Brown served for 18 years in the Senate before he lost 50.1%-46.5% to Republican Bernie Moreno last November. He built a reputation as a champion for blue-collar workers in Ohio, an industrial state that has lost jobs to globalization. The state, once a political battleground, has trended increasingly Republican over the past decade. Brown will likely face Republican Senator John Husted, who was appointed in January to temporarily fill the seat vacated by JD Vance when he became vice president. Husted previously served as Ohio's lieutenant governor. The winner of the November 2026 special election would serve the remainder of Vance's Senate term, ending in January 2029. Analysts say it will be difficult for Democrats to pick up the four seats they will need to win back control of the Senate, which now has a 53-47 Republican majority. The nonpartisan Cook Political Report said Brown, the only Democrat to win statewide office in the past two decades, will make the race competitive and moved its rating from "likely Republican" to "lean Republican."
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How Trump's Big Beautiful Bill Impacts Student Loans — and What Borrowers Should Do Now
Student loan borrowers should start preparing for July 1, 2026, when specific provisions of President Donald Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' go into effect, marking changes from the Higher Education Act of 1965 and limiting options for borrowers on income-driven repayment (IDR) plans. The new Repayment Assistance Plan (RAP) will be the only choice, apart from the standard repayment plan, for new borrowers as well as existing borrowers who reconsolidate or take out new loans. Read Next: Find Out: In this case, however, having fewer options may be a good thing for borrowers. 'By streamlining options down to just RAP and the standard plan for new borrowers, the government is addressing the confusion that's historically made it difficult for borrowers to make informed decisions,' said Ken Ruggiero, CEO of Ascent Funding. Also see what to do if you're falling behind on federal student loan payments, according to Suze Orman. RAP Loan Terms Borrowers Should Understand Borrowers who choose RAP will make payments ranging from 1% to 10% of their income, with a minimum monthly payment of $10. Ruggiero called the plan 'notably flexible.' There are also built-in principal subsidies of up to $50 per month and built-in interest subsidies to prevent rising balances, which has been an issue with past IDR plans. Loans will be forgiven after 30 years of qualifying payments. Payments through RAP may also qualify for Public Student Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) after 10 years of payments for workers who qualify. Check Out: Should You Choose RAP? Although RAP offers some advantages, 'that doesn't necessarily mean it's better for every borrower,' per Ruggiero. Younger borrowers with lower income may find lower monthly payments with RAP. As their capacity to pay increases, payments will increase. 'Borrowers pursuing Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) should know that RAP-qualifying payments count toward forgiveness, which is a big plus,' Ruggiero said. If you already have a high income or if you have a smaller loan balance and just want to pay it off as fast as possible, a standard plan might be more cost-effective in the long run. 'Factors like age, income trajectory, loan size and how long someone's been repaying all matter in this decision,' Ruggiero said. Consult With a Professional If you're facing student loan debt now or planning to take out loans to finance your education, you still have nearly a year before making any decisions about RAP or the standard repayment plan. However, 'it's smart to start evaluating your options now,' Ruggiero said. He suggested speaking to a financial consultant or your loan servicer before making any moves. 'The OBBB allocated $1 billion to help servicers upgrade their systems and improve customer service, ensuring they can provide more accurate and timely support,' Ruggiero explained. 'The key is to get clarity before any decision becomes irreversible, especially for those considering loan consolidation, which could limit their repayment plan options moving forward.' Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates New Law Could Make Electricity Bills Skyrocket in These 4 States I'm a Self-Made Millionaire: 6 Ways I Use ChatGPT To Make a Lot of Money 5 Strategies High-Net-Worth Families Use To Build Generational Wealth 10 Unreliable SUVs To Stay Away From Buying This article originally appeared on How Trump's Big Beautiful Bill Impacts Student Loans — and What Borrowers Should Do Now Sign in to access your portfolio
Los Angeles Times
8 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Newsom's redistricting plan is a power grab. But the GOP objections are rubbish
SACRAMENTO — One accusation hurled at Gov. Gavin Newsom for his retaliatory redistricting move against President Trump and Texas Republicans is that he's overriding the will of California voters. Rubbish. The flawed argument goes like this: Californians — once upon a time — voted overwhelmingly to ban partisan gerrymandering and strip the task of drawing congressional seats from self-interested legislators. In a historic political reform, redistricting was turned over to an independent citizens' commission. Now, Newsom is trying to subvert the voters' edict. 'It is really a calculated power grab that dismantles the very safeguards voters put in place,' California Republican Party Chairwoman Corrin Rankin said in a statement last week, echoing other party members. 'This is Gavin the Gaslighter overturning the will of the voters and telling you it's for your own good.' Again, baloney. Power grab? Sure. Overturning the voters' will? Hardly. Newsom is asking voters to express a new will–seeking permission to fight back against Trump's underhanded attempt to redraw congressional districts in Texas and other red states so Republicans can retain control of the U.S. House of Representatives after next year's midterm elections. First of all, that anti-gerrymandering vote creating the citizens' commission was 15 years ago. It was a wise decision and badly needed, and still a wonderful concept in the abstract. But that was then, this is now. Just because a ballot measure was passed one or two decades ago doesn't mean it has been cast in stone. Would Californians still vote to ban same-sex marriage or deny public schooling to undocumented children? Doubtful. Circumstances and views change. Second, that 2010 electorate no longer exists. Today's electorate is substantially different. And it shouldn't necessarily be tied to the past. Consider: PPIC researchers recently reported that 'partisanship now shapes the state's migration — with those moving out of the state more likely to be Republican and those moving in more likely to be Democrat. … This process makes California more Democratic than it would otherwise be.' So, Newsom and Democratic legislators are not thumbing their noses at the voters' will. They're asking today's voters to suspend the ban on gerrymandering and adopt a partisan redistricting plan at a Nov. 4 special election. The good government process of map drawing by the citizen's commission would return after the 2030 decennial census. The heavily Democratic Legislature will pass a state constitutional amendment containing Newsom's plan and put it on the ballot, probably this week. It would take effect only if Texas or other red states bow to Trump's demand to gerrymander their congressional districts to rig them for Republicans. Trump is seeking five more GOP seats from Texas and Gov. Greg Abbott is trying to oblige. Republicans already hold 25 of the 38 seats. Newsom's plan, released Friday, counters Texas' scheme with a blatant gerrymander of his own. It would gain five Democratic seats. Democrats already outnumber Republicans on the California House delegation 43 to 9. Neither the governor nor any Democrats are defending gerrymandering. They agree it's evil politics. They support redistricting by the citizens' commission and believe this high-road process should be required in every state. But that's not about to happen. And to stand by meekly without matching the red states' election rigging would amount to unilateral disarmament, they contend correctly. 'It's not good enough to just hold hands, have a candlelight vigil and talk about the way the world should be,' Newsom declared at a campaign kickoff last week. 'We have got to recognize the cards that have been dealt. And we have got to meet fire with fire.' But polling indicates it could be a tough sell to voters. A large majority believe the bipartisan citizens commission should draw congressional districts, not the politicians who they don't particularly trust. 'It'll be complicated to explain to voters why two wrongs make a right,' says Republican strategist Rob Stutzman, a GOP never-Trumper. Former GOP redistricting consultant Tony Quinn says: 'There is no way to 'educate' voters on district line drawing. And Californians vote 'no' on ballot measures they do not understand. … It's sort of like trying to explain the basketball playoffs to me.' But veteran Democratic strategist Garry South doesn't see a problem. 'The messaging here is clear: 'Screw Trump',' South says. 'If the object is to stick it to Trump, [voter] turnout won't be a problem.' Gerrymandering may not be the voters' will in California. But they may well jump at the chance to thwart Trump. The must-read: Newsom's decision to fight fire with fire could have profound political consequences The TK: Trial in National Guard lawsuit tests whether Trump will let courts limit authority The L.A. Times Special: Hundreds of Californians have been paid $10,000 to relocate to Oklahoma. Did they find paradise? Until next week,George Skelton —Was this newsletter forwarded to you? Sign up here to get it in your inbox.
